System accuracy evaluation of four systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose following ISO 15197 using a glucose oxidase and a hexokinase-based comparison method

Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 1041-1050

  Link, Manuela ^a   Schmid, Christina ^a   Pleus, Stefan ^a   Baumstark, Annette ^a   Rittmeyer, Delia ^a   Haug, Cornelia ^a   Freckmann, Guido ^a  

^a Institut Für Diabetes Technologie Forschungs und Entwicklungsgesellschaft MbH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Comparison measurement method; Glucose oxidase method; Hexokinase method; ISO 15197:2003; ISO 15197:2013; Self monitoring of blood glucose; System accuracy

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE; GLUCOSE OXIDASE; HEXOKINASE; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLOOD GLUCOSE METER; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; CARBOHYDRATE DIET; DATA ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; GLUCOSE ANALYZER; GLYCOLYSIS; HEMATOCRIT; HUMAN; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TEST STRIP; ADOLESCENT; AGED; ANALYSIS; BLOOD; DEVICES; EVALUATION STUDY; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; MATERIALS TESTING; MIDDLE AGED; STANDARD; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BLOOD GLUCOSE; BLOOD GLUCOSE SELF-MONITORING; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; GLUCOSE OXIDASE; HEXOKINASE; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MIDDLE AGED; REFERENCE STANDARDS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85016650386     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19322968     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1932296815580161     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. International Organization for Standardization. In vitro diagnostic test systems-requirements for blood-glucose monitoring systems for self-testing in managing diabetes Mellitus. EN ISO 15197:2003E.
2. International Organization for Standardization. In vitro diagnostic test systems-requirements for blood-glucose monitoring systems for self-testing in managing diabetes mellitus. ISO 15197:2013 (E).
3. International Organization for Standardization. In vitro diagnostic medical devices-measurement of quantities in biological samples-metrological traceability of values assigned to calibrators and control materials. EN ISO 17511:2003 (D).
4. Bundesärztekammer. Richtlinie Der Bundesärztekammer Zur Qualitätssicherung Laboratoriumsmedizinischer Unter suchungen. Deutsches Ärzteblatt. 2008; 105(7):341-355.
5. Freckmann G, Schmid C, Baumstark A, Pleus S, Link M, Haug C. Partial pressure of oxygen in capillary blood samples from the fingertip. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013; 7(6):1648-1649.
6. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1(8476):307-310.
7. Passing H, Bablok W. A new biometrical procedure for testing the equality of measurements from two different analytical methods. Application of linear regression procedures for method comparison studies in clinical chemistry, part I. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1983; 21(11):709-720.
8. Freckmann G, Pleus S, Link M, et al. Accuracy evaluation of four blood glucose monitoring systems in unaltered blood samples in the low glycemic range and blood samples in the concentration range defined by ISO 15197. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015.
9. Freckmann G, Baumstark A, Jendrike N, et al. System Accuracy Evaluation of 27 Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems According to DIN EN ISO 15197. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2010; 12(3):221-231.
10. Freckmann G, Baumstark A, Schmid C, Pleus S, Link M, Haug C. Evaluation of 12 blood glucose monitoring systems for self-testing: system accuracy and measurement reproducibility. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014; 16(2):113-122.
11. Baumstark A, Pleus S, Schmid C, Link M, Haug C, Freckmann G. Lot-to-lot variability of test strips and accuracy assessment of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose according to ISO 15197. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012; 6(5):1076-1086.
12. Bernstein R, Parkes JL, Goldy A, et al. A new test strip technology platform for self-monitoring of blood glucose. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013; 7(5):1386-1399.
13. Hasslacher C, Kulozik F, Platten I. Analytical performance of glucose monitoring systems at different blood glucose ranges and analysis of outliers in a clinical setting. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014; 8(3):466-472.
14. Kristensen GB, Monsen G, Skeie S, Sandberg S. Standardized evaluation of nine instruments for self-monitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2008; 10(6):467-477.
15. Halldorsdottir S, Warchal-Windham ME, Wallace JF, Pardo S, Parkes JL, Simmons DA. Accuracy evaluation of five blood glucose monitoring systems: the North American Comparator Trial. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013; 7(5):1294-1304.
16. Zueger T, Schuler V, Stettler C, Diem P, Christ E. Assessment of three frequently used blood glucose monitoring devices in clinical routine. Swiss Med Wkly. 2012; 142: w13631.
17. Pleus S, Schmid C, Link M, et al. Accuracy assessment of two novel systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose following ISO 15197:2013. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014; 8:906-908.
18. Scandinavian evaluation of laboratory equipment for primary health care (SKUP). Accu-Chek Aviva-meter and test strips designed for glucose self-measurement. 2014. http://www.skup.nu/. Accessed January 13, 2015.
19. Scandinavian evaluation of laboratory equipment for primary health care (SKUP). CONTOUR(R) NEXT and CONTOUR(R) XT Test strips and meter designated for self-monitoring of blood glucose. 2012. http://www.skup.nu/. Accessed September 1, 2014.
20. Twomey PJ. Plasma glucose measurement with the Yellow Springs glucose 2300 STAT and the Olympus AU640. J Clin Pathol. 2004; 57(7):752-754.
21. Genter PM, Ipp E. Accuracy of plasma glucose measurements in the hypoglycemic range. Diabetes Care. 1994; 17(6):595-598.
22. Freckmann G, Link M, Baumstark A, Schmid C, Pleus S, Haug C. System accuracy evaluation of 10 SMBG systems with 3 lots each following ISO 15197:2013 against 2 different comparison methods. Paper presented at: EASD Annual Meeting; September 15-19, 2014; Vienna, Austria.
23. Kristensen GB, Christensen NG, Thue G, Sandberg S. Between-lot variation in external quality assessment of glucose: clinical importance and effect on participant performance evaluation. Clin Chem. 2005; 51(9):1632-1636.
24. Kimberly MM, Vesper HW, Caudill SP, et al. Variability among five over-the-counter blood glucose monitors. Clin Chim Acta. 2006; 364(1-2):292-297.
25. Klaff LJ, Brazg R, Hughes K, et al. Accuracy evaluation of contour next compared with five blood glucose monitoring systems across a wide range of blood glucose concentrations occurring in a clinical research setting. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015; 17:8-15.
26. DeSalvo DJ, Shanmugham S, Ly TT, Wilson DM, Buckingham BA. Accuracy evaluation of blood glucose monitoring systems in children on overnight closed-loop control. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014; 8(5):969-973.
27. European Commission. Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the council on in vitro diagnostic medical devices. European Commission; September 26, 2012. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/health/medical-devices/files/revision-docs/proposal-2012-541-en.pdf. Accessed December 4, 2014.