The landscape of olive groves as a driver of the rural economy

Land Use Policy

Volumn 65, Issue , 2017, Pages 164-175

  Rodríguez Entrena, Macario ^a,b   Colombo, Sergio ^c   Arriaza, Manuel ^a  

^a IFAPA CENTRO ALAMEDA DEL OBISPO   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CÓRDOBA   (Spain)

^c IFAPA CENTRO EL TORUÑO   (Spain)

Author keywords

Aesthetic value; Choice experiments; First and second order effects; Multiplier effects; Payment for ecosystem services; Recreation value

Indexed keywords

AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ESTHETICS; LANDSCAPE CHANGE; PLANTATION; PROFITABILITY; RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENT; RURAL ECONOMY;

EID: 85018526188     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.03.017     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Alix-Garcia, J., Wolff, H., Payment for ecosystem services from forests. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 6 (2014), 361–380.
2. Andrews, R.L., Currim, I.S., A comparison of segment retention criteria for finite mixture logit models. J. Market. Res. 40:2 (2003), 235–243.
3. Boyd, J., Krupnick, A. (2009). The Definition & Choice of Environmental Commodities for Nonmarket Valuation. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1479820.
4. Colombo, S., Hanley, N., Louviere, J., Modeling preference heterogeneity in stated choice data: an analysis for public goods generated by agriculture. Agric. Econ. 40:3 (2009), 307–322.
5. Colombo, S., Calatrava-Requena, J., Hanley, N., Analysing the social benefit of soil conservation measures using stated preference methods. Ecol. Econ. 58:4 (2006), 850–861.
6. Cooper, T., Hart, K., Baldock, D., The provision of public goods through agriculture in the European Union. 2009, Institute for European Environmental Policy, London.
7. Council of Europe, The European Landscape Convention, Firenze (ETS No. 176). Retrieved from: http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/176.htm. 2000.
8. Council of Europe, Landscape and sustainable development: challenges of the European Landscape Convention. 2006, Council of Europe, Strasbourg.
9. Daniel, T.C., Muhar, A., Arnberger, A., Aznar, O., Boyd, J.W., Chan, K.M., Costanza, R., Elmqvist, T., Flint, C.G., Gobster, P.H., Grêt-Regamey, A., Lave, R., Muhar, M., Penker, M., Ribe, R.G., Schauppenlehner, T., Sikor, T., Soloviy, I., Spierenburg, M., Taczanowska, K., Tam, J., von der Dunk, A., Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. PNAS 109:23 (2012), 8812–8819.
10. Agri, D.G., Landscape and rural areas: towards an economic valuation of socio-economic impacts. 2010, European Commission, Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural Development, Brussels.
11. Domański, B., Gwosdz, K., Multiplier effects in local and regional development. Quaestiones Geographicae 29:2 (2010), 27–37.
12. ENRD (European Network for Rural Development), Thematic Working Group 3: Public Goods And Public Intervention: Final Report., 2010, European Network for Rural Development, Brussels.
13. Espinosa, M., Psaltopoulos, D., Santini, F., Phimister, E., Roberts, D., Mary, S., Ratinger, T., Skuras, D., Balamou, E., Cardenete, M.A., Gomez y Paloma, S., Ex-ante analysis of the regional impacts of the common agricultural policy: a rural–urban recursive dynamic CGE Model Approach. Eur. Plan. Stud. 22:7 (2014), 1342–1367.
14. EUROSTAT, Agriculture, forestry and fishery statistics. 2013, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
15. Ferraria, S., Rambonilazab, M., Agricultural multifunctionality promoting policies and the safeguarding of rural landscapes: How to evaluate the link?. Landsc. Res. 33:3 (2008), 297–309.
16. Glenk, K., Colombo, S., How sure can you be?. A framework for considering delivery uncertainty in benefit assessments based on stated preference methods. J. Agric. Econ. 62:1 (2011), 25–46.
17. Gobster, P., Nassauer, J., Daniels, T., Fry, G., The shared landscape: what does aesthetics have to do with ecology?. Landsc. Ecol. 22 (2007), 959–972.
18. Grammatikopoulou, I., Pouta, E., Salmiovirta, M., Soini, K., Heterogeneous preferences for agricultural landscape improvements in southern Finland. Landsc. Urban Plan. 107:2 (2012), 181–191.
19. Greene, W.H., Hensher, D.A., A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: contrasts with mixed logit. Transp. Res Part B: Methodol 37:8 (2003), 681–698.
20. Habib, K.N., Improving choice model parameter estimates by jointly modelling the SP choices with corresponding elicited certainty ratings. Transport. Res. Part A: Policy Practice 95 (2017), 305–319.
21. Hanemann, W.M., Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 66:3 (1984), 332–341.
22. Hasund, K.P., Kataria, M., Lagerkvist, C.J., Valuing public goods of the agricultural landscape: a choice experiment using reference points to capture observable heterogeneity. J. Environ. Plan. Manage. 54:1 (2011), 31–53.
23. Hsiao, C., Sun, B., Morwitz, V.G., The role of stated intentions in new product purchase forecasting. Fomby, T.B., Hill, R.C., (eds.) Advances in Econometrics, 2002, Elsevier Science, Oxford, 11–28.
24. Hynes, S., Hanley, N., Scarpa, R., Effects on welfare measures of alternative means of accounting for preference heterogeneity in recreational demand models. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 90:4 (2008), 1011–1027.
25. Ladenburg, J., Olsen, S.B., Augmenting short cheap talk scripts with repeated opt-out reminder in choice experiment surveys. Resour. Energy Econ. 37 (2014), 39–63.
26. Lefebvre, M., Espinosa, M., Gómez y Paloma, S., The influence of the Common Agricultural Policy on agricultural landscapes. 2012, Institute for Prospective and Technological Studies, Joint Research Centre, Seville.
27. López-Guzmán, T., Sánchez Cañizares, S.M., Culinary tourism in Cordoba (Spain). Br. Food J. 114:2 (2012), 168–179.
28. Loomis, J.B., Strategies for overcoming hypothetical bias in stated preference surveys. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 39:1 (2014), 34–46.
29. Luque-Valle, P., Análisis del modelo de uso-visita de los deportistas-turistas de las vías verdes andaluzas. 2012, University of Granada, Granada.
30. Martin-Ortega, J., Ojea, E., Roux, C., Payments for water ecosystem services in Latin America: A literature review and conceptual model. Ecosyst. Services 6 (2013), 122–132.
31. Martins, M., Marques, C., Is agricultural policy promoting a new role for farmers?: A case study. J. Policy Model. 28 (2006), 847–860.
32. Mary, S., Santini, F., Espinosa, M., Cardenete, M.A., Gomez y Paloma, S., The rural-urban spillovers of EU structural policies in Cordoba, Spain. 2013, Institute for Prospective and Technological Studies, Joint Research Centre, Seville.
33. Matzdorf, B., Biedermann, C., Meyer, C., Nicolaus, K., Sattler, C., Schomers, S., Paying for Green? Payments for Ecosystem Services in Practice. Successful examples of PES from Germany, the United Kingdom and the United States. Müncheberg: CIVILand project (www.civiland-zalf.org). 2014.
34. MERCODES (Mercado, Comunicación y Desarrollo S.L.), Consultoría y asistencia para la creación del producto cicloturismo: Vías Verdes. 2008, Ministerio de Industria, Turismo y Comercio, Madrid.
35. Millán Vázquez de la Torre, M.G., Agudo, E.M., Agudo, I., Oil-tourism in the South-east of Spain: The necessity of coordinating the tourism activity with the agrarian one for the development of the rural areas. Panorama Socioeconómico 28:41 (2010), 116–124.
36. Millán Vázquez de la Torre, M.G., Arjona, J.M., Amador, L., A new market segment for olive oil: olive oil tourism in the south of Spain. Agric. Sci. 5:3 (2014), 179–185.
37. Montoro Council, Tourism information. Montoro Council's website. Available online at: http://www.montoro.es/turismo/que_hacer/gastronomia. 2016.
38. Morwitz, V.G., Steckel, J.H., Gupta, A., When do purchase intentions predict sales?. Int. J. Forecasting 23:3 (2007), 347–364.
39. Nylund, K.L., Asparouhov, T., Muthén, B.O., Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling 14:4 (2007), 535–569.
40. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation Development), Multifunctionality - towards an analytical framework. 2001, OECD, Paris.
41. Paudyal, K., Baral, H., Keenand, R.J., Local Actions for the common good: Can the application of the ecosystem services concept generate improved societal outcomes from natural resource management?. Land Use Policy 56 (2016), 327–332.
42. Richards, G., Hall, D., Tourism and Sustainable Community Development. 2000, Routledge, London.
43. Rocamora-Montiel, B., Colombo, S., Salazar-Ordóñez, M., Social attitudes in southern Spain to shape EU agricultural policy. J. Policy Model. 36 (2014), 156–171.
44. Rocamora-Montiel, B., Glenk, K., Colombo, S., Territorial management contracts as a tool to enhance the sustainability of sloping and mountainous olive orchards: evidence from a case study in Southern Spain. Land Use Policy 41 (2014), 313–324.
45. Rodríguez-Entrena, M., Arriaza, M., Adoption of conservation agriculture in olive groves: evidences from southern Spain. Land Use Policy 34 (2013), 294–300.
46. Rodríguez-Entrena, M., Barreiro-Hurlé, J., Gómez-Limón, J.A., Espinosa-Goded, M., Castro-Rodríguez, J., Evaluating the demand for carbon sequestration in olive grove soils as a strategy toward mitigating climate change. J. Environ. Manage. 112 (2012), 368–376.
47. Rodríguez-Entrena, M., Espinosa-Goded, M., Barreiro-Hurlé, J., The role of ancillary benefits on the value of agricultural soils carbon sequestration programmes: evidence from a latent class approach to Andalusian olive groves. Ecol. Econ. 99 (2014), 63–73.
48. Rose, J.M., Bliemer, M.C.J., Constructing efficient stated choice experimental designs. Transp. Rev. 29:5 (2009), 587–617.
49. Salazar-Ordóñez, M., Rodríguez-Entrena, M., Sayadi, S., Agricultural sustainability from a societal view: an analysis of southern Spanish citizens. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics 26:2 (2013), 473–490.
50. Saxena, G., Clark, G., Oliver, T., Ilbery, B., Conceptualizing integrated rural tourism. Tourism Geographies 9:4 (2007), 347–370.
51. Scarfo, F., Mercurio, R., del Peso, C., Assessing visual impacts of forest operations on a landscape in the Serre Regional Park of southern Italy. Landsc. Ecol. Eng. 9:1 (2013), 1–10.
52. Scarpa, R., Thiene, M., Destination choice models for rock climbing in the Northeastern Alps: a latent-class approach based on intensity of preferences. Land Econ. 81:3 (2005), 426–444.
53. Schilizzi, S., Latacz-Lohmann, U., Assessing the performance of conservation auctions: an experimental study. Land Econ. 83:4 (2007), 497–515.
54. Sevenant, M., Antrop, M., Settlement models, land use and visibility in rural landscapes: Two case studies in Greece. Landsc. Urban Plan. 80:4 (2007), 362–374.
55. Shen, J., Latent class model or mixed logit model?. A comparison by transport mode choice data. Appl. Econ. 41:22 (2009), 2915–2924.
56. Sheppard, B.H., Hartwick, J., Warshaw, P.R., The theory of reasoned action: a meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. J. Consum. Res. 15 (1988), 325–343.
57. Skuras, D., Dimara, E., Petrou, A., Rural tourism and visitors’ expenditures for local food products. Reg. Stud. 40:7 (2007), 769–779.
58. Slee, R.W., Farr, H., Snowdon, P., The economic impact of alternative types of rural tourism. J. Agric. Econ. 48:1–3 (1997), 179–192.
59. Street, D.J., Burgess, L., The Construction of Optimal Stated Choice Experiments: Theory and Methods. 2007, John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey.
60. Sun, B., Morwitz, V.G., Stated intentions and purchase behavior: a unified model. Int. J. Res. Market. 27:4 (2010), 356–366.
61. Swait, J., A structural equation model of latent segmentation and product choice for cross-sectional revealed preference choice data. J. Retail. Consumer Services 1:2 (1994), 77–89.
62. Tang, L., Luo, X., Cheng, Y., Yang, F., Ran, B., Comparing the state-of-the-art efficient stated choice designs based on empirical analysis. Math. Problems Eng. 740612 (2014), 1–8.
63. TEEB (The Economics of Ecosystems Biodiversity), TEEB Ecological and Economic Foundations. 2010, TEEB, Washington, DC.
64. Tempesta, T., Giancristofaro, R.A., Corain, L., Salmaso, L., Tomasi, D., Boatto, V., The importance of landscape in wine quality perception: an integrated approach using choice-based conjoint analysis and combination-based permutation tests. Food Quality Prefer. 21:7 (2010), 827–836.
65. Tveit, M., Ode, A., Fry, G., Key Concepts in a framework for analyzing visual landscape character. Landsc. Res. 313:3 (2006), 229–255.
66. Van Huylenbroeck, G., Mettepenningen, E., The role of institutional arrangements in rural development. Agrarian perspectives: proceedings of the 20th international scientific conference, 2011, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, Prague, 377–386.
67. Vanslembrouck, I., van Huylenbroeck, G., Measuring the recreational value of the agricultural landscape. Vanslembrouck, I., van Huylenbroeck, G., (eds.) Landscape Amenities: Economic Assessment of Agricultural Landscapes, 2005, Springer, The Netherlands, 87–113.
68. van Zanten, B.T., Verburg, P.H., Espinosa, M., Gomez-y-Paloma, S., Galimberti, G., Kantelhardt, J., Kapfer, M., Lefebvre, M., Manrique, R., Piorr, A., Raggi, M., Schaller, L., Targetti, S., Zasada, I., Viaggi, D., European agricultural landscapes, common agricultural policy and ecosystem services: a review. Agron. Sustainable Develop. 34:2 (2013), 309–325.
69. Varela, E., Jacobsen, J.B., Soliño, M., Understanding the heterogeneity of social preferences for fire prevention management. Ecol. Econ. 106 (2014), 91–104.
70. Varela, E., Mahieu, P.A., Giergiczny, M., Riera, P., Soliño, M., Testing the single opt-out reminder in choice experiments: an application to fuel break management in Spain. J. For. Econ. 20:3 (2014), 212–222.
71. Villanueva, A.J., Gómez-Limón, J.A., Arriaza, M., Nekhay, O., Analysing the provision of agricultural public goods: the case of irrigated olive groves in Southern Spain. Land Use Policy 38:1 (2014), 300–313.
72. Villanueva, A.J., Gómez-Limón, J.A., Arriaza, M., Rodríguez-Entrena, M., The design of agri-environmental schemes: farmers’ preferences in southern Spain. Land Use Policy 46 (2015), 142–154.
73. Villanueva, A.J., Gómez-Limón, J.A., Arriaza, M., Rodríguez-Entrena, M., Assessment of greening and collective participation in the context of agri-environmental schemes: the case of Andalusian irrigated olive groves. Spanish J. Agric. Res., 13(4), 2015, e0108.
74. Villanueva, A.J., Targetti, S., Schaller, L., Arriaza, M., Kantelhardt, J., Rodriguez-Entrena, M., Bossi-Fedrigotti, V., Viaggi, D., Assessing the role of economic actors in the production of private and public goods in three EU agricultural landscapes. J. Environ. Plan. Manage. 58:12 (2015), 2113–2136.
75. Volleta, D., Candau, J., Ginelli, L., Michelin, Y., Ménadier, L., Rapey, H., Dobremez, L., Landscape elements: can they help in selling ‘Protected Designation of Origin’ products?. Landsc. Res. 33:3 (2008), 365–385.
76. Welsh Government, Proposals for the Glastir Scheme, Part of the Rural Development Plan for Wales 2014-2020, Consultation Document. Available online at: http:/wales.gov.uk/docs/drah/consultation/140123proposalsforglastirv1en.pdf. 2014.
77. Zasada, I., Multifunctional peri-urban agriculture - a review of societal demands and the provision of goods and services by farming. Land Use Policy 28 (2011), 639–648.
78. Zasada, I., Häfner, K., Schaller, L., van Zanten, B.T., Lefebvre, M., Malak-Rawlikowska, A., Nikolov, D., Rodríguez-Entrena, M., Manrique, R., Ungaro, F., Zavalloni, M., Delattre, L., Piorr, A., Kantelhardt, J., Verburg, P.H., Viaggi, D., A conceptual model to integrate the regional context in landscape policy, management and contribution to rural development: Literature review and European case study evidence. Geoforum 82 (2017), 1–12.