In vitro phototoxicity testing: A procedure involving multiple endpoints

Hit and Lead Profiling: Identification and Optimization of Drug-like Molecules

Volumn 43, Issue , 2010, Pages 471-494

  Marrot, Laurent ^a   Meunier, Jean Roch ^a  

^a Oréal R and D Life Sciences Division   (France)

Author keywords

In vitro strategy, photosensitization; Photoinduced ROS; Photoreactivity in tubo; Phototoxicity screening

Indexed keywords

IN-VITRO; PHOTO-INDUCED; PHOTO-TOXICITY;

EID: 85018193687     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9783527627448.ch19     Document Type: Chapter

References (77)

1. Ferguson, J. (2002) Photosensitivity due to drugs photodermatol. Photoimmunology & Photomedicine, 18, 262-269.
2. Moore, D.E. (2002) Drug-induced cutaneous photosensitivity: incidence, mechanism, prevention and management. Drug Safety, 25, 345-372.
3. Kochevar, I.E. (1995) Photoimmunology: primary processes, in Photobiology and Photosensitization, Blackwell Sciences, Oxford, pp. 19-33.
4. Moore, D.E. (1998) Mechanisms of photosensitization by phototoxic drugs. Mutation Research, 422, 165-173.
5. Spielmann, H., Balls, M., Dupuis, J., Pape, W.J., Pechovitch, G., De Silva, O., Holzhutter, H.G., Clothier, R. et al. (1998) The international EU/COLIPA in vitro phototoxicity validation study: results of phase II (blind trial). Part 1: the 3T3. NRU phototoxicity test. Toxicology In Vitro: An International Journal Published in Association with BIBRA, 12, 305-327.
6. Commission directive 67/548/EEC: 3T3. NRU phototoxicity test Regulation: included into AnnexVof Council Directive 67/548/EEC part B.41. on phototoxicity in April 2000; and OECD Test Guideline 432, adopted April 2004.
7. OECD (2004) In Vitro 3T3. NRU Phototoxicity. Guideline TG 432. Revised and approved by the National Coordinators in May 2002, approved by Council April 2004. Organization for Economic Coop±eration and Development, Paris.
8. Christiaens, F.J., Chardon, A., Fourtanier, A. and Frederick, J.E. (2005) Standard ultraviolet daylight for non extreme exposure conditions. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 81, 874-878.
9. Commission directive 2000/33/EC of 25. april 2000. adapting to technical progress for the 27th time Council Directive 67/548. E on the classification, packaging and labeling of dangerous substance, 2000. Annex V method B41. phototoxicity -in vitro 3T3. NRU phototoxicity test. Official Journal of the European Communities L136, 90.
10. Pelletier, D. and Greene, N. (2007) Evaluation of phototoxicity alerts in DEREK and use of a fingerprint-based decision tree approach to identify potential novel alerts. The Toxicologist, 96, 223.
11. Barratt, M.D. (2004) Structure-activity relationships and prediction of the phototoxicity and phototoxic potential of new drugs. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, 32, 511-524.
12. Newsted, J. and Giesy, J. (1987) Predictive models for photoinduced acute toxicity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons to Daphnia Magna, strauss (Cladocera, crustacea). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry/SETAC, 6, 445-461.
13. Mekenyan, O.G., Ankley, G.T., Veith, G.D. and Call, D.J. (1994) QSARs for photoinduced toxicity: 1. Acute lethality of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons to Daphnia Magna. Chemosphere, 28, 567-582.
14. Lampi, M.A., Gurska, J., Huang, X.D., Dixon, D.G. and Greenberg, B.M. (2007) A predictive quantitative structure-activity relationship model for the photoinduced toxicity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons to Daphnia magna with the use of factors for photosensitization and photomodification. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry/SETAC, 26, 406-415.
15. Veith, G.D., Mekenyan, O.G., Ankley, G.T. and Call, D.J. (1995) A QSAR analysis of substituent effects on the photoinduced acute toxicity of PAHs. Chemosphere, 30, 2129-2142.
16. Alves De Lima Ribeiros, F. and Castro Ferreira, M. (2005) QSAR model of the phototoxicity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Journal of Molecular Structure, 719, 191-200.
17. Kraljic, I. and El Mohsni, S. (1978) A new method for the detection of singlet oxygen in aqueous solutions. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 28, 577-581.
18. Pathak, M.A. and Joshi, P.C. (1984) Production of active oxygen species (1O2. and O2-.) by psoralens and ultraviolet radiation (320-400. nm). Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 798, 115-126.
19. Onoue, S. and Tsuda, Y. (2006) Analytical studies on the prediction of photosensitive/phototoxic potential of pharmaceutical substances. Pharmaceutical Research, 23, 156-164.
20. Martinez, L. and Chignell, C.F. (1998) Photocleavage of DNA by the fluoroquinolone antibacterials. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology. B, Biology, 45, 51-59.
21. Marrot, L. and Agapakis-Causse, C. (2000) Differences in the photogenotoxic potential of two fluoroquinolones as shown in diploid yeast strain (Saccharomyces cerevisae) and supercoiled plasmid DNA. Mutation Research, 468, 1-9.
22. Viola, G., Facciolo, L., Dallacqua, S., Di Lisa, F., Canton, M., Vedaldi, D., Fravolini, A., Tabarrini, O. et al. (2004) 6-Aminoquinolones: photostability, cellular distribution and phototoxicity. Toxicology In Vitro: An International Journal Published in Association with BIBRA, 18, 581-592.
23. Dunford, R., Salinaro, A., Cai, L., Serpone, N., Horikoshi, S., Hidaka, H. and Knowland, J. (1997) Chemical oxidation and DNA damage catalysed by inorganic sunscreen ingredients. FEBS Letters, 418, 87-90.
24. Ashikaga, T., Wada, M., Kobayashi, H., Mori, M., Katsumura, Y., Fukui, H., Kato, S., Yamaguchi, M. et al. (2000) Effect of the photocatalytic activity of TiO2. on plasmid DNA. Mutation Research, 466, 1-7.
25. Pape, W.J., Maurer, T., Pfannenbecker, U. and Steiling, W. (2001) The red blood cell phototoxicity test (photohaemolysis and haemoglobin oxidation): EU/COLIPA validation programme on phototoxicity (phase II). Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, 29, 145-162.
26. Dean, S.W., Lane, M., Dunmore, R.H., Ruddock, S.P.,Martin, C.N., Kirkland, D.J. and Loprieno, N. (1991) Development of assays for the detection of photomutagenicity of chemicals during exposure to UVlight-I. Assay development,Mutagenesis, 6, 335-341.
27. Henderson, L., Fedyk, J., Bourner, C., Windebank, S., Fletcher, S. and Lovell, W. (1994) Photomutagenicity assays in bacteria: factors affecting assay design and assessment of photomutagenic potential of para-aminobenzoic acid. Mutagenesis, 9, 459-465.
28. Gocke, E. (2001) Photochemical mutagenesis: examples and toxicological relevance. Journal of Environmental Pathology, Toxicology and Oncology, 20, 285-292.
29. Verma, K., Agrawal, N., Misra, R.B., Farooq, M. and Hans, R.K. (2008) Phototoxicity assessment of drugs and cosmetic products using E. coli. Toxicology In Vitro: An International Journal Published in Association with BIBRA, 22, 249-253.
30. Chetelat, A., Albertini, S., Dresp, J.H., Strobel, R. and Gocke, E. (1993) Photomutagenesis test development: I. 8-Methoxypsoralen, chlorpromazine and sunscreen compounds in bacterial and yeast assays. Mutation Research, 292, 241-250.
31. Moysan, A., Miranda, M.A., Morliere, P., Peno-Mazzarino, L., Averbeck, D., Averbeck, S., Cl±ement-Lacroix, P. et al. (1994) Utilisation of In Vitro Techniques in the Evaluation of Phototoxicity of New Compounds, IOS Press, pp. 85-105.
32. Marrot, L., Belaidi, J.P., Chaubo, C., Meunier, J.R., Perez, P. and Agapakis-Causse, C. (1998) An in vitro strategy to evaluate the phototoxicity of solarUVat the molecular and cellular level: application to photoprotection assessment. European Journal of Dermatology, 8, 403-412.
33. Weinberg, E.H. and Springer, S.T. (1981) A quantitative in vitro assay for the evaluation of phototoxic potential of topically applied materials. Journal of Society of Cosmetic Chemists, 32, 303-315.
34. Tenenbaum, S., Di Nardo, J., Morris, W.E., Wolf, B.A. and Schnetzinger, R.W. (1984)A quantitative in vitro assay for the evaluation of phototoxic potential of topically applied materials. Cell Biology and Toxicology, 1, 1-9.
35. Sugiyama, M., Itagaki, H. and Kato, S. (1994) Photohemolysis test and yeast growth inhibition assay to assess phototoxic potential of chemicals, in Alternative Methods in Toxicology (eds A. Rougier, A.M. Goldberg and H.I. Maibach), Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., NY, 10, pp. 213-221.
36. Averbeck, D., Averbeck, S., Dubertret, L., Young, A.R. and Morliere, P. (1990) Genotoxicity of bergapten and bergamot oil in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology. B, Biology, 7, 209-229.
37. Zimmermann, F.K., Kern, R. and Rasenberger, H.A. (1975) Yeast strain for simultaneous detection of induced mitotic crossing over, mitotic gene conversion and reverse mutation. Mutation Research, 28, 381-388.
38. Marrot, L., Belaidi, J.P., Chaubo, C., Meunier, J.R., Perez, P. and Agapakis-Causse, C. (2001) Fluoroquinolones as chemical tools to define a strategy for photogenotoxicity in vitro assessment. Toxicology In Vitro: An International Journal Published in Association with BIBRA, 15, 131-142.
39. Marrot, L., Labarussiat, A., Perez, P. and Meunier, J.R. (2006) Use of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a prescreening approach for assessment of chemical-induced phototoxicity. Toxicology In Vitro: An International Journal Published in Association with BIBRA, 20, 1040-1050.
40. Spielmann, H., Lowell, W.W., Holzle, E. et al. (1994) In vitro phototoxicity testing. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 2. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, 22, 314-348.
41. Spielmann, H., Muller, L., Averbeck, D., Balls, M., Brendler-Schwaab, S., Castell, J.V., Curren, R., De Silva, O. et al. (2000) The second ECVAM workshop on phototoxicity testing. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, 28, 777-814.
42. Jones, P.A. and King, A.V. (2003) High throughput screening (HTS) for phototoxicity hazard using the in vitro 3T3. neutral red uptake assay. Toxicology In Vitro: An International Journal Published in Association with BIBRA, 17, 703-708.
43. Marrot, L., Belaidi, J.P., Jones, C., Perez, P., Riou, L., Sarasin, A. and Meunier, J.R. (2003) Molecular responses to photogenotoxic stress induced by the antibiotic lomefloxacin in human skin cells: from DNA damage to apoptosis. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 121, 596-606.
44. Reid, L., Clothier, R.H. and Khammo, N. (2001) Hydrogen peroxide induced stress in human keratinocytes and its effect on bithionol toxicity. Toxicology In Vitro: An International Journal Published in Association with BIBRA, 15, 441-445.
45. Clothier, R., Willshaw, A., Cox, H., Garle, M., Bowler, H. and Combes, R. (1999) The use of human keratinocytes in the EU/ COLIPA international in vitro phototoxicity test validation study and the ECVAM/ COLIPA study on UV filter chemicals. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, 27, 247-259.
46. IARC (1992) Solar and ultraviolet radiation. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks toHumans, 55, 1-316.
47. Klecak, G., Urbach, F. and Urwyler, H. (1997) Fluoroquinolone antibacterials enhance UVA-induced skin tumors. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B, Biology, 37, 174-181.
48. Traynor, N.J. and Gibbs, N.K. (1999) The phototumorigenic fluoroquinolone lomefloxacin photosensitizes pyrimidine dimer formation in human keratinocytes in vitro. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 70, 957-959.
49. Monk, B.E. (1990) Amiodarone-induced photosensitivity and basal-cell carcinoma. Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, 15, 319-320.
50. Monk, B.E. (1995) Basal cell carcinoma following amiodarone therapy. The British Journal of Dermatology, 133, 148-149.
51. EMEA (2002) note for guidance on photo safety testing.
52. Brendler-Schwaab, S., Czich, A., Epe, B., Gocke, E., Kaina, B., Muller, L., Pollet, D. and Utesch, D. (2004) Photochemical genotoxicity: principles and test methods. Report of a GUM task force. Mutation Research, 566, 65-91.
53. Tice, R.R., Agurell, E., Anderson, D., Burlinson, B., Hartmann, A., Kobayashi, H., Miyamae, Y., Rojas, E. et al. (2000) Single cell gel/comet assay: guidelines for in vitro and in vivo genetic toxicology testing. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis, 35, 206-221.
54. Marrot, L., Belaidi, J.P. and Meunier, J.R. (2005) Importance of UVA photoprotection as shown by genotoxic related endpoints: DNA damage and p53. status. Mutation Research, 571, 175-184.
55. Agapakis-Causse, C., Bosca, F., Castell, J.V., Hernandez, D., Marin, M.L., Marrot, L. and Miranda, M.A. (2000) Tiaprofenic acid-photosensitized damage to nucleic acids: a mechanistic study using complementary in vitro approaches. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 71, 499-505.
56. Kiskinis, E., Suter, W. and Hartmann, A. (2002)High throughput Comet assay using 96-well plates. Mutagenesis, 17, 37-43.
57. Struwe, M., Greulich, K.O., Suter, W. and Plappert-Helbig, U. (2007) The photo comet assay-a fast screening assay for the determination of photogenotoxicity in vitro. Mutation Research, 632, 44-57.
58. Kirsch-Volders, M., Sofuni, T., Aardema, M., Albertini, S., Eastmond, D., Fenech, M., Ishidate, M., Lorge, E. et al. (2000) Report from the in vitro micronucleus assay working group. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis, 35, 167-172.
59. Von derHude,W., Kalweit, S., Engelhardt, G., Mc Kiernan, S., Kasper, P., Slacik-Erben, R., Miltenburger, H.G., Honarvar, N. et al. (2000) In vitro micronucleus assay with Chinese hamster V79. cells -results of a collaborative study with in situ exposure to 26. chemical substances. Mutation Research, 468, 137-163.
60. Gocke, E., Muller, L., Guzzie, P.J., Brendler-Schwaab, S., Bulera, S., Chignell, C.F., Henderson, L.M. et al. (2000) Considerations on photochemical genotoxicity: report of the international workshop on genotoxicity test procedures working group. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis, 35, 173-184.
61. Kersten, B., Kasper, P., Brendler-Schwaab, S.Y. andMuller, L. (2002) Use of the photomicronucleus assay in Chinese hamster V79. cells to study photochemical genotoxicity. Mutation Research, 519, 49-66.
62. Natarajan, A.T., Verdegaal-Immerzeel, E.A.M., Ashwood-Smith, M.J. and Poulton, G.A. (1981) Chromosomal damage induced by furocoumarins and UVA in hamster and human cells including cells from patients with ataxia telangiectasia and xeroderma pigmentosum. Mutation Research, 84, 113-124.
63. Itoh, S., Nakayama, S. and Shimada, H. (2002) In vitro photochemical clastogenicity of quinolone antibacterial agents studied by a chromosomal aberration test with light irradiation. Mutation Research, 517, 113-121.
64. Cohen, C., Dossou, K.G., Rougier, A. and Roguet, R. (1994) Episkin: An in vitro model for the evaluation of phototoxicity and sunscreen photoprotective properties. Toxicology In Vitro: An International Journal Published in Association with BIBRA, 8, 669-671.
65. Edwards, S.M., Donelly, T.A., Sayre, R.M., Rheins, L.A., Spielmann, H. and Liebsch, M. (1994) Quantitative in vitro assessment of phototoxicity using a human skin model, Skin2. Photodermatology Photoimmunology & Photomedicine, 10, 111-117.
66. Liebsch, H.M. and Spielmann, H. (1995) Balb/c 3T3. cytotoxicity test. Methods in Molecular Biology, 43, 177-187.
67. Jones, P.A., King, A.V., Earl, L.K. and Lawrence, R.S. (2003) An assessment of the phototoxic hazard of a personal product ingredient using in vitro assays. Toxicology In Vitro: An International Journal Published in Association with BIBRA, 17, 471-480.
68. Bernard, F.X., Barrault, C., Deguercy, A., De Wever, B. and Rosdy, M. (2000) Development of a highly sensitive in vitro phototoxicity assay using the SkinEthic reconstructed human epidermis. Cell Biology and Toxicology, 16, 391-400.
69. Medina, J., Elsaesser, C., Picarles, V., Grenet, O., Kolopp, M., Chibout, S.D. and De Brugerolle de Fraissinette, A. (2001) Assessment of the phototoxic potential of compounds and finished topical products using a human reconstructed epidermis. In Vitro & Molecular Toxicology -A Journal of Basic and Applied Research, 14, 157-168.
70. Portes, P., Pygmalion, M.J., Popovic, E., Cottin, M. and Mariani, M. (2002) Use of human reconstituted epidermis Episkin for assessment of weak phototoxic potential of chemical compounds. Photodermatology Photoimmunology & Photomedicine, 18, 96-102.
71. Liebsch, M., Spielmann, H., Pape, W., Krul, C., Deguercy, A. and Eskes, C. (2005) UV-induced effects. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, 33. (Suppl 1), 131-146.
72. Schafer-Korting, M., Bock, U., Gamer, A., Haberland, A., Haltner-Ukomadu, E., Kaca, M., Kamp, H., Kietzmann, M. et al. (2006) Reconstructed human epidermis for skin absorption testing: results of the German prevalidation study. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, 34, 283-294.
73. Netzlaff, F., Lehr, C.M., Wertz, P.W. and Schaefer, U.F. (2005) The human epidermis models EpiSkin, SkinEthic and EpiDerm: an evaluation of morphology and their suitability for testing phototoxicity, irritancy, corrosivity and substance transport. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 60, 167-178.
74. Liebsch, M., Traue, D., Barrabas, C., Spielmann, H., Gerberick, F., Cruse, L., Diembeck, W., Pfannenbecker, U. et al. (1999) Prevalidation of the EpiDerm phototoxicity test, in Alternatives to Animal Testing II: Proceedings of the Second International Scientific Conference Organised by the European Cosmetic Industry (eds D. Clark, S. Lisansky and R. Macmillan), CPL Press, Newbury, UK.
75. Lelievre, D., Justine, P., Christiaens, F., Bonaventure, N., Coutet, J.,Marrot, L. and Cotovio, J. (2007) The EpiSkin phototoxicity assay (EPA): development of an in vitro tiered strategy using 17. reference chemicals to predict phototoxic potency. Toxicology In Vitro: An International Journal Published in Association with BIBRA, 21, 977-995.
76. Flamand, N., Marrot, L., Belaidi, J.P., Bourouf, L., Dourille, E., Feltes, M. and Meunier, J.R. (2006) Development of genotoxicity test procedures with Episkin, a reconstructed human skin model: towards new tools for in vitro risk assessment of dermally applied compounds? Mutation Research, 606, 39-51.
77. Lee, J.H., Kim, J.E., Kim, B.J. and Cho, K.H. (2007) In vitro phototoxicity test using artificial skin with melanocytes. Photodermatology Photoimmunology & Photomedicine, 23, 73-80.