Assessing the true incidence of mosaicism in preimplantation embryos

Fertility and Sterility

Volumn 107, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 1107-1112

  Vera Rodriguez, Maria ^a   Rubio, Carmen ^a  

^a Igenomix and Igenomix Foundation   (Spain)

Author keywords

aneuploidy; blastocyst; embryo; Mosaicism; preimplantation genetic diagnosis

Indexed keywords

ANEUPLOIDY; BLASTOCYST; CELL COUNT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EMBRYO; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; IN VITRO FERTILIZATION; INCIDENCE; LIVE BIRTH; MEDICAL ETHICS; MOSAICISM; NIDATION; PARTHENOGENESIS; PREIMPLANTATION EMBRYO; PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SPONTANEOUS ABORTION; CHROMOSOME DISORDERS; EMBRYO TRANSFER; EMBRYOLOGY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; GENETIC COUNSELING; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION; GENETIC SCREENING; GENETICS; MORTALITY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; RISK FACTOR; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

CHROMOSOME DISORDERS; EMBRYO IMPLANTATION; EMBRYO TRANSFER; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; GENETIC COUNSELING; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; GENETIC TESTING; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MOSAICISM; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREIMPLANTATION DIAGNOSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK FACTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 85017525231     PISSN: 00150282     EISSN: 15565653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.03.019     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. 1 Yang, Z., Liu, J., Collins, G.S., Salem, S.A., Liu, X., Lyle, S.S., et al. Selection of single blastocysts for fresh transfer via standard morphology assessment alone and with array CGH for good prognosis IVF patients: results from a randomized pilot study. Mol Cytogenet, 5, 2012, 24.
2. 2 Scott, R.T. Jr., Upham, K.M., Forman, E.J., Hong, K.H., Scott, K.L., Taylor, D., et al. Blastocyst biopsy with comprehensive chromosome screening and fresh embryo transfer significantly increases in vitro fertilization implantation and delivery rates: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril 100 (2013), 697–703.
3. 3 Forman, E.J., Li, X., Ferry, K.M., Scott, K., Treff, N.R., Scott, R.T. Jr., Oocyte vitrification does not increase the risk of embryonic aneuploidy or diminish the implantation potential of blastocysts created after intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a novel, paired randomized controlled trial using DNA fingerprinting. Fertil Steril 98 (2012), 644–649.
4. 4 Liu, J., Wang, W., Sun, X., Liu, L., Jin, H., Li, M., et al. DNA microarray reveals that high proportions of human blastocysts from women of advanced maternal age are aneuploid and mosaic. Biol Reprod, 87, 2012, 148.
5. 5 Papadopoulos, G., Templeton, A.A., Fisk, N., Randall, J., The frequency of chromosome anomalies in human preimplantation embryos after in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 4 (1989), 91–98.
6. 6 Baart, E.B., Martini, E., van den Berg, I., Macklon, N.S., Galjaard, R.J., Fauser, B.C., et al. Preimplantation genetic screening reveals a high incidence of aneuploidy and mosaicism in embryos from young women undergoing IVF. Hum Reprod 21 (2006), 223–233.
7. 7 Li, M., DeUgarte, C.M., Surrey, M., Danzer, H., DeCherney, A., Hill, D.L., Fluorescence in situ hybridization reanalysis of day-6 human blastocysts diagnosed with aneuploidy on day 3. Fertil Steril 84 (2005), 1395–1400.
8. 8 Barbash-Hazan, S., Frumkin, T., Malcov, M., Yaron, Y., Cohen, T., Azem, F., et al. Preimplantation aneuploid embryos undergo self-correction in correlation with their developmental potential. Fertil Steril 92 (2009), 890–896.
9. 9 DeUgarte, C.M., Li, M., Surrey, M., Danzer, H., Hill, D., DeCherney, A.H., Accuracy of FISH analysis in predicting chromosomal status in patients undergoing preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Fertil Steril 90 (2008), 1049–1054.
10. 10 Johnson, D.S., Gemelos, G., Baner, J., Ryan, A., Cinnioglu, C., Banjevic, M., et al. Preclinical validation of a microarray method for full molecular karyotyping of blastomeres in a 24-h protocol. Hum Reprod 25 (2010), 1066–1075.
11. 11 Vanneste, E., Voet, T., Le Caignec, C., Ampe, M., Konings, P., Melotte, C., et al. Chromosome instability is common in human cleavage-stage embryos. Nat Med 15 (2009), 577–583.
12. 12 Harton, G.L., Magli, M.C., Lundin, K., Montag, M., Lemmen, J., Harper, J.C., et al. ESHRE PGD Consortium/Embryology Special Interest Group—best practice guidelines for polar body and embryo biopsy for preimplantation genetic diagnosis/screening (PGD/PGS). Hum Reprod 26 (2011), 41–46.
13. 13 Rubio, C., Gimenez, C., Fernandez, E., Vendrell, X., Velilla, E., Parriego, M., et al. The importance of good practice in preimplantation genetic screening: critical viewpoints. Hum Reprod 24 (2009), 2045–2047.
14. 14 Simpson, J.L., What next for preimplantation genetic screening? Randomized clinical trial in assessing PGS: necessary but not sufficient. Hum Reprod 23 (2008), 2179–2181.
15. 15 Gutierrez-Mateo, C., Colls, P., Sanchez-Garcia, J., Escudero, T., Prates, R., Ketterson, K., et al. Validation of microarray comparative genomic hybridization for comprehensive chromosome analysis of embryos. Fertil Steril 95 (2011), 953–958.
16. 16 Mir, P., Rodrigo, L., Mercader, A., Buendia, P., Mateu, E., Milan-Sanchez, M., et al. False positive rate of an arrayCGH platform for single-cell preimplantation genetic screening and subsequent clinical application on day-3. J Assist Reprod Genet 30 (2013), 143–149.
17. 17 Mir, P., Mateu, E., Mercader, A., Herrer, R., Rodrigo, L., Vera, M., et al. Confirmation rates of array-CGH in day-3 embryo and blastocyst biopsies for preimplantation genetic screening. J Assist Reprod Genet 33 (2016), 59–66.
18. 18 Northrop, L.E., Treff, N.R., Levy, B., Scott, R.T. Jr., SNP microarray-based 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening demonstrates that cleavage-stage FISH poorly predicts aneuploidy in embryos that develop to morphologically normal blastocysts. Mol Hum Reprod 16 (2010), 590–600.
19. 19 Treff, N.R., Levy, B., Su, J., Northrop, L.E., Tao, X., Scott, R.T. Jr., SNP microarray-based 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening is significantly more consistent than FISH. Mol Hum Reprod 16 (2010), 583–589.
20. 20 Maxwell, S.M., Colls, P., Hodes-Wertz, B., McCulloh, D.H., McCaffrey, C., Wells, D., et al. Why do euploid embryos miscarry? A case-control study comparing the rate of aneuploidy within presumed euploid embryos that resulted in miscarriage or live birth using next-generation sequencing. Fertil Steril 106 (2016), 1414–1419.e5.
21. 21 Goodrich, D., Tao, X., Bohrer, C., Lonczak, A., Xing, T., Zimmerman, R., et al. A randomized and blinded comparison of qPCR and NGS-based detection of aneuploidy in a cell line mixture model of blastocyst biopsy mosaicism. J Assist Reprod Genet 33 (2016), 1473–1480.
22. 22 Capalbo, A., Wright, G., Elliott, T., Ubaldi, F.M., Rienzi, L., Nagy, Z.P., FISH reanalysis of inner cell mass and trophectoderm samples of previously array-CGH screened blastocysts shows high accuracy of diagnosis and no major diagnostic impact of mosaicism at the blastocyst stage. Hum Reprod 28 (2013), 2298–2307.
23. 23 Mamas, T., Gordon, A., Brown, A., Harper, J., Sengupta, S., Detection of aneuploidy by array comparative genomic hybridization using cell lines to mimic a mosaic trophectoderm biopsy. Fertil Steril 97 (2012), 943–947.
24. 24 Ruttanajit, T., Chanchamroen, S., Cram, D.S., Sawakwongpra, K., Suksalak, W., Leng, X., et al. Detection and quantitation of chromosomal mosaicism in human blastocysts using copy number variation sequencing. Prenat Diagn 36 (2016), 154–162.
25. 25 Johnson, D.S., Cinnioglu, C., Ross, R., Filby, A., Gemelos, G., Hill, M., et al. Comprehensive analysis of karyotypic mosaicism between trophectoderm and inner cell mass. Mol Hum Reprod 16 (2010), 944–949.
26. 26 Garrisi, G., Walmsley, R.H., Bauckman, K., Mendola, R.J., Colls, P., Munne, S., Discordance among serial biopsies of mosaic embryos. Fertil Steril, 106, 2016, e151.
27. 27 Vera-Rodriguez, M., Michel, C.E., Mercader, A., Bladon, A.J., Rodrigo, L., Kokocinski, F., et al. Distribution patterns of segmental aneuploidies in human blastocysts identified by next-generation sequencing. Fertil Steril 105 (2016), 1047–1055.e2.
28. 28 Greco, E., Minasi, M.G., Fiorentino, F., Healthy babies after intrauterine transfer of mosaic aneuploid blastocysts. N Engl J Med 373 (2015), 2089–2090.
29. 29 Fragouli, E., Alfarawati, S., Spath, K., Tarozzi, N., Borini, A., Wells, D., The developmental potential of mosaic embryos. Fertil Steril, 104, 2015, e96.
30. 30 Werner, M.D., Leondires, M.P., Schoolcraft, W.B., Miller, B.T., Copperman, A.B., Robins, E.D., et al. Clinically recognizable error rate after the transfer of comprehensive chromosomal screened euploid embryos is low. Fertil Steril 102 (2014), 1613–1618.
31. 31 Martinez, M.C., Mendez, C., Ferro, J., Nicolas, M., Serra, V., Landeras, J., Cytogenetic analysis of early nonviable pregnancies after assisted reproduction treatment. Fertil Steril 93 (2010), 289–292.
32. 32 Kroon, B., Harrison, K., Martin, N., Wong, B., Yazdani, A., Miscarriage karyotype and its relationship with maternal body mass index, age, and mode of conception. Fertil Steril 95 (2011), 1827–1829.
33. 33 Li, G., Liu, Y., He, N.N., Hu, L.L., Zhang, Y.L., Wang, Y., et al. Molecular karyotype single nucleotide polymorphism analysis of early fetal demise. Syst Biol Reprod Med 59 (2013), 227–231.
34. 34 Hassold, T., Mosaic trisomies in human spontaneous abortions. Hum Genet 61 (1982), 31–35.
35. 35 Ferro, J., Martinez, M.C., Lara, C., Pellicer, A., Remohi, J., Serra, V., Improved accuracy of hysteroembryoscopic biopsies for karyotyping early missed abortions. Fertil Steril 80 (2003), 1260–1264.
36. 36 Campos-Galindo, I., Garcia-Herrero, S., Martinez-Conejero, J.A., Ferro, J., Simon, C., Rubio, C., Molecular analysis of products of conception obtained by hysteroembryoscopy from infertile couples. J Assist Reprod Genet 32 (2015), 839–848.
37. 37 García-Herrero S. Molecular analysis of fetoplacental discrepancies in products of conception (POCs) obtained by hysteroembryoscopy. Molecular Diagnostics Europe, Lisbon, Portugal, 2016.
38. 38 Segawa, T., Kuroda, T., Kato, K., Kuroda, M., Omi, K., Miyauchi, O., et al. Cytogenetic analysis of the retained products of conception after missed abortion following blastocyst transfer: a retrospective, large-scale, single-centre study. Reprod Biomed Online 34 (2017), 203–210.
39. 39 Ledbetter, D.H., Zachary, J.M., Simpson, J.L., Golbus, M.S., Pergament, E., Jackson, L., et al. Cytogenetic results from the U.S. Collaborative Study on CVS. Prenat Diagn 12 (1992), 317–345.
40. 40 Kalousek, D.K., Pathogenesis of chromosomal mosaicism and its effect on early human development. Am J Med Genet 91 (2000), 39–45.
41. 41 Minor, A., Harmer, K., Peters, N., Yuen, B.H., Ma, S., Investigation of confined placental mosaicism (CPM) at multiple sites in post-delivery placentas derived through intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Am J Med Genet A 140 (2006), 24–30.
42. 42 Langlois, S., Yong, P.J., Yong, S.L., Barrett, I., Kalousek, D.K., Miny, P., et al. Postnatal follow-up of prenatally diagnosed trisomy 16 mosaicism. Prenat Diagn 26 (2006), 548–558.
43. 43 Yong, P.J., Barrett, I.J., Kalousek, D.K., Robinson, W.P., Clinical aspects, prenatal diagnosis, and pathogenesis of trisomy 16 mosaicism. J Med Genet 40 (2003), 175–182.
44. 44 Robinson, W.P., McGillivray, B., Lewis, M.E., Arbour, L., Barrett, I., Kalousek, D.K., Prenatally detected trisomy 20 mosaicism. Prenat Diagn 25 (2005), 239–244.
45. 45 Iourov, I.Y., Vorsanova, S.G., Yurov, Y.B., Chromosomal mosaicism goes global. Mol Cytogenet, 1, 2008, 26.
46. 46 Warburton, D., Anyane-Yeboa, K., Taterka, P., Yu, C.Y., Olsen, D., Mosaic variegated aneuploidy with microcephaly: a new human mitotic mutant?. Ann Genet 34 (1991), 287–292.
47. 47 Banka, S., Metcalfe, K., Clayton-Smith, J., Trisomy 18 mosaicism: report of two cases. World J Pediatr 9 (2013), 179–181.
48. 48 McPadden, J., Helm, B.M., Spangler, B.B., Ross, L.P., Boles, D.B., Schrier Vergano, S.A., Mosaic trisomy 15 in a liveborn infant. Am J Med Genet A 167A (2015), 821–825.
49. 49 Hulten, M.A., Jonasson, J., Iwarsson, E., Uppal, P., Vorsanova, S.G., Yurov, Y.B., et al. Trisomy 21 mosaicism: we may all have a touch of Down syndrome. Cytogenet Genome Res 139 (2013), 189–192.
50. 50 Penaherrera, M.S., Barrett, I.J., Brown, C.J., Langlois, S., Yong, S.L., Lewis, S., et al. An association between skewed X-chromosome inactivation and abnormal outcome in mosaic trisomy 16 confined predominantly to the placenta. Clin Genet 58 (2000), 436–446.
51. 51 Christian, S.L., Smith, A.C., Macha, M., Black, S.H., Elder, F.F., Johnson, J.M., et al. Prenatal diagnosis of uniparental disomy 15 following trisomy 15 mosaicism. Prenat Diagn 16 (1996), 323–332.
52. 52 Balbeur, S., Grisart, B., Parmentier, B., Sartenaer, D., Leonard, P.E., Ullmann, U., et al. Trisomy rescue mechanism: the case of concomitant mosaic trisomy 14 and maternal uniparental disomy 14 in a 15-year-old girl. Clin Case Rep 4 (2016), 265–271.
53. 53 Scheuvens, R., Begemann, M., Soellner, L., Meschede, D., Raabe-Meyer, G., Elbracht, M., et al. Maternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 16 (upd(16)mat): Clinical features are rather caused by (hidden) trisomy 16 mosaicism than by upd(16)mat itself. Clin Genet, 2016.
54. 54 Scott, R.T. Jr., Galliano, D., The challenge of embryonic mosaicism in preimplantation genetic screening. Fertil Steril 105 (2016), 1150–1152.