On ‘the subject’ of planning’s public interest

Planning Theory

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 150-168

  Lennon, Mick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

MacIntyre; planning theory; public interest; the subject; virtue ethics

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; ETHICS; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; PHILOSOPHY; PLANNING PRACTICE; PLANNING THEORY; PUBLIC ATTITUDE;

EID: 85018753687     PISSN: 14730952     EISSN: 17413052     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1473095215621773     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Alexander ER, (2002) The public interest in planning: From legitimation to substantive plan evaluation. Planning Theory 1: 226–249.
2. Alfasi N, (2009) Planning and the public interest: An editorial introduction. Geography Research Forum 29: 1–6.
3. Allmendinger P, (2009) Planning Theory. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
4. Allmendinger P, Tewdwr-Jones M, (eds) (2002) Planning Futures: New Directions for Planning Theory. Oxford: Routledge.
5. Aristotle (2014) Nicomachean Ethics (translation and commentary by Reeve CDC,). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.
6. Bäcklund P, Mäntysalo R, (2010) Agonism and institutional ambiguity: Ideas on democracy and the role of participation in the development of planning theory and practice-the case of Finland. Planning Theory 9: 333–350.
7. Basta C, (2015) From justice in planning toward planning for justice: A capability approach. Planning Theory. Epub ahead of print 13 February. DOI: 10.1177/1473095215571399.
8. Bell DA, (1993) Communitarianism and Its Critics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
9. Bond S, (2011) Negotiating a ‘democratic ethos’: Moving beyond the agonistic–communicative divide. Planning Theory 10(2): 161–186.
10. Brand R, Gaffikin F, (2007) Collaborative planning in an uncollaborative world. Planning Theory 6: 282–313.
11. Campbell H, (2002) Planning: An idea of value. The Town Planning Review 73: 271–288.
12. Campbell H, (2006) Just planning: The art of situated ethical judgment. Journal of Planning Education and Research 26: 92–106.
13. Campbell H, (2012a) ‘Planning ethics’ and rediscovering the idea of planning. Planning Theory 11: 379–399.
14. Campbell H, (2012b) Planning to change the world: Between knowledge and action lies synthesis. Journal of Planning Education and Research 32: 135–146.
15. Campbell H, Marshall R, (2000) Moral obligations, planning, and the public interest: A commentary on current British practice. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 27: 297–312.
16. Campbell H, Marshall R, (2002) Utilitarianism’s bad breath? A re-evaluation of the public interest justification for planning. Planning Theory 1: 163–187.
17. Campbell H, Marshall R, (2006) Towards justice in planning: A reappraisal. European Planning Studies 14: 239–252.
18. Connolly WE, (1995) The Ethos of Pluralization. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
19. Conway D, (1995) Classical Liberalism: The Unvanquished Ideal. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
20. Etzioni A, (1994) Spirit of Community. London: Touchstone Books.
21. Fainstein SS, (2010) The Just City. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
22. Flatman RE, (1966) The Public Interest: An Essay concerning the Normative Discourse of Politics. New York: Wiley Blackwell.
23. Flyvbjerg B, (2004) Phronetic planning research: Theoretical and methodological reflections. Planning Theory & Practice 5: 283–306.
24. Foucault M, (1980) Power/Knowledge. New York: Pantheon.
25. Frazer A, Lacey N, (1993) The Politics of Community: A Feminist Critique of the Liberal-Communitarian Debate. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
26. Grange K, (2014) In search of radical democracy: The ideological character of current political advocacies for culture change in planning. Environment and Planning A 46: 2670–2685.
27. Grant J, (1994) On some public uses of planning ‘theory’: Rhetoric and expertise in community planning disputes. Town Planning Review 65: 59–78.
28. Griggs S, Howarth D, (2013) The Politics of Airport Expansion in the United Kingdom: Hegemony, Policy and the Rhetoric of ‘Sustainable Aviation’. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
29. Gunder M, Hillier J, (2009) Planning in Ten Words or Less: A Lacanian Entanglement with Spatial Planning. Farnham: Ashgate.
30. Hartmann T, (2012) Wicked problems and clumsy solutions: Planning as expectation management. Planning Theory 11: 242–256.
31. Healey P, (1993) Planning through debate: The communicative turn in planning theory. In: Fischer F, Forester J, (eds) The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. London: Duke University Press, 233–253.
32. Healey P, (2003) Collaborative planning in perspective. Planning Theory 2: 101–123.
33. Healey P, (2005) On the project of ‘institutional transformation’ in the planning field: Commentary on the contributions. Planning Theory 4: 301–310.
34. Healey P, (2012) Performing place governance collaboratively: Planning as a communicative process. In: Fischer F, Gottweis H, (eds) The Argumentative Turn Revisited: Public Policy as Communicative Practice. London: Duke University Press, 58–84.
35. Hendler S, (1995) Planning Ethics: A Reader in Planning Theory, Practice, and Education. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publications.
36. Higgins C, (2003) MacIntyre’s moral theory and the possibility of an Aretaic ethics of teaching. Journal of Philosophy of Education 37: 279–292.
37. Hillier J, (2003) Agon’izing over consensus: Why Habermasian ideals cannot be ‘real’. Planning Theory 2: 37–59.
38. Hirt S, Zahm DL, (2012) The Urban Wisdom of Jane Jacobs. New York: Routledge.
39. Honig B. (1993) Political Theory and the Displacement of Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
40. Huxley M, Yiftachel O, (2000) New paradigm or old myopia? Unsettling the communicative turn in planning theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research 19: 333–342.
41. Innes JE, (1995) Planning theory’s emerging paradigm: Communicative action and interactive practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research 14: 183–189.
42. Innes JE, (1996) Planning through consensus building: A new view of the comprehensive planning ideal. Journal of the American Planning Association 62: 460–472.
43. Innes JE, Booher (2010) Planning with complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy. New York: Taylor & Francis.
44. Innes JE, Booher DE, (2015) A turning point for planning theory? Overcoming dividing discourses. Planning Theory 14: 195–213.
45. Kant I, ([1785] 2005) Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Broadview Press.
46. Kant I, ([1788] 2012) The Critique of Practical Reason. San Antonio, TX: Bibliotech Press.
47. Kemmis S, (2005) Knowing practice: Searching for saliences. Pedagogy, Culture & Society 13: 391–426.
48. Lennon M, (2015) Finding purpose in planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research 35: 63–75.
49. Lo Piccolo F, Thomas H, (2008) Research ethics in planning: A framework for discussion. Planning Theory 7: 7–23.
50. Lutz CS, (2009) Tradition in the Ethics of Alasdair MacIntyre: Relativism, Thomism, and Philosophy. New York: Lexington Books.
51. Lutz CS, (2012) Reading Alasdair MacIntyre’s after Virtue. London: Continuum International Publishing.
52. McClymont K, (2011) Revitalising the political: Development control and agonism in planning practice. Planning Theory 10: 239–256.
53. MacIntyre A, (1984) After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
54. MacIntyre AC, (1988) Whose justice? Which rationality? Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
55. MacIntyre AC, (2007) After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
56. Miller D, (1994) Virtues, practices and justice. In: Horton J, Mendus S, (eds) After MacIntyre: Critical Perspectives on the Work of Alasdair MacIntyre. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 245–264.
57. Moroni S, (2004) Towards a reconstruction of the public interest criterion. Planning Theory 3: 151–171.
58. Mosteller T, (2008) Relativism in Contemporary American Philosophy: MacIntyre, Putnam, and Rorty. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
59. Mouffe C, (1999) Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism. Social Research 66: 745–758.
60. Mouffe C, (2000) The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso Books.
61. Mouffe C, (2011) On the Political. New York: Taylor & Francis.
62. Mulhall S, Swift A, (1996) Liberals and Communitarians. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
63. Murphy E, Fox-Rogers L, (2015) Perceptions of the common good in planning. Cities 42 (Part B): 231–241.
64. Murphy MC, (2003) MacIntyre’s political philosophy. In: Murphy MC, (ed.) Alasdair MacIntyre. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 152–175.
65. Nagel T, (1986) The View from Nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
66. Nicholas JL, (2012) Reason, Tradition and The Good. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
67. Nussbaum M, (1989) Recoiling from reason. The New York Review of Books, 7 December, 41.
68. Owens S, Cowell R, (2011) Land and Limits: Interpreting Sustainability in the Planning Process. New York: Routledge.
69. Pløger J, (2004) Strife: Urban planning and agonism. Planning Theory 3: 71–92.
70. Porter J, (2003) Tradition in the recent work of Alasdair MacIntyre. In: Murphy MC, (ed.) Alasdair MacIntyre. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 38–69.
71. Purcell M, (2009) Resisting neoliberalization: Communicative planning or counter-hegemonic movements? Planning Theory 8: 140–165.
72. Rawls J, (1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
73. Ricoeur P, (1995) Oneself as Another. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
74. Rittel HW, Webber MM, (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4: 155–169.
75. Roskamm N, (2014) On the other side of “agonism”: “The enemy,” the “outside,” and the role of antagonism. Planning Theory 14: 384–403.
76. Sandel M, (1982) Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
77. Sandercock L, (1997) Towards Cosmopolis: Planning for Multicultural Cities. London: Wiley Blackwell.
78. Schlosberg D, (2013) Theorising environmental justice: The expanding sphere of a discourse. Environmental Politics 22: 37–55.
79. Schwandt TA, (2005) On modeling our understanding of the practice fields. Pedagogy, Culture & Society 13: 313–332.
80. Stevenson CL, (1963) Facts and Values: Studies in Ethical Analysis. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
81. Tait M, Campbell H, (2000) The politics of communication between planning officers and politicians: The exercise of power through discourse. Environment and Planning A 32: 489–506.
82. Taylor C, (1989) Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
83. Tewdwr-Jones M, Allmendinger P, (1998) Deconstructing communicative rationality: A critique of Habermasian collaborative planning. Environment and Planning A 30: 1975–1989.
84. Thomas H, (1994) Values and planning. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
85. Walzer M, (1983) Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. New York: Basic Books.
86. Young IM, (2000) Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.