Transcranial electrical stimulation: What we know and do not know about mechanisms

Neuroscientist

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 109-123

  Fertonani, Anna ^a   Miniussi, Carlo ^a,b  

^a IRCCS ISTITUTO CENTRO SAN GIOVANNI DI DIO FATEBENEFRATELLI   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRESCIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Cognition; Models; Neuroenhancement; Neuromodulation; NIBS; Noninvasive brain stimulation; Stochastic resonance; TACS; TDCS; TES; TRNS

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EXCITATION; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NEUROMODULATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRANSCRANIAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION; BRAIN; DEVICES; EVOKED RESPONSE; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; THEORETICAL MODEL; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION;

BRAIN; EVOKED POTENTIALS; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION;

EID: 85018700403     PISSN: 10738584     EISSN: 10894098     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1073858416631966     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Accornero N, Capozza M, Pieroni L, Pro S, Davì L, Mecarelli O. 2014. EEG mean frequency changes in healthy subjects during prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation. J Neurophysiol 112: 1367-75.
2. Aihara K, Suzuki H. 2010. Theory of hybrid dynamical systems and its applications to biological and medical systems. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 368: 4893-914.
3. Anderson JR 2005. Cognitive psychology and its implications. 6th ed. New York, NY: Worth.
4. Antal A, Keeser D, Priori A, Padberg F, Nitsche MA. 2015. Conceptual and procedural shortcomings of the systematic review "Evidence That Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Generates Little-to-no Reliable Neurophysiologic Effect Beyond MEP Amplitude Modulation in Healthy Human Subjects: A Systematic Review". Brain Stimul 8: 846-9.
5. Antal A, Nitsche MA, Kruse W, Kincses TZ, Hoffmann K-P, Paulus W. 2004. Direct current stimulation over V5 enhances visuomotor coordination by improving motion perception in humans. J Cogn Neurosci 16: 521-7.
6. Batsikadze G, Moliadze V, Paulus W, Kuo M-F, Nitsche MA. 2013. Partially non-linear stimulation intensity-dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans. J Physiol 591: 1987-2000.
7. Benwell CS, Learmonth G, Miniussi C, Harvey M, Thut G. 2015. Non-linear effects of transcranial direct current stimulation as a function of individual baseline performance: Evidence from biparietal tDCS influence on lateralized attention bias. Cortex 69: 152-65.
8. Bestmann S, de Berker AO, Bonaiuto J. 2015. Understanding the behavioural consequences of noninvasive brain stimulation. Trends Cogn Sci 19: 13-20.
9. Bikson M, Rahman A. 2013. Origins of specificity during tDCS: anatomical, activity-selective, and input-bias mechanisms. Front Hum Neurosci. 7: 688.
10. Bindman LJ, Lippold OC, Redfearn JW. 1964. The action of brief polarizing currents on the cerebral cortex of the rat (1) during current flow and (2) in the production of long-lasting after-effects. J Physiol 172: 369-82.
11. Blais BS, Frenkel MY, Kuindersma SR, Muhammad R, Shouval HZ, Cooper LN, and others. 2008. Recovery from monocular deprivation using binocular deprivation. J Neurophysiol 100: 2217-24.
12. Bortoletto M, Pellicciari MC, Rodella C, Miniussi C. 2015a. The interaction with task-induced activity is more important than polarization: a tDCS study. Brain Stimul 8: 269-76.
13. Bortoletto M, Veniero D, Thut G, Miniussi C. 2015b. The contribution of TMS-EEG coregistration in the exploration of the human cortical connectome. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 49: 114-24.
14. Brem AK, Fried PJ, Horvath JC, Robertson EM, Pascual-Leone A. 2014. Is neuroenhancement by noninvasive brain stimulation a net zero-sum proposition? Neuroimage 85: 1058-68.
15. Brunoni AR, Fregni F, Pagano RL. 2011. Translational research in transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): a systematic review of studies in animals. Rev Neurosci 22: 471-81.
16. Brunoni AR, Nitsche MA, Bolognini N, Bikson M, Wagner T, Merabet L, and others. 2012. Clinical research with tran-scranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): challenges and future directions. Brain Stimul 5: 175-95.
17. Chhatbar PY, Feng W. 2015. Data synthesis in meta-analysis may conclude differently on cognitive effect from transcranial direct current stimulation. Brain Stimul 8: 974-6.
18. Cho KK, Bear MF. 2010. Promoting neurological recovery of function via metaplasticity. Future Neurol 5: 21-6.
19. Creutzfeldt OD, Fromm GH, Kapp H. 1962. Influence of transcortical d-c currents on cortical neuronal activity. Exp Neurol 5: 436-52.
20. Dayan E, Censor N, Buch ER, Sandrini M, Cohen LG. 2013. Noninvasive brain stimulation: from physiology to network dynamics and back. Nat Neurosci 16: 838-44.
21. de Berker AO, Bikson M, Bestmann S. 2013. Predicting the behavioral impact of transcranial direct current stimulation: issues and limitations. Front Hum Neurosci 7: 613.
22. Dockery CA, Hueckel-Weng R, Birbaumer N, Plewnia C. 2009. Enhancement of planning ability by transcranial direct current stimulation. J Neurosci 29: 7271-7.
23. Dubljević V, Saigle V, Racine E. 2014. The rising tide of tDCS in the media and academic literature. Neuron 82: 731-6.
24. Fertonani A, Pirulli C, Miniussi C. 2011. Random noise stimulation improves neuroplasticity in perceptual learning. J Neurosci 31: 15416-23.
25. Francis JT, Gluckman BJ, Schiff SJ. 2003. Sensitivity of neurons to weak electric fields. J Neurosci 23: 7255-61.
26. Fricke K, Seeber AA, Thirugnanasambandam N, Paulus W, Nitsche MA, Rothwell JC. 2011. Time course of the induction of homeostatic plasticity generated by repeated transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. J Neurophysiol 105: 1141-9.
27. Furuya S, Klaus M, Nitsche MA, Paulus W, Altenmuller E. 2014. Ceiling effects prevent further improvement of transcranial stimulation in skilled musicians. J Neurosci 34: 13834-9.
28. Gammaitoni L, Hänggi P, Jung P, Marchesoni F. 1998. Stochastic resonance. Rev Mod Phys 70: 223-87.
29. Gartside IB 1968. Mechanisms of sustained increases of firing rate of neurons in the rat cerebral cortex after polarization: reverberating circuits or modification of synaptic conductance? Nature 220: 382-3.
30. Gill J, Shah-Basak PP, Hamilton R. 2015. It's the thought that counts: examining the task-dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on executive function. Brain Stimul 8: 253-9.
31. Herrmann CS, Rach S, Neuling T, Strüber D. 2013. Transcranial alternating current stimulation: a review of the underlying mechanisms and modulation of cognitive processes. Front Hum Neurosci 7: 279.
32. Horvath JC, Forte JD, Carter O. 2015a. Evidence that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) generates little-to-no reliable neurophysiologic effect beyond MEP amplitude modulation in healthy human subjects: a systematic review. Neuropsychologia 66: 213-36.
33. Horvath JC, Forte JD, Carter O. 2015b. Quantitative review finds no evidence of cognitive effects in healthy populations from single-session transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Brain Stimul 8: 535-50.
34. Hsu T-Y, Tseng P, Liang W-K, Cheng S-K, Juan C-H. 2014. Transcranial direct current stimulation over right posterior parietal cortex changes prestimulus alpha oscillation in visual short-term memory task. Neuroimage 98: 306-13.
35. Iuculano T, Cohen Kadosh R. 2013. The mental cost of cognitive enhancement. J Neurosci 33: 4482-6.
36. Jacobson L, Koslowsky M, Lavidor M. 2012. tDCS polarity effects in motor and cognitive domains: a meta-analytical review. Exp Brain Res 216: 1-10.
37. Kitajo K, Nozaki D, Ward LM, Yamamoto Y. 2003. Behavioral stochastic resonance within the human brain. Phys Rev Lett. 90: 218103.
38. Krause B, Cohen Kadosh R. 2014. Not all brains are created equal: the relevance of individual differences in responsiveness to transcranial electrical stimulation. Front Syst Neurosci 8: 25.
39. Krause B, Márquez-Ruiz J, Kadosh RC. 2013. The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation: a role for cortical excitation/inhibition balance? Front Hum Neurosci. 7: 602.
40. Kutchko KM, Fröhlich F. 2013. Emergence of metastable state dynamics in interconnected cortical networks with propagation delays. PLoS Comput Biol 9: e1003304.
41. Learmonth G, Thut G, Benwell CSY, Harvey M. 2015. The implications of state-dependent tDCS effects in aging: behavioural response is determined by baseline performance. Neuropsychologia 74: 108-19.
42. Li LM, Uehara K, Hanakawa T. 2015. The contribution of inter-individual factors to variability of response in transcranial direct current stimulation studies. Front Cell Neurosci 9: 181.
43. Liebetanz D, Nitsche MA, Tergau F, Paulus W. 2002. Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability. Brain 125: 2238-47.
44. 2+ levels affect plasticity differently: the LTP zone, the LTD zone and no man's land. J Physiol. 532(Pt 2): 285.
45. Luber B. 2014. Neuroenhancement by noninvasive brain stimulation is not a net zero-sum proposition. Front Syst Neurosci. 8: 127.
46. Luft CD, Pereda E, Banissy MJ, Bhattacharya J. 2014. Best of both worlds: promise of combining brain stimulation and brain connectome. Front Syst Neurosci 8: 132.
47. Maass W. 2000. On the computational power of winner-take-all. Neural Comput. 12: 2519-35.
48. Miniussi C, Harris J a, Ruzzoli M. 2013. Modelling non-invasive brain stimulation in cognitive neuroscience. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 37: 1702-12.
49. Miniussi C, Ruzzoli M, Walsh V. 2010. The mechanism of transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognition. Cortex 46: 128-30.
50. Moliadze V, Atalay D, Antal A, Paulus W. 2012. Close to threshold transcranial electrical stimulation preferentially activates inhibitory networks before switching to excitation with higher intensities. Brain Stimul 5: 505-11.
51. Moos K, Vossel S, Weidner R, Sparing R, Fink GR. 2012. Modulation of top-down control of visual attention by cathodal tDCS over right IPS. J Neurosci 32: 16360-8.
52. Müller-Dahlhaus F, Ziemann U. 2015. Metaplasticity in human cortex. Neuroscientist 21: 185-202.
53. Nitsche MA, Kuo M-F, Grosch J, Bergner C, Monte-Silva K, Paulus W. 2009. D1-receptor impact on neuroplasticity in humans. J Neurosci 29: 2648-53.
54. Nitsche MA, Fricke K, Henschke U, Schlitterlau A, Liebetanz D, Lang N, and others. 2003. Pharmacological modulation of cortical excitability shifts induced by transcranial direct current stimulation in humans. J Physiol 553: 293-301.
55. Nitsche MA, Müller-Dahlhaus F, Paulus W, Ziemann U. 2012. The pharmacology of neuroplasticity induced by non-invasive brain stimulation: building models for the clinical use of CNS active drugs. J Physiol 590: 4641-62.
56. Okun M, Lampl I. 2008. Instantaneous correlation of excitation and inhibition during ongoing and sensory-evoked activities. Nat Neurosci 11: 535-7.
57. Opitz A, Paulus W, Will A, Thielscher A. 2015. Anatomical determinants of the electric field during transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroimage 109: 2.
58. Paulus W. 2011. Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES - tDCS; tRNS, tACS) methods. Neuropsychol Rehabil 21: 602-17.
59. Peters MA, Thompson B, Merabet LB, Wu AD, Shams L. 2013. Anodal tDCS to V1 blocks visual perceptual learning consolidation. Neuropsychologia 51: 1234-9.
60. Pirulli C, Fertonani A, Miniussi C. 2013. The role of timing in the induction of neuromodulation in perceptual learning by transcranial electric stimulation. Brain Stimul 6: 683-9.
61. Pirulli C, Fertonani A, Miniussi C. 2014. Is neural hyperpolarization by cathodal stimulation always detrimental at the behavioral level? Front Behav Neurosci 8: 226.
62. Reato D, Rahman A, Bikson M, Parra LC. 2013. Effects of weak transcranial alternating current stimulation on brain activity-a review of known mechanisms from animal studies. Front Hum Neurosci 7: 687.
63. Riggall K, Forlini C, Carter A, Hall W, Weier M, Partridge B, and others. 2015. Researchers' perspectives on scientific and ethical issues with transcranial direct current stimulation: An international survey. Sci Rep 5: 10618.
64. + channels by weak capacitive currents on a silicon chip. J Neurophysiol 100: 346-57.
65. Siebner HR, Hartwigsen G, Kassuba T, Rothwell JC. 2009. How does transcranial magnetic stimulation modify neuronal activity in the brain? Implications for studies of cognition. Cortex 45: 1035-42.
66. Silvanto J, Muggleton N, Walsh V. 2008. State-dependency in brain stimulation studies of perception and cognition. Trends Cogn Sci. 12: 447-54.
67. Stagg CJ, Johansen-Berg H. 2013. Studying the effects of transcranial direct-current stimulation in stroke recovery using magnetic resonance imaging. Front Hum. Neurosci 7: 857.
68. Stagg CJ, Nitsche MA. 2011. Physiological basis of transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroscientist 17: 37-53.
69. Terney D, Chaieb L, Moliadze V, Antal A, Paulus W. 2008. Increasing human brain excitability by transcranial high-frequency random noise stimulation. J Neurosci 28: 14147-55.
70. Thut G, Miniussi C, Gross J. 2012. The functional importance of rhythmic activity in the brain. Curr Biol 22: R658-63.
71. Thut G, Miniussi C. 2009. New insights into rhythmic brain activity from TMS-EEG studies. Trends Cogn Sci 13: 182-9.
72. Tiwari A, Ray JCJ, Narula J, Igoshin OA. 2011. Bistable responses in bacterial genetic networks: designs and dynamical consequences. Math Biosci 231: 76-89.
73. Tognoli E, Kelso JA. 2014. The metastable brain. Neuron 81: 35-48.
74. Tseng P, Hsu T-Y, Chang C-F, Tzeng OJL, Hung DL, Muggleton NG, and others. 2012. Unleashing potential: transcranial direct current stimulation over the right posterior parietal cortex improves change detection in low-performing individuals. J Neurosci 32: 10554-61.
75. Vallar G, Bolognini N. 2011. Behavioural facilitation following brain stimulation: implications for neurorehabilitation. Neuropsychol Rehabil 21: 618-49.
76. van der Groen O, Wenderoth N. 2015. Random noise stimulation of the cortex: stochastic resonance enhances central mechanisms of perception. Paper presented at: NYC Neuromodulation Conference; January 9-11, 2015. Abstract #14.
77. Wiesenfeld K, Moss F. 1995. Stochastic resonance and the benefits of noise: from ice ages to crayfish and SQUIDs. Nature 373: 33-6.
78. Wiethoff S, Hamada M, Rothwell JC. 2014. Variability in response to transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex. Brain Stimul 7: 468-75.
79. Woods AJ, Antal A, Bikson M, Boggio PS, Brunoni AR, Celnik P, and others. 2016. A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools. Clin Neurophysiol. Epub Nov 22. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.11.012.
80. Zaghi S, Acar M, Hultgren B, Boggio PS, Fregni F. 2010. Noninvasive brain stimulation with low-intensity electrical currents: putative mechanisms of action for direct and alternating current stimulation. Neuroscientist 16: 285-307.
81. Zwissler B, Sperber C, Aigeldinger S, Schindler S, Kissler J, Plewnia C. 2014. Shaping memory accuracy by left prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation. J Neurosci 34: 4022-6.