ELECTRE TRI-based approach to the failure modes classification on the basis of risk parameters: An alternative to the risk priority number

Computers and Industrial Engineering

Volumn 108, Issue , 2017, Pages 100-110

  Certa, Antonella ^a   Enea, Mario ^a   Galante, Giacomo Maria ^a   La Fata, Concetta Manuela ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PALERMO   (Italy)

Author keywords

ELECTRE TRI; Failure modes classification; FMECA

Indexed keywords

CRITICALITY (NUCLEAR FISSION); DECISION MAKING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

CLASSIFICATION RESULTS; CRITICALITY ASSESSMENT; ELECTRE TRI; ENGINEERING TECHNIQUES; FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS; FMECA; MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING;

FAILURE MODES;

EID: 85017548748     PISSN: 03608352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2017.04.018     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Arvanitoyannis, I.S., Savelides, S.C., Application of failure mode and effect analysis and cause and effect analysis and Pareto diagram in conjunction with HACCP to a chocolate-producing industry: A case study of tentative GMO detection at pilot plant scale. International Journal of Food Science and Technology 42 (2007), 1265–1289.
2. Arvanitoyannis, I.S., Varzakas, T.H., Application of failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA), cause and effect analysis and Pareto diagram in conjunction with HACCP to a potato chips manufacturing plant. International Journal of Food Science and Technology 42 (2007), 1424–1442.
3. Bevilacqua, M., Braglia, M., Gabbrielli, R., Monte Carlo simulation approach for a modified FMECA in a power plant. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 16:14 (2000), 313–324.
4. Bowles, J.B., Peláez, C.E., Fuzzy logic prioritization of failures in a system failure mode, effects and criticality analysis. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 50:2 (1995), 203–213.
5. Braglia, M., MAFMA: Multi-attribute failure mode analysis. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management 17 (2000), 1017–1033.
6. Braglia, M., Bevilacqua, M., Fuzzy modelling and analytical hierarchy processing as a means of quantifying risk levels associated with failure modes in production systems. Technology, Law and Insurance 5 (2000), 125–134.
7. Braglia, M., Frosolini, M., Montanari, R., Fuzzy criticality assessment model for failure modes and effects analysis. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management 20:4 (2003), 503–524.
8. Braglia, M., Frosolini, M., Montanari, R., Fuzzy TOPSIS approach for failure mode, effects and criticality analysis. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 19 (2003), 425–443.
9. Brito, A.J., de Almeida, A.T., Mota, C.M.M., A multicriteria model for risk sorting of natural gas pipelines based on ELECTRE TRI integrating Utility Theory. European Journal of Operational Research 200 (2010), 812–821.
10. Carpitella, S., Certa, A., Galante, G., Izquierdo, J., La Fata, C.M., The FTOPSIS method to support FMECA analyses. Proceedings of the 22nd ISSAT international conference on reliability and quality in design, Los Angeles, California, USA, 2016, 398–402.
11. Cayrac, D., Dubois, D., Prade, H., Handling uncertainty with possibility theory and fuzzy sets in a satellite fault diagnosis application. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 4:3 (1996), 251–269.
12. Certa, A., Enea, M., Galante, G., La Fata, C.M., Multi-objective human resources allocation in RD projects planning. International Journal of Production Research 47:13 (2009), 3505–3523.
13. Certa, A., Enea, M., Galante, G.M., La Fata, C.M., A multistep methodology for the evaluation of human resources using the evidence theory. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 28:11 (2013), 1072–1088.
14. Certa, A., Enea, M., Lupo, T., ELECTRE III to dynamically support the decision maker about the periodic replacements configurations for a multi-component system. Decision Support Systems 55:1 (2013), 126–134.
15. Certa, A., Hopps, F., Inghilleri, R., La Fata, C.M., A Dempster-Shafer theory-based approach to the failure mode, effects and criticality analysis (FMECA) under epistemic uncertainty: Application to the propulsion system of a fishing vessel. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 159 (2017), 69–79.
16. Chang, W.L., Tay, K.M., Lim, C.P., Clustering and visualization of failure modes using an evolving tree. Expert Systems with Applications 42 (2015), 7235–7244.
17. Chen, P.-S., Wu, M.-T., A modified failure mode and effects analysis method for supplier selection problems in the supply chain risk environment: A case study. Computers & Industrial Engineering 66 (2013), 634–642.
18. Cicek, K., Celik, M., Application of failure modes and effects analysis to main engine crankcase explosion failure on-board ship. Safety Science 51 (2013), 6–10.
19. Curcurù, G., Galante, G.M., La Fata, C.M., A bottom-up procedure to calculate the top event probability in presence of epistemic uncertainty. 11th international probabilistic safety assessment and management conference and the annual European safety and reliability conference 2012, PSAM11 ESREL 2012, Helsinki, 2012.
20. Curcurù, G., Galante, G.M., La Fata, C.M., An imprecise fault tree analysis for the estimation of the Rate of OCcurrence Of Failure (ROCOF). Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 26 (2013), 1285–1292.
21. Damart, S., Dias, L.C., Mousseau, V., Supporting groups in sorting decisions: Methodology and use of a multi-criteria aggregation/disaggregation DSS. Decision Support Systems 43 (2007), 1464–1475.
22. de Moura, M.do C.S., Sobral, M.F.F., Evaluation skills with support of multicriteria modeling. International Business Management 10:1 (2016), 1–8.
23. de Oliveira Nepomuceno, L.D., Costa, H.G., Analyzing perceptions about the influence of a master course over the professional skills of its alumni: A multicriteria approach. Pesquisa Operacional 35:1 (2015), 187–211.
24. Dempster, A.P., Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 38:2 (1967), 325–339.
25. Figueira, J., Greco, S., Roy, B., Slowinski, R., Electre methods: Main features and recent developments. Handbook of multicriteria analysis Series applied optimization, 2010, Springer, New York.
26. Figueira, J., Mousseau, V., Roy, B., Electre Methods. Greco, Salvatore, (eds.) Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, 2005, Springer, New York, 133–153.
27. Figueira, J., Roy, B., Determining the weights of criteria in the ELECTRE type methods with a revised Simos’ procedure. European Journal of Operational Research 139 (2002), 317–326.
28. Francese, M., Galante, G. M., La Fata, C. M., & Passannanti, G. (2015). Handling epistemic uncertainty in the fault tree analysis using interval-valued expert information. Safety and Reliability: Methodology and Applications. In Proceedings of the European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL 2014 (pp. 1683–1690). Wroclaw.
29. IEC 60812 (2006). Analysis techniques for system reliability – Procedure for failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA). International Electrotechnical Commission, 3, rue de Varembé, PO Box 131, CH-1211 Geneva 20, Switzerland.
30. Jee, T.L., Tay, K.M., Lim, C.P., A new two-stage fuzzy inference system-based approach to prioritize failures in failure mode and effect analysis. IEEE Transaction on Reliability 64:3 (2015), 869–877.
31. Jerônimo, T.D.B., Medeiros, D., Measuring quality service: The use of a SERVPERF scale as an input for ELECTRE TRI multicriteria model. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management 31:6 (2014), 652–664.
32. Kadziński, M., Słowiński, R., Parametric evaluation of research units with respect to reference profiles. Decision Support Systems 72 (2015), 33–43.
33. Kerk, Y.W., Tay, K.M., Lim, C.P., An analytical interval fuzzy inference system for risk evaluation and prioritization in failure mode and effect analysis. IEEE Systems Journal(99), 2015, 1–12.
34. Kurt, L., Özilgen, S., Failure mode and effect analysis for dairy product manufacturing: Practical safety improvement action plan with cases from Turkey. Safety Science 55 (2013), 195–206.
35. Kutlu, A.C., Ekmekçioğlu, M., Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis by using fuzzy TOPSIS-based fuzzy AHP. Expert Systems with Applications 39 (2012), 61–67.
36. Liu, H.C., Liu, L., Bian, Q.H., Lin, Q.L., Dong, N., Xu, P.C., Failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy evidential reasoning approach and grey theory. Expert Systems with Applications 38 (2011), 4403–4415.
37. Liu, H.-C., Liu, L., Liu, N., Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: A literature review. Expert Systems with Applications 40 (2013), 828–838.
38. Liu, H.-C., You, J.-X., You, X.-Y., Evaluating the risk of healthcare failure modes using interval 2-tuple hybrid weighted distance measure. Computers & Industrial Engineering 78 (2014), 249–258.
39. Lourenςo, R.P., Costa, J.P., Using ELECTRE TRI outranking method to sort MOMILP non dominated solutions. European Journal of Operational Research 153 (2004), 271–289.
40. Lupo, T., Fuzzy ServPerf model combined with ELECTRE III to comparatively evaluate service quality of international airports in Sicily. Journal of Air Transport Management 42 (2015), 249–259.
41. Lupo, T., A fuzzy framework to evaluate service quality in the healthcare industry: An empirical case of public hospital service evaluation in Sicily. Applied Soft Computing 40 (2016), 468–478.
42. Merad, M.M., Verdel, T., Roy, B., Kouniali, S., Use of multi-criteria decision-aids for risk zoning and management of large area subjected to mining-induced hazards. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 19 (2004), 125–138.
43. Montgomery, T.A., Pugh, D.R., Leedham, S.T., Twitchett, S.R., FMEA automation for the complete design process. Proceedings annual reliability & maintainability symposium, 1996, 30–36.
44. Mousseau, V., Ngo-The, A., Using assignment examples to infer category limits for the ELECTRE TRI method. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 11:1 (2002), 29–43.
45. Mousseau, V., Eliciting information concerning the relative importance of criteria. Pardalos, P., Siskos, Y., Zopounidis, C., (eds.) Advances in multi-criteria analysis, nonconvex optimization and its applications, 1995, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 17–43.
46. Mousseau, V., Słowiński, R., Inferring an ELECTRE TRI model from assignment examples. Journal of Global Optimization 12:2 (1998), 157–174.
47. Mousseau, V., Slowinski, R., Zielniewicz, P., ELECTRE TRI 2.0 a methodological guide and user's manual. Document du LAMSADE n°111, 1999, Université Paris-Dauphine.
48. Mousseau, V., Slowinski, R., Zielniewicz, P., A user-oriented implementation of the ELECTRE-TRI method integrating preference elicitation support. Computers & Operations Research 27 (2000), 757–777.
49. Omdahl, T.P., Reliability, availability and maintainability dictionary. 1988, ASQC Quality Press, Milwaukee.
50. Pang, L.M., Tay, K.M., Lim, C.P., Monotone fuzzy rule relabeling for the zero-order TSK Fuzzy Inference System. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 24:6 (2016), 1455–1463.
51. Puente, J., Pino, R., Priore, P., Fuente, D., A decision support system for applying failure mode and effects analysis. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management 19:2 (2001), 137–150.
52. Roy, B., Classement et choix en presence de points de vue multiples (la method ELECTRE). Revue Informatique et Recherche Operationnelle 8 (1968), 57–75.
53. Roy, B., The outranking approach and the foundations of electre methods Theory and decision, Vol. 31(1), 1991, Springer, New York, 49–73.
54. Roy, B., Multicriteria for decision aiding. 1996, Kluwer Academic Publishers, London.
55. Roy, B., Présentation et interprétation de la méthode ELECTRE TRI pour affecter des zones dans des catégories de risque. Document du LAMSADE 124, 2002, Université Paris-Dauphine, Paris, France.
56. Roy, B., & Bouyssou, D. (1993). Aide multicritère à la decision: Méthodes et Cas. Economica, Paris.
57. Saaty, T.L., The analytic hierarchy process. 1994, McGraw Hill Company, New York.
58. Saaty, T.L., Ozdemir, M.S., The encyclicon: A dictionary of decisions with dependence and feedback based on analytic network process. 2005, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh (USA).
59. Sànchez-Lozano, J.M., Antunes, C.H., García-Cascales, M.S., Dias, L.C., GIS-basedphotovoltaic solar farms site selection using ELECTRE-TRI: Evaluating the case for Torre-Pacheco, murcia, southeast of Spain. Renewable Energy 66 (2014), 478–494.
60. Sànchez-Lozano, J.M., García-Cascales, M.S., Lamata, M.T., Identification and selection of potential sites for onshore wind farms development in Region of Murcia, Spain. Energy 73 (2014), 311–324.
61. Sankar, N.R., Prabhu, B.S., Modified approach for prioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management 18:3 (2001), 324–335.
62. Scipioni, A., Saccarola, G., Centazzo, A., Arena, F., FMEA methodology design, implementation and integration with HACCP system in a food company. Food Control 13 (2002), 495–501.
63. Seyed-Hosseini, S.M., Safaei, N., Asgharpour, M.J., Reprioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis by decision making trial and evaluation laboratory technique. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 91 (2006), 872–881.
64. Shafer, G., A mathematical theory of evidence. 1976, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
65. Signor, M.C., The failure-analysis matrix: A Kinder, gentler alternative to FMEA for information systems. Proceeding of reliability and maintainability symposium, 2002, 173–177.
66. Silva, S., Alçada-Almeida, L., Dias, L.C., Biogas plants site selection integrating Multicriteria Decision Aid methods and GIS techniques: A case study in a Portuguese region. Biomass and Bioenergy 71 (2014), 58–68.
67. Takougang, M., Aimé, S., Pirlo, M., Yonkeu, S., Some, B., Assessing the response to land degradation risk: The case of the Loulouka Catchment Basin in Burkina Faso. Evaluation and decision models with multiple criteria: Case studies, 2015, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 341–399.
68. Tay, K.M., Jong, C.H., Lim, C.P., A clustering-based failure mode and effect analysis model and its application to the edible bird nest industry. Neural Computing and Applications 26:3 (2015), 551–560.
69. Tay, K.M., Lim, C.P., Enhancing the failure mode and effect analysis methodology with fuzzy inference techniques. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 21 (2010), 135–146.
70. Tversky, A., Intransitivity of preferences. Psychological Review 76:1 (1969), 31–48.
71. Wang, Y.M., Chin, K.S., Poon, G.K.K., Yang, J.B., Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy weighted geometric mean. Expert Systems with Applications 36 (2009), 1195–1207.
72. Xu, K., Tang, L.C., Xie, M., Ho, S.L., Zhu, M.L., Fuzzy assessment of FMEA for engine systems. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 75:1 (2002), 17–29.
73. Yang, Z.L., Bonsall, S., Wang, J., Fuzzy rule-based bayesian reasoning approach for prioritization of failures in FMEA. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 57:3 (2008), 517–528.
74. Yu, W., Aide multicritere a la decision dans le cadre de la problematique dutri: Methodes et applications. Ph.D. Thesis, 1992, LAMSADE, Universite Paris Dauphine.
75. Zammori, F., Gabbrielli, R., ANP/RPN: A multi criteria evaluation of the risk priority number. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 28 (2011), 85–104.
76. Zhang, Z., Chu, X., Risk prioritization in failure mode and effects analysis under uncertainty. Expert Systems with Applications 38 (2011), 206–214.