Accuracy evaluation of blood glucose monitoring systems in children on overnight closed-loop control

Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 969-973

  DeSalvo, Daniel J ^a   Shanmugham, Satya ^a   Ly, Trang T ^a   Wilson, Darrell M ^a   Buckingham, Bruce A ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Blood glucose; Blood glucose meter; Closed loop; Contour Next; HemoCue; YSI

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE; HEMOGLOBIN A1C; INSULIN; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BLOOD GLUCOSE METER; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; BLOOD SAMPLING; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HEMOGLOBIN BLOOD LEVEL; HOME MONITORING; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; PILOT STUDY; STANDARD; ANALYSIS; DEVICES; FEMALE; MALE; STANDARDS;

ADOLESCENT; BLOOD GLUCOSE; BLOOD GLUCOSE SELF-MONITORING; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PILOT PROJECTS;

EID: 84930749375     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19322968     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1932296814532238     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. DeSalvo D, Buckingham B. Continuous glucose monitoring: current use and future directions. Curr Diab Rep. 2013;13(5):657-662.
2. Russell SJ, El-Khatib FH, Nathan DM, et al. Blood glucose control in type 1 diabetes with a bihormonal bionic endocrine pancreas. Diabetes Care. 2012l35(11):2148-2155.
3. Cameron F, Wilson DM, Buckingham BA, et al. Inpatient studies of a Kalman-filter-based predictive pump shutoff algorithm. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012;6(5):1142-1147.
4. Cameron F, Bequette BW, Wilson DM, et al. A closed-loop artificial pancreas based on risk management. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011;5(2):368-379.
5. Vlasselaers D, Van Herpe T, Milants I, et al. Blood glucose measurements in arterial blood of intensive care unit patients submitted to tight glycemic control: agreement between bedside tests. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008;2(6):932-938.
6. Buhling KJ, Henrich W, Kjos SL, et al. Comparison of pointof-care-Testing glucose meters with standard laboratory measurement of the 50g-glucose-challenge test (GCT) during pregnancy. Clin Biochem. 2003;36(5):333-337.
7. Torjman MC, Jahn L, Joseph JI, Crothall K. Accuracy of the hemocue portable glucose analyzer in a large nonhomogeneous population. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2001;3(4):591-600.
8. Halldorsdottir S, Warchall-Windham ME, Wallace ME, et al. Accuracy evaluation of five blood glucose monitoring systems: the North American Comparator Trial. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013;7(5):1294-1304.
9. Freckmann G, Baumstark A, Schmid C, et al. Evaluation of 12 blood glucose monitoring systems for self-Testing: system accuracy and measurement reproducibility. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014;16:113-122.
10. Pflug B, Warchal-Windham ME, Goldy A, Chu A. Analytical accuracy evaluation of the CONTOUR® XT blood glucose meter. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013;7(1):281-284, A-107.
11. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 15197. In vitro diagnostic test systems-requirements for bloodglucose monitoring systems for self-Testing in managing diabetes mellitus. May 2003.
12. International Organization for Standardization. In vitro diagnostic test systems-requirements for blood-glucose monitoring systems for self-Testing in managing diabetes mellitus. Reference number ISO/FDIS 15197.2013.
13. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1(8476):307-310.
14. Swaminathan A, Lunt H, Chang WS, et al. Impact of prandial status on the comparison of capillary glucose meter and venous plasma glucose measurements in healthy volunteers. Ann Clin Biochem. 2013;50(pt 1):6-12.