COCACOLA: Binning metagenomic contigs using sequence COmposition, read CoverAge, CO-alignment and paired-end read LinkAge

Bioinformatics

Volumn 33, Issue 6, 2017, Pages 791-798

  Lu, Yang Young ^a   Chen, Ting ^a,b   Fuhrman, Jed A ^a   Sun, Fengzhu ^a,c   Sahinalp, Cenk ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b TSINGHUA NATIONAL LABORATORY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^c FUDAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; BACTERIAL GENOME; BACTERIUM; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETICS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; HUMAN; METAGENOMICS; MICROFLORA; PROCEDURES; SOFTWARE;

ALGORITHMS; BACTERIA; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; GENOME, BACTERIAL; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; HUMANS; METAGENOMICS; MICROBIOTA; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SOFTWARE;

EID: 85018348728     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw290     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Albertsen, M. et al. (2013) Genome sequences of rare, uncultured bacteria obtained by differential coverage binning of multiple metagenomes. Nat. Biotechnol., 31, 533-538.
2. Alneberg, J. et al. (2014) Binning metagenomic contigs by coverage and composition. Nat. Methods, 11, 1144-1146.
3. Baran, Y. and Halperin, E. (2012) Joint analysis of multiple metagenomic samples. PLoS Comput. Biol., 8, e1002373.
4. Basu, S. et al. (2008). Constrained Clustering: Advances in Algorithms, Theory, and Applications. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Series. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.
5. Brady, A. and Salzberg, S.L. (2009) Phymm and PhymmBL: metagenomic phylogenetic classification with interpolated Markov models. Nat. Methods, 6, 673-676.
6. Cai, D. et al. (2010). Unsupervised feature selection for multi-cluster data. In: Proceedings of the 16th A CM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 333-342.
7. Cai, D. et al. (2011) Graph regularized nonnegative matrix factorization for data representation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 33, 1548-1560.
8. Carr, R. et al. (2013) Reconstructing the genomic content of microbiome taxa through shotgun metagenomic deconvolution. PLoS Comput. Biol., 9, e1003292.
9. Chatterji, S. et al. (2008) Compostbin: a DNA composition-based algorithm for binning environmental shotgun reads. Res. Comput. Mol. Biol., 17-28.
10. Chung, F.R. (1997). Spectral Graph Theory, Vol. 92. American Mathematical Society.
11. Consortium, H.M.P. et al. (2012) Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature, 486, 207-214.
12. Corduneanu, A. and Bishop, CM. (2001) Variational Bayesian model selection for mixture distributions. In: Artificial intelligence and Statistics 2001, Key West, Florida, USA, pp. 27-34.
13. Davies, D.L. and Bouldin, D.W. (1979) A cluster separation measure. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 1, 224-227.
14. Huson, D.H. et al. (2007) MEGAN analysis of metagenomic data. Genome Res., 17, 377-386.
15. Ijaz, U. and Quince, C. (2013). TAXAassign v0.4. https://github.com/umerijaz/taxaassign.
16. Imelfort, M. et al. (2014) GroopM: an automated tool for the recovery of population genomes from related metagenomes. PeerJ, 2, e603.
17. Jiang, P. et al. (2014) A clustering approach to constrained binary matrix factorization. In: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery for Big Data, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 281-303.
18. Kang, D.D. et al. (2015) Meta BAT, an efficient tool for accurately reconstructing single genomes from complex microbial communities. PeerJ, 3, e1165.
19. Kelley, D.R. and Salzberg, S.L. (2010) Clustering metagenomic sequences with interpolated Markov models. BMC Bioinformatics, 11, 544.
20. Kim, J. and Park, H. (2008) Sparse nonnegative matrix factorization for clustering. Technical Report GT-CSE-08-01, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
21. Langville, A.N. et al. (2006) Initializations for the nonnegative matrix factorization. In Proceedings of the twelfth ACM International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (SIGKDD), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, pp. 23-26.
22. Lee, D.D. and Seung, H.S. (1999) Learning the parts of objects by nonnegative matrix factorization. Nature, 401, 788-791.
23. Liao, R. et al. (2014) A new unsupervised binning approach for metagenomic sequences based on n-grams and automatic feature weighting. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform., 11, 42-54.
24. Liu, Y. et al. (2013) Understanding and enhancement of internal clustering validation measures. IEEE Trans. Cybern., 43, 982-994.
25. Mande, S.S. et al. (2012) Classification of metagenomic sequences: methods and challenges. Brief. Bioinform., 13, 669-681.
26. McHardy, A.C. et al. (2007) Accurate phylogenetic classification of variable-length DNA fragments. Nat. Methods, 4, 63-72.
27. Mohammed, M.H. et al. (2011) SPHINXan algorithm for taxonomic binning of metagenomic sequences. Bioinformatics, 27, 22-30.
28. Nielsen, H.B. et al. (2014) Identification and assembly of genomes and genetic elements in complex metagenomic samples without using reference genomes. Nat. Biotechnol., 32, 822-828.
29. Purdom, E. (2011) Analysis of a data matrix and a graph: metagenomic data and the phylogenetic tree. Ann. Appl. Stat., 2326-2358.
30. Qin, J. et al. (2010) A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature, 464, 59-65.
31. Riesenfeld, C.S. et al. (2004) Metagenomics: genomic analysis of microbial communities. Annu. Rev. Genet., 38, 525-552.
32. Rosen, G.L. et al. (2011) NBC: the naive bayes classification tool webserver for taxonomic classification of metagenomic reads. Bioinformatics, 27, 127-129.
33. Salvador, S. and Chan, P. (2004). Determining the number of clusters/segments in hierarchical clustering/segmentation algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 16th IEEEE International Conference on Tools with AI (ICTAI), Boca Raton, Florida, USA, pp. 576-584.
34. Sharon, I. et al. (2013) Time series community genomics analysis reveals rapid shifts in bacterial species, strains, and phage during infant gut colonization. Genome Res., 23, 111-120.
35. Su, C.H. et al. (2012) The impact of normalization and phylogenetic information on estimating the distance for metagenomes. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform., 9, 619-628.
36. Tang, Y. et al. (2005). Improved validation index for fuzzy clustering. In: American Control Conference, pp. 1120-1125.
37. Tsuda, K. et al. (2005) Fast protein classification with multiple networks. Bioinformatics, 21, ii59-ii65.
38. Wan, L. et al. (2010) Alignment-free sequence comparison (ii): theoretical power of comparison statistics. J. Comput. Biol., 17, 1467-1490.
39. Wiwie, C. et al. (2015) Comparing the performance of biomedical clustering methods. Nat. Methods, page (epub ahead of print).
40. Wood, D.E. and Salzberg, S.L. (2014) Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments. Genome Biol., 15, R46.
41. Wu, Y.W. and Ye, Y. (2011) A novel abundance-based algorithm for binning metagenomic sequences using l-tuples. J. Comput. Biol., 18, 523-534.
42. Wu, Y.W. et al. (2016) MaxBin 2.0: an automated binning algorithm to recover genomes from multiple metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics, 32, 605-607.
43. Yang, B. et al. (2010) Unsupervised binning of environmental genomic fragments based on an error robust selection of l-mers. BMC Bioinformatics, 11, S5.
44. Ye, Y. and Tang, H. (2009) An ORFome assembly approach to metagenomics sequences analysis. J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol., 7, 455-471.
45. Zhao, Z. and Liu, H. (2007) Semi-supervised feature selection via spectral analysis. In: Proceedings of SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, pp. 641-646.