State-dependency in brain stimulation studies of perception and cognition

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 12, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 447-454

  Silvanto, Juha ^a,b   Muggleton, Neil ^c   Walsh, Vincent ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b Plasticity and Rehabilitation   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRAIN STIMULATIONS; COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCES; INITIAL STATES; NEURAL ACTIVATIONS; NEURAL POPULATIONS; NEURONAL POPULATIONS; PERCEPTION AND COGNITIONS; PERCEPTUAL EFFECTS; SPECIAL EMPHASES; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATIONS;

FUNCTIONAL ELECTRIC STIMULATION;

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; BRAIN REGION; CELL POPULATION; COGNITION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; HUMAN; PERCEPTION; SENSORY STIMULATION; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

ANIMALS; AROUSAL; ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; CATS; CEREBRAL CORTEX; COGNITION; COLOR PERCEPTION; DOMINANCE, CEREBRAL; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, MOTOR; HAPLORHINI; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MEMBRANE POTENTIALS; NEURAL INHIBITION; NEURONS; PERCEPTION; PHOSPHENES; SACCADES; SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

EID: 56149111359     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.09.004     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Reis J., et al. Contribution of transcranial magnetic stimulation to the understanding of cortical mechanisms involved in motor control. J. Physiol. 586 (2008) 325-351
2. Tyc F., and Boyadjian A. Cortical plasticity and motor activity studied with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Rev. Neurosci. 17 (2006) 469-495
3. Ziemann U. TMS induced plasticity in human cortex. Rev. Neurosci. 15 (2004) 253-266
4. Ridding M.C., and Rothwell J.C. Is there a future for therapeutic use of transcranial magnetic stimulation?. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 8 (2007) 559-567
5. Thut G., et al. Alpha-band electroencephalographic (EEG) activity over occipital cortex indexes visuospatial attention bias and predicts visual target detection. J. Neurosci. 26 (2006) 9494-9502
6. Walsh V., et al. Cortical plasticity in perceptual learning demonstrated by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuropsychologia 36 (1998) 363-367
7. Toth L.J., and Assad J.A. Dynamic coding of behaviourally relevant stimuli in parietal cortex. Nature 415 (2002) 165-168
8. Lamme V.A., et al. Figure-ground activity in primary visual cortex is suppressed by anesthesia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95 (1998) 3263-3268
9. Super H., et al. Internal state of monkey primary visual cortex (V1) predicts figure-ground perception. J. Neurosci. 23 (2003) 3407-3414
10. Moran J., and Desimone R. Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. Science 229 (1985) 782-784
11. Hubel D.H., and Wiesel T.N. Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. J. Physiol. 195 (1968) 215-243
12. Zeki S.M. Functional organization of a visual area in the posterior bank of the superior temporal sulcus of the rhesus monkey. J. Physiol. 236 (1974) 549-573
13. Mechler F., and Ringach D.L. On the classification of simple and complex cells. Vision Res. 42 (2002) 1017-1033
14. Nagarajan S.S., et al. Effects of induced electric fields on finite neural structures: a simulation study. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 40 (1993) 1175-1178
15. Rudiak D., and Marg E. Finding the depth of magnetic brain stimulation: a re-evaluation. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 93 (1994) 358-371
16. Moliadze V., et al. Effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation on single-unit activity in the cat primary visual cortex. J. Physiol. 553 (2003) 665-679
17. Cowey A. The Ferrier Lecture 2004 what can transcranial magnetic stimulation tell us about how the brain works?. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 360 (2005) 1185-1205
18. Walsh V., and Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Neurochronometrics of Mind. 1st edn (2003), MIT Press
19. Töpper R., et al. Facilitation of picture naming by focal transcranial magnetic stimulation of Wernicke's area. Exp. Brain Res. 121 (1998) 371-378
20. Grosbras M.H., and Paus T. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human frontal eye field facilitates visual awareness. Eur. J. Neurosci. 18 (2003) 3121-3126
21. Walsh V., et al. Task-specific impairments and enhancements induced by magnetic stimulation of human visual area V5. Proc. Biol. Sci. 265 (1998) 537-543
22. Campana G., et al. Priming of motion direction and area V5/MT+: a test of perceptual memory. Cereb. Cortex 12 (2002) 663-669
23. Campana G., et al. Visual area V5/MT remembers "what" but not "where". Cereb. Cortex 16 (2006) 1766-1770
24. Silvanto J., and Muggleton N.G. New light through old windows: moving beyond the virtual lesion approach to transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuroimage 39 (2008) 549-552
25. Silvanto J., et al. Neural adaptation reveals state-dependent effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation. Eur. J. Neurosci. 25 (2007) 1874-1881
26. Carandini M., and Ferster D. A tonic hyperpolarization underlying contrast adaptation in cat visual cortex. Science 276 (1997) 949-952
27. Sanchez-Vives M.V., et al. Membrane mechanisms underlying contrast adaptation in cat area 17 in vivo. J. Neurosci. 20 (2000) 4267-4285
28. Cattaneo Z., and Silvanto J. Investigating visual motion perception using the TMS-adaptation paradigm. Neuroreport 19 (2008) 1423-1427
29. Silvanto J., and Muggleton N.G. A novel approach for enhancing the functional specificity of TMS: revealing the properties of distinct neural populations within the stimulated region. Clin. Neurophysiol. 119 (2008) 724-726
30. Ridding M.C., and Rothwell J.C. Is there a future of therapeutic use of transcranial magnetic stimulation?. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 8 (2007) 559-567
31. Brighina F., et al. Modulation of visual cortical excitability in migraine with aura: effects of 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Exp. Brain Res. 145 (2002) 177-181
32. Siebner H.R. Preconditioning of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with transcranial direct current stimulation: evidence for homeostatic plasticity in the human motor cortex. J. Neurosci. 24 (2004) 3379-3385
33. Lang N., et al. Preconditioning with transcranial direct current stimulation sensitizes the motor cortex to rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation and controls the direction of after-effects. Biol. Psychiatry 56 (2004) 634-638
34. Rossini P.M., and Rossi S. TMS in cognitive plasticity and the potential for rehabilitation. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8 (2007) 273-279
35. Valero-Cabré A., et al. Cumulative sessions of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) build up facilitation to subsequent TMS-mediated behavioural disruptions. Eur. J. Neurosci. 27 (2008) 765-774
36. Kähkönen S., et al. Ethanol modulates cortical activity: direct evidence with combined TMS and EEG. Neuroimage 14 (2001) 322-328
37. Lee L., et al. Acute remapping within the motor system induced by low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. J. Neurosci. 23 (2003) 5308-5318
38. Nikulin V.V., et al. Modulation of electroencephalographic responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation: evidence for changes in cortical excitability related to movement. Eur. J. Neurosci. 18 (2003) 1206-1212
39. Romei V., et al. Resting electroencephalogram alpha-power over posterior sites indexes baseline visual cortex excitability. Neuroreport 19 (2008) 203-208
40. Rahn E., and Basar E. Enhancement of visual evoked potentials by stimulation during low prestimulus EEG stages. Int. J. Neurosci. 72 (1993) 123-136
41. Ergenoglu T., et al. Alpha rhythm of the EEG modulates visual detection performance in humans. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 20 (2004) 376-383
42. Romei V., et al. Spontaneous fluctuations in posterior alpha-band EEG activity reflect variability in excitability of human visual areas. Cereb. Cortex 18 (2008) 2010-2018
43. Marreiros A.C., et al. Dynamic causal modelling for fMRI: a two-state model. Neuroimage 39 (2008) 269-278
44. Penny W.D., et al. Modelling functional integration: a comparison of structural equation and dynamic causal models. Neuroimage 23 (2004) S264-S274
45. Cowey A., and Walsh V. Magnetically induced phosphenes in sighted, blind and blindsighted observers. Neuroreport 11 (2000) 3269-3273
46. Bestmann S., et al. Dorsal premotor cortex exerts state-dependent causal influences on activity in contralateral primary motor and dorsal premotor cortex. Cereb. Cortex 18 (2008) 1281-1291
47. Wörgötter F., et al. State-dependent receptive-field restructuring in the visual cortex. Nature 396 (1998) 165-168
48. Ruff C.C., et al. Distinct causal influences of parietal versus frontal areas on human visual cortex: evidence from concurrent TMS fMRI. Cereb. Cortex 18 (2008) 817-827
49. Steriade M., et al. Thalamocortical oscillations in the sleeping and aroused brain. Science 262 (1993) 679-685
50. Funke K., and Eysel U.T. EEG-dependent modulation of response dynamic of cat dLGN relay cells and the contribution of the corticogeniculate feedback. Brain Res. 573 (1992) 217-227
51. McCarley R.W., et al. Lateral geniculate nucleus unitary discharge in sleep and waking: state- and rate-specifc aspects. J. Neurophysiol. 50 (1983) 798-818
52. Cattaneo Z., and Silvanto J. Time course of the state-dependent effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the TMS-adaptation paradigm. Neurosci. Lett. 443 (2008) 82-85
53. Muggleton N.G., and Silvanto J. Testing the validity of the TMS state-dependency approach: targeting functionally distinct motion-selective neural populations in visual areas V1/V2 and V5/MT+. Neuroimage 40 (2008) 1841-1848