Mid- to long-term outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after instrumented posterior spinal fusion: A meta-analysis

Spine

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2013, Pages

  Lykissas, Marios G ^a   Jain, Viral V ^a   Nathan, Senthil T ^a   Pawar, Varun ^a   Eismann, Emily A ^a   Sturm, Peter F ^a   Crawford, Alvin H ^a  

^a CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

all pedicle screw; complications; Cotrel Dubousset; Harrington rod; idiopathic scoliosis

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COTREL DUBOUSSET INSTRUMENTATION; FOLLOW UP; HARRINGTON INSTRUMENTATION; HEMIPARESIS; HUMAN; LONG TERM CARE; META ANALYSIS; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; ORTHOPEDIC SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTERIOR SPINE FUSION; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDARTHROSIS; REOPERATION; REVIEW; SAMPLE SIZE; SPINE PEDICLE FIXATION DEVICE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

ADOLESCENT; BONE NAILS; BONE SCREWS; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; SCOLIOSIS; SPINAL FUSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84872966826     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31827ae3d0     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. La Grone MO. Loss of lumbar lordosis. A complication of spinal fusion for scoliosis. Orthop Clin North Am 1988; 19: 383-93.
2. Cotrel Y, Dubousset J, Guillaumat M. New universal instrumentation in spinal surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988; 227: 10-23. (Pubitemid 18054616)
3. Hitchon PW, Brenton MD, Black AG, et al. In vitro biomechanical comparison of pedicle screws, sublaminar hooks, and sublaminar cables. J Neurosurg 2003; 99: 104-9. (Pubitemid 36750445)
4. Suk SI, Lee SM, Chung ER, et al. Selective thoracic fusion with segmental pedicle screw fi xation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis: more than 5-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30: 1602-9.
5. Connolly PJ, Von Schroeder HP, Johnson GE, et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Long-term effect of instrumentation extending to the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995; 77: 1210-6.
6. Danielsson AJ, Nachemson AL. Back pain and function 23 years after fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A case-control studypart II. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003; 28: E373-83.
7. Danielsson AJ, Nachemson AL. Childbearing, curve progression, and sexual function in women 22 years after treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A case-control study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001; 26: 1449-56. (Pubitemid 32606817)
8. Helenius I, Remes V, Yrjönen T, et al. Comparison of long-term functional and radiologic outcomes after Harrington instrumentation and spondylodesis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A review of 78 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002; 27: 176-80. (Pubitemid 34215558)
9. Helenius I, Remes V, Yrjönen T, et al. Does gender affect outcome of surgery in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis ? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30: 462-7. (Pubitemid 40262161)
10. Helenius I, Remes V, Yrjönen T, et al. Harrington and Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Longterm functional and radiographic outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85: 2303-9. (Pubitemid 37499638)
11. Dickson JH, Erwin WD, Rossi D. Harrington instrumentation and arthrodesis for idiopathic scoliosis. A twenty-one-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990; 72: 678-83. (Pubitemid 20236487)
12. Bartie BJ, Lonstein JE, Winter RB. Long-term follow-up of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients who had Harrington instrumentation and fusion to the lower lumbar vertebrae: Is low back pain a problem ? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34: E873-8.
13. Danielsson AJ, Wiklund I, Pehrsson K, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A matched follow-up at least 20 years after treatment with brace or surgery. Eur Spine J 2001; 10: 278-88. (Pubitemid 32762771)
14. Niemeyer T, Bövingloh AS, Grieb S, et al. Low back pain after spinal fusion and Harrington instrumentation for idiopathic scoliosis. Int Orthop 2005; 29: 47-50. (Pubitemid 40248291)
15. Mariconda M, Galasso O, Barca P, et al. Minimum 20-year followup results of Harrington rod fusion for idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2005; 14: 854-61. (Pubitemid 41789824)
16. Götze C, Liljenqvist UR, Slomka A, et al. Quality of life and back pain: Outcome 16.7 years after Harrington instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002; 27: 1456-63; discussion 1463-4.
17. Andersen MO, Christensen SB, Thomsen K. Outcome at 10 years after treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006; 31: 350-4. (Pubitemid 43214778)
18. Padua R, Padua S, Aulisa L, et al. Patient outcomes after Harrington instrumentation for idiopathic scoliosis: A 15- to 28-year evaluation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001; 26: 1268-73. (Pubitemid 32520503)
19. Danielsson AJ, Romberg K, Nachemson AL. Spinal range of motion, muscle endurance, and back pain and function at least 20 years after fusion or brace treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A case-control study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006; 31: 275-83. (Pubitemid 43214767)
20. Danielsson AJ, Cederlund CG, Ekholm S, et al. The prevalence of disc aging and back pain after fusion extending into the lower lumbar spine. A matched MR study twenty-fi ve years after surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Acta Radiol 2001; 42: 187-97. (Pubitemid 33655045)
21. Takahashi S, Delécrin J, Passuti N. Changes in the unfused lumbar spine in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. A 5- to 9-year assessment after Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1997; 22: 517-23; discussion 524.
22. Humke T, Grob D, Scheier H, et al. Cotrel-Dubousset and Harrington instrumentation in idiopathic scoliosis: A comparison of long-term results. Eur Spine J 1995; 4: 280-3.
23. Remes V, Helenius I, Schlenzka D, et al. Cotrel-Dubousset (CD) or universal spine system (USS) instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS): Comparison of midterm clinical, functional, and radiologic outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004; 29: 2024-30. (Pubitemid 40202273)
24. Bjerkreim I, Steen H, Brox JI. Idiopathic scoliosis treated with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation: Evaluation 10 years after surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007; 32: 2103-10. (Pubitemid 47359617)
25. Violas P, Chapuis M, Bracq H. Local autograft bone in the surgical management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004; 29: 189-92. (Pubitemid 38112503)
26. Boos N, Dolan LA, Weinstein SL. Long-term clinical and radiographic results of Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation of right thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Iowa Orthop J 2007; 27: 40-6.
27. Pérez-Grueso FS, Fernández-Baíllo N, Arauz de, Robles S, et al. The low lumbar spine below Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation: longterm fi ndings. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000; 25: 2333-41.
28. Karatoprak O, Unay K, Tezer M, et al. Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery. Int Orthop 2008; 32: 523-8; discussion 529. (Pubitemid 351904621)
29. Di Silvestre M, Bakaloudis G, Lolli F, et al. Posterior fusion only for thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis of more than 80 degrees: pedicle screws versus hybrid instrumentation. Eur Spine J 2008; 17: 1336-49.
30. Edwards CC 2nd, Lenke LG, Peelle M, et al. Selective thoracic fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with C modifi er lumbar curves: 2- to 16-year radiographic and clinical results. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004; 29: 536-46. (Pubitemid 38282612)
31. Westrick ER, Ward WT. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: 5-year to 20-year evidence-based surgical results. J Pediatr Orthop 2011; 31: S61-8.