Comparison of minimally invasive spine surgery using intraoperative computed tomography integrated navigation, fluoroscopy, and conventional open surgery for lumbar spondylolisthesis: a prospective registry-based cohort study

Spine Journal

Volumn 17, Issue 8, 2017, Pages 1082-1090

  Wu, Meng Huang ^a,b,c   Dubey, Navneet Kumar ^d   Li, Yen Yao ^e,f   Lee, Ching Yu ^e,f   Cheng, Chin Chang ^e,f   Shi, Chung Sheng ^c   Huang, Tsung Jen ^a,b  

^a TAIPEI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^b TAIPEI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c CHANG GUNG UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (Taiwan)

^d TAIPEI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^e CHANG GUNG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^f CHANG GUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Functional outcomes; Image integrated navigation; Lumbar spondylolisthesis; Minimally invasive spine surgery; Superior level facet violation; Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IMAGE INTEGRATED NAVIGATION; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; FLUOROSCOPY SYSTEM; HOSPITALIZATION COST; HUMAN; IMAGING SOFTWARE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; LENGTH OF STAY; LUMBAR SPINE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL DEVICE COMPLICATION; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OPEN SURGERY; OPERATION DURATION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PEDICLE SCREW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADICULOPATHY; SHORT FORM 12; SPINE SURGERY; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; STEREOTACTIC DEVICE; SURGICAL NAVIGATION SYSTEM; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; WOUND HEALING IMPAIRMENT; WOUND INFECTION; ADVERSE DEVICE EFFECT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; LUMBOSACRAL REGION; NEURONAVIGATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REGISTER; SPINE FUSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; X-RAY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY;

ADULT; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; LUMBOSACRAL REGION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; NEURONAVIGATION; OPERATIVE TIME; PEDICLE SCREWS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REGISTRIES; SPINAL FUSION; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 85018885809     PISSN: 15299430     EISSN: 18781632     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.04.002     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Brodano, G.B., Martikos, K., Lolli, F., et al. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative disk disease and spondylolisthesis grade I: minimally invasive versus open surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech 28 (2015), E559–64.
2. Perez-Cruet, M.J., Hussain, N.S., White, G.Z., et al. Quality-of-life outcomes with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion based on long-term analysis of 304 consecutive patients. Spine 39 (2014), E191–8.
3. Mobbs, R.J., Sivabalan, P., Li, J., Technique, challenges and indications for percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. J Clin Neurosci 18 (2011), 741–749.
4. Lloyd, J.M., Wainwright, T., Middleton, R.G., What is the role of minimally invasive surgery in a fast track hip and knee replacement pathway?. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 94 (2012), 148–151.
5. Shin, B.J., James, A.R., Njoku, I.U., Hartl, R., Pedicle screw navigation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perforation risk for computer-navigated versus freehand insertion. J Neurosurg Spine 17 (2012), 113–122.
6. Lozano-Alvarez, C., Perez-Prieto, D., Salo, G., Molina, A., Llado, A., Ramirez, M., Usefulness of the core outcome measures index in daily clinical practice for assessing patients with degenerative lumbar disease. Adv Orthop, 2012, 2012, 474685.
7. Mobbs, R.J., Sivabalan, P., Li, J., Minimally invasive surgery compared to open spinal fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine pathologies. J Clin Neurosci 19 (2012), 829–835.
8. Ulzheimer, S.L.C., Endt, H., Dose parameters and advanced dose management on SOMATOM scanners. Available at: https://static.healthcare.siemens.com/siemens_hwem-hwem_ssxa_websites-context-root/wcm/idc/groups/public/@us/@imaging/documents/download/mdaw/ndq2/~edisp/low_dose_session_27_v2-00308413.pdf Accessed March 16, 2017.
9. Tannous, O., Jazini, E., Weir, T.B., et al. Facet joint violation during percutaneous pedicle screw placement: a comparison of two techniques. Spine, 2016, 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002001.
10. Hoang, J.K., Yoshizumi, T.T., Toncheva, G., et al. Radiation dose exposure for lumbar spine epidural steroid injections: a comparison of conventional fluoroscopy data and CT fluoroscopy techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197 (2011), 778–782.
11. Chung, K.J., Suh, S.W., Swapnil, K., Yang, J.H., Song, H.R., Facet joint violation during pedicle screw insertion: a cadaveric study of the adult lumbosacral spine comparing the two pedicle screw insertion techniques. Int Orthop 31 (2007), 653–656.
12. Raley, D.A., Mobbs, R.J., Retrospective computed tomography scan analysis of percutaneously inserted pedicle screws for posterior transpedicular stabilization of the thoracic and lumbar spine: accuracy and complication rates. Spine 37 (2012), 1092–1100.
13. Yson, S.C., Sembrano, J.N., Sanders, P.C., Santos, E.R., Ledonio, C.G., Polly, D.W. Jr, Comparison of cranial facet joint violation rates between open and percutaneous pedicle screw placement using intraoperative 3-D CT (O-arm) computer navigation. Spine 38 (2013), E251–8.
14. Zeng, Z.L., Jia, L., Xu, W., et al. Analysis of risk factors for adjacent superior vertebral pedicle-induced facet joint violation during the minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective study. Eur J Med Res, 20, 2015, 80.
15. Schulte, T.L., Ringel, F., Quante, M., Eicker, S.O., Muche-Borowski, C., Kothe, R., Surgery for adult spondylolisthesis: a systematic review of the evidence. Eur Spine J 25 (2016), 2359–2367.
16. Tender, G.C., Miller, L.E., Block, J.E., Percutaneous pedicle screw reduction and axial presacral lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of lumbosacral spondylolisthesis: a case series. J Med Case Rep, 5, 2011, 454.
17. Smith, J.S., Shaffrey, C.I., Sansur, C.A., et al. Rates of infection after spine surgery based on 108,419 procedures: a report from the Scoliosis Research Society Morbidity and Mortality Committee. Spine 36 (2011), 556–563.
18. Wang, J., Zhou, Y., Zhang, Z.F., Li, C.Q., Zheng, W.J., Liu, J., Comparison of one-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2. Eur Spine J 19 (2010), 1780–1784.
19. Wong, A.P., Smith, Z.A., Stadler, J.A. 3rd, et al. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF): surgical technique, long-term 4-year prospective outcomes, and complications compared with an open TLIF cohort. Neurosurg Clin N Am 25 (2014), 279–304.
20. Mattei, T.A., Right L4/L5 extreme-lateral interbody fusion for adult degenerative scoliosis: when the black swan is too real. World Neurosurg 84 (2015), 1500–1505.
21. Li, B., He, J., Zhu, Z., et al. Comparison of 3D C-arm fluoroscopy and 3D image-guided navigation for minimally invasive pelvic surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 10 (2015), 1527–1534.
22. Nakashima, H., Sato, K., Ando, T., Inoh, H., Nakamura, H., Comparison of the percutaneous screw placement precision of isocentric C-arm 3-dimensional fluoroscopy-navigated pedicle screw implantation and conventional fluoroscopy method with minimally invasive surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech 22 (2009), 468–472.
23. Sulaiman, W.A., Singh, M., Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis grades 1–2: patient-reported clinical outcomes and cost-utility analysis. Ochsner J 14 (2014), 32–37.
24. Ohba, T., Ebata, S., Fujita, K., Sato, H., Haro, H., Percutaneous pedicle screw placements: accuracy and rates of cranial facet joint violation using conventional fluoroscopy compared with intraoperative three-dimensional computed tomography computer navigation. Eur Spine J 25 (2016), 1775–1780.
25. Ravi, B., Zahrai, A., Rampersaud, R., Clinical accuracy of computer-assisted two-dimensional fluoroscopy for the percutaneous placement of lumbosacral pedicle screws. Spine 36 (2011), 84–91.
26. Hikata, T., Kamata, M., Furukawa, M., Risk factors for adjacent segment disease after posterior lumbar interbody fusion and efficacy of simultaneous decompression surgery for symptomatic adjacent segment disease. J Spinal Disord Tech 27 (2014), 70–75.
27. Cardoso, M.J., Dmitriev, A.E., Helgeson, M., Lehman, R.A., Kuklo, T.R., Rosner, M.K., Does superior-segment facet violation or laminectomy destabilize the adjacent level in lumbar transpedicular fixation? An in vitro human cadaveric assessment. Spine 33 (2008), 2868–2873.
28. Babu, R., Park, J.G., Mehta, A.I., et al. Comparison of superior-level facet joint violations during open and percutaneous pedicle screw placement. Neurosurgery 71 (2012), 962–970.
29. Lau, D., Terman, S.W., Patel, R., La Marca, F., Park, P., Incidence of and risk factors for superior facet violation in minimally invasive versus open pedicle screw placement during transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a comparative analysis. J Neurosurg Spine 18 (2013), 356–361.
30. Park, Y., Ha, J.W., Lee, Y.T., Sung, N.Y., Cranial facet joint violations by percutaneously placed pedicle screws adjacent to a minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion. Spine J 11 (2011), 295–302.
31. Jenne, J., Tromanhauser, S., Jenis, L., Losina, E., Katz, J., Outcomes following superior segment facet joint violation in pedicle instrumentation of the lumbar spine. Spine J, 5, 2005, S99.
32. Sethi, A., Lee, A., Vaidya, R., Lumbar pedicle screw placement: using only AP plane imaging. Indian J Orthop 46 (2012), 434–438.
33. Al-Khouja, L., Shweikeh, F., Pashman, R., Johnson, J.P., Kim, T.T., Drazin, D., Economics of image guidance and navigation in spine surgery. Surg Neurol Int 6:Suppl. 10 (2015), S323–6.
34. Wang, M.Y., Lerner, J., Lesko, J., McGirt, M.J., Acute hospital costs after minimally invasive versus open lumbar interbody fusion: data from a US national database with 6106 patients. J Spinal Disord Tech 25 (2012), 324–328.
35. Park, M.S., Lee, K.M., Lee, B., et al. Comparison of operator radiation exposure between C-arm and O-arm fluoroscopy for orthopaedic surgery. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 148 (2012), 431–438.
36. Mason, C., Tracking radiology's risks. CMAJ, 181, 2009, E50.
37. Mendelsohn, D., Strelzow, J., Dea, N., et al. Patient and surgeon radiation exposure during spinal instrumentation using intraoperative computed tomography-based navigation. Spine J 16 (2016), 343–354.
38. Sackett, D.L., Richardson, W.S., Haynes, R.B., Evidence-based medicine—how to practice and teach EBM. 1996, Churchill Livingstone, New York.