A New Navigational Tool for Pedicle Screw Placement in Patients with Severe Scoliosis

Clinical Spine Surgery

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2017, Pages E430-E439

  Putzier, Michael ^a   Strube, Patrick ^a   Cecchinato, Riccardo ^b   Lamartina, Claudio ^b   Hoff, Eike K ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^b IRCCS ISTITUTO ORTOPEDICO GALEAZZI   (Italy)

Author keywords

3D printing; deformity; navigation; pedicle screw guide; positioning tool; scoliosis

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN CORTEX; CASE REPORT; COBB ANGLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DEFORMITY; DRILL; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; INSTRUMENT VALIDATION; LUMBAR REGION; LUMBAR SPINE; MALE; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; PEDICLE SCREW; PILOT STUDY; SACRAL SPINAL CORD; SCOLIOSIS; SPINE IMPLANT; SPINE MALFORMATION; THORACIC SPINE; THORAX; THREE DIMENSIONAL PRINTING; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; X-RAY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES; PEDICLE SCREWS; PILOT PROJECTS; SCOLIOSIS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 85018670088     PISSN: 23800186     EISSN: 23800194     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000220     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Ledonio CG, Polly DW Jr, Vitale MG, et al. Pediatric pedicle screws: comparative effectiveness and safety: a systematic literature review from the Scoliosis Research Society and the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America task force. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:1227-1234.
2. Lenke LG, Kuklo TR, Ondra S, et al. Rationale behind the current state-of-the-art treatment of scoliosis (in the pedicle screw era). Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33:1051-1054.
3. Lykissas MG, Jain VV, Nathan ST, et al. Mid-to long-term outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after instrumented posterior spinal fusion: a meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38:E113-E119.
4. Jeswani S, Drazin D, Hsieh JC, et al. Instrumenting the small thoracic pedicle: the role of intraoperative computed tomography image-guided surgery. Neurosurg Focus. 2014;36:E6.
5. Lee CS, Park SA, Hwang CJ, et al. A novel method of screw placement for extremely small thoracic pedicles in scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36:E1112-E1116.
6. Liljenqvist UR, Link TM, Halm HF. Morphometric analysis of thoracic and lumbar vertebrae in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25:1247-1253.
7. Takeshita K, Maruyama T, Chikuda H, et al. Diameter, length, and direction of pedicle screws for scoliotic spine: analysis by multiplanar reconstruction of computed tomography. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34:798-803.
8. Flynn JM, Sakai DS. Improving safety in spinal deformity surgery: advances in navigation and neurologic monitoring. Eur Spine J. 2013;22(suppl 2):S131-S137.
9. Hicks JM, Singla A, Shen FH, et al. Complications of pedicle screw fixation in scoliosis surgery: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35:E465-E470.
10. Shin BJ, James AR, Njoku IU, et al. Pedicle screw navigation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perforation risk for computer-navigated versus freehand insertion. J Neurosurg. 2012; 17:113-122.
11. Liljenqvist UR, Halm HF, Link TM. Pedicle screw instrumentation of the thoracic spine in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997;22:2239-2245.
12. Sarlak AY, Tosun B, Atmaca H, et al. Evaluation of thoracic pedicle screw placement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2009;18:1892-1897.
13. Amiot LP, Lang K, Putzier M, et al. Comparative results between conventional and computer-assisted pedicle screw installation in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25:606-614.
14. Chapman JR, Harrington RM, Lee KM, et al. Factors affecting the pullout strength of cancellous bone screws. J Biomech Eng. 1996;118:391-398.
15. Cho W, Cho SK, Wu C. The biomechanics of pedicle screw-based instrumentation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92:1061-1065.
16. Hirano T, Hasegawa K, Takahashi HE, et al. Structural characteristics of the pedicle and its role in screw stability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997;22:2504-2509.
17. Tian NF, Huang QS, Zhou P, et al. Pedicle screw insertion accuracy with different assisted methods: a systematic review and metaanalysis of comparative studies. Eur Spine J. 2011;20:846-859.
18. Rivkin MA, Yocom SS. Thoracolumbar instrumentation with CTguided navigation (O-arm) in 270 consecutive patients: accuracy rates and lessons learned. Neurosurg Focus. 2014;36:E7.
19. Rahmathulla G, Nottmeier EW, Pirris SM, et al. Intraoperative image-guided spinal navigation: technical pitfalls and their avoidance. Neurosurg Focus. 2014;36:E3.
20. Hu Y, Yuan ZS, Kepler CK, et al. Deviation analysis of C1-C2 transarticular screw placement assisted by a novel rapid prototyping drill template: a cadaveric study. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014;27: E181-E186.
21. Lu S, Xu YQ, Chen GP, et al. Efficacy and accuracy of a novel rapid prototyping drill template for cervical pedicle screw placement. Comput Aided Surg. 2011;16:240-248.
22. Lu S, Xu YQ, Zhang YZ, et al. A novel computer-assisted drill guide template for lumbar pedicle screw placement: a cadaveric and clinical study. Int J Med Robot. 2009;5:184-191.
23. Lu S, Zhang YZ, Wang Z, et al. Accuracy and efficacy of thoracic pedicle screws in scoliosis with patient-specific drill template. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2012;50:751-758.
24. Merc M, Drstvensek I, Vogrin M, et al. A multi-level rapid prototyping drill guide template reduces the perforation risk of pedicle screw placement in the lumbar and sacral spine. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013;133:893-899.
25. Ryken TC, Owen BD, Christensen GE, et al. Image-based drill templates for cervical pedicle screw placement. J Neurosurg. 2009;10:21-26.
26. Ferrari V, Parchi P, Condino S, et al. An optimal design for patientspecific templates for pedicle spine screws placement. Int J Med Robot. 2013;9:298-304.
27. Shih G, Lu ZF, Zabih R, et al. Automated framework for digital radiation dose index reporting from CT dose reports. Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:1170-1174.
28. Mirza SK, Wiggins GC, Kuntz CT, et al. Accuracy of thoracic vertebral body screw placement using standard fluoroscopy, fluoroscopic image guidance, and computed tomographic image guidance: a cadaver study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28:402-413.
29. Hu Y, Yuan ZS, Spiker WR, et al. Deviation analysis of C2 translaminar screw placement assisted by a novel rapid prototyping drill template: a cadaveric study. Eur Spine J. 2013;22:2770-2776.
30. Lu S, Xu YQ, Zhang YZ, et al. A novel computer-assisted drill guide template for placement of C2 laminar screws. Eur Spine J. 2009;18:1379-1385.
31. Owen BD, Christensen GE, Reinhardt JM, et al. Rapid prototype patient-specific drill template for cervical pedicle screw placement. Comput Aid Surg. 2007;12:303-308.
32. Ma T, Xu YQ, Cheng YB, et al. A novel computer-assisted drill guide template for thoracic pedicle screw placement: a cadaveric study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012;132:65-72.
33. Gelalis ID, Paschos NK, Pakos EE, et al. Accuracy of pedicle screw placement: a systematic review of prospective in vivo studies comparing free hand, fluoroscopy guidance and navigation techniques. Eur Spine J. 2012;21:247-255.
34. Di Silvestre M, Parisini P, Lolli F, et al. Complications of thoracic pedicle screws in scoliosis treatment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32:1655-1661.
35. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. Free hand pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine: is it safe Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004;29:333-342.
36. Belmont PJ Jr, Klemme WR, Dhawan A, et al. In vivo accuracy of thoracic pedicle screws. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26:2340-2346.
37. Ebraheim NA, Xu R, Darwich M, et al. Anatomic relations between the lumbar pedicle and the adjacent neural structures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997;22:2338-2341.
38. Gertzbein SD, Robbins SE. Accuracy of pedicular screw placement in vivo. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990;15:11-14.
39. Liljenqvist UR, Allkemper T, Hackenberg L, et al. Analysis of vertebral morphology in idiopathic scoliosis with use of magnetic resonance imaging and multiplanar reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84-A:359-368.
40. Luther N, Iorgulescu JB, Geannette C, et al. Comparison of navigated versus non-navigated pedicle screw placement in 260 patients and 1434 screws: screw accuracy, screw size, and the complexity of surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013. [Epub ahead of print].
41. White KK, Oka R, Mahar AT, et al. Pullout strength of thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation: comparison of the transpedicular and extrapedicular techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31: E355-E358.
42. Thorne MC. Background radiation: natural and man-made. J Radiol Prot. 2003;23:29-42.
43. Lange J, Karellas A, Street J, et al. Estimating the effective radiation dose imparted to patients by intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography in thoracolumbar spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38:E306-E312.
44. Hartl R, Lam KS, Wang J, et al. Worldwide survey on the use of navigation in spine surgery. World Neurosurg. 2013;79:162-172.