In vivo MRI and ex vivo histological assessment of the cardioprotection induced by ischemic preconditioning, postconditioning and remote conditioning in a closed-chest porcine model of reperfused acute myocardial infarction: Importance of microvasculature

Journal of Translational Medicine

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Baranyai, Tamás ^a   Giricz, Zoltán ^a,g   Varga, Zoltán V ^a   Koncsos, Gábor ^a   Lukovic, Dominika ^b   Makkos, András ^a   Sárközy, Márta ^c   Pávó, Noémi ^b   Jakab, András ^b   Czimbalmos, Csilla ^a   Vágó, Hajnalka ^a   Ruzsa, Zoltán ^a   Tóth, Levente ^d,e   Garamvölgyi, Rita ^d   Merkely, Béla ^a   Schulz, Rainer ^f   Gyöngyösi, Mariann ^b   Ferdinandy, Péter ^a,c,g  

^a SEMMELWEIS UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

^b MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SZEGED   (Hungary)

^d SZENT ISTVÁN UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

^e UNIVERSITY OF PÉCS   (Hungary)

^f JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^g PHARMAHUNGARY GROUP   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Area at risk; Ischemia reperfusion injury; Ischemic postconditioning; Ischemic preconditioning; Myocardial edema; Remote conditioning

Indexed keywords

GADOBUTROL; CARDIOTONIC AGENT;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL OCCLUSION; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOMESTIC PIG; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; EX VIVO STUDY; FEMALE; HEART EDEMA; HEART INFARCTION PREVENTION; HEART MUSCLE NECROSIS; HEART PROTECTION; ISCHEMIC POSTCONDITIONING; ISCHEMIC PRECONDITIONING; JUVENILE ANIMAL; MICROVASCULAR OBSTRUCTION; MICROVASCULATURE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PORCINE MODEL; REMOTE CONDITIONING; ANIMAL; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EDEMA; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; HEART FUNCTION TEST; HEMODYNAMICS; METABOLISM; MYOCARDIAL REPERFUSION INJURY; NECROSIS; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PIG; PROCEDURES; STAINING;

ANIMALS; CARDIOTONIC AGENTS; EDEMA; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART FUNCTION TESTS; HEMODYNAMICS; ISCHEMIC POSTCONDITIONING; ISCHEMIC PRECONDITIONING, MYOCARDIAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MICROVESSELS; MYOCARDIAL REPERFUSION INJURY; NECROSIS; STAINING AND LABELING; SUS SCROFA;

EID: 85016591813     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14795876     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12967-017-1166-z     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Moran AE, Forouzanfar MH, Roth GA, Mensah GA, Ezzati M, Flaxman A, et al. The global burden of ischemic heart disease in 1990 and 2010: the global burden of disease 2010 study. Circulation. 2014;129(14):1493-501.
2. Hausenloy DJ, Garcia-Dorado D, Bøtker HE, Davidson SM, Downey J, Engel FB, et al. Novel targets and future strategies for acute cardioprotection: position paper of the European Society of cardiology working group on cellular biology of the heart. Cardiovasc Res. 2017. In Press.
3. Murry CE, Jennings RB, Reimer KA. Preconditioning with ischemia: a delay of lethal cell injury in ischemic myocardium. Circulation. 1986;74(5):1124-36.
4. Zhao ZQ, Corvera JS, Halkos ME, Kerendi F, Wang NP, Guyton RA, et al. Inhibition of myocardial injury by ischemic postconditioning during reperfusion: comparison with ischemic preconditioning. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003;285(2):H579-88.
5. Heusch G, Botker HE, Przyklenk K, Redington A, Yellon D. Remote ischemic conditioning. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(2):177-95.
6. Thuny F, Lairez O, Roubille F, Mewton N, Rioufol G, Sportouch C, et al. Post-conditioning reduces infarct size and edema in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(24):2175-81.
7. Botker HE, Kharbanda R, Schmidt MR, Bottcher M, Kaltoft AK, Terkelsen CJ, et al. Remote ischaemic conditioning before hospital admission, as a complement to angioplasty, and effect on myocardial salvage in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2010;375(9716):727-34.
8. Crimi G, Pica S, Raineri C, Bramucci E, De Ferrari GM, Klersy C, et al. Remote ischemic post-conditioning of the lower limb during primary percutaneous coronary intervention safely reduces enzymatic infarct size in anterior myocardial infarction: a randomized controlled trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6(10):1055-63.
9. White SK, Frohlich GM, Sado DM, Maestrini V, Fontana M, Treibel TA, et al. Remote ischemic conditioning reduces myocardial infarct size and edema in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8(1 Pt B):178-88.
10. Hahn JY, Yu CW, Park HS, Song YB, Kim EK, Lee HJ, et al. Long-term effects of ischemic postconditioning on clinical outcomes: 1-year follow-up of the POST randomized trial. Am Heart J. 2015;169(5):639-46.
11. The third DANish study of optimal acute treatment of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: ischemic postconditioning during Primary PCI - DANAMI 3-iPOST http://www.acc.org/latest-in-cardiology/clinical-trials/2016/03/29/22/46/danami-3-ipost.
12. Sloth AD, Schmidt MR, Munk K, Kharbanda RK, Redington AN, Schmidt M, et al. Improved long-term clinical outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing remote ischaemic conditioning as an adjunct to primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(3):168-75.
13. Hausenloy DJ, Candilio L, Evans R, Ariti C, Jenkins DP, Kolvekar S, et al. Remote ischemic preconditioning and outcomes of cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(15):1408-17.
14. Meybohm P, Bein B, Brosteanu O, Cremer J, Gruenewald M, Stoppe C, et al. A multicenter trial of remote ischemic preconditioning for heart surgery. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(15):1397-407.
15. Aletras AH, Tilak GS, Natanzon A, Hsu LY, Gonzalez FM, Hoyt RF Jr, et al. Retrospective determination of the area at risk for reperfused acute myocardial infarction with T2-weighted cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: histopathological and displacement encoding with stimulated echoes (DENSE) functional validations. Circulation. 2006;113(15):1865-70.
16. Kim HW, Van Assche L, Jennings RB, Wince WB, Jensen CJ, Rehwald WG, et al. Relationship of T2-weighted MRI myocardial hyperintensity and the ischemic area-at-risk. Circ Res. 2015;117(3):254-65.
17. Gibbons RJ, Valeti US, Araoz PA, Jaffe AS. The quantification of infarct size. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44(8):1533-42.
18. Hausenloy DJ, Erik Botker H, Condorelli G, Ferdinandy P, Garcia-Dorado D, Heusch G, et al. Translating cardioprotection for patient benefit: position paper from the working group of cellular biology of the heart of the European Society of cardiology. Cardiovasc Res. 2013;98(1):7-27.
19. Garcia-Dorado D, Andres-Villarreal M, Ruiz-Meana M, Inserte J, Barba I. Myocardial edema: a translational view. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2012;52(5):931-9.
20. Niccoli G, Scalone G, Lerman A, Crea F. Coronary microvascular obstruction in acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(13):1024-33.
21. Heusch G. The coronary circulation as a target of cardioprotection. Circ Res. 2016;118(10):1643-58.
22. Efird J. Blocked randomization with randomly selected block sizes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011;8(1):15-20.
23. Task Force on the management of STseamiotESoC, Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, Badano LP, Lundqvist CB, Borger MA, Di Mario C, Dickstein K, Ducrocq G, Fernandez-Aviles F, Gershlick AH. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(20):2569-619.
24. Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet JP, Mueller C, Valgimigli M, Andreotti F, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: task force for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2016;37(3):267-315.
25. Patti G, Barczi G, Orlic D, Mangiacapra F, Colonna G, Pasceri V, et al. Outcome comparison of 600- and 300-mg loading doses of clopidogrel in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results from the ARMYDA-6 MI (antiplatelet therapy for reduction of myocardial damage during angioplasty-myocardial infarction) randomized study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(15):1592-9.
26. Yang XM, Liu Y, Cui L, Yang X, Liu Y, Tandon N, et al. Platelet P2Y(1)(2) blockers confer direct postconditioning-like protection in reperfused rabbit hearts. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2013;18(3):251-62.
27. Ovize M, Aupetit JF, Rioufol G, Loufoua J, Andre-Fouet X, Minaire Y, et al. Preconditioning reduces infarct size but accelerates time to ventricular fibrillation in ischemic pig heart. Am J Physiol. 1995;269(1 Pt 2):H72-9.
28. Iliodromitis EK, Georgiadis M, Cohen MV, Downey JM, Bofilis E, Kremastinos DT. Protection from post-conditioning depends on the number of short ischemic insults in anesthetized pigs. Basic Res Cardiol. 2006;101(6):502-7.
29. Zalewski J, Claus P, Bogaert J, Driessche NV, Driesen RB, Galan DT, et al. Cyclosporine A reduces microvascular obstruction and preserves left ventricular function deterioration following myocardial ischemia and reperfusion. Basic Res Cardiol. 2015;110(2):18.
30. Wu KC, Kim RJ, Bluemke DA, Rochitte CE, Zerhouni EA, Becker LC, et al. Quantification and time course of microvascular obstruction by contrast-enhanced echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging following acute myocardial infarction and reperfusion. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32(6):1756-64.
31. Nijveldt R, Beek AM, Hirsch A, Stoel MG, Hofman MB, Umans VA, et al. Functional recovery after acute myocardial infarction: comparison between angiography, electrocardiography, and cardiovascular magnetic resonance measures of microvascular injury. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52(3):181-9.
32. Hausenloy DJ, Iliodromitis EK, Andreadou I, Papalois A, Gritsopoulos G, Anastasiou-Nana M, et al. Investigating the signal transduction pathways underlying remote ischemic conditioning in the porcine heart. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2012;26(2):87-93.
33. Brandt PW, Partridge JB, Wattie WJ. Coronary arteriography; method of presentation of the arteriogram report and a scoring system. Clin Radiol. 1977;28(4):361-5.
34. Henriques JP, Zijlstra F, van 't Hof AW, de Boer MJ, Dambrink JH, Gosselink M, Hoorntje JC, Suryapranata H. Angiographic assessment of reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction by myocardial blush grade. Circulation. 2003;107(16):2115-9.
35. Gibson CM, de Lemos JA, Murphy SA, Marble SJ, Dauterman KW, Michaels A, et al. Methodologic and clinical validation of the TIMI myocardial perfusion grade in acute myocardial infarction. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2002;14(3):233-7.
36. Graham MM, Faris PD, Ghali WA, Galbraith PD, Norris CM, Badry JT, et al. Validation of three myocardial jeopardy scores in a population-based cardiac catheterization cohort. Am Heart J. 2001;142(2):254-61.
37. Briggs AH, Wonderling DE, Mooney CZ. Pulling cost-effectiveness analysis up by its bootstraps: a non-parametric approach to confidence interval estimation. Health Econ. 1997;6(4):327-40.
38. Moscucci M, Kline-Rogers E, Share D, O'Donnell M, Maxwell-Eward A, Meengs WL, et al. Simple bedside additive tool for prediction of in-hospital mortality after percutaneous coronary interventions. Circulation. 2001;104(3):263-8.
39. Yotti R, Bermejo J, Benito Y, Antoranz JC, Desco MM, Rodriguez-Perez D, et al. Noninvasive estimation of the rate of relaxation by the analysis of intraventricular pressure gradients. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4(2):94-104.
40. Campos CM, van Klaveren D, Farooq V, Simonton CA, Kappetein AP, Sabik JF, et al. Long-term forecasting and comparison of mortality in the evaluation of the xience everolimus eluting stent vs. coronary artery bypass surgery for effectiveness of left main revascularization (EXCEL) trial: prospective validation of the SYNTAX score II. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(20):1231-41.
41. Laajala TD, Jumppanen M, Huhtaniemi R, Fey V, Kaur A, Knuuttila M, et al. Optimized design and analysis of preclinical intervention studies in vivo. Sci Rep. 2016;6:30723.
42. Kim EK, Hahn JY, Song YB, Lee SC, Choi JH, Choi SH, et al. Effect of ischemic postconditioning on myocardial salvage in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: cardiac magnetic resonance substudy of the POST randomized trial. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;31(3):629-37.
43. Eitel I, Stiermaier T, Rommel KP, Fuernau G, Sandri M, Mangner N, et al. Cardioprotection by combined intrahospital remote ischaemic perconditioning and postconditioning in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the randomized LIPSIA CONDITIONING trial. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(44):3049-57.
44. Raman SV, Simonetti OP, Winner MW 3rd, Dickerson JA, He X, Mazzaferri EL Jr, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance with edema imaging identifies myocardium at risk and predicts worse outcome in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(22):2480-8.
45. Mewton N, Thibault H, Roubille F, Lairez O, Rioufol G, Sportouch C, et al. Postconditioning attenuates no-reflow in STEMI patients. Basic Res Cardiol. 2013;108(6):383.
46. Rodriguez-Sinovas A, Cabestrero A, Garcia del Blanco B, Inserte J, Garcia A, Garcia-Dorado D. Intracoronary acid infusion as an alternative to ischemic postconditioning in pigs. Basic Res Cardiol. 2009;104(6):761-71.
47. Schmidt MR, Smerup M, Konstantinov IE, Shimizu M, Li J, Cheung M, et al. Intermittent peripheral tissue ischemia during coronary ischemia reduces myocardial infarction through a KATP-dependent mechanism: first demonstration of remote ischemic perconditioning. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007;292(4):H1883-90.
48. Munk K, Andersen NH, Schmidt MR, Nielsen SS, Terkelsen CJ, Sloth E, et al. Remote ischemic conditioning in patients with myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty: impact on left ventricular function assessed by comprehensive echocardiography and gated single-photon emission CT. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3(6):656-62.
49. Halkin A, Stone GW, Dixon SR, Grines CL, Tcheng JE, Cox DA, et al. Impact and determinants of left ventricular function in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2005;96(3):325-31.
50. Ortiz-Perez JT, Lee DC, Meyers SN, Davidson CJ, Bonow RO, Wu E. Determinants of myocardial salvage during acute myocardial infarction: evaluation with a combined angiographic and CMR myocardial salvage index. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3(5):491-500.
51. de Waard GA, Hollander MR, Teunissen PF, Jansen MF, Eerenberg ES, Beek AM, et al. Changes in coronary blood flow after acute myocardial infarction: insights from a patient study and an experimental porcine model. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(6):602-13.
52. Kern KB, Hanna JM, Young HN, Ellingson CJ, White JJ, Heller B, et al. Importance of both early reperfusion and therapeutic hypothermia in limiting myocardial infarct size post-cardiac arrest in a porcine model. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(23):2403-12.
53. Heusch G, Skyschally A, Schulz R. The in situ pig heart with regional ischemia/reperfusion - ready for translation. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2011;50(6):951-63.
54. Heusch G, Musiolik J, Gedik N, Skyschally A. Mitochondrial STAT3 activation and cardioprotection by ischemic postconditioning in pigs with regional myocardial ischemia/reperfusion. Circ Res. 2011;109(11):1302-8.
55. Sun H, Guo T, Liu L, Yu Z, Xu W, Chen W, et al. Ischemic postconditioning inhibits apoptosis after acute myocardial infarction in pigs. Heart Surg Forum. 2010;13(5):E305-10.
56. Ma XJ, Yin SJ, Jin JC, Wu CF, Huang Y, Shi DZ, et al. Synergistic protection of Danhong injection and ischemic postconditioning on myocardial reperfusion injury in minipigs. Chin J Integr Med. 2010;16(6):531-6.
57. Kharbanda RK, Mortensen UM, White PA, Kristiansen SB, Schmidt MR, Hoschtitzky JA, et al. Transient limb ischemia induces remote ischemic preconditioning in vivo. Circulation. 2002;106(23):2881-3.
58. Andreka G, Vertesaljai M, Szantho G, Font G, Piroth Z, Fontos G, et al. Remote ischaemic postconditioning protects the heart during acute myocardial infarction in pigs. Heart. 2007;93(6):749-52.
59. O'Connor RE, Al Ali AS, Brady WJ, Ghaemmaghami CA, Menon V, Welsford M, et al. Part 9: acute coronary syndromes: 2015 American heart association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2015;132(18 Suppl 2):S483-500.
60. Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F, Collet JP, Cremer J, 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization, et al. The task force on myocardial revascularization of the european society of cardiology (ESC) and the european association for cardio-thoracic surgery (EACTS) developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J. 2014;35(37):2541-619.
61. Alcindor D, Krolikowski JG, Pagel PS, Warltier DC, Kersten JR. Cyclooxygenase-2 mediates ischemic, anesthetic, and pharmacologic preconditioning in vivo. Anesthesiology. 2004;100(3):547-54.
62. Penna C, Mancardi D, Tullio F, Pagliaro P. Postconditioning and intermittent bradykinin induced cardioprotection require cyclooxygenase activation and prostacyclin release during reperfusion. Basic Res Cardiol. 2008;103(4):368-77.
63. Guo Y, Tukaye DN, Wu WJ, Zhu X, Book M, Tan W, et al. The COX-2/PGI2 receptor axis plays an obligatory role in mediating the cardioprotection conferred by the late phase of ischemic preconditioning. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(7):e41178.
64. Yusuf S, Zhao F, Mehta SR, Chrolavicius S, Tognoni G, Fox KK, et al. Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(7):494-502.
65. Roubille F, Lairez O, Mewton N, Rioufol G, Ranc S, Sanchez I, et al. Cardioprotection by clopidogrel in acute ST-elevated myocardial infarction patients: a retrospective analysis. Basic Res Cardiol. 2012;107(4):275.
66. Ferdinandy P, Hausenloy DJ, Heusch G, Baxter GF, Schulz R. Interaction of risk factors, comorbidities, and comedications with ischemia/reperfusion injury and cardioprotection by preconditioning, postconditioning, and remote conditioning. Pharmacol Rev. 2014;66(4):1142-74.
67. Alvarez P, Tapia L, Mardones LA, Pedemonte JC, Farias JG, Castillo RL. Cellular mechanisms against ischemia reperfusion injury induced by the use of anesthetic pharmacological agents. Chem Biol Interact. 2014;218:89-98.
68. Kottenberg E, Thielmann M, Bergmann L, Heine T, Jakob H, Heusch G, et al. Protection by remote ischemic preconditioning during coronary artery bypass graft surgery with isoflurane but not propofol-a clinical trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012;56(1):30-8.
69. Fernandez-Jimenez R, Garcia-Prieto J, Sanchez-Gonzalez J, Aguero J, Lopez-Martin GJ, Galan-Arriola C, et al. Pathophysiology underlying the bimodal edema phenomenon after myocardial ischemia/reperfusion. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(7):816-28.
70. Nordlund D, Klug G, Heiberg E, Koul S, Larsen TH, Hoffmann P, et al. Multi-vendor, multicentre comparison of contrast-enhanced SSFP and T2-STIR CMR for determining myocardium at risk in ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;17(7):744-53.
71. Lelovas PP, Kostomitsopoulos NG, Xanthos TT. A comparative anatomic and physiologic overview of the porcine heart. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2014;53(5):432-8.
72. Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG. Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol. 2010;8(6):e1000412.