Nonholonomic systems via moving frames: Cartan equivalence and chaplygin hamiltonization

Progress in Mathematics

Volumn 232, Issue , 2005, Pages 75-120

  Ehlers, Kurt ^a   Koiller, Jair ^b   Montgomery, Richard ^c   Rios, Pedro M ^d  

^a Truckee Meadows Community College   (United States)

^b FUNDAÇÃO GETÚLIO VARGAS   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85014806128     PISSN: 07431643     EISSN: 2296505X     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/0-8176-4419-9_4     Document Type: Chapter

References (112)

1. Abraham, R., Marsden, J. [1994], Foundations of Mechanics, 2nd revised ed., Perseus Publishing, Boulder, CO.
2. Arnold, V. I. [1989], Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics, 2nd ed., Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Vol. 60, Springer-Verlag, New York; 1st ed., 1978.
3. Arnold, V. I., Kozlov, V. V., Neishtadt, A. I. [1988], Mathematical aspects of classical and celestial mechanics, in Arnold, V. I., ed., Dynamical Systems III, Springer-Verlag, New York.
4. Bates, L. [2002], Problems and progress in nonholonomic reduction, Rep. Math. Phys., 49:2-3, 143-149.
5. Bates, L., Cushman, R. [1999], What is a completely integrable nonholonomic dynamical system?, Rep. Math. Phys., 44:1-2, 29-35.
6. Bates, L., Śniatycki, J. [1993], Nonholonomic reduction, Rep. Math. Phys., 32:1, 99-115.
7. Blackall, C. J. [1941], On volume integral invariants of non-holonomic dynamical systems, Amer. J. Math., 63:1, 155-168.
8. Bloch, A. M. [2003], Nonholonomic Mechanics and Control, Springer-Verlag, New York.
9. Bloch, A. M., Krishnaprasad, P. S., Marsden, J. E., Murray, R. M. [1996], Nonholonomic mechanical systems with symmetry, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 136, 21-99.
10. Bocharov, A.V., Vinogradov, A. M. [1977], The Hamiltonian form of mechanics with friction, nonholonomic mechanics, invariant mechanics, the theory of refraction and impact, Appendix II in Kuperschmidt, B. A. and Vinogradov, A. M., “The structure of Hamiltonian mechanics,’’ Russian Math. Surveys, 42:2, 177-243.
11. Borisov, A.V., Mamaev, I. S. [2001], Chaplygin’s ball rolling problem is Hamiltonian, Math. Notes (Mat. Z.), 70:5, 793-795.
12. Borisov, A. V., Mamaev, I. S. [2002], Obstacle to the reduction of nonholonomic systems to the Hamiltonian form, Dokl. Phys. USSR, 47:12, 892-894.
13. Borisov, A. V., Mamaev, I. S. [2002a], On the history of the development of the nonholonomic dynamics, Regular Chaotic Dynam., 7:1, 43-47.
14. Borisov, A. V., Mamaev, I. S. [2002a], The rolling body motion of a rigid body on a plane and a sphere: Hierarchy of dynamics, Regular Chaotic Dynam., 7:2, 177-200.
15. Borisov A. V., Mamaev I. S., Kilin A. A. [2002], The rolling motion of a ball on a surface: New integrals and hierarchy of dynamics, Regular Chaotic Dynam., 7:2, 201-218.
16. Bryant, R. [1994], Lectures on the Geometry of Differential Equations, Fall 1994 Andre Aisenstadt Lectures, Centre de Recherche Mathematique, Montreal, in preparation; unpublished lecture notes available at http://www.cimat.mx/gil.
17. Cantrijn, F., de Leon, M., Marrero, J. C., de Diego, D. [1998], Reduction of nonholonomic mechanical systems with symmetries, Rep. Math. Phys., 42:1-2, 25-45.
18. Cantrijn, F., de Leon, M., de Diego, D. [1999], On almost-Poisson structures in nonholonomic mechanics, Nonlinearity, 12, 721-737.
19. Cantrijn, F., Cortes, J., de Leon, M., de Diego, D. [2002], On the geometry of generalized Chaplygin systems, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc., 132, 323-351.
20. Cartan, E. [1910], Le systeme de Pfaff a cinq variables et les equations aux derivees partielles du second ordre, Ann. Sci. Ecole Norm., 27:3, 109-192.
21. Cartan, E. [1926], La theorie des groupes finis et continus et la geometrie differentielle, traitees par la methode du repere mobile: Lecons professees a la Sorbonne (redigees par Jean Leray), Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1951.
22. Cartan, E. [1928], Sur la representation geometrique des systemes materiels non holonomes, Proc. Internat. Congr. Math. Bologna, 4, 253-261.
23. Cartan, E [1937], Lecons sur la theorie des espaces a connexion projective, Gauthier-Villars, Paris.
24. Cartan, E. [2001], Riemannian Geometry in an Orthogonal Frame: From Lectures Delivered by Elie Cartan at the Sorbonne in 1926-27, World Scientific, River Edge, NJ, 2001 (translated from the 1960 Russian edition by Vladislav V. Goldberg; foreword by S. S. Chern; preface to the Russian edition by S. P. Finikov).
25. Cendra, H., Lacomba, E. A., Reartes, W. [2001], The Lagrange-d’Alembert-Poincare equations for the symmetric rolling sphere, in Proceedings of the 6th Dr. Antonio A. R. Monteiro Congress of Mathematics (Bahia Blanca, 2001), 19-32, Departamento de Matematica, Instituto de Matematica, Universidad Nacional del Sur, Bahia Blanca, Argentina; MR1919465 (2003g:70021).
26. Cendra, H., Marsden, J. E., Ratiu, T. S. [2001], Geometric mechanics, Lagrangian reduction and nonholonomic systems, in Enguist, B., and Schmid, W., eds., Mathematics Unlimited: 2001 and Beyond, Springer-Verlag, New York, 221-273.
27. Cendra, H., Ibort, A., de Leon, M., de Diego, D. [2004] Ageneralization of Chetaev’s principle for a class of higher order non-holonomic constraints, J. Math. Phys., submitted.
28. Chaplygin, S. A. [1911], On the theory of the motion of nonholonomic systems: Theorem on the reducing factor, Mat. Sb., 28, 303-314.
29. Chaplygin, S. A. [1981], Selected Works on Mechanics and Mathematics, Nauka, Moscow.
30. Chaplygin, S. A. [2002], On a ball’s rolling on a horizontal plane, Regular Chaotic Dynam., 7:2, 131-148; original paper in Math. Sb., 24 (1903), 139-168.
31. Bryant, R. L., Chern, S. S., Gardner, R. B., Goldschmidt, H. L., and Griffiths, P. A. [1991], Exterior Differential Systems, Mathematical Sciences Research Institute Publications, Vol. 18, Springer-Verlag, New York.
32. Clemente-Gallardo, J., Mashke, B., van der Schaft, A. J. [2001], Kinematical constraints and algebroids, Rep. Math. Phys., 47:3, 413-429.
33. Cortes, J. [2002], Geometric, Control and Numerical Aspects of Nonholonomic Systems, Springer-Verlag, New York.
34. Cortes, J., de Leon, M. [1999], Reduction and reconstruction of the dynamics of nonholonomic systems, J. Phys. A Math. Gen., 32, 8615-8645.
35. Cortes, J., de Leon, M., de Diego, D., Martinez, S. [2003], Geometric description of vakonomic and nonholonomic dynamics: Comparison of solutions, SIAM J. Control Optim., 41:5, 1389-1412.
36. Courant, T. J. [1990], Dirac manifolds, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 319:2, 631-661.
37. Cushman, R., Hermans, J., Kemppainen, D. [1995], The rolling disk, in Nonlinear Dynamical Systems and Chaos, Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and Their Applications, Vol. 19, 21-60, Birkhauser, Basel.
38. Cushman, R., Kemppainen, D., Śniatycki, J., Bates, L. [1995], Geometry of nonholonomic constraints, Rep. Math. Phys., 36:2-3, 275-286.
39. Cushman, R., Bates, L. [1997], Global Aspects of Classical Integrable Systems, Birkhauser, Basel, 1997.
40. Cushman, R., Śniatycki, J. [2002], Nonholonomic reduction for free and proper actions, Regular Chaotic Dynam., 7, 61-72.
41. Dazord, P. [1994], Mecanique hamiltonienne en presence de contraintes, Illinois J. Math., 38, 148-175.
42. Dragović, V., Gajić, B., Jovanović, B. [1998], Generalizations of classical integrable nonholonomic rigid body systems, J. Phys. A, 31:49, 9861-9869.
43. Duistermaat, J. J. [2000], Chaplygin’s sphere, in Cushman, R., Duistermaat, J. J., and Śniatycki, J., Chaplygin and the Geometry of Nonholonomically Constrained Systems, in preparation; arXiv.org/abs/math.DS/0409019.
44. Eisenhart, L. P. [1925], Riemannian Geometry, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ; 5th printing, 1964.
45. Ehlers, K. [2002], The geometry of nonholonomic three-manifolds, in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Dynamical Systems and Differential Equations, University of North Carolina atWilmington,Wilmington, NC.
46. Fedorov, Yu. N. [1989], Two integrable nonholonomic systems in classical dynamics, Vestnik Moskov. Univ. Ser. I Mat. Mekh., 4, 38-41 (in Russian).
47. Fedorov, Yu. N., Kozlov, V. V. [1995], Various aspects of n-dimensional rigid body dynamics, in Kozlov, V. V., ed., Dynamical Systems in Classical Mechanics, AMS Translations (Series 2), Vol. 168, AMS, Providence, RI.
48. Fedorov, Yu. N., Jovanovic, B. [2003], Nonholonomic LR systems as generalized Chaplygin systems with an invariant measure and geodesic flows on homogeneous spaces, J. Nonlinear Sci., to appear; arXiv: math-ph/0307016.
49. Flanders, H. [1963], Differential Forms with Applications to the Physical Sciences, Academic Press, New York.
50. Gardner, R. [1989], The Method of Equivalence and its Applications, SIAM, Philadelphia.
51. Grossman, D. A. [2000], Torsion-free path geometries and integrable second order ODE systems, Selecta Math. (N.S.), 6, 399-442.
52. Guillemin, V., Sternberg, S. [1980], The moment map and collective motion, Ann. Phys., 1278, 220-253.
53. Hamel, G. [1949], Theoretische Mechanik: Eine einheitliche Einfuhrung in die gesamte Mechanik, revised ed., Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, Vol. 57, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, New York, 1978.
54. Haller, S., Rybicki, T. [1999], On the group of diffeomorphisms preserving a locally conformal symplectic structure, Ann. Global Anal. Geom., 17, 475-502.
55. Haller, S., Rybicki, T. [2001], Symplectic reduction for locally conformal symplectic manifolds, J. Geom. Phys., 37, 262-271.
56. Hertz, H. [1899], The Principles of Mechanics Presented in a New Form by Heinrich Hertz, with an Introduction by H. von Helmholtz, Macmillan, London, New York.
57. Hicks, N. J. [1965], Notes on Differential Geometry, Van Nostrand, New York.
58. Hughen, K. [1995], The Geometry of Sub-Riemannian Three-Manifolds, Ph.D. thesis, Duke University, Durham, NC.
59. Ibort, A., de Leon, M., Marrero, J. C., de Diego, D. [1999], Dirac brackets in constraind dynamics, Fortschr. Phys., 47:5, 459-492.
60. Iliyev, Il. [1985], On the conditions for the existence of the reducing Chaplygin factor, P. M. M. USSR, 49:2, 295-301.
61. Jovanovic, B. [2003], Some multidimensional integrable cases of nonholonomic rigid body dynamics, Regular Chaotic Dynam., 8:1, 125-132.
62. Kazarian, M. R., Montgomery, R., Shapiro, B. [1997], Characteristic classes for the degenerations of two-plane fields in four dimensions, Pacific J. Math., 179:2, 355-370.
63. Kobayashi, S., Nomizu, K. [1963], Foundations of Differential Geometry, Vol. 1, Wiley, New York, London.
64. Kobayashi, M. H., Oliva, W. M. [2003], A note on the conservation of energy and volume in the setting of nonholonomic mechanical systems, Qual. Theory Dynam. Systems, 5 (2004), 255-283.
65. Koiller, J. [1992], Reduction of some classical non-holonomic systems with symmetry, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 118, 113-148.
66. Koiller, J., Rodrigues, P. R., Pitanga, P. [2001], Nonholonomic connections following Elie Cartan, An. Acad. Brasileira Ciencias, 73:2, 165-190.
67. Koiller, J., Rios, P. M. [2001], Nonholonomic systems with symmetry allowing a conformally symplectic reduction, in Delgado, J., Lacomba, E. A., and Perez-Chavela, E., eds., Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Hamiltonian Systems and Celestial Mechanics (Mexico 2001), Kluwer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, to appear; arXiv: math-ph/0203013.
68. Koiller, J., Rios, P. M., Ehlers, K. [2002], Moving frames for cotangent bundles, Rep. Math. Phys., 49:2-3, 225-238.
69. Koiller, J. [2003], Analytical Mechanics, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.), 40:3, 405-419.
70. Koon, W. S., Marsden, J. E. [1997], The Hamiltonian and Lagrangian approaches to the dynamics of nonholonomic systems, Rep. Math. Phys., 40, 21-62.
71. Koon, W. S., Marsden, J. E. [1998], Poisson reduction for nonholonomic mechanical systems with symmetry, Rep. Math. Phys., 42, 101-134.
72. Kozlov, V. V. [2002], On the integration theory of equations of nonholonomic mechanics, Regular Chaotic Dynam., 7:2, 161-176.
73. Kummer, M. [1981], On the construction of the reduced phase space of a Hamiltonian system with symmetry, Indiana Univ. Math. J., 30, 281-291.
74. Kupka, I., Oliva, W. M. [2001], The Non-Holonomic Mechanics, J. Differential Equations, 169, 169-189.
75. Levi, M. [1996], Composition of rotations and parallel transport, Nonlinearity, 9, 413-419.
76. Lewis, A. D. [1998], Affine connections and distributions with applications to nonholonomic mechanics, Rep. Math. Phys., 42:1-2, 135-164.
77. Marle, C. M. [1995], Reduction of constrained mechanical systems and stability of relative equilibria, Comm. Math. Phys., 174, 295-318.
78. Marle, C. M. [1998], Various approaches to conservative and nonconservative nonholonomic systems, Rep. Math. Phys., 42:1-2, 211-229.
79. Marle, C. M. [2003], On symmetries and constants of motion in Hamiltonian systems with nonholonomic constraints, Banach Center Publ., 59, 223-242.
80. Marsden, J. E., Weinstein, A. [2001], Reduction of symplectic manifolds with symmetry, Rep. Math. Phys., 5, 121-130.
81. Marsden, J. E., Weinstein, A. [2001], Some comments on the history, theory, and applications of symplectic reduction, in Landsman, N. P., and Pflaum, M., eds., Quantization of Singular Symplectic Quotients, Birkhauser, Boston, 2001.
82. Montgomery, R. [1991], How much does the rigid body rotate? A Berry’s phase from the 18th century, Amer. J. Phys., 59:5, 394-398.
83. Montgomery, R. [2002], A Tour of Sub-Riemannian Geometries, Their Geodesics, and Applications, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, Vol. 91, AMS, Providence, RI.
84. Moseley, K. [2001], The Geometry of Sub-Riemannian Engel Manifolds, Ph.D. thesis, Duke University, Durham, NC, 2001.
85. Neimark, J. I., Fufaev, N.A. [1972], Dynamics of Nonholonomic Systems,Translations of Mathematical Monographs, Vol. 33, AMS, Providence, RI.
86. Oliva, W. M. [2002], Geometric Mechanics, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1798, Springer-Verlag, New York.
87. Papastavridis, J. G. [2002], Analytical Mechanics: A Comprehensive Treatise on the Dynamics of Constrained Systems: For Engineers, Physicists and Mathematicians, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK (reviewed in Koiller [2003]).
88. Pars, L. A. [1965], A Treatise on Analytical Dynamics, Wiley, New York.
89. Poincare, H. [1901], Sur une forme nouvelle des equations de la mecanique, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 132, 369-371.
90. Ramos, A. [2004], Poisson Structures for Reduced Non-Holonomic Systems, J. Phys. A Math. Gen., 37 (2004), 4821-4842.
91. Salamon, S. [1989], Riemannian Geometry and Holonomy Groups, Pitman Research Notes in Mathematics 201, Longman Scientific and Technical, Essex, UK.
92. Schneider, D., Nonholonomic Euler-Poincare equations and stability in Chaplygin’s sphere, Dynam. Systems Intern. J., 17:2, 87-130.
93. Sharpe, R.W. [1997], Differential Geometry: Cartan’s Generalization of Klein’s Erlangen Program, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Vol. 166, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997.
94. Śniatycli, J. [1998], Nonholonomic Noether theorem and reduction of symmetries, Rep. Math. Phys., 42:1-2, 5-23.
95. Sniatycki, J. [2001], Almost Poisson spaces and nonholonomic singular reduction, Rep. Math. Phys., 48:1-2, 235-248.
96. Śniatycki, J. [2002], The momentum equation and the second order differential condition, Rep. Math. Phys., 213, 371-394.
97. Sommerfeld, A. [1952], Lectures on Theoretical Physics: Mechanics, Academic Press, New York.
98. Stanchenko, S. V. [1985], Non-holonomic Chaplygin systems, P. M. M. USSR, 53:1, 11-17.
99. Tavares, J. N. [2002], About Cartan Geometrization of Non-Holonomic Mechanics, preprint, Centro de Matematica, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal; available at www.fc.up.pt/cmup.
100. van der Schaft, A., Mashke, B. M. [1994], On the hamiltonian formulation of nonholonomic mechanical systems, Rep. Math. Phys., 34, 225-233.
101. Vaisman, I., Locally conformal symplectic manifolds, Internat. J. Math. Math. Sci., 8:3, 521-536.
102. Vershik, A. M., Gerhskovich, V. [1994], Nonholonomic dynamical systems, geometry of distributions and variational problems, in Arnol’d, V. I., and Novikov, S. P., eds., Dynamical Systems VII, Encyclopedia of Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 16, Springer-Verlag, New York.
103. Vershik, A. M., Fadeev, L. D. [1981], Lagrangian mechanics in invariant form, Selecta Math. Sov., 1:4, 339-350.
104. Veselov, A. P., Veselova, L. E. [1986], Flows on Lie groups with a nonholonomic constraint and integrable non-Hamiltonian systems, Funkt. Anal. Prilozhen., 20:4, 65-66 (in Russian); Functional Anal. Appl., 20:4, 308-309 (in English).
105. Veselov, A. P., Veselova, L. E. [1988], Integrable nonholonomic systems on Lie groups, Mat. Z., 44:5, 604-619, 701 (in Russian); Math. Notes, 44:5-6 (1989), 810-819 (in English).
106. Wade, A. [2000], Conformal Dirac structures, Lett. Math. Phys., 53, 331-348.
107. Warner, F. [1971], Foundations of Differentiable Manifolds and Lie Groups, Scott Foresman, Glenview, IL.
108. Weber, R. W. [1986], Hamiltonian systems with constraints and their meaning in mechanics, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 91, 309-335.
109. Whittaker, E. T. [1988], A Treatise on the Analytical Dynamics of Particles and Rigid Bodies, with an Introduction to the Problem of Three Bodies, reprint of the 1937 ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
110. Zenkov, D. V. [1995], The geometry of the Routh problem, J. Nonlinear Sci., 5:6, 503-519.
111. Zenkov, D. V., Bloch, A. M. [2000], Dynamics of the n-dimensional Suslov problem, J. Geom. Phys., 34:2, 121-136.
112. Zenkov, D. V., Bloch, A. M. [2003], Invariant measures of nonholonomic flows with internal degrees of freedom, Nonlinearity, 16, 1793-1807.