Knowledge creation and the journal editor's role

Opening the Black Box of Editorship

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 3-15

  Konrad, Alison M ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650875926     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1057/9780230582590     Document Type: Chapter

References (15)

1. Academy of Management. (December 2005). Academy of Management Code of Ethics: Policies and Procedures for Handling Charges of Ethical Standards Violations. Available online at http://www.aomonline.org/aom.asp?id271 (last accessed May 7, 2007).
2. Aguinis, H., & Henle, C. A. (2002). Ethics in research. In S. G. Rogelberg (Ed.), Handbook of Research Methods in Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 34-56). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers [available online at http://carbon.cudenver.edu/~haguinis/ AguinisHenle2002.pdf].
3. Argyris, C., & Schon, D. (1978). Organizational Learning: A theory of action perspective, Addison-Wesley, Reading MA, 1978.
4. Calhoun, M. A., & Starbuck, W. H. (2003). Barriers to creating knowledge. In M. Easterby-Smith & M. A. Lyles (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge (pp. 471-90). London: Blackwell.
5. De Cock, C., & Jeanes, E. L. (2006). Questioning consensus, cultivating conflict. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15, 18-30.
6. Feldman, D. C. (2006). Communicating more effectively with editors: Strategies for authors and reviewers. In Y. Baruch, S. E. Sullivan, & H. N. Schepmyer (Eds.), Winning Reviews: A guide for evaluating scholarly writing (pp. 236-50). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
7. Foss, N. J. (2007). The emerging knowledge governance approach: Challenges and characteristics. Organization, 14, 29-52.
8. Nonaka, I., von Krogh, G., & Voelpel, S. (2006). Organizational knowledge creation theory: Evolutionary paths and future advances. Organization Studies, 27, 1179-208.
9. Pfeffer, J. (1993). Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable. Academy of Management Review, 18, 599-620.
10. Starbuck, W. H. (2005). How much better are the most-prestigious journals? The statistics of academic publication. Organization Science, 16, 180-200.
11. Tsang, E. W. K., & Frey, B. S. (2007). The as-is journal review process: Let authors own their ideas. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6, 128-36.
12. Tywoniak, S. A. (2007). Knowledge in four deformation dimensions. Organization, 14, 53-76.
13. Van de Ven, A. H. (1999). The buzzing, blooming, confusing world of organization and management theory: A view from Lake Wobegon University. Journal of Management Inquiry, 8, 118-25.
14. Van Maanen, J. (1995). Style as theory. Organization Science, 6, 133-43.
15. Vermeulen, F. (2005). On rigor and relevance: Fostering dialectic progress in management research. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 978-82.