The plant perceptron connects environment to development

Nature

Volumn 543, Issue 7645, 2017, Pages 337-345

  Scheres, Ben ^a   Van Der Putten, Wim H ^a,b  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE OF ECOLOGY NIOO KNAW   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PHYTOHORMONE; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR;

ADAPTATION; ENVIRONMENTAL GRADIENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; PLANT; TRADE-OFF;

BIOTIC STRESS; ENVIRONMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; IMMUNITY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LIFE HISTORY; PERCEPTRON; PHENOTYPE; PLANT DEVELOPMENT; PLANT GROWTH; PLANT RESPONSE; PLANT STRESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; ECOSYSTEM; EVOLUTION; METABOLISM; PLANT;

BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENT; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); PLANT DEVELOPMENT; PLANTS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 85015412094     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature22010     Document Type: Review

References (139)

1. Heywood, V., Brummitt, R. & Culham, A. Flowering Plants of the World (Croom Helm, 2007).
2. Laughlin, D. C. The intrinsic dimensionality of plant traits and its relevance to community assembly. J. Ecol. 102, 186-193 (2014).
3. Díaz, S. et al. The global spectrum of plant form and function. Nature 529, 167-171 (2016).
4. Abley, K., Locke, J. C. W. & Leyser, H. M. O. Developmental mechanisms underlying variable, invariant and plastic phenotypes. Ann. Bot. 117, 733-748 (2016).
5. Reich, P. B. et al. The evolution of plant functional variation: traits, spectra, and strategies. Int. J. Plant Sci. 164, S143-S164 (2003).
6. Freschet, G. T., Swart, E. M. & Cornelissen, J. H. C. Integrated plant phenotypic responses to contrasting above-and below-ground resources: key roles of specific leaf area and root mass fraction. New Phytol. 206, 1247-1260 (2015).
7. Pieterse, C. M. J., Leon-Reyes, A., Van der Ent, S. & Van Wees, S. C. M. Networking by small-molecule hormones in plant immunity. Nature Chem. Biol. 5, 308-316 (2009).
8. Pierik, R. & Testerink, C. The art of being flexible: how to escape from shade, salt, and drought. Plant Physiol. 166, 5-22 (2014).
9. Rellán-Álvarez, R., Lobet, G. & Dinneny, J. R. Environmental control of root system biology. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 67, 619-642 (2016).
10. Kempel, A., Schadler, M., Chrobock, T., Fischer, M. & van Kleunen, M. Tradeoffs associated with constitutive and induced plant resistance against herbivory. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 5685-5689 (2011).
11. Dicke, M. & Baldwin, I. T. The evolutionary context for herbivore-induced plant volatiles: beyond the 'cry for help'. Trends Plant Sci. 15, 167-175 (2010).
12. Lavorel, S. et al. A novel framework for linking functional diversity of plants with other trophic levels for the quantification of ecosystem services. J. Veg. Sci. 24, 942-948 (2013).
13. Alpert, P. Constraints of tolerance: why are desiccation-tolerant organisms so small or rare? J. Exp. Biol. 209, 1575-1584 (2006).
14. Herms, D. A. & Mattson, W. J. The dilemma of plants: to grow or to defend. Q. Rev. Biol. 67, 283-335 (1992).
15. Agrawal, A. A. Current trends in the evolutionary ecology of plant defence. Funct. Ecol. 25, 420-432 (2011).
16. Huot, B., Yao, J., Montgomery, B. L. & He, S. Y. Growth-defense tradeoffs in plants: a balancing act to optimize fitness. Mol. Plant 7, 1267-1287 (2014).
17. Geng, Y. et al. A spatio-temporal understanding of growth regulation during the salt stress response in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 25, 2132-2154 (2013).
18. Campos, M. L. et al. Rewiring of jasmonate and phytochrome B signalling uncouples plant growth-defense tradeoffs. Nature Commun. 7, 12570 (2016).
19. Karasov, T. L. et al. The long-term maintenance of a resistance polymorphism through diffuse interactions. Nature 512, 436-440 (2014).
20. Pérez-Jaramillo, J. E., Mendes, R. & Raaijmakers, J. M. Impact of plant domestication on rhizosphere microbiome assembly and functions. Plant Mol. Biol. 90, 635-644 (2016).
21. Rasmann, S. et al. Recruitment of entomopathogenic nematodes by insect-damaged maize roots. Nature 434, 732-737 (2005).
22. Hasegawa, P. M., Bressan, R. A., Zhu, J. K. & Bohnert, H. J. Plant cellular and molecular responses to high salinity. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 51, 463-499 (2000).
23. Rosenblatt, F. The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychol. Rev. 65, 386-408 (1958).
24. Bray, D. Protein molecules as computational elements in living cells. Nature 376, 307-312 (1995).
25. Alon, U. Network motifs: theory and experimental approaches. Nature Rev. Genet. 8, 450-461 (2007).
26. Hochreiter, S. & Schmidhuber, J. Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 9, 1735-1780 (1997).
27. Grime, J. P. & Pierce, S. The Evolutionary Strategies that Shape Ecosystems (Wiley-Blackwell, 2012).
28. Diaz, S. et al. The plant traits that drive ecosystems: evidence from three continents. J. Veg. Sci. 15, 295-304 (2004).
29. Fine, P. V. A. et al. The growth-defense trade-off and habitat specialization by plants in Amazonian forests. Ecology 87, S150-S162 (2006).
30. Albert, C. H. et al. A multi-trait approach reveals the structure and the relative importance of intra-vs. interspecific variability in plant traits. Funct. Ecol. 24, 1192-1201 (2010).
31. van Velzen, E. & Etienne, R. S. The importance of ecological costs for the evolution of plant defense against herbivory. J. Theor. Biol. 372, 89-99 (2015).
32. Wright, I. J. et al. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428, 821-827 (2004).
33. Cornwell, W. K. et al. Plant species traits are the predominant control on litter decomposition rates within biomes worldwide. Ecol. Lett. 11, 1065-1071 (2008).
34. MacArthur, R. H. & Wilson, E. O. The Theory of Island Biogeography (Princeton University Press, 1967).
35. Meiners, S. J., Pickett, S. T. A. & Cadenasso, M. L. An Integrative Approach to Successional Dynamics (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2015).
36. Westoby, M., Falster, D. S., Moles, A. T., Vesk, P. A. & Wright, I. J. Plant ecological strategies: some leading dimensions of variation between species. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33, 125-159 (2002).
37. Messier, J., McGill, B. J. & Lechowicz, M. J. How do traits vary across ecological scales? A case for trait-based ecology. Ecol. Lett. 13, 838-848 (2010).
38. Banta, J. A. et al. Climate envelope modelling reveals intraspecific relationships among flowering phenology, niche breadth and potential range size in Arabidopsis thaliana. Ecol. Lett. 15, 769-777 (2012).
39. Dostál, P. Plant competitive interactions and invasiveness: searching for the effects of phylogenetic relatedness and origin on competition intensity. Am. Nat. 177, 655-667 (2011).
40. Bardgett, R. D., Mommer, L. & De Vries, F. T. Going underground: root traits as drivers of ecosystem processes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 29, 692-699 (2014).
41. Baxendale, C., Orwin, K. H., Poly, F., Pommier, T. & Bardgett, R. D. Are plant-soil feedback responses explained by plant traits? New Phytol. 204, 408-423 (2014).
42. Mommer, L., Kirkegaard, J. & van Ruijven, J. Root-root interactions: towards a rhizosphere framework. Trends Plant Sci. 21, 209-217 (2016).
43. Coen, E. Cells to Civilizations: the Principles of Change that Shape Life (Princeton Univ. Press, 2012).
44. Scheres, B. Stem-cell niches: nursery rhymes across kingdoms. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 345-354 (2007).
45. Smith, R. S. et al. A plausible model of phyllotaxis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 1301-1306 (2006).
46. Bilsborough, G. D. et al. Model for the regulation of Arabidopsis thaliana leaf margin development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 3424-3429 (2011).
47. Mähönen, A. P. et al. PLETHORA gradient formation mechanism separates auxin responses. Nature 515, 125-129 (2014).
48. Blilou, I. et al. The PIN auxin efflux facilitator network controls growth and patterning in Arabidopsis roots. Nature 433, 39-44 (2005).
49. Benková, E. et al. Local, efflux-dependent auxin gradients as a common module for plant organ formation. Cell 115, 591-602 (2003).
50. Davies, P. Plant Hormones: Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013).
51. Santner, A. & Estelle, M. Recent advances and emerging trends in plant hormone signalling. Nature 459, 1071-1078 (2009).
52. Depuydt, S. & Hardtke, C. S. Hormone signalling crosstalk in plant growth regulation. Curr. Biol. 21, R365-R373 (2011).
53. Domagalska, M. A. & Leyser, O. Signal integration in the control of shoot branching. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 12, 211-221 (2011).
54. Dello Ioio, R. et al. A genetic framework for the control of cell division and differentiation in the root meristem. Science 322, 1380-1384 (2008).
55. De Rybel, B. et al. Integration of growth and patterning during vascular tissue formation in Arabidopsis. Science 345, 1255215 (2014).
56. Besnard, F. et al. Cytokinin signalling inhibitory fields provide robustness to phyllotaxis. Nature 505, 417-421 (2014).
57. Prusinkiewicz, P. et al. Control of bud activation by an auxin transport switch. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 17431-17436 (2009).
58. Shinohara, N., Taylor, C. & Leyser, O. Strigolactone can promote or inhibit shoot branching by triggering rapid depletion of the auxin efflux protein PIN1 from the plasma membrane. PLoS Biol 11, e1001474 (2013).
59. Fletcher, J. C., Brand, U., Running, M. P., Simon, R. & Meyerowitz, E. M. Signaling of cell fate decisions by CLAVATA3 in Arabidopsis shoot meristems. Science 283, 1911-1914 (1999).
60. Matsuzaki, Y., Ogawa-Ohnishi, M., Mori, A. & Matsubayashi, Y. Secreted peptide signals required for maintenance of root stem cell niche in Arabidopsis. Science 329, 1065-1067 (2010).
61. Clark, S. E., Williams, R. W. & Meyerowitz, E. M. The CLAVATA1 gene encodes a putative receptor kinase that controls shoot and floral meristem size in Arabidopsis. Cell 89, 575-585 (1997).
62. Shinohara, H., Mori, A., Yasue, N., Sumida, K. & Matsubayashi, Y. Identification of three LRR-RKs involved in perception of root meristem growth factor in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 3897-3902 (2016).
63. Araya, T. et al. CLE-CLAVATA1 peptide-receptor signaling module regulates the expansion of plant root systems in a nitrogen-dependent manner. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 2029-2034 (2014).
64. Searle, I. R. et al. Long-distance signaling in nodulation directed by a CLAVATA1-like receptor kinase. Science 299, 109-112 (2003).
65. Nemhauser, J. L., Hong, F. X. & Chory, J. Different plant hormones regulate similar processes through largely nonoverlapping transcriptional responses. Cell 126, 467-475 (2006).
66. Stepanova, A. N. et al. TAA1-mediated auxin biosynthesis is essential for hormone crosstalk and plant development. Cell 133, 177-191 (2008).
67. Sun, Y. et al. Integration of brassinosteroid signal transduction with the transcription network for plant growth regulation in Arabidopsis. Dev. Cell 19, 765-777 (2010).
68. Vitasse, Y. et al. Elevational adaptation and plasticity in seedling phenology of temperate deciduous tree species. Oecologia 171, 663-678 (2013).
69. van der Heijden, M. G. A. & Hartmann, M. Networking in the plant microbiome. PLoS Biol. 14, e1002378 (2016).
70. Chen, M., Chory, J. & Fankhauser, C. Light signal transduction in higher plants. Annu. Rev. Genet. 38, 87-117 (2004).
71. Rizzini, L. et al. Perception of UV-B by the Arabidopsis UVR8 protein. Science 332, 103-106 (2011).
72. Li, L. et al. Linking photoreceptor excitation to changes in plant architecture. Genes Dev. 26, 785-790 (2012).
73. de Lucas, M. et al. A molecular framework for light and gibberellin control of cell elongation. Nature 451, 480-484 (2008).
74. Djakovic-Petrovic, T., de Wit, M., Voesenek, L. A. & Pierik, R. DELLA protein function in growth responses to canopy signals. Plant J. 51, 117-126 (2007).
75. Haga, K., Takano, M., Neumann, R. & Iino, M. The rice coleoptile phototropism 1 gene encoding an ortholog of Arabidopsis NPH3 is required for phototropism of coleoptiles and lateral translocation of auxin. Plant Cell 17, 103-115 (2005).
76. Ding, Z. et al. Light-mediated polarization of the PIN3 auxin transporter for the phototropic response in Arabidopsis. Nature Cell Biol. 13, 447-452 (2011).
77. Andrés, F. & Coupland, G. The genetic basis of flowering responses to seasonal cues. Nature Rev. Genet. 13, 627-639 (2012).
78. Rohde, A. & Bhalerao, R. P. Plant dormancy in the perennial context. Trends Plant Sci. 12, 217-223 (2007).
79. Yanovsky, M. J. & Kay, S. A. Molecular basis of seasonal time measurement in Arabidopsis. Nature 419, 308-312 (2002).
80. Kaiserli, E. et al. Integration of light and photoperiodic signaling in transcriptional nuclear foci. Dev. Cell 35, 311-321 (2015).
81. Chinnusamy, V., Zhu, J. & Zhu, J. K. Cold stress regulation of gene expression in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 12, 444-451 (2007).
82. Qu, A. L., Ding, Y. F., Jiang, Q. & Zhu, C. Molecular mechanisms of the plant heat stress response. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 432, 203-207 (2013).
83. Zhu, D., Rosa, S. & Dean, C. Nuclear organization changes and the epigenetic silencing of FLC during vernalization. J. Mol. Biol. 427, 659-669 (2015).
84. Wang, R. et al. PEP1 regulates perennial flowering in Arabis alpina. Nature 459, 423-427 (2009).
85. Box, M. S. et al. ELF3 controls thermoresponsive growth in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol. 25, 194-199 (2015).
86. Kumar, S. V. et al. Transcription factor PIF4 controls the thermosensory activation of flowering. Nature 484, 242-245 (2012).
87. Nieto, C., López-Salmerón, V., Davière, J. M. & Prat, S. ELF3-PIF4 interaction regulates plant growth independently of the evening complex. Curr. Biol. 25, 187-193 (2015).
88. Franklin, K. A. et al. PHYTOCHROME-INTERACTING FACTOR 4 (PIF4) regulates auxin biosynthesis at high temperature. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 20231-20235 (2011).
89. Patel, D. et al. Temperature-dependent shade avoidance involves the receptor-like kinase ERECTA. Plant J. 73, 980-992 (2013).
90. Krouk, G. et al. Nitrate-regulated auxin transport by NRT1.1 defines a mechanism for nutrient sensing in plants. Dev. Cell 18, 927-937 (2010).
91. Tabata, R. et al. Perception of root-derived peptides by shoot LRR-RKs mediates systemic N-demand signaling. Science 346, 343-346 (2014).
92. Pérez-Torres, C. A. et al. Phosphate availability alters lateral root development in Arabidopsis by modulating auxin sensitivity via a mechanism involving the TIR1 auxin receptor. Plant Cell 20, 3258-3272 (2008).
93. Kellermeier, F. et al. Analysis of the root system architecture of Arabidopsis provides a quantitative readout of crosstalk between nutritional signals. Plant Cell 26, 1480-1496 (2014).
94. Barberon, M. et al. Adaptation of root function by nutrient-induced plasticity of endodermal differentiation. Cell 164, 447-459 (2016).
95. Pierik, R. & Testerink, C. The art of being flexible: how to escape from shade, salt, and drought. Plant Physiol. 166, 5-22 (2014).
96. Julkowska, M. M. & Testerink, C. Tuning plant signaling and growth to survive salt. Trends Plant Sci. 20, 586-594 (2015).
97. Yoshida, T. et al. Four Arabidopsis AREB/ABF transcription factors function predominantly in gene expression downstream of SnRK2 kinases in abscisic acid signalling in response to osmotic stress. Plant Cell Environ. 38, 35-49 (2015).
98. Claeys, H. & Inze, D. The agony of choice: how plants balance growth and survival under water-limiting conditions. Plant Physiol. 162, 1768-1779 (2013).
99. Jones, J. D. G. & Dangl, J. L. The plant immune system. Nature 444, 323-329 (2006).
100. Pieterse, C. M. J. et al. Induced systemic resistance by beneficial microbes. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 52, 347-375 (2014).
101. Howe, G. A. & Jander, G. Plant immunity to insect herbivores. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 59, 41-66 (2008).
102. Belkhadir, Y., Yang, L., Hetzel, J., Dangl, J. L. & Chory, J. The growth-defense pivot: crisis management in plants mediated by LRR-RK surface receptors. Trends Biochem. Sci. 39, 447-456 (2014).
103. Smakowska, E., Kong, J., Busch, W. & Belkhadir, Y. Organ-specific regulation of growth-defense tradeoffs by plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 29, 129-137 (2016).
104. Rodriguez, E., El Ghoul, H., Mundy, J. & Petersen, M. Making sense of plant autoimmunity and 'negative regulators'. FEBS J. 283, 1385-1391 (2016).
105. Pieterse, C. M. J., Pierik, R. & Van Wees, S. C. M. Different shades of JAZ during plant growth and defense. New Phytol. 204, 261-264 (2014).
106. Ballaré, C. L. Light regulation of plant defense. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 65, 335-363 (2014).
107. Lozano-Durán, R. et al. The transcriptional regulator BZR1 mediates trade-off between plant innate immunity and growth. eLife 2, e00983 (2013).
108. De Vleesschauwer, D., Gheysen, G. & Hofte, M. Hormone defense networking in rice: tales from a different world. Trends Plant Sci. 18, 555-565 (2013).
109. Vlot, A. C., Dempsey, D. A. & Klessig, D. F. Salicylic acid, a multifaceted hormone to combat disease. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 47, 177-206 (2009).
110. Kazan, K. Auxin and the integration of environmental signals into plant root development. Ann. Bot. 112, 1655-1665 (2013).
111. Mitra, S. & Baldwin, I. T. RuBPCase activase (RCA) mediates growth-defense trade-offs: silencing RCA redirects jasmonic acid (JA) flux from JA-isoleucine to methyl jasmonate (MeJA) to attenuate induced defense responses in Nicotiana attenuata. New Phytol. 201, 1385-1395 (2014).
112. Machado, R. A., Arce, C. C., Ferrieri, A. P., Baldwin, I. T. & Erb, M. Jasmonate-dependent depletion of soluble sugars compromises plant resistance to Manduca sexta. New Phytol. 207, 91-105 (2015).
113. van Dam, N. M. & Heil, M. Multitrophic interactions below and above ground: en route to the next level. J. Ecol. 99, 77-88 (2011).
114. Biere, A. & Bennett, A. E. Three-way interactions between plants, microbes and insects. Funct. Ecol. 27, 567-573 (2013).
115. de la Peña, E. & Bonte, D. Above-and belowground herbivory jointly impact defense and seed dispersal traits in Taraxacum officinale. Ecol. Evol. 4, 3309-3319 (2014).
116. Kostenko, O., Mulder, P. P. J., Courbois, M. & Bezemer, T. M. Effects of plant diversity on the concentration of secondary plant metabolites and the density of arthropods on focal plants in the field. J. Ecol. (2016).
117. Pozo, M. J. & Azcón-Aguilar, C. Unraveling mycorrhiza-induced resistance. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 10, 393-398 (2007).
118. Dinneny, J. R. et al. Cell identity mediates the response of Arabidopsis roots to abiotic stress. Science 320, 942-945 (2008).
119. Birnbaum, K. et al. Cell type-specific expression profiling in plants via cell sorting of protoplasts from fluorescent reporter lines. Nature Methods 2, 615-619 (2005).
120. Harlan, J. R. Crops and Man 2nd edn (American Society of Agronomy and Crop Science Society of America, 1992).
121. Civelek, M. & Lusis, A. J. Systems genetics approaches to understand complex traits. Nature Rev. Genet. 15, 34-48 (2014).
122. Fu, J. et al. System-wide molecular evidence for phenotypic buffering in Arabidopsis. Nature Genet. 41, 166-167 (2009).
123. Atwell, S. et al. Genome-wide association study of 107 phenotypes in Arabidopsis thaliana inbred lines. Nature 465, 627-631 (2010).
124. Albert, F. W. & Kruglyak, L. The role of regulatory variation in complex traits and disease. Nature Rev. Genet. 16, 197-212 (2015).
125. Lebeis, S. L. et al. Salicylic acid modulates colonization of the root microbiome by specific bacterial taxa. Science 349, 860-864 (2015).
126. Poelman, E. H., Broekgaarden, C., Van Loon, J. J. A. & Dicke, M. Early season herbivore differentially affects plant defence responses to subsequently colonizing herbivores and their abundance in the field. Mol. Ecol. 17, 3352-3365 (2008).
127. Lambers, H., Raven, J. A., Shaver, G. R. & Smith, S. E. Plant nutrient-acquisition strategies change with soil age. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 95-103 (2008).
128. Lau, J. A. & Lennon, J. T. Rapid responses of soil microorganisms improve plant fitness in novel environments. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 14058-14062 (2012).
129. Van Nuland, M. E. et al. Plant-soil feedbacks: connecting ecosystem ecology and evolution. Funct. Ecol. 30, 1032-1042 (2016).
130. Wooliver, R., Pfennigwerth, A. A., Bailey, J. K. & Schweitzer, J. A. Plant functional constraints guide macroevolutionary trade-offs in competitive and conservative growth responses to nitrogen. Funct. Ecol. 30, 1099-1108 (2016).
131. Agrawal, A. A., Hastings, A. P., Johnson, M. T. J., Maron, J. L. & Salminen, J. P. Insect herbivores drive real-time ecological and evolutionary change in plant populations. Science 338, 113-116 (2012).
132. Heil, M. & Baldwin, I. T. Fitness costs of induced resistance: emerging experimental support for a slippery concept. Trends Plant Sci. 7, 61-67 (2002).
133. Blumenthal, D. M. Interactions between resource availability and enemy release in plant invasion. Ecol. Lett. 9, 887-895 (2006).
134. Seabloom, E. W. et al. Plant species' origin predicts dominance and response to nutrient enrichment and herbivores in global grasslands. Nature Commun. 6, 7710 (2015).
135. Blossey, B. & Notzold, R. Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants: a hypothesis. J. Ecol. 83, 887-889 (1995).
136. Fitzpatrick, C. R. et al. The importance of plant genotype and contemporary evolution for terrestrial ecosystem processes. Ecology 96, 2632-2642 (2015).
137. Hawkes, C. V. Are invaders moving targets? The generality and persistence of advantages in size, reproduction, and enemy release in invasive plant species with time since introduction. Am. Nat. 170, 832-843 (2007).
138. Warren, M. S. et al. Rapid responses of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change. Nature 414, 65-69 (2001).
139. Thomas, C. D. et al. Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427, 145-148 (2004).