Supporting collaborative learning with tag recommendations: A real-world study in an inquiry-based classroom project

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 409-418

  Kopeinik, Simone ^a   Lex, Elisabeth ^a   Seitlinger, Paul ^b   Albert, Dietrich ^a   Ley, Tobias ^b  

^a GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

^b TALLINN UNIVERSITY   (Estonia)

Author keywords

Base level learning equation; Cognitive user models; Inquiry based learning; Minerva; Personalized tag recommendations; Real world testing; Semantic stabilization; Technology enhanced learning

Indexed keywords

STABILIZATION;

BASE-LEVEL LEARNING EQUATION; INQUIRY-BASED LEARNING; MINERVA; REAL-WORLD TESTING; TAG RECOMMENDATIONS; TECHNOLOGY ENHANCED LEARNING; USER MODELS;

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION;

EID: 85016514163     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/3027385.3027421     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (41)

1. J. R. Anderson and L. J. Schooler. Reflections of the environment in memory. Psychological science, 2(6):396-408, 1991.
2. M. Anjorin, I. Dackiewicz, A. Fernández, C. Rensing, et al. A framework for cross-platform graph-based recommendations for tel. In Proceedings of the 2nd workshop on recommender systems in technology enhanced learning, pages 83-88, 2012.
3. S. Bateman, C. Brooks, G. McCalla, and P. Brusilovsky. Applying collaborative tagging to e-learning. Proceedings of ACM WWW, 3(4), 2007.
4. M. A. Bedek, S. Kopeinik, B. Prunster, and D. Albert. Applying the formal concept analysis to introduce guidance in an inquiry-based learning environment. In Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 2015 IEEE 15th International Conference on, pages 285-289. IEEE, 2015.
5. D. M. Blei, A. Y. Ng, and M. I. Jordan. Latent dirichlet allocation. The Journal of machine Learning research, 3:993-1022, 2003.
6. B. S. Bloom, M. D. Engelhart, E. J. Furst, W. H. Hill, and D. R. Krathwohl. Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook 1: The cognitive domain, 1956.
7. M. A. Chatti, A. L. Dyckhoff, U. Schroeder, and H. Thüs. A reference model for learning analytics. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(5-6):318-331, 2012.
8. E. Diaz-Aviles, M. Fisichella, R. Kawase, W. Nejdl, and A. Stewart. Unsupervised auto-tagging for learning object enrichment. In Towards Ubiquitous Learning, pages 83-96. Springer, 2011.
9. H. Drachsler, H. Hummel, and R. Koper. Recommendations for learners are different: Applying memory-based recommender system techniques to lifelong learning. In TENC: Publications and Preprints. Paper presented at the SIRTEL workshop of EC-TEL 2007, volume 1. Keur der Wetenschap, 2007.
10. H. Drachsler, K. Verbert, O. C. Santos, and N. Manouselis. Panorama of recommender systems to support learning. In Recommender systems handbook, pages 421-451. Springer, 2015.
11. E. Duval. Attention please!: learning analytics for visualization and recommendation. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pages 9-17. ACM, 2011.
12. F. Font, J. Serrà, and X. Serra. Analysis of the impact of a tag recommendation system in a real-world folksonomy. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol., 7(1):6:1-6:27, Sept. 2015.
13. W.-T. Fu. The microstructures of social tagging: a rational model. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, pages 229-238. ACM, 2008.
14. W.-T. Fu and W. Dong. Collaborative indexing and knowledge exploration: A social learning model. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 27(1):39-46, 2012.
15. W.-T. Fu, T. G. Kannampallil, and R. Kang. A semantic imitation model of social tag choices. In Computational Science and Engineering, 2009. CSE'09. International Conference on, volume 4, pages 66-73. IEEE, 2009.
16. H. Halpin, V. Robu, and H. Shepherd. The complex dynamics of collaborative tagging. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 211-220. ACM, 2007.
17. P. Heymann, D. Ramage, and H. Garcia-Molina. Social tag prediction. In Proceedings of the 31st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 531-538. ACM, 2008.
18. D. L. Hintzman. Minerva 2: A simulation model of human memory. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 16(2):96-101, 1984.
19. R. Jaschke, L. Marinho, A. Hotho, L. Schmidt-Thieme, and G. Stumme. Tag recommendations in folksonomies. In Knowledge Discovery in Databases: PKDD 2007, pages 506-514. Springer, 2007.
20. M. K. Khribi, M. Jemni, and O. Nasraoui. Recommendation systems for personalized technology-enhanced learning. In Ubiquitous learning environments and technologies, pages 159-180. Springer, 2015.
21. A. Klašnja-Milićević, M. Ivanović, and A. Nanopoulos. Recommender systems in e-learning environments: a survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. Artificial Intelligence Review, 44(4):571-604, 2015.
22. S. Kopeinik, D. Kowald, and E. Lex. Which algorithms suit which learning environments? a comparative study of recommender systems in tel. In European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, pages 124-138. Springer, 2016.
23. D. Kowald, S. Kopeinik, P. Seitlinger, T. Ley, D. Albert, and C. Trattner. Refining frequency-based tag reuse predictions by means of time and semantic context. In Mining, Modeling, and Recommending'Things' in Social Media, pages 55-74. Springer, 2015.
24. D. Kowald, P. Seitlinger, S. Kopeinik, T. Ley, and C. Trattner. Forgetting the words but remembering the meaning: Modeling forgetting in a verbal and semantic tag recommender. In Mining, Modeling, and Recommending'Things' in Social Media, pages 75-95. Springer, 2015.
25. A. Kuhn, C. Cahill, C. Quintana, and S. Schmoll. Using tags to encourage reflection and annotation on data during nomadic inquiry. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 667-670. ACM, 2011.
26. A. Kuhn, B. McNally, S. Schmoll, C. Cahill, W.-T. Lo, C. Quintana, and I. Delen. How students find, evaluate and utilize peer-collected annotated multimedia data in science inquiry with zydeco. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 3061-3070. ACM, 2012.
27. T. Ley and P. Seitlinger. Dynamics of human categorization in a collaborative tagging system: How social processes of semantic stabilization shape individual sensemaking. Computers in human behavior, 51:140-151, 2015.
28. N. Lin, D. Li, Y. Ding, B. He, Z. Qin, J. Tang, J. Li, and T. Dong. The dynamic features of delicious, flickr, and youtube. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(1):139-162, 2012.
29. G. Macgregor and E. McCulloch. Collaborative tagging as a knowledge organisation and resource discovery tool. Library review, 55(5):291-300, 2006.
30. N. Manouselis, H. Drachsler, R. Vuorikari, H. Hummel, and R. Koper. Recommender systems in technology enhanced learning. In Recommender systems handbook, pages 387-415. Springer, 2011.
31. L. B. Marinho, A. Hotho, R. Jaschke, A. Nanopoulos, S. Rendle, L. Schmidt-Thieme, G. Stumme, and P. Symeonidis. Recommender systems for social tagging systems. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
32. A. Mathes. Folksonomies-cooperative classification and communication through shared metadata, 2004. Available at: http://www.adammathes.com/academic/computermediated-communication/folksonomies.html.
33. K. Niemann. Automatic tagging of learning objects based on their usage in web portals. In Design for Teaching and Learning in a Networked World, pages 240-253. Springer, 2015.
34. A. Protopsaltis, P. Seitlinger, F. Chaimala, O. Firssova, S. Hetzner, K. Kikis-Papadakis, and P. Boytchev. Working environment with social and personal open tools for inquiry based learning: Pedagogic and diagnostic frameworks. The International Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Learning, 20(4):51-63, 2014.
35. R. Raffelsiefen. Semantic stability in derivationally related words. Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science, 4:247-268, 1998.
36. P. Seitlinger, T. Ley, and D. Albert. An implicit-semantic tag recommendation mechanism for socio-semantic learning systems. In Open and Social Technologies for Networked Learning, pages 41-46. Springer, 2013.
37. M. Specht, M. Bedek, E. Duval, P. Held, A. Okada, K. Stevanov, E. Parodi, K. Kikis-Papadakis, and V. Strahovnik. Wespot: Inquiry based learning meets learning analytics. In 3rd international conference on e-Learning, pages 15-20, 2012.
38. C. Trattner, D. Kowald, P. Seitlinger, S. Kopeinik, and T. Ley. Modeling activation processes in human memory to predict the use of tags in social bookmarking systems. The Journal of Web Science, 2(1):1-16, 2015.
39. K. Verbert, H. Drachsler, N. Manouselis, M. Wolpers, R. Vuorikari, and E. Duval. Dataset-driven research for improving recommender systems for learning. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pages 44-53. ACM, 2011.
40. C. Wagner, P. Singer, M. Strohmaier, and B. Huberman. Semantic stability and implicit consensus in social tagging streams. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 1(1):108-120, 2014.
41. Z. Xu, Y. Fu, J. Mao, and D. Su. Towards the semantic web: Collaborative tag suggestions. In Collaborative web tagging workshop at WWW2006, Edinburgh, Scotland, 2006.