Who, me? An inductive study of novice experts in the context of how editors come to understand theoretical contribution

Academy of Management Perspectives

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 4-27

  Corley, Kevin G ^a   Schinoff, Beth S ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85016112121     PISSN: 15589080     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5465/amp.2015.0131     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. Aguinis, H., de Bruin, G. P., Cunningham, D., Hall, N. L., Culpepper, S. A., & Gottfredson, R. K. (2010). What does not kill you (sometimes) makes you stronger: Productivity fluctuations of journal editors. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9, 683-695.
2. Allen, T. D., Eby, L. T., Poteet, M. L., Lentz, E., & Lima, L. (2004). Career benefits associated with mentoring for protégés: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 127-136.
3. Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. (2007). Unraveling HRM: Identity, ceremony, and control in a management consulting firm. Organization Science, 18, 711-723.
4. Arbaugh, J. B. (2013). Emerging from the black box: AMLE's continuing influences on its newest past editor. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12, 115-124.
5. Ashforth, B. E., Harrison, S. H., & Sluss, D. M. (2014). Becoming: The interaction of socialization and identity in organizations over time. In A. J. Shipp & Y. Fried (Eds.), Time and work: How time impacts individuals (Vol. 1, pp. 11-39). East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
6. Ashforth, B. E., Sluss, D. M., & Saks, A. M. (2007). Socialization tactics, proactive behavior, and newcomer learning: Integrating socialization models. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70, 447-462.
7. Bakanic, V., McPhail, C., & Simon, R. J. (1987). The manuscript review and decision-making process. American Sociological Review, 52, 631-642.
8. Balogun, J., Bartunek, J. M., & Do, B. (2015). Senior managers' sensemaking and responses to strategic change. Organization Science, 26, 960-979.
9. Banks, G. C., et al. (2016). Questions about questionable research practices in the field of management: A guest commentary. Journal of Management, 42, 5-20.
10. Bartunek, J. M., Rynes, S. L., & Ireland, R. D. (2006).What makes management research interesting, and why does it matter? Academy ofManagement Journal, 49, 9-15.
11. Baruch, Y., Konrad, A. M., Aguinis, H., & Starbuck, W. H. (2008). Epilogue: Trade-offs among editorial goals in complex publishing environments. In Y. Baruch, A. M. Konrad, H. Aguinis, & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Opening the black box of editorship (pp. 250-270). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
12. Bedeian, A. G. (2004). Peer review and the social construction of knowledge in the management discipline. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3, 198-216.
13. Bedeian, A. G., Taylor, S. G., & Miller, A. N. (2010). Management science on the credibility bubble: Cardinal sins and various misdemeanors. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9, 715-725.
14. Benner, P. (1984). From novice to expert: Excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley Publishing.
15. Bergh, D. D. (2003). Thinking strategically about contribution. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 135-136.
16. Bergh, D. D. (2008). The developmental editor: Assessing and directing manuscript contribution. In Y. Baruch, A. M. Konrad, H. Aguinis, & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Opening the black box of editorship (pp. 114-123). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
17. Carey, B. (2015a, June 15). Science, now under scrutiny itself. New York Times. Retrieved from http://nyti. ms/1GHXpAU
18. Carey, B. (2015b, August 27). Many psychology findings not as strong as claimed, study says. New York Times. Retrieved from http://nyti.ms/1U8G10F
19. Carr, E. S. (2010). Enactments of expertise. Annual Review of Anthropology, 39, 17-32.
20. Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). London: SAGE.
21. Clair, J. A. (2015). Procedural injustice in the system of peer review and scientific misconduct. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 14, 159-172.
22. Colquitt, J. A. (2011). From the editors: The next three years at AMJ - Maintaining the mission while expanding the journal. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 9-14.
23. Corley, K. G. (2015). A commentary on "What grounded theory is ⋯ ": Engaging a phenomenon from the perspective of those living it. Organizational Research Methods, 18, 600-605.
24. Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36, 12-32.
25. Crane, D. (1967). The gatekeepers of science: Some factors affecting the selection of articles for scientific journals. American Sociologist, 2, 195-201.
26. Daley, B. J. (1999). Novice to expert: An exploration of how professionals learn. Adult Education Quarterly, 49, 133-147.
27. Dane, E. (2010). Reconsidering the trade-off between expertise and flexibility: A cognitive entrenchment perspective. Academy of Management Review, 35, 579-603.
28. Dane, E., & Pratt, M. G. (2007). Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making. Academy of Management Review, 32, 33-54.
29. Davis, M. S. (1971). That's interesting! Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1, 309-344.
30. Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (1986). Mind over machine. New York: Macmillan.
31. Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (2005). Peripheral vision expertise in real-world contexts. Organization Studies, 26, 779-792.
32. Dreyfus, S. E., & Dreyfus, H. L. (1980). A five-stage model of the mental activities involved in direct skill acquisition (Operations Research Center Research Report). Berkeley, CA: University of California at Berkeley.
33. Eden, D. (2002). From the editors: Replication, meta-analysis, scientific progress, and AMJ's publication policy. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 841-846.
34. Eden, D. (2004). Reflections on the AMJ associate editor role. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 167-173.
35. Einhorn, H. J. (1974). Expert judgment: Some necessary conditions and an example. Journal of Applied Psychology, 595, 562-571.
36. Ericsson, K. A., & Charness, N. (1994). Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition. American Psychologist, 49, 725-747.
37. Ericsson, K. A.,Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363-406.
38. Ericsson, K. A., Prietula, M. J., & Cokely, E. T. (2007). The making of an expert. Harvard Business Review, 85(7/8), 114-121.
39. Ericsson, K. A., Roring, R. W., & Nandagopal, K. (2007). Giftedness and evidence for reproducibly superior performance: An account based on the expert-performance framework. High Ability Studies, 18, 3-56.
40. Ferris, G. R., Hochwarter, W. A., & Buckley, M. R. (2011). Theory in the organizational sciences: How will we know it when we see it? Organizational Psychology Review, 2, 94-106.
41. Gavetti, G., & Warglien, M. (2015). A model of collective interpretation. Organization Science, 26, 1263-1283.
42. Gephart, R. P. (2004). Qualitative research and the Academy of Management Journal. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 454-462.
43. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction.
44. Gobet, F.,&Chassy, P. (2009). Expertise and intuition:Atale of three theories. Minds and Machines, 19, 151-180.
45. Grant, A. M., & Pollock, T. G. (2011). From the editors- Publishing in AMJ part 3: Setting the hook. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 873-879.
46. Harrison, S. H., & Rouse, E. D. (2014). Let's dance! Elastic coordination in creative group work: A qualitative study of modern dancers. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 1256-1283.
47. Hernes, T. (2014). In search of a soul of relevance for European management research. European Management Journal, 32(6), 852-857.
48. Hirschauer, S. (2010). Editorial judgments: A praxeology of "voting" in peer review. Social Studies of Science, 40, 71-103.
49. Hogarth, R. M. (2001). Educating intuition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
50. Hollenbeck, J. R. (2008). The role of editing in knowledge development: Consensus shifting and consensus creation. In Y. Baruch, A. M. Konrad, H. Aguinis, & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Opening the black box of editorship (pp. 16-26). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
51. Humberd, B., & Rouse, E. (2016). Seeing you in me and me in you: Personal identification in the phases of mentoring relationships. Academy of Management Review, 41, 435-455.
52. Joshi, A. (2014). By whom and when is women's expertise recognized? The interactive effects of gender and education in science and engineering teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59, 202-239.
53. Kahneman, D., & Klein, G. (2009). Conditions for intuitive expertise: A failure to disagree. American Psychologist, 64, 515-526.
54. Kilduff, M. (2006). Editor's comments: Publishing theory. Academy of Management Review, 31, 252-255.
55. Konrad, A. M. (2008). Knowledge creation and the editor's role. In Y. Baruch, A. M. Konrad, H. Aguinis, & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Opening the black box of editorship (pp. 3-15). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
56. Kram, K. E. (1983). Phases of the mentor relationship. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 608-625.
57. Kram, K. E.,&Isabella, L. A. (1985). Mentoring alternatives: The role of peer relationships in career development. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 110-132.
58. Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
59. Lamont, M. (2009). How professors think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
60. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
61. Lee, C. J., Sugimoto, C. R., Zhang, G., & Cronin, B. (2013). Bias in peer review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64, 2-17.
62. Leonard, D., Barton, G., & Barton, M. (2013). Make yourself an expert (digest summary). Harvard Business Review, 91, 127-131.
63. Locke, K., & Golden-Biddle, K. (1997). Constructing opportunities for contribution: Structuring intertextual coherence and"problematizing" inorganizational studies. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 1023-1062.
64. Maitlis, S., & Christianson, M. (2014). Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. Academy of Management Annals, 8, 57-125.
65. Mieg, H. A. (2006). Social and sociological factors in the development of expertise. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 743-760). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
66. Muse. (2014, December 1). 7 mistakes most first-time managers make at least once. Forbes. Retrieved from http://onforb.es/1v47C0d
67. Myers, G. (1985). Texts as knowledge claims: The social construction of two biology articles. Social Studies of Science, 15, 593-630.
68. Nguyen, H. T. (2006). Constructing "expertness":A novice pharmacist's development of interactional competence in patient consultations. Communication & Medicine, 3, 147-160.
69. Nielsen, K. H. (2013). Scientific communication and the nature of science. Science & Education, 22, 2067-2086.
70. Ollier-Malaterre, A., Rothbard, N. P., & Berg, J. M. (2013). When worlds collide in cyberspace: How boundary work in online social networks impacts professional relationships. Academy of Management Review, 38(4), 645-669.
71. O'Reilly, K., Paper, D., & Marx, S. (2012). Demystifying grounded theory for business research. Organizational Research Methods, 15, 247-262.
72. Peters, H. P. (2008). Scientists as public experts. In M. Bucchi & B. Trench (Eds.), Handbook of public communication of science and technology (pp. 131-146). London: Routledge.
73. Pratt, M. G., Rockmann, K. W., & Kaufmann, J. B. (2006). Constructing professional identity: The role of work and identity learning cycles in the customization of identity among medical residents. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 235-262.
74. Raabe, B., & Beehr, T. A. (2003). Formal mentoring versus supervisor and coworker relationships: Differences in perceptions and impact. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 271-293.
75. Roediger, H. L. (1987). The role of journal editors in the scientific process. In D. N. Jackson & J. Rushton (Eds.), Scientific excellence: Origins and assessment (pp. 222-252). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications.
76. Rosa, P. J. (2013). Recent trends in leading entrepreneurship research: The challenge for European researchers. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 3(1), 35-43.
77. Rynes, S. (2002). Some reflections on contribution. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 311-313.
78. Sandberg, J., & Tsoukas, H. (2015). Making sense of the sensemaking perspective: Its constituents, limitations, and opportunities for further development. Journal of Organizational Behavior, S1, S6-S32.
79. Scholarly Kitchen. (2014, September 23). The editor - A vital role we barely talk about anymore. Society for Scholarly Publishing. Retrieved from https:// scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2014/09/23/the-editora-vital-role-we-barely-talk-about-anymore
80. Simon, H. A. (1989). Models of thought (Vol. 2). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
81. Simon, R. J., Bakanic, V., & McPhail, C. (1986). Who complains to journal editors and what happens. Sociological Inquiry, 56, 259-271.
82. Smith, K. G., & Hitt, M. A. (Eds.). (2005). Great minds in management: The process of theory development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
83. Steinmetz, G. (2005). The politics of method in the human sciences: Positivism and its epistemological others. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
84. Strang, D., & Siler, K. (2015). Revising as reframing: Original submissions versus published papers in Administrative Science Quarterly, 2005 to 2009. Sociological Theory, 33, 71-96.
85. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
86. Suddaby, R. (2006). From the editors: What grounded theory is not. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 633-642.
87. Twenge, J. M., Campbell, S. M., Hoffman, B. J., & Lance, C. E. (2010). Generational differences in work values: Leisure and extrinsic values increasing, social and intrinsic values decreasing. Journal of Management, 36(5), 1117-1142.
88. Vough, H. C., Cardador, M. T., Bednar, M., Dane, E. I., & Pratt, M. G. (2013). What clients don't get about my profession: A model of perceived role-based image discrepancies. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 1050-1080.
89. Weick, K. E. (1995).Sensemaking inorganizations.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
90. Whetten, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14, 490-495.