The microstructures of social tagging: A rational model

Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 229-238

  Fu, Wai Tat ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Categorization; Exploratory search; Rational model; Tagging

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE ACTIVITIES; COLLABORATIVE SYSTEMS; DISTRIBUTED COGNITION FRAMEWORKS; EXPLORATORY SEARCH; INFORMATION TASKS; INTEGRATED PREDICTION; MULTIPLE USER; RATIONAL MODELS; SEARCH EFFICIENCY; TAGGING SYSTEMS;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; GROUPWARE; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; MICROSTRUCTURE;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

EID: 70450148492     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1460563.1460600     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Anderson, J. R. (1990). The adaptive character of thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Anderson, J. R., Bothell, D., Byrne, M. D., Douglass, S., Lebiere, C., & Qin, Y . (2004). An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review 111, 1036-1060.
3. Anderson, J. & Schooler, L. (1991). Reflections of the environment in memory. Psyc Science, 2, 396-408.
4. Blackmon, M. H., Kitajima, M., & Polson, P. G. (2005). Tool for accurately predicting website navigation problems, non-problems, problem severity, and effectiveness of repairs. Proc. of CHI 2005.
5. Budiu, R.; Royer, C.; Pirolli, P. L. (2007). Modeling information scent: a comparison of LSA, PMI and GLSA similarity measures on common tests and corpora. In Proc. of 8th RIAO Conference.
6. Cattuto, C., Loreto, V., & Pietronero, L. (2007). Semiotic dynamics and collaborative tagging. PNAS, 104, 1461-1464.
7. Fu, W.-T., & Pirolli, P. (2007). SNIF-ACT: A cognitive model of user navigation on the World Wide Web. Human-Computer Interaction, 22, 355-412.
8. Golder & Huberman, (2006). Usage Patterns of collaborative tagging systems. J. Info. Sci., 32, 198-208.
9. Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., Kirsh, D. (2000). Distributed Cognition: Toward a New Foundation for Human-Computer Interaction Research, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7 (2), 174-196.
10. Hutchins, E. (1995). How a cockpit remembers its speed. Cognitive Science, 19, 265-288.
11. Kitajima, M., Blackmon, M., & Polson, P. (2005). Cognitive architecture for Website design and usability evaluation: Comprehension and information scent in performing by exploration (pp. 343-373). HCII.
12. Marchionini, G. (2006). Exploratory search: From finding to understanding. Comm. of the ACM, 49, 41-46.
13. Matveeva, I., Levow, G., Farahat, A., & Royer, C. (2005). Terms representation with generalized latent semantic analysis. In Proc. ranlp Conference.
14. Medin, D. & Schafer, M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psy Review, 85, 207-238.
15. Medin, D., Lynch, E., & Coley, J. (1997). Categorization and reasoning among tree experts: Do all road lead to Rome? Cognitive Psychology, 32, 49-96.
16. Oaksford, M. & Chater, N. (2006). Bayesian Rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Piaget, J. (1963, 2001). The psychology of intelligence. New York: Routledge.
18. Pirolli, P. (2004). The InfoCLASS model: conceptual richness and inter-person conceptual consensus about information collections. Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society, 11, 197-213.
19. Pirolli, P. (2005). Rational analyses of information foraging on the Web. Cognitive Science, 29, 343-373.
20. Pirolli, P., & Card, S. K. (1999). Information foraging. Psychological Review, 106, 643-675.
21. Qu, Y. & Furnas, G. (2005). Source of structure in sensemaking. In Proc. of CHI, 1989-1992.
22. Qu, Y. & Furnas, G. (2008). Model-driven formative evaluation of exploratory search: A study under a sensemaking framework.
23. Russell, D. M., Stefik, M. J., Pirolli, P., & Card, S. K. (1993). The cost structure of sensemaking. Proc. of ACM INTERCHI'93, 269-276.
24. Sen, S., Lam, S., Rashid, A.,Cosley, D., Frankowski, D., Osterhouse, J., Harper, F., & Riedl, J. (2006). Tagging, communities, vocabulary, evolution. In Proc. of CSCW.
25. Siegler, R. S., & Crowley, K. (1991). The microgenetic method: A direct means for studying cognitive development. American Psychologist, 46, 606-620.
26. White, R., Kules, B., Drucker, S., & Schraefel, M. (2006). Supporting exploratory search: Introduction. Communications of the ACM, 49, 36-39.
27. Zhang, J. & Norman, D. (1994). Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. Cognitive Science, 18, 87-122.