Comparison of cranial facet joint violation rates between open and percutaneous pedicle screw placement using intraoperative 3-D CT (o-arm) computer navigation

Spine

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2013, Pages

  Yson, Sharon C ^a   Sembrano, Jonathan N ^a   Sanders, Peter C ^a   Santos, Edward Rainier G ^a   Ledonio, Charles Gerald T ^a   Polly Jr , David W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

facet impingement; intraoperative imaging; navigation; pedicle screw insertion

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHILD; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONSENSUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRANIAL FACET JOINT VIOLATION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; IMPLANTATION; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DEGENERATION; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; JOINT; LUMBAR DISK; LUMBAR SPINE FUSION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PEDICLE SCREW; PERCUTANEOUS PEDICLE SCREW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHOOL CHILD; SCOLIOSIS; SKULL; SPINE FUSION; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BONE SCREWS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL FUSION; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT; ZYGAPOPHYSEAL JOINT;

EID: 84874114851     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31827ecbf1     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Aota Y, Kumano K, Hirabayashi S. Postfusion instability at the adjacent segments after rigid pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spinal disorders. J Spinal Disord 1995; 8: 464-73.
2. Axelsson P, Johnsson R, Stromqvist B. The spondylolytic vertebra and its adjacent segment. Mobility measured before and after pos-terolateral fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1997; 22: 414-7.
3. Ghiselli G, Wang JC, Bhatia NN, et al. Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86-A: 1497-503.
4. Gillet P. The fate of the adjacent motion segments after lumbar fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003; 16: 338-45.
5. Park P, Garton HJ, Gala VC, et al. Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004; 29: 1938-44.
6. Wiltse LL, Radecki SE, Biel HM, et al. Comparative study of the incidence and severity of degenerative change in the transition zones after instrumented versus noninstrumented fusions of the lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord 1999; 12: 27-33.
7. Seo HY, Chung JY, Kang KD, et al. Transpedicular screw violation of facet joint could lead to adjacent segment degeneration. Paper presented at: The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; February 16, 2011; San Diego, California.
8. Kim DY, Lee SH, Chung SK, et al. Comparison of multifidus muscle atrophy and trunk extension muscle strength: percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30: 123-9.
9. Lehmann W, Ushmaev A, Ruecker A, et al. Comparison of open versus percutaneous pedicle screw insertion in a sheep model. Eur Spine J 2008; 17: 857-63.
10. Schizas C, Michel J, Kosmopoulos V, et al. Computer tomography assessment of pedicle screw insertion in percutaneous posterior transpedicular stabilization. Eur Spine J 2007; 16: 613-7.
11. Scheufler KM, Dohmen H, Vougioukas VI. Percutaneous transfo-raminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar instability. Neurosurgery 2007; 60 (suppl 2): 203-12; discussion 212-203.
12. Chen Z, Zhao J, Xu H, et al. Technical factors related to the incidence of adjacent superior segment facet joint violation after transpedicular instrumentation in the lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 2008; 17: 1476-80.
13. Chung KJ, Suh SW, Swapnil K, et al. Facet joint violation during pedicle screw insertion: a cadaveric study of the adult lumbosacral spine comparing the two pedicle screw insertion techniques. Int Orthop 2007; 31: 653-6.
14. Knox JB, Dai JM 3rd, Orchowski Jr. Superior segment facet joint violation and cortical violation after minimally invasive pedicle screw placement. Spine J 2011; 11: 213-7.
15. Moshirfar A, Jenis LG, Spector LR, et al. Computed tomography evaluation of superior-segment facet-joint violation after pedicle instrumentation of the lumbar spine with a midline surgical approach. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006; 31: 2624-9.
16. Park Y, Ha JW, Lee YT, et al. Cranial facet joint violations by per-cutaneously placed pedicle screws adjacent to a minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion. Spine J 2011; 11: 295-302.
17. Patel RD, Graziano GP, Vanderhave KL, et al. Facet violation with the placement of percutaneous pedicle screws. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011; 36: E1749-52.
18. Shah RR, Mohammed S, Saifuddin A, et al. Radiologic evaluation of adjacent superior segment facet joint violation following transpe-dicular instrumentation of the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003; 28: 272-5.
19. Oertel MF, Hobart J, Stein M, et al. Clinical and methodological precision of spinal navigation assisted by 3D intraoperative O-arm radiographic imaging. J Neurosurg Spine 2011; 14: 532-6.
20. Tian NF, Huang QS, Zhou P, et al. Pedicle screw insertion accuracy with different assisted methods: a systematic review and meta-anal-ysis of comparative studies. Eur Spine J 2011; 20: 846-59.
21. Larson AN, Santos ER, Polly D W, Jr, et al. Pediatric pedicle screw placement using intraoperative computed tomography and 3-dimensional image-guided navigation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012; 37: E188-94.
22. Ughwanogho E, Patel NM, Baldwin KD, et al. Computed tomography-guided navigation of thoracic pedicle screws for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis results in more accurate placement and less screw removal. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012; 37: E473-8.
23. Amato V, Giannachi L, Irace C, et al. Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in the lumbosacral spine using conventional technique: computed tomography postoperative assessment in 102 consecutive patients. J Neurosurg Spine 2010; 12: 306-13.
24. Cardoso MJ, Dmitriev AE, Helgeson M, et al. Does superior-segment facet violation or laminectomy destabilize the adjacent level in lumbar transpedicular fixation?: an in vitro human cadaveric assessment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008; 33: 2868-73.
25. Kim HJ, Chun HJ, Moon SH, et al. The biomechanical effect of pedicle screws' insertion angle and position on the superior adjacent segment in one segment lumbar fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011; 37: 1637-44.
26. Santos ER, Ledonio CG, Castro CA, et al. The accuracy of intraop-erative O-arm images for the assessment of pedicle screw postion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012; 37: E119-25.
27. Zindrick MR, Wiltse LL, Doornik A, et al. Analysis of the mor-phometric characteristics of the thoracic and lumbar pedicles. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1987; 12: 160-6.
28. Van Schaik JP, Verbiest H, Van Schaik FD. The orientation of laminae and facet joints in the lower lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1985; 10: 59-63.
29. Weinstein JN, Spratt KF, Spengler D, et al. Spinal pedicle fixation: reliability and validity of roentgenogram-based assessment and surgical factors on successful screw placement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1988; 13: 1012-8.
30. Wood MJ, Mannion RJ. Improving accuracy and reducing radiation exposure in minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 2010; 12: 533-9.
31. Zausinger S, Scheder B, Uhl E, et al. Intraoperative computed tomography with integrated navigation system in spinal stabilizations. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34: 2919-26.
32. Bandela JR, Jacob RP, Arreola M, et al. Use of CT-based intraopera-tive spinal navigation: management of radiation exposure to operator, staff, and patients [published online ahead of print November 9, 2011]. World Neurosurg. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2011.05.019.