Standardized evaluation of nine instruments for self-monitoring of blood glucose

Diabetes Technology and Therapeutics

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 467-477

  Kristensen, Gunn B B ^a,d   Monsen, Grete ^a   Skeie, Svein ^a,b   Sandberg, Sverre ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

^b STAVANGER UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^c HAUKELAND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^d NOKLUS   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE DEHYDROGENASE; GLUCOSE OXIDASE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD GLUCOSE METER; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; CHILD; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; COVARIANCE; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEMATOCRIT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIST; PATIENT EDUCATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCHOOL CHILD; STANDARDIZATION; TEMPERATURE; TEST STRIP;

BLOOD GLUCOSE SELF-MONITORING; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; QUESTIONNAIRES; REAGENT STRIPS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TECHNOLOGY, MEDICAL;

EID: 57349106743     PISSN: 15209156     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/dia.2008.0034     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) guidelines for diabetes management. Endocr Pract 2007;13(Suppl 1):18.
2. Bergenstal RM, Gavin JR 3rd: The role of self-monitoring of blood glucose in the care of people with diabetes: report of a global consensus conference. Am J Med 2005;118(Suppl):1S-6S.
3. International Diabetes Federation: Global guideline for type 2 diabetes. www.idf.org (accessed November 24, 2006).
4. Welschen LM, Bloemendal E, Nijpels G, Dekker JM, Heine RJ, Stalman WA, Bouter LM: Self-monitoring of blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes who are not using insulin. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005:CD005060.
5. Farmer A, Wade A, Goyder E, Yudkin P, French D, Craven A, Holman R, Kinmonth AL, Neil A: Impact of self monitoring of blood glucose in the management of patients with non-insulin treated diabetes: open parallel group randomised trial. BMJ 2007;335:132.
6. McGeoch G, Derry S, Moore RA: Self-monitoring of blood glucose in type-2 diabetes: what is the evidence? Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2007;23:423-440.
7. Davis WA, Norman PE, Bruce DG, Davis TM: Predictors, consequences and costs of diabetes-related lower extremity amputation complicating type 2 diabetes: the Fremantle Diabetes Study. Diabetologia 2006;49:2634-2641.
8. Chen ET, Nichols JH, Duh SH, Hortin G: Performance evaluation of blood glucose monitoring devices. Diabetes Technol Ther 2003;5:749-768.
9. Cohen M, Boyle E, Delaney C, Shaw J: A comparison of blood glucose meters in Australia. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2006;71:113-118.
10. Solnica B, Naskalski JW, Sieradzki J: Analytical performance of glucometers used for routine glucose self-monitoring of diabetic patients. Clin Chim Acta 2003;331:29-35.
11. Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH): Human Factors in Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose. Task IV Report, Vol. 1. Rockville, MD: U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 1990.
12. Skeie S, Thue G, Nerhus K, Sandberg S: Instruments for self-monitoring of blood glucose: comparisons of testing quality achieved by patients and a technician. Clin Chem 2002;48:994-1003.
13. Lehmann R, Kayrooz S, Greuter H, Spinas GA: Clinical and technical evaluation of a new self-monitoring blood glucose meter: assessment of analytical and user error. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2001;53:121-128.
14. The International Organization for Standardization: In Vitro Diagnostic Test Systems - Requirements for Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems for Self-Testing in Managing Diabetes Mellitus. ISO/TC 212/SC. International Standard ISO 15197. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2003.
15. Kristensen GB, Nerhus K, Thue G, Sandberg S: Standardized evaluation of instruments for self-monitoring of blood glucose by patients and a technologist. Clin Chem 2004;50:1068-1071.
16. Thienpont LM, Leenheer AP, Stockl D, Reinauer H: Candidate reference methods for determining target values for cholesterol, creatinine, uric acid, and glucose in external quality assessment and internal accuracy control. II. Method transfer. Clin Chem 1993;39:1001-1006.
17. Sacks DB, Bruns DE, Goldstein DE, Maclaren NK, McDonald JM, Parrott M: Guidelines and recommendations for laboratory analysis in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus. Clin Chem 2002;48:436-472.
18. nd ed. CLSI document C30-A2. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2002.
19. Burnett RW: Accurate estimation of standard deviations for quantitative methods used in clinical chemistry. Clin Chem 1975;21:1935-1938.
20. Mohr T, Pfützner A, Forst S, Forst T, Schondorf T: Self-monitoring of blood glucose levels requires intensive training for use of meters to obtain reliable and clinically relevant measurements. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2007;1:56-61.
21. Alto WA, Meyer D, Schneid J, Bryson P, Kindig J: Assuring the accuracy of home glucose monitoring. J Am Board Fam Pract 2002;15:1-6.
22. Bohme P, Floriot M, Sirveaux MA, Durain D, Ziegler O, Drouin P, Guerci B: Evolution of analytical performance in portable glucose meters in the last decade. Diabetes Care 2003;26:1170-1175.
23. Johnson RN, Baker JR: Error detection and measurement in glucose monitors. Clin Chim Acta 2001;307:61-67.
24. Skeie S, Thue G, Sandberg S: Patient-derived quality specifications for instruments used in self-monitoring of blood glucose. Clin Chem 2001;47:67-73.
25. Boyd JC, Bruns DE: Quality specifications for glucose meters: assessment by simulation modelling of errors in insulin dose. Clin Chem 2001;47:209-214.
26. Goldstein DE, Little RR, Lorenz RA, Malone JI, Nathan D, Peterson CM, Sacks DB: Tests of glycemia in diabetes. Diabetes Care 2004;27:1761-1773.
27. Kimberly MM, Vesper HW, Caudill SP, Ethridge SF, Archibold E, Porter KH, Myers GL: Variability among five over-the-counter blood glucose monitors. Clin Chim Acta 2006;364:292-297.
28. Kristensen GBB, Christensen NG, Thue G, Sandberg S: Between-lot variation in external quality assessment of glucose: clinical importance and effect on participant performance evaluation. Clin Chem 2005;51:1632-1636.
29. Louie RF, Tang Z, Chan KJ, Kost GJ: Measurement variability between test strip lots on five handheld glucose meter systems [abstract]. Clin Chem 2000;46(Suppl 6):A15.
30. Balion C, Grey V, Ismaila A, Blatz S, Seidlitz W: Screening for hypoglycemia at the bedside in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) with the Abbott PCx glucose meter. BMC Pediatr 2006;6:28.
31. Tang Z, Lee JH, Louie RF, Kost GJ: Effects of different hematocrit levels on glucose measurements with handheld meters for point-of-care testing. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000;124:1135-1140.
32. Scandinavian Evaluation of Laboratory Equipment for Primary Health Care (SKUP). http://www.skup.nu (accessed July 2007).
33. Mahoney J, Ellison J: Assessing the quality of glucose monitor studies: a critical evaluation of published reports. Clin Chem 2007;53:1122-1128.
34. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, Moher D, Rennie D, de Vet HC, Lijmer JG: The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Group. Croat Med J 2003;44:639-650.
35. Mahoney JJ, Ellison JM: Assessing glucose monitor performance - a standardized approach. Diabetes Technol Ther 2007;9:545-552.
36. Clinical Diagnostics Growth Partnership Service: Strategic Analysis Service. Global In Vitro Diagnostics Market Outlook. Publication Number F365-52. Palo Alto, CA: Frost & Sullivan, 2005.