What is the role of minimally invasive surgery in a fast track hip and knee replacement pathway?

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England

Volumn 94, Issue 3, 2012, Pages

  Lloyd, J M ^a   Wainwright, T ^a   Middleton, R G ^a  

^a NHS Foundation Trust   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Arthroplasty; Enhanced recovery; Minimally invasive surgery

Indexed keywords

ARTHROSCOPY; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; LITERATURE; METHODOLOGY; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; TREATMENT FAILURE;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; ARTHROSCOPY; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC; TREATMENT FAILURE;

EID: 84862636189     PISSN: 00358843     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1308/003588412X13171221590214     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. King J, Stamper DL, Schaad DC, Leopold SS. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with traditional total knee arthroplasty. Assessment of the learning curve and the postoperative recuperative period. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89: 1,497-1,503.
2. Light TR, Keggi KJ. Anterior approach to hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980; 152: 255-260.
3. Matta JM, Shahrdar C, Ferguson T. Single-incision anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty on an orthopaedic table. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; 441: 115-124.
4. Siguier T, Siguier M, Brumpt B. Mini-incision anterior approach does not increase dislocation rate: a study of 1037 total hip replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; 426: 164-173.
5. Judet J, Judet H. Anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty. Presse Med 1985; 14: 1,031-1,033.
6. Bertin KC, Röttinger H. Anterolateral mini-incision hip replacement surgery: a modified Watson-Jones approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; 429: 248-255.
7. Berger RA. Mini-incision total hip replacement using an anterolateral approach: technique and results. Orthop Clin North Am 2004; 35: 143-151.
8. Moore AT. The self-locking metal hip prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1957; 39: 811-827.
9. Smith-Petersen MN. Approach to and exposure of the hip joint for mold arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1949; 31: 40-46.
10. Irving JF. Direct two-incision total hip replacement without fluoroscopy. Orthop Clin North Am 2004; 35: 173-181.
11. Berger RA. Total hip arthroplasty using the minimally invasive two-incision approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; 417: 232-241.
12. O'Brien DA, Rorabeck CH. The mini-incision direct lateral approach in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; 441: 99-103.
13. Swanson TV. Posterior single-incision approach to minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2007; 31: S1-S5.
14. Price AJ, Webb J, Topf H et al. Rapid recovery after Oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty through a short incision. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16: 970-976.
15. Reilly KA, Beard DJ, Barker KL et al. Efficacy of an accelerated recovery protocol for Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty -a randomised controlled trial. Knee 2005; 12: 351-357.
16. Borgwardt L, Zerahn B, Bliddal H et al. Similar clinical outcome after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using a conventional or accelerated care program: a randomized, controlled study of 40 patients. Acta Orthop 2009; 80: 334-337.
17. Huang HT, Su JK, Chang JK et al. The early clinical outcome of minimally invasive quadriceps-sparing total knee arthroplasty: report of a 2-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22: 1,007-1,012.
18. McAllister CM, Stephanian JD. The impact of minimally invasive surgical techniques on early range of motion after primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2008; 23: 10-18.
19. de Beer JD, Petruccelli D, Zalzal P, Winemaker MJ. Single-incision, minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: length doesn't matter. J Arthroplasty 2004; 18: 945-950.
20. Ogonda L, Wilson R, Archbold P et al. A minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve early postoperative outcomes. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87: 701-710.
21. Sharma V, Morgan PM, Cheng EY. Factors influencing early rehabilitation after THA: a systemic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467: 1,400-1,411.
22. Dorr LD, Maheshwari AV, Long WT et al. Early pain relief and function after posterior minimally invasive and conventional total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, blinded study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89: 1,153-1,160.
23. Nuelle DG, Mann K. Minimal incision protocols for anesthesia, pain management, and physical therapy with standard incisions in hip and knee arthroplasties: the effect on early outcomes. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22: 20-25.
24. Peck CN, Foster A, McLauchlan GJ. Reducing incision length or intensifying rehabilitation: what makes the difference to length of stay in total hip replacement in a UK setting? Int Orthop 2006; 30: 395-398.
25. Pour AE, Parvizi J, Sharkey PF et al. Minimally invasive hip arthroplasty: what role does patient preconditioning play? J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89: 1,920-1,927.
26. Khanna A, Gougoulias N, Longo UG. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Orthop Clin North Am 2009; 40: 479-489.
27. Popischill M, Kranzl A, Attwenger B, Knahr H. Minimally invasive compared with traditional transgluteal approach for total hip arthroplasty: a comparative gait analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92: 328-337.
28. Bennett D, Ogonda L, Elliott D et al. Comparison of gait kinematics in patients receiving minimally invasive and traditional hip replacement surgery: a prospective blinded study. Gait Posture 2006; 23: 374-382.
29. Bennett D, Ogonda L, Elliott D et al. Comparison of immediate postoperative walking ability in patients receiving minimally invasive and standard-incision hip arthroplasty: a prospective blinded study. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22: 490-495.
30. Lawlor M, Humphreys P, Morrow E et al. Comparison of early postoperative functional levels following total hip replacement using minimally invasive versus standard incisions. A prospective randomized blinded trial. Clin Rehabil 2005; 19: 465-474.
31. Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Meneghini RM, Hanssen AD. Slower recovery after two-incision than mini-posterior-incision total hip arthroplasty. A randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90: 1,000-1,006.
32. Berger RA, Sanders S, Gerlinger T et al. Outpatient total knee arthroplasty with a minimally invasive technique. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20: 33-38.
33. Chen AF, Alan RK, Redziniak DE, Tria AJ. Quadriceps sparing total knee replacement. The initial experience with results at two to four years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006; 88: 1,448-1,453.
34. Sanders S, Buchheit K, Deirmengian C, Berger RA. Perioperative protocols for minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2006; 19: 129-132.
35. Scuderi GR. Preoperative planning and perioperative management for minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. Am J Orthop 2006; 35: 4-6.
36. Leuchte S, Riedl K, Wohlrab D. Immediate post-operative advantages of minimally invasive hip replacement -results of symmetry and load from the measurement of ground reaction force. Z Orthop Unfall 2009; 147: 69-78.
37. Wohlrab D, Droege JW, Mendel T et al. Minimally invasive vs transgluteal total hip replacement. A 3-month follow-up of a prospective randomized clinical study. Orthopade 2008; 37: 1,121-1,126.
38. Wohlrab D, Hagel A, Hein W. Advantages of minimal invasive total hip replacement in the early phase of rehabilitation. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2004; 142: 685-690.
39. Meneghini RM, Smits SA. Early discharge and recovery with three minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty approaches: a preliminary study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467: 1,431-1,437.
40. Goebel S, Steinert AF, Schillinger J et al. Reduced postoperative pain in total hip arthroplasty after minimal-invasive anterior approach. Int Orthop 2011 May 25. [Epub ahead of print.]
41. Bonutti PM, Zywiel MG, Ulrich SD et al. A comparison of subvastus and midvastus approaches in minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92: 575-582.
42. Aglietti P, Baldini A, Sensi L. Quadriceps-sparing versus mini-subvastus approach in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 452: 106-111.
43. Chin PL, Foo LS, Yang KY et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing the radiologic outcomes of conventional and minimally invasive techniques for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22: 800-806.
44. Niki Y, Matsumoto H, Hakozaki A et al. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty through a lateral approach. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011; 19: 973-979.
45. Grande M, Tucci GF, Adorisio O et al. Systemic acute-phase response after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2002; 16: 313-316.
46. Niki Y, Mochizuki T, Momohara S et al. Is minimally invasive surgery in total knee arthroplasty really minimally invasive surgery? J Arthroplasty 2009; 24: 499-504.
47. Woolson ST, Mow CS, Syquia JF et al. Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86: 1,353-1,358.
48. Bal BS, Haltom D, Aleto T, Barrett M. Early complications of primary total hip replacement performed with a two-incision minimally invasive technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87: 2,432-2,438.
49. Barrack RL. The mini-incision: occasionally desirable, but rarely necessary. Orthopedics 2004; 27: 936, 945.