Remote ischemic conditioning reduces myocardial infarct size and edema in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 178-188

  White, Steven K ^a   Frohlich, Georg M ^a   Sado, Daniel M ^a   Maestrini, Viviana ^a   Fontana, Marianna ^a   Treibel, Thomas A ^a   Tehrani, Shana ^a   Flett, Andrew S ^b   Meier, Pascal ^a   Ariti, Cono ^c   Davies, John R ^d   Moon, James C ^a   Yellon, Derek M ^a   Hausenloy, Derek J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON HOSPITALS   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SOUTHAMPTON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^c LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

^d NHS Foundation Trust   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Acute myocardial infarction; Cardiovascular magnetic resonance; Myocardial edema; Primary percutaneous coronary intervention; Remote ischemic conditioning; Reperfusion injury

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM; TROPONIN T; BIOLOGICAL MARKER;

ADULT; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDEMA; FEMALE; HEART INFARCTION SIZE; HEART MUSCLE NECROSIS; HUMAN; ISCHEMIC PRECONDITIONING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REMOTE ISCHEMIC CONDITIONING; REMOTE SENSING; REPERFUSION INJURY; ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AGED; ARM; BLOOD; EDEMA, CARDIAC; HEART INFARCTION PREVENTION; HEART MUSCLE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROCEDURES; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED KINGDOM; VASCULARIZATION;

AGED; BIOMARKERS; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; EDEMA, CARDIAC; ENGLAND; FEMALE; HUMANS; ISCHEMIC PRECONDITIONING, MYOCARDIAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; MYOCARDIUM; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TROPONIN T; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 84921342036     PISSN: 19368798     EISSN: 18767605     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.05.015     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Yellon DM, Hausenloy DJ. Myocardial reperfusion injury. N Engl J Med 2007;357:1121-35.
2. Heusch G. Cardioprotection: chances and challenges of its translation to the clinic. Lancet 2013;381:166-75.
3. Przyklenk K, Bauer B, Ovize M, Kloner RA, Whittaker P. Regional ischemic "preconditioning" protects remote virgin myocardium from subsequent sustained coronary occlusion. Circulation 1993;87:893-9.
4. Hausenloy DJ, Yellon DM. Remote ischaemic preconditioning: underlying mechanisms and clinical application. Cardiovasc Res 2008;79:377-86.
5. Kharbanda RK, Mortensen UM, White PA, et al. Transient limb ischemia induces remote ischemic preconditioning in vivo. Circulation 2002;106:2881-3.
6. Hausenloy DJ, Mwamure PK, Venugopal V, et al. Effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning on myocardial injury in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2007;370:575-9.
7. Thielmann M, Kottenberg E, Kleinbongard P, et al. Cardioprotective and prognostic effects of remote ischaemic preconditioning in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: a single-centre randomised, double-blind, controlled trial. Lancet 2013;382:597-604.
8. Hoole SP, Heck PM, Sharples L, et al. Cardiac Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Coronary Stenting (CRISP Stent) study: a prospective, randomized control trial. Circulation 2009;119:820-7.
9. Rentoukas I, Giannopoulos G, Kaoukis A, et al. Cardioprotective role of remote ischemic periconditioning in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: enhancement by opioid action. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2010;3:49-55.
10. Bøtker HE, Kharbanda R, Schmidt MR, et al. Remote ischaemic conditioning before hospital admission, as a complement to angioplasty, and effect on myocardial salvage in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a randomised trial. Lancet 2010;375:727-34.
11. Kim HW, Farzaneh-Far A, Kim RJ. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with myocardial infarction: current and emerging applications. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;55:1-16.
12. Eitel I, Desch S, Fuernau G, et al. Prognostic significance and determinants of myocardial salvage assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in acute reperfused myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:2470-9.
13. Aletras AH, Tilak GS, Natanzon A, et al. Retrospective determination of the area at risk for reperfused acute myocardial infarction with T2-weighted cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: histopathological and displacement encoding with stimulated echoes (DENSE) functional validations. Circulation 2006;113:1865-70.
14. Wright J, Adriaenssens T, Dymarkowski S, Desmet W, Bogaert J. Quantification of myocardial with contrast-enhanced CMR and coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2009;2:825-31.
15. Carlsson M, Ubachs JF, Hedstrom E, Heiberg E, Jovinge S, Arheden H. Myocardium at risk after acute infarction in humans on cardiac magnetic resonance: quantitative assessment during follow-up and validation with single-photon emission computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2009;2:569-76.
16. Götberg M, Olivecrona GK, Koul S, et al. A pilot study of rapid cooling by cold saline and endovascular cooling before reperfusion in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2010;3:400-7.
17. Lønborg J, Vejlstrup N, Kelbaek H, et al. Exenatide reduces reperfusion injury in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2012;33:1491-9.
18. Thuny F, Lairez O, Roubille F, et al. Postconditioning reduces infarct size and edema in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:2175-81.
19. Kramer CM, Barkhausen J, Flamm SD, Kim RJ, Nagel E. Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) protocols, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: Board of Trustees Task Force on Standardized Protocols. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2008;10:35.
20. Giri S, Chung YC, Merchant A, et al. T2 quantification for improved detection of myocardial edema. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2009;11:56.
21. Verhaert D, Thavendiranathan P, Giri S, et al. Direct T2 quantification of myocardial edema in acute ischemic injury. J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2011;4:269-78.
22. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 2012;9:671-5.
23. Vermes E, Childs H, Carbone I, Barckow P, Friedrich MG. Auto-threshold quantification of late gadolinium enhancement in patients with acute heart disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013;37:382-90.
24. Higgins CB, Herfkens R, Lipton MJ, et al. Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of acute myocardial infarction in dogs: alterations in magnetic relaxation times. Am J Cardiol 1983;52:184-8.
25. Graham MM, Faris PD, Ghali WA, et al., for the APPROACH Investigators. Validation of three myocardial jeopardy scores in a population-based 142:254-61.
26. Ortiz-Perez JT, Meyers SN, Lee DC, et al. Angiographic estimates of myocardium at risk during acute myocardial infarction: validation study using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Heart J 2007;28:1750-8.
27. Fuernau G, Eitel I, Franke V, et al. Myocardium at risk in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction comparison of T2-weighted edema imaging with the MR-assessed endocardial surface area and validation against angiographic scoring. J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2011;4:967-76.
28. Versteylen MO, Bekkers SC, Smulders MW, et al. Performance of angiographic, electrocardiographic and MRI methods to assess the area at risk in acute myocardial infarction. Heart 2012;98:109-15.
29. Goetti R, Kozerke S, Donati OF, et al. Acute, subacute, and chronic myocardial infarction: quantitative comparison of 2D and 3D late gadolinium enhancement MR imaging. Radiology 2011;259:704-11.
30. Efron B, Tibshirani R. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC, 1993.
31. Redington KL, Disenhouse T, Strantzas SC, et al. Remote cardioprotection by direct peripheral nerve stimulation and topical capsaicin is mediated by circulating humoral factors. Basic Res Cardiol 2012;107:241.
32. Jensen RV, Stottrup NB, Kristiansen SB, Bøtker HE. Release of a humoral circulating cardioprotective factor by remote ischemic preconditioning is dependent on preserved neural pathways in diabetic patients. Basic Res Cardiol 2012;107:285.
33. Davies WR, Brown AJ, Watson W, et al. Remote ischemic preconditioning improves outcome at 6 years after elective percutaneous coronary intervention: the CRISP stent trial long-term follow-up. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2013;6:246-51.
34. Munk K, Andersen NH, Schmidt MR, et al. Remote ischemic conditioning in patients with myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty: impact on left ventricular function assessed by comprehensive echocardiography and gated single-photon emission CT. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2010;3:656-62.
35. Sloth AD, Schmidt MR, Munk K, et al., for CONDI Investigators. Improved long-term clinical infarction undergoing remote ischaemic conditioning as an adjunct to primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Eur Heart J 2014;35:168-75.
36. Wagner A, Mahrholdt H, Holly TA, et al. Contrast-enhanced MRI and routine single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging for detection of subendocardial myocardial infarcts: an imaging study. Lancet 2003;361:374-9.
37. Arai AE, Leung S, Kellman P. Controversies in cardiovascular MR imaging: reasons why imaging myocardial T2 has clinical and pathophysiologic value in acute myocardial infarction. Radiology 2012;265:23-32.
38. Croisille P, Kim HW, Kim RJ. Controversies in cardiovascular MR imaging: T2-weighted imaging should not be used to delineate the area at risk in ischemic myocardial injury. Radiology 2012;265:12-22.
39. Berry C, Kellman P, Mancini C, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging delineates the ischemic area at risk and myocardial salvage in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2010;3:527-35.
40. Payne AR, Casey M, McClure J, et al. Bright-blood T2-weighted MRI has higher diagnostic accuracy than dark-blood short tau inversion recovery MRI for detection of acute myocardial infarction and for assessment of the ischemic area at risk and myocardial salvage. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4:210-9.
41. Ugander M, Bagi PS, Oki AJ, et al. Myocardial edema as detected by pre-contrast T1 and T2 CMR delineates area at risk associated with acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2012;5:596-603.
42. Ibanez B, Macaya C, Sánchez-Brunete V, et al. Effect of Early metoprolol on infarct size in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: the Effect of Metoprolol in Cardioprotection During an Acute Myocardial Infarction (METOCARD-CNIC) trial. Circulation 2013;128:1495-503.