Molecular analysis of products of conception obtained by hysteroembryoscopy from infertile couples

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 839-848

  Campos Galindo, Inmaculada ^a   García Herrero, Sandra ^a   Martínez Conejero, José Antonio ^a,c   Ferro, Jaime ^b   Simón, Carlos ^a,b,c   Rubio, Carmen ^a,c  

^a Igenomix   (Spain)

^b IVI Valencia   (Spain)

^c INSTITUTO VALENCIANO DE INFERTILIDAD   (Spain)

Author keywords

Aneuploidy; Assisted reproductive technology; Hysteroembryoscopy; Karyolite BoBs; Products of conception

Indexed keywords

ABORTION, SPONTANEOUS; ADULT; ADVERSE EFFECTS; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION; FETOSCOPY; FIRST TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; GENETICS; HUMAN; HYSTEROSCOPY; INFERTILITY; INFERTILITY THERAPY; MALE; MATERNAL AGE; PATHOLOGY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PROCEDURES; SPERMATOZOON COUNT;

ABORTION, SPONTANEOUS; ADULT; CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS; CYTOGENETIC ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION; FETOSCOPY; HUMANS; HYSTEROSCOPY; INFERTILITY; MALE; MATERNAL AGE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANCY TRIMESTER, FIRST; REPRODUCTIVE TECHNIQUES, ASSISTED; SPERM COUNT;

EID: 84939990182     PISSN: 10580468     EISSN: 15737330     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-015-0460-z     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Jacobs PA, Hassold TJ. Chromosome abnormalities: Origin and etiology in abortions and livebirths. In: Vogel F, Sperling K, editors. Human Genetics. Berlin: Springer; 1987. p. 233–244.
2. Hassold TJ. A cytogenetic study of repeated spontaneous abortions. Am J Med Genet. 1980;32:723–30.
3. Hassold T, Chen N, Funkhouser J, et al. A cytogenetic study of 1000 spontaneous abortions. Ann Hum Genet. 1980;44(Pt 2):151–78.
4. Simpson JL. Incidence and timing of pregnancy losses: relevance to evaluating safety of early prenatal diagnosis. Am J Med Genet. 1990;35(2):165–73.
5. Boué J, Bou A, Lazar P. Retrospective and prospective epidemiological studies of 1500 karyotyped spontaneous human abortions. Teratology. 1975;12(1):11–26.
6. Kajii T, Ferrier A, Niikawa N, Takahara H, Ohama K, Avirachan S. Anatomic and chromosomal anomalies in 639 spontaneous abortuses. Hum Genet. 1980;55(1):87–98.
7. Robberecht C, Schuddinck V, Fryns JP, Vermeesch JR. Diagnosis of miscarriages by molecular karyotyping: benefits and pitfalls. Genet Med. 2009;11(9):646–54.
8. Kalousek D, Lau A. Pathology of spontaneous abortion. In: Dimmick J, Kalousek D, editors. Developmental pathology of the embryo and fetus. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1992. p. 55–82.
9. Reddy KS. Double trisomy in spontaneous abortions. Hum Genet. 1997;101:339–45.
10. Robberecht C, Pexsters A, Deprest J, Fryns JP, D’Hooghe T, Vermeesch JR. Cytogenetic and morphological analysis of early products of conception following hystero-embryoscopy from couples with recurrent pregnancy loss. Prenat Diagn. 2012;32(10):933–42.
11. van den Boogaard E, Kaandorp SP, Franssen MT, et al. Consecutive or non-consecutive recurrent miscarriage: is there any difference in carrier status? Hum Reprod. 2010;25(6):1411–4.
12. Stirrat GM. Recurrent miscarriage. Lancet. 1990;336(8716):673–5.
13. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Definitions of infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(5 Suppl):S60.
14. Stephenson M, Kutteh W. Evaluation and management of recurrent early pregnancy loss. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2007;50(1):132–45.
15. Jauniaux E, Farquharson RG, Christiansen OB, Exalto N. Evidence-based guidelines for the investigation and medical treatment of recurrent miscarriage. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(9):2216–22.
16. Stephenson MD. Frequency of factors associated with habitual abortion in 197 couples. Fertil Steril. 1996;66(1):24–9.
17. Marquard K, Westphal LM, Milki AA, Lathi RB. Etiology of recurrent pregnancy loss in women over the age of 35 years. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(4):1473–7.
18. Grati FR, Gomes DM, Ganesamoorthy D, et al. Application of a new molecular technique for the genetic evaluation of products of conception. Prenat Diagn. 2013;33(1):32–41.
19. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Evaluation and treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(5):1103–11.
20. Ferro J, Martinez MC, Lara C, Pellicer A, Remohi J, Serra V. Improved accuracy of hysteroembryoscopic biopsies for karyotyping early missed abortions. Fertil Steril. 2003;80(5):1260–4.
21. Bell KA, Van Deerlin PG, Haddad BR, Feinberg RF. Cytogenetic diagnosis of “normal 46, XX” karyotypes in spontaneous abortions frequently may be misleading. Fertil Steril. 1999;71(2):334–41.
22. Jarrett KL, Michaelis RC, Phelan MC, Vincent VA, Best RG. Microsatellite analysis reveals a high incidence of maternal cell contamination in 46, XX products of conception consisting of villi or a combination of villi and membranous material. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185(1):198–203.
23. Hassold T, Quillen SD, Yamane JA. Sex ratio in spontaneous abortions. Ann Hum Genet. 1983;47(Pt 1):39–47.
24. Lathi RB, Gustin SL, Keller J, et al. Reliability of 46, XX results on miscarriage specimens: a review of 1,222 first-trimester miscarriage specimens. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(1):178–82.
25. Caramins MC, Saville T, Shakeshaft R, et al. A comparison of molecular and cytogenetic techniques for the diagnosis of pregnancy loss. Genet Med. 2011;13(1):46–51.
26. Donaghue C, Mann K, Docherty Z, Mazzaschi R, Fear C, Ogilvie C. Combined QF-PCR and MLPA molecular analysis of miscarriage products: an efficient and robust alternative to karyotype analysis. Prenat Diagn. 2010;30(2):133–7.
27. Schaeffer AJ, Chung J, Heretis K, Wong A, Ledbetter DH, Lese MC. Comparative genomic hybridization-array analysis enhances the detection of aneuploidies and submicroscopic imbalances in spontaneous miscarriages. Am J Hum Genet. 2004;74(6):1168–74.
28. Menten B, Swerts K, Delle Chiaie B, et al. Array comparative genomic hybridization and flow cytometry analysis of spontaneous abortions and mors in utero samples. BMC Med Genet. 2009;10:89.
29. Doria S, Lima V, Carvalho B, et al. Application of touch FISH in the study of mosaic tetraploidy and maternal cell contamination in pregnancy losses. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010;27(11):657–62.
30. Vialard F, Simoni G, Gomes DM, et al. Prenatal BACs-on-beads: the prospective experience of five prenatal diagnosis laboratories. Prenat Diagn. 2012;32(4):329–35.
31. Dunbar SA. Applications of luminex xMAP technology for rapid, high-throughput multiplexed nucleic acid detection. Clin Chim Acta. 2006;363(1–2):71–82.
32. Bettio D, Venci A, Levi Setti PE. Chromosomal abnormalities in miscarriages after different assisted reproduction procedures. Placenta. 2008;29(Suppl B):126–8.
33. Guerneri S, Bettio D, Simoni G, Brambati B, Lanzani A, Fraccaro M. Prevalence and distribution of chromosome abnormalities in a sample of first trimester internal abortions. Hum Reprod. 1987;2(8):735–9.
34. Nagaishi M, Yamamoto T, Iinuma K, Shimomura K, Berend SA, Knops J. Chromosome abnormalities identified in 347 spontaneous abortions collected in japan. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2004;30(3):237–41.
35. Yusuf RZ, Naeem R. Cytogenetic abnormalities in products of conception: a relationship revisited. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2004;52(1):88–96.
36. Morales C, Sanchez A, Bruguera J, et al. Cytogenetic study of spontaneous abortions using semi-direct analysis of chorionic villi samples detects the broadest spectrum of chromosome abnormalities. Am J Med Genet A. 2008;146A(1):66–70.
37. Menasha J, Levy B, Hirschhorn K, Kardon NB. Incidence and spectrum of chromosome abnormalities in spontaneous abortions: new insights from a 12-year study. Genet Med. 2005;7(4):251–63.
38. Rodrigo L, Peinado V, Mateu E, et al. Impact of different patterns of sperm chromosomal abnormalities on the chromosomal constitution of preimplantation embryos. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(4):1380–6.
39. Rubio C, Gil-Salom M, Simon C, et al. Incidence of sperm chromosomal abnormalities in a risk population: relationship with sperm quality and ICSI outcome. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(10):2084–92.
40. Ballif BC, Kashork CD, Saleki R, et al. Detecting sex chromosome anomalies and common triploidies in products of conception by array-based comparative genomic hybridization. Prenat Diagn. 2006;26(4):333–9.
41. Vermeesch JR, Melotte C, Froyen G, et al. Molecular karyotyping: array CGH quality criteria for constitutional genetic diagnosis. J Histochem Cytochem. 2005;53(3):413–22.
42. Ballif BC, Rorem EA, Sundin K, et al. Detection of low-level mosaicism by array CGH in routine diagnostic specimens. Am J Med Genet A. 2006;140(24):2757–67.
43. Cheung SW, Shaw CA, Scott DA, et al. Microarray-based CGH detects chromosomal mosaicism not revealed by conventional cytogenetics. Am J Med Genet A. 2007;143A(15):1679–86.
44. Al-Asmar N, Peinado V, Vera M, et al. Chromosomal abnormalities in embryos from couples with a previous aneuploid miscarriage. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(1):145–50.