Remote ischaemic postconditioning protects the heart during acute myocardial infarction in pigs

Heart

Volumn 93, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 749-752

  Andreka, Gyorgy ^b   Vertesaljai, Marton ^b   Szantho, Gergely ^b   Font, Gusztav ^b   Piroth, Zsolt ^b   Fontos, Geza ^b   Juhasz, Eszter D ^c   Szekely, Laszlo ^b   Szelid, Zsolt ^b   Turner, Mark S ^d   Ashrafian, Houman ^e   Frenneaux, Michael P ^a   Andreka, Peter ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b Hungarian Institute of Cardiology   (Hungary)

^c SEMMELWEIS UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

^d BRISTOL ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CREATINE KINASE;

ACUTE HEART INFARCTION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE CUFF; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME RELEASE; FEMALE; HEART INFARCTION SIZE; HEART MUSCLE REPERFUSION; HEART PROTECTION; HISTOPATHOLOGY; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; ISCHEMIC PRECONDITIONING; LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING CORONARY ARTERY; LEG ISCHEMIA; MALE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ST SEGMENT ELEVATION; SWINE;

ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; ANIMALS; AREA UNDER CURVE; CREATINE KINASE; FEMALE; ISCHEMIC PRECONDITIONING, MYOCARDIAL; MALE; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; MYOCARDIUM; SUS SCROFA;

EID: 34249277833     PISSN: 13556037     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2006.114504     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet 2003;361:13-20.
2. Halkin A, Stone G, Dixon S, et al. Impact and determinants of left ventricular function in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2005;96:325-31.
3. Ito H, Maruyama A, Iwakura K, et al. Clinical implications of the 'no reflow' phenomenon. A predictor of complications and left ventricular remodeling in reperfused anterior wall myocardial infarction. Circulation 1996;93:223-8.
4. Cannon RO III. Mechanisms, management and future directions for reperfusion injury after acute myocardial infarction. Nat Clin Prod Cardiovasc Med 2005;2:88-94.
5. Yellon DM, Downey JM. Preconditioning the myocardium: from cellular physiology to clinical cardiology. Physiol Rev 2003;83:1113-51.
6. Kloner RA, Rezkalla SH. Preconditioning, postconditioning and their application to clinical cardiology. Cardiovasc Res 2006;70:297-307.
7. Zhao ZQ, Vinten-Johansen J. Postconditioning: Reduction of reperfusion-induced injury. Cardiovasc Res 006, 70:200-11.
8. Stoat P, Rioufol G, Christophe P, et al. Postconditioning the human heart. Circulation 2005;112:2143-8.
9. Laskey WK, Staat P, Rioufol G, et al. Letter regarding article by Staat et al., "postconditioning the human heart. Circulation 2006;113:e665.
10. Sutton MS, Pfeffer AM, Moye L, et al. Cardiovascular death and left ventricular remodeling two years after myocardial infarction : baseline predictors and impact of long-term use of captopril: information from the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement (SAVE) Trial. Circulation 1997;96:3294-9.
11. Yellon DM, Hausenloy DJ. Realizing the clinical potential of ischemic preconditioning and postconditioning. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 2005;2:568-75.
12. Okamoto F, Allen BS, Buckberg GD, et al. Reperfusion conditions: importance of ensuring gentle versus sudden reperfusion during relief of coronary occlusion. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1986;92:613-20.
13. Kerendi F, Kin H, Halkos ME, et al. Remote postconditioning. Brief renal ischemia and reperfusion applied before coronary artery reperfusion reduces myocardial infarct size via endogenous activation of adenosine receptors. Basic Res Cardiol 2005;100:404-12.
14. Li CM, Zhang XH, Ma XJ, et al. Limb ischemic postconditioning protects myocardium from ischemia-reperfusion injury. Scand Cardiovasc J 2006;40:312-17.
15. Schmidt MR, Smerup M, Konstantinov IE, et al. Intermittent peripheral tissue ischemia during coronary ischemia reduces myocardial infarction: first demonstration of remote ischemic perconditioning. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. Published Online First 15 Dec 2006. doi: 10, 1152/ajpheart.00617., 2006.
16. Kim RJ, David S, Fieno BS, et al. Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. Circulation 1999;100:1992-2002.
17. Crisostomo PR, Aairiuko GM, Wang M, et al. Preconditioning versus postconditioning: mechanisms and therapeutic potentials. J Am Coll Surg 2006;202:797-812.
18. Kharbanda RK, Mortensen UM, White PA, et al. Transient limb ischemia induces remote ischemic preconditioning in vivo. Circulation 2002;106:2881-3.
19. Gho BCG, Schoemaker RG, van den Doel MA, et al. Myocardial protection by brief ischemia in noncardiac tissue. Circulation 1996;94:2193-2200.
20. Iliodromitis EK, Georgiadis M, Cohen MV, et al. Protection from postconditioning depends on the number of short ischemic insults in anesthetized pigs. Basic Res Cardiol 2006;101:502-7.
21. Schwartz LM, Lagranha CJ. Ischemic postconditioning during reperfusion activates Akt and ERK without protecting against lethal myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury in pigs. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2006;290:H1011-18.
22. Heusch G. Postconditioning: old wine in a new bottle? J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:1111-12.