How students find, evaluate and utilize peer-collected annotated multimedia data in science inquiry with Zydeco

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 3061-3070

  Kuhn, Alex ^a   McNally, Brenna ^b   Schmoll, Shannon ^b   Cahill, Clara ^b   Lo, Wan Tzu ^b   Quintana, Chris ^b   Delen, Ibrahim ^b  

^a Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Children and technology; Learner centered design; Mobile computing; Science inquiry; Tagging

Indexed keywords

CLASSROOM STUDY; DATA INTERPRETATION; DATA SETS; LEARNER-CENTERED; MULTI-COMPONENT SYSTEMS; MULTIMEDIA DATA; SCIENCE INQUIRY; SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY; TAGGING;

DATA PROCESSING; HUMAN ENGINEERING; MOBILE COMPUTING;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84862060622     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2207676.2208719     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science Benchmarks for Science Literacy. Oxford University Press, New York, 2009.
2. Ames, M. and Naaman, M. Why we tag: motivations for annotation in mobile and online media. In Proc. CHI 2007, ACM (2007), 971-980.
3. Berland, L.K. and McNeill, K.L. Using a learning progression to inform scientific argumentation in talk and writing. Learning Progression in Science, 2009.
4. Bilal, D. Children's Use of the Yahooligans! Web Search Engine. III. Cognitive and Physical Behaviors on Fully Self- Generated Search Tasks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53 (13), 1170-1183.
5. Bischoff, K., Firan, C.S., Nejdl, W. and Paiu, R. Can all tags be used for search? In Proc. Information and Knowledge Management, ACM (2008), 193-202.
6. Cahill, C., Kuhn, A., Schmoll, S., Lo, W.-T., McNally, B. and Quintana, C. Mobile learning in museums: how mobile supports for learning influence student behavior. In Proc. Interaction Design and Children 2011, ACM (2011), 21-28.
7. Cahill, C., Lo, W.-T., Kuhn, A., Quintana, C., McNally, B., Schmoll, S. and Krajcik, J., Student use of multimodal data and metadata tools during nomadic inquiry. In Proc. Mobile and Contextual Learning 2011.
8. Druin, A., Foss, E., Hutchinson, H., Golub, E. and Hatley, L. Children's roles using keyword search interfaces at home. In Proc. CHI 2010, ACM (2010), 413-422.
9. Fraser, D.S., Smith, H., Tallyn, E., Kirk, D., Benford, S., Rowland, D., Paxton, M., Price, S. and Fitzpatrick, G. The SENSE project: a context-inclusive approach to studying environmental science within and across schools. In Proc. Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, International Society of the Learning Sciences, 2005, 155-159.
10. Furnas, G., Fake, C., von Ahn, L., Schachter, J., Golder, S., Fox, K., Davis, M., Marlow, C. and Naaman, M. Why do tagging systems work? In Proc. CHI 2006, ACM (2006), 36-39.
11. Hutchinson, H.B., Bederson, B.B. and Druin, A. The evolution of the international children's digital library searching and browsing interface. In Proc. Interaction Design and Children 2006, ACM (2006), 105-112.
12. Jochmann-Mannak, H.E., Huibers, T.W.C. and Sanders, T.J.M. Children's information retrieval: beyond examining search strategies and interfaces. The BCSIRSG Symposium: Future Directions in Information Access, British Computer Society, 2008, 64-72.
13. Kuhn, A., Cahill, C., Quintana, C. and Schmoll, S. Using tags to encourage reflection and annotation on data during nomadic inquiry. In Proc. CHI 2011, ACM (2011), 667-670.
14. Kuhn, A., McNally, B., Cahill, C., Quintana, C. and Soloway, E. Constructing scientific arguments with user collected data in nomadic inquiry. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2011, ACM (2011), 2167-2172.
15. Martin, S., Stanton Fraser, D., Fraser, M., Woodgate, D. and Crellin, D. The impact of hand held mobile technologies upon children's motivation and learning. In Proc. Mobile and Contextual Learning 2010.
16. McNeill, K.L. and Krajcik, J. Supporting grade 5-8 students in constructing explanations in science: The claim, evidence and reasoning framework for talk and writing. Pearson Allyn & Bacon, New York, NY, 2011.
17. Razikin, K., Goh, D.H.-L., Teng, Y.-L., Nguyen, Q.M., Kim, T.N.Q., Lim, E.-P., Chang, C.H., Chatterjea, K. and Sun, A. Sharing Mobile Multimedia Annotations to Support Inquiry-Based Learning Using MobiTOP. Active Media Technology, 2009, 171-182.
18. Scheuer, O., Loll, F., Pinkwart, N. and McLaren, B.M. Computer-supported argumentation: A review of the state of the art. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5 (1), 43-102.
19. Vavoula, G., Sharples, M., Rudman, P., Meek, J. and Lonsdale, P. Myartspace: Design and evaluation of support for learning with multimedia phones between classrooms and museums. Computers & Education, 53 (2), 286-299.
20. Woodgate, D., Stanton Fraser, D., Gower, A., Glancy, M., Gower, A.P., Chamberlain, A., Dillon, T. and Crellin, D. Using mobile and pervasive technologies to engage formal and informal learners in scientific debate. in Goh, T. ed. Multiplatform E-Learning Systems and Technologies: Mobile Devices for Ubiquitous ICTBased Education, Information Science Reference, 2010, 196-214.