Recurrent fury: Conspiratorial discourse in the blogosphere triggered by research on the role of conspiracist ideation in climate denial

Journal of Social and Political Psychology

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 142-178

  Lewandowsky, Stephan ^a,b   Cook, John ^b,c   Oberauer, Klaus ^b,d   Brophy, Scott ^e   Lloyd, Elisabeth A ^f   Marriott, Michael ^g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^e HOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGES   (United States)

^f INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g Climate Realities Research   (Australia)

Author keywords

Climate denial; Conspiracist discourse; Internet blogs; Rejection of science

Indexed keywords

EID: 85014880124     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21953325     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5964/jspp.v3i1.443     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Abt, C. C. (1983, September). The anti-smoking industry (Philip Morris internal report). Retrieved from http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/vob81f00
2. Anderegg, W. R. L., & Goldsmith, G. R. (2014). Public interest in climate change over the past decade and the effects of the ‘climategate’ media event. Environmental Research Letters, 9, Article 054005. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/9/5/054005
3. Anderegg, W. R. L., Prall, J. W., Harold, J., & Schneider, S. H. (2010). Expert credibility in climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 12107-12109. doi:10.1073/pnas.1003187107
4. Anderson, A. A., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., Xenos, M. A., & Ladwig, P. (2014). The “nasty effect”: Online incivility and risk perceptions of emerging technologies. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 373-387. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12009
5. Bale, J. M. (2007). Political paranoia v. political realism: On distinguishing between bogus conspiracy theories and genuine conspiratorial politics. Patterns of Prejudice, 41, 45-60. doi:10.1080/00313220601118751
6. Barkun, M. (2003). A culture of conspiracy: Apocalyptic visions in contemporary America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
7. Bell, L. (2011). Climate of corruption: Politics and power behind the global warming hoax. Austin, TX: Greenleaf Book Group Press.
8. Bessi, A., Coletto, M., Davidescu, G. A., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2015). Science vs conspiracy: Collective narratives in the age of misinformation. PLOS ONE, 10, Article e0118093. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118093
9. Buckels, E. E., Trapnell, P. D., & Paulhus, D. L. (2014). Trolls just want to have fun. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 97-102. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.016
10. Cook, J., Nuccitelli, D., Green, S. A., Richardson, M., Winkler, B., Painting, R., … Skuce, A. (2013). Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environmental Research Letters, 8, Article 024024. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024
11. Delingpole, J. (2011). Watermelons: The Green movement’s true colors. New York, NY: Publius Books.
12. Diethelm, P., & McKee, M. (2009). Denialism: What is it and how should scientists respond? European Journal of Public Health, 19, 2-4. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckn139
13. Dixon, R. M., & Jones, J. A. (2015). Conspiracist ideation as a predictor of climate-science rejection: An alternative analysis. Psychological Science. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0956797614566469
14. Doran, P. T., & Zimmerman, M. K. (2009). Examining the scientific consensus on climate change. EOS, 90, 21-22. doi:10.1029/2009EO030002
15. Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2011). Does it take one to know one? Endorsement of conspiracy theories is influenced by personal willingness to conspire. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 544-552. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02018.x
16. Dunlap, R. E., & McCright, A. M. (2008). A widening gap: Republican and Democratic views on climate change. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 50, 26-35. doi:10.3200/ENVT.50.5.26-35
17. Feygina, I., Jost, J. T., & Goldsmith, R. E. (2010). System justification, the denial of global warming, and the possibility of “system-sanctioned change”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 326-338. doi:10.1177/0146167209351435
18. Gillis, J. (2013, February 21). Unlocking the conspiracy mind-set [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/02/21/unlocking-the-conspiracy-mindset/? r=0
19. Goertzel, T. (1994). Belief in conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 15, 731-742. doi:10.2307/3791630
20. Goertzel, T. (2010). Conspiracy theories in science. EMBO Reports, 11, 493-499. doi:10.1038/embor.2010.84
21. Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O. P. (2004). Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about Internet questionnaires. The American Psychologist, 59, 93-104. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.59.2.93
22. Hamilton, L. C. (2011). Education, politics and opinions about climate change evidence for interaction effects. Climatic Change, 104, 231-242. doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9957-8
23. Heath, Y., & Gifford, R. (2006). Free-market ideology and environmental degradation: The case of belief in global climate change. Environment and Behavior, 38, 48-71. doi:10.1177/0013916505277998
24. Inhofe, J. (2012). The greatest hoax: How the global warming conspiracy threatens your future. Washington, DC: WND Books. Isaac, R. J. (2012). Roosters of the apocalypse: How the junk science of global warming nearly bankrupted the western world. Chicago, IL: The Heartland Institute.
25. Jang, S. M., & Hart, P. S. (2015). Polarized frames on “climate change” and “global warming” across countries and states: Evidence from Twitter big data. Global Environmental Change, 32, 11-17. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.02.010
26. Jones, R. (2014, April). Frontiers retraction controversy [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://2risk.wordpress.com/2014/04/17/frontiers-retraction-controversy/
27. Kahan, D. M. (2010). Fixing the communications failure. Nature, 463, 296-297. doi:10.1038/463296a
28. Kahan, D. M., Jenkins-Smith, H., & Braman, D. (2011). Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. Journal of Risk Research, 14, 147-174. doi:10.1080/13669877.2010.511246
29. Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Wittlin, M., Slovic, P., Ouellette, L. L., Braman, D., & Mandel, G. (2012). The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nature Climate Change, 2, 732-735. doi:10.1038/nclimate1547
30. Kalichman, S. C. (2009). Denying AIDS: Conspiracy theories, pseudoscience, and human tragedy. New York, NY: Springer.
31. Keeley, B. L. (1999). Of conspiracy theories. The Journal of Philosophy, 96, 109-126. doi:10.2307/2564659
32. Koteyko, N., Jaspal, R., & Nerlich, B. (2013). Climate change and ‘climategate’ in online reader comments: A mixed methods study. The Geographical Journal, 179, 74-86. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4959.2012.00479.x
33. Krzywinski, M., & Altman, N. (2014). Points of significance: Visualizing samples with box plots. Nature Methods, 11, 119-120. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2813
34. Kuypers, J. A., Young, M. J., & Launer, M. K. (1994). Of mighty mice and meek men: Contextual reconstruction of the Iranian Airbus shootdown. The Southern Communication Journal, 59, 294-306. doi:10.1080/10417949409372949
35. Kuypers, J. A., Young, M. J., & Launer, M. K. (2001). Composite narrative, authoritarian discourse, and the Soviet response to the destruction of Iran Air flight 655. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 87, 305-320. doi:10.1080/00335630109384339
36. Lahsen, M. (1999). The detection and attribution of conspiracies: The controversy over Chapter 8. In G. Marcus (Ed.), Paranoia within reason: A casebook on conspiracy as explanation (pp. 111-136). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
37. Landman, A., & Glantz, S. A. (2009). Tobacco industry efforts to undermine policy-relevant research. American Journal of Public Health, 99, 45-58. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2007.130740
38. Leviston, Z., Walker, I., & Morwinski, S. (2013). Your opinion on climate change might not be as common as you think. Nature Climate Change, 3, 334-337. doi:10.1038/nclimate1743
39. Lewandowsky, S. (2014a). Conspiratory fascination versus public interest: The case of ‘climategate’. Environmental Research Letters, 9, Article 111004. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/9/11/111004
40. Lewandowsky, S. (2014b, March). Recursive fury goes recurrent. Retrieved from http://www.shapingtomorrowsworld.org/rf1.html
41. Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., Oberauer, K., & Marriott, M. (2013). Recursive fury: Conspiracist ideation in the blogosphere in response to research on conspiracist ideation. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 73. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00073
42. Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13, 106-131. doi:10.1177/1529100612451018
43. Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. E., & Oberauer, K. (2013). The role of conspiracist ideation and worldviews in predicting rejection of science. PLOS ONE, 8, Article e75637. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0075637
44. Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. E., & Oberauer, K. (2015). The robust relationship between conspiracism and denial of (climate) science. Psychological Science, 26, 667-670. doi:10.1177/0956797614568432
45. Lewandowsky, S., Mann, M. E., Bauld, L., Hastings, G., & Loftus, E. F. (2013, November). The subterranean war on science. APS Observer, 26(9). Retrieved from http://www.psychologicalscience.org/index.php/publications/observer/2013/november-2013/the-subterranean-war-on-science.html.
46. Lewandowsky, S., Oberauer, K., & Gignac, G. E. (2013). NASA faked the moon landing—Therefore (climate) science is a hoax: An anatomy of the motivated rejection of science. Psychological Science, 24, 622-633. doi:10.1177/0956797612457686
47. Lewandowsky, S., Stritzke, W. G. K., Oberauer, K., & Morales, M. (2005). Memory for fact, fiction, and misinformation: The Iraq War 2003. Psychological Science, 16, 190-195. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00802.x
48. Lobato, E., Mendoza, J., Sims, V., & Chin, M. (2014). Examining the relationship between conspiracy theories, paranormal beliefs, and pseudoscience acceptance among a university population. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 617-625. doi:10.1002/acp.3042
49. Mann, M. E. (2012). The hockey stick and the climate wars: Dispatches from the front lines. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
50. McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011a). Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative White males in the United States. Global Environmental Change, 21, 1163-1172. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.06.003
51. McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011b). The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010. The Sociological Quarterly, 52, 155-194. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x
52. McKee, M., & Diethelm, P. (2010). Christmas 2010: Reading between the lines: How the growth of denialism undermines public health. British Medical Journal, 341, Article c6950. doi:10.1136/bmj.c6950
53. McKewon, E. (2012a). Duelling realities: Conspiracy theories vs climate science in regional newspaper coverage of Ian Plimer’s book, Heaven and Earth. Rural Society, 21, 99-115. doi:10.5172/rsj.2012.21.2.99
54. McKewon, E. (2012b). Talking points ammo: The use of neoliberal think tank fantasy themes to delegitimise scientific knowledge of climate change in Australian newspapers. Journalism Studies, 13, 277-297. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2011.646403
55. McKewon, E. (2014, April). Climate deniers intimidate journal into retracting paper that finds they believe conspiracy theories. Scientific American. Retrieved from http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/climate-deniers-intimidate-journal-into-retracting-paper-that-finds-they-believe-conspiracy-theories
56. Michaels, P. J., & Balling, R. C. (2009). Climate of extremes: Global warming science they don’t want you to know. Washington, DC: Cato Institute.
57. Moghaddam, F. M. (2013). The psychology of dictatorship. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
58. Montford, A. W. (2010). The hockey stick illusion: Climategate and the corruption of science. London, United Kingdom: Stacey Publishing.
59. Olivieri, N. F. (2003). Patients’ health or company profits? The commercialisation of academic research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 9, 29-41. doi:10.1007/s11948-003-0017-x
60. Oreskes, N. (2004). The scientific consensus on climate change. Science, 306, 1686. doi:10.1126/science.1103618
61. Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. M. (2010). Merchants of doubt. London, United Kingdom: Bloomsbury Publishing.
62. Painter, J., & Ashe, T. (2012). Cross-national comparison of the presence of climate scepticism in the print media in six countries, 2007-10. Environmental Research Letters, 7, Article 044005. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/044005
63. Pelli, D. G. (1997). The video toolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442. doi:10.1163/156856897X00366
64. Pierson, C. A. (2014). Ethical decision-making in Internet research: Another slant on the “Recursive Fury” debate. Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, 26, 353-354. doi:10.1002/2327-6924.12143
65. Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
66. Sleek, S. (2013, November). Inconvenient truth-tellers: What happens when research yields unpopular findings. APS Observer, 26(9). Retrieved from http://www.psychologicalscience.org/index.php/publications/observer/2013/november-2013/inconvenient-truth-tellers.html
67. Smith, N., & Leiserowitz, A. (2012). The rise of global warming skepticism: Exploring affective image associations in the United States over time. Risk Analysis, 32, 1021-1032. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01801.x
68. Solomon, L. (2008). The deniers: The world renowned scientists who stood up against global warming hysteria, political persecution, and fraud and those who are too fearful to do so. Minneapolis, MN: Richard Vigilante Books.
69. Sunstein, C. R., & Vermeule, A. (2009). Conspiracy theories: Causes and cures. Journal of Political Philosophy, 17, 202-227. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00325.x
70. Sussman, B. (2010). Climategate: A veteran meteorologist exposes the global warming scam. Washington, DC: WND Books.
71. Swami, V., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2010). Unanswered questions: A preliminary investigation of personality and individual difference predictors of 9/11 conspiracist beliefs. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 749-761. doi:10.1002/acp.1583
72. Taylor, J. (2012, June 13). Doctored data, not U.S. temperatures, set a record this year. Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2012/06/13/
73. Wagner-Egger, P., Bangerter, A., Gilles, I., Green, E., Rigaud, D., Krings, F., … Clémence, A. (2011). Lay perceptions of collectives at the outbreak of the H1N1 epidemic: Heroes, villains and victims. Public Understanding of Science, 20, 461-476. doi:10.1177/0963662510393605
74. Whitson, J. A., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Lacking control increases illusory pattern perception. Science, 322, 115-117. doi:10.1126/science.1159845
75. Wood, M. J., Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2012). Dead and alive: Beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 767-773. doi:10.1177/1948550611434786