Assessment of three frequently used blood glucose monitoring devices in clinical routine

Swiss Medical Weekly

Volumn 142, Issue JULY, 2012, Pages

  Zueger, Thomas ^a   Schuler, Vanessa ^a   Stettler, Christoph ^a   Diem, Peter ^a   Christ, Emanuel R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Blood glucose; Diabetes; Self measurement of blood glucose (SMBG)

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE; HEMOGLOBIN A1C; GLYCOSYLATED HEMOGLOBIN; HEMOGLOBIN A1C PROTEIN, HUMAN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLOOD GLUCOSE METER; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; CAPILLARY BLOOD; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FEMALE; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEMOGLOBIN BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; IMPAIRED GLUCOSE TOLERANCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARDIZATION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BLOOD; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; GLUCOSE INTOLERANCE; INSTRUMENTATION; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BLOOD GLUCOSE; BLOOD GLUCOSE SELF-MONITORING; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; GLUCOSE INTOLERANCE; HEMOGLOBIN A, GLYCOSYLATED; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84864535171     PISSN: 14247860     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4414/smw.2012.13631     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. U.K. prospective diabetes study 16. Overview of 6 years' therapy of type II diabetes: a progressive disease. U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Diabetes. 1995;44:1249-58.
2. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:977-86.
3. Haller MJ, Stalvey MS, Silverstein JH. Predictors of control of diabetes: monitoring may be the key. J Pediatr. 2004;144:660-1.
4. Levine BS, Anderson BJ, Butler DA, Antisdel JE, Brackett J, Laffel LM. Predictors of glycaemia control and short-term adverse outcomes in youth with type 1 diabetes. J Pediatr. 2001;139:197-203. (Pubitemid 32721704)
5. Strowig SM, Raskin P. Improved glycaemia control in intensively treated type 1 diabetic patients using blood glucose meters with storage capability and computer-assisted analyses. Diabetes Care. 1998;21:1694-8. (Pubitemid 28449810)
6. Schutt M, Kern W, Krause U, Busch P, Dapp A, Grziwotz R, Mayer I, Rosenbauer J, Wagner C, Zimmermann A, Kerner W, Holl RW. Is the frequency of self-monitoring of blood glucose related to long-term metabolic control? Multicenter analysis including 24,500 patients from 191 centres in Germany and Austria. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2006;114:384-8. (Pubitemid 44265571)
7. Ziegler R, Heidtmann B, Hilgard D, Hofer S, Rosenbauer J, Holl R. Frequency of SMBG correlates with HbA1c and acute complications in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2011;12:11-7.
8. Allemann S, Houriet C, Diem P, Stettler C. Self-monitoring of blood glucose in non-insulin treated patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009;25:2903-13.
9. St John A, Davis WA, Price CP, Davis TM. The value of self-monitoring of blood glucose: a review of recent evidence. J Diabetes Complications. 2010;24:129-41.
10. Poolsup N, Suksomboon N, Rattanasookchit S. Meta-analysis of the benefits of self-monitoring of blood glucose on glycaemia control in type 2 diabetes patients: an update. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009;11:775-84.
11. International Diabetes Federation (IDF): Diabetes Atlas, 5th edition. 2011
12. Ginsberg BH. Factors affecting blood glucose monitoring: sources of errors in measurement. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009;3:903-13.
13. ISO 15197:2003: In vitro diagnostic test systems requirement for blood glucose monitoring systems for self-testing in managing diabetes mellitus. Geneva: World Health Organisation. 2003
14. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes - 2011. Diabetes Care. 2011;34 Suppl 1:S11-61.
15. Stork AD, Kemperman H, Erkelens DW, Veneman TF. Comparison of the accuracy of the HemoCue glucose analyzer with the Yellow Springs Instrument glucose oxidase analyzer, particularly in hypoglycaemia. Eur J Endocrinol. 2005;153:275-81. (Pubitemid 41167485)
16. Bland MJ, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;307-10. (Pubitemid 16134762)
17. Clarke WL, Cox D, Gonder-Frederick LA, Carter W, Pohl SL. Evaluating clinical accuracy of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Care. 1987;10:622-8. (Pubitemid 17158937)
18. Self-monitoring of blood glucose. American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 1994;17:81-6.
19. Kuo CY, Hsu CT, Ho CS, Su TE, Wu MH, Wang CJ. Accuracy and precision evaluation of seven self-monitoring blood glucose systems. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011;13:596-600.
20. Tack C, Pohlmeier H, Behnke T, Schmid V, Grenningloh M, Forst T, Pfutzner A. Accuracy evaluation of five blood glucose monitoring systems obtained from the pharmacy: a European multicenter study with 453 subjects. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011
21. Freckmann G, Baumstark A, Jendrike N, Zschornack E, Kocher S, Tshiananga J, Heister F, Haug C. System accuracy evaluation of 27 blood glucose monitoring systems according to DIN EN ISO 15197. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2010;12:221-31.
22. Consensus statement on self-monitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Care. 1987;10:95-9.
23. Hirose T, Mita T, Fujitani Y, Kawamori R, Watada H. Glucose monitoring after fruit peeling: pseudohyperglycaemia when neglecting hand washing before fingertip blood sampling: wash your hands with tap water before you check blood glucose level. Diabetes Care. 2011;34:596-7.
24. Arabadjief D, Nichols JH. Assessing glucose meter accuracy. Curr Med Res Opin. 2006;22:2167-74. (Pubitemid 44789981)
25. Ellison JM, Stegmann JM, Colner SL, Michael RH, Sharma MK, Ervin KR, Horwitz DL. Rapid changes in postprandial blood glucose produce concentration differences at finger, forearm, and thigh sampling sites. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:961-4. (Pubitemid 41110478)