Principal component analysis for a seismic usability model of unreinforced masonry buildings

Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 96, Issue , 2017, Pages 64-75

  Zucconi, Maria ^a   Sorrentino, Luigi ^b   Ferlito, Rachele ^c  

^a NICCOLÒ CUSANO UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^b SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^c Seismic and Volcanic Survey   (Italy)

Author keywords

Building parameters; Rapid visual screening; Seismic vulnerability; Usability probability matrices; Vulnerability classes

Indexed keywords

BUILDINGS; CONCRETE BUILDINGS; MASONRY CONSTRUCTION; MASONRY MATERIALS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; ROOFS; SEISMOLOGY; USABILITY ENGINEERING;

BUILDING PARAMETERS; L'AQUILA EARTHQUAKES; MACROSEISMIC INTENSITY; SCENARIO ASSESSMENT; SEISMIC VULNERABILITY; UNREINFORCED MASONRY BUILDING; VISUAL SCREENING; VULNERABILITY CLASSES;

PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

BUILDING; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; MASONRY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROBABILITY; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC RESPONSE; VULNERABILITY;

AQUILA;

EID: 85014429459     PISSN: 02677261     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.02.014     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. [1] Calvi, G.M., Pinho, R., Magenes, G., Bommer, J.J., Restrepo-Vélez, L.F., Crowley, H., Development of seismic vulnerability assessment methodologies over the past 30 years. ISET J Earthq Technol 43 (2006), 75–104.
2. [2] Whitman RV, Reed JW, Hong ST. Earthquake damage probability matrices. In: Proceedings of the 5th world conference earthq. eng., Rome; 1973, p. 2531–40.
3. [3] ATC-13. Earthquake damage evaluation data for California. Applied technology council, Redwood city, California; 1985.
4. [4] Spence R, Coburn AW, Pomonis A. Correlation of ground motion with building damage: the definition of a new damage-based seismic intensity scale. In: Proceedings of the 10th world conference earthq. eng., Madrid, Spain; 1992, p. 551–6.
5. [5] Rota, M., Penna, A., Strobbia, C.L., Processing Italian damage data to derive typological fragility curves. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 28 (2008), 933–947, 10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.10.010.
6. [6] Braga F, Dolce M, Liberatore D. A statistical study on damaged buildings and an ensuing review of the MSK-76 scale. Seventh eur. conference earthq. eng; 1982, p. 431–450.
7. [7] Benedetti, D., Petrini, V., Sulla vulnerabilita sismica di edifici in muratura: un metodo di valutazione. A method for evaluating the seismic vulnerability of masonry buildings. L'industria Delle Costr 19 (1984), 66–74.
8. [8] Formisano A, Florio G, Landolfo R, Mazzolani FM. Numerical calibration of a simplified procedure for the seismic behaviour assessment of masonry building aggregates. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference civil, struct environ eng comput stirlingshire, scotl; 2011, p. 1–28. 〈http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2014.09.013〉.
9. [9] Martinelli, A., Cifani, G., Cialone, G., Corazza, L., Petracca, A., Petrucci, G., Building vulnerability assessment and damage scenarios in Celano (Italy) using a quick survey data-based methodology. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 28 (2008), 875–889, 10.1016/j.soildyn.2008.03.002.
10. [10] Grünthal, G., Cahiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie: volume 15 – European Macroseismic Scale 1998. 1998, European Center for Geodynamics and Seismology, Luxembourg.
11. [11] Vicente, R., Parodi, S., Lagomarsino, S., Varum, H., Mendes Silva, J.A.R., Seismic vulnerability and risk assessment: case study of the historic city centre of Coimbra, Portugal. Bull Earthq Eng 9 (2011), 1067–1096, 10.1007/s10518-010-9233-3.
12. [12] Lagomarsino, S., Giovinazzi, S., Macroseismic and mechanical models for the vulnerability and damage assessment of current buildings. Bull Earthq Eng 4 (2006), 415–443, 10.1007/s10518-006-9024-z.
13. [13] Singhal, A., Kiremidjian, A.S., Method for probabilistic evaluation of seismic structural damage. J Struct Eng 122 (1996), 1459–1467, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:12(1459).
14. [14] Masi A. Seismic vulnerability assessment of gravity load designed R/C frames 2003;1:371–95. 〈 http://doi.org/10.1023/B:BEEE.0000021426.31223.60〉.
15. [15] Magenes G A method for pushover analysis in seismic assessment of masonry buildings. In: Proceedings of the 12th world conference earthq. eng., Auckland; 2000, p. Paper 1866.
16. [16] D'Ayala, D., Speranza, E., Definition of collapse mechanisms and seismic vulnerability of historic masonry buildings. Earthq Spectra 19 (2003), 479–509, 10.1193/1.1599896.
17. [17] Barbat AH, Pujades LG, Lantada N. Seismic damage evaluation in urban areas using the capacity spectrum method: application to Barcelona, 28; 2008, p. 851–65. 〈 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.10.006〉.
18. [18] Bernardini, A., Gori, R., Modena, C., Application of coupled analytical models and experiential knowledge to seismic vulnerability analyses of masonry buildings. Koridze, A., (eds.) Eng. damage eval. vulnerability anal. build. struct., 1990, Omega Scientific, Oxon, UK, 161–180.
19. [19] Barbat, A.H., Yépez Moya, F., Canas, J.A., Damage scenarios simulation for seismic risk assessment in Urban zones. Earthq Spectra 12 (1996), 371–394.
20. [20] Kappos, A.J., Panagopoulos, G., Panagiotopoulos, C., Penelis, G., A hybrid method for the vulnerability assessment of R/C and URM buildings. Bull Earthq Eng 4 (2006), 391–413, 10.1007/s10518-006-9023-0.
21. [21] D'Ayala, D., Assessing the seismic vulnerability of masonry buildings. Handb Seism Risk Anal Manag Civ Infrastruct Syst, 2013, 334–365, 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
22. [22] Baiocchi, V., Dominici, D., Giannone, F., Zucconi, M., Rapid building damage assessment using EROS B data: the case study of L'Aquila earthquake. Ital J Remote Sens 44 (2012), 153–165, 10.5721/ItJRS201244112.
23. [23] Ferlito R, Guarascio M, Zucconi M. Assessment of a vulnerability model against post-earthquake damage data: the case study of the historic city centre of L'Aquila in Italy. In: Proceedings of the 9th World Conf. Earthq. Resist. Eng. Struct. 8–10 July, A Coruna; 2013, p. 393–404. 〈 http://doi.org/10.2495/ERES130321〉.
24. [24] Zucconi M, Ferlito R, Sorrentino L. Simplified survey form of unreinforced masonry buildings calibrated on data from the 2009 L'Aquila earthquake. Bull Earthq Eng, Submitted; 2017.
25. [25] Goretti, A., Di Pasquale, G., Building inspection and damage data for the 2002 Molise, Italy, earthquake. Earthq Spectra 20 (2004), S167–S190, 10.1193/1.1769373.
26. [26] Dolce, M., Goretti, A., Building damage assessment after the 2009 Abruzzi earthquake. Bull Earthq Eng 13 (2015), 2241–2264, 10.1007/s10518-015-9723-4.
27. [27] Stannard, M., Galloway, B., Brunsdon, D., Wood, P., Beattie, G., McCarthy, S., et al. Field guide: rapid post disaster building usability assessment – earthquakes. 2014, Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, Wellington, New Zealand.
28. [28] Dolce, M., Manfredi, G., Libro Bianco Sulla Ricostruzione Privata Fuori Dai Centri Storici Nei Comuni Colpiti Dal Sisma Dell'Abruzzo Del 6 Aprile 2009. 2015, Doppiavoce, Napoli.
29. [29] Angeletti P, Cherubini A, Cifani G, De Marco R, Ferrini M, Frish G. et al. La ricostruzione dei centri storici di L'Aquila e delle sue frazioni. 15 Convegno Naz. L'ingegneria sismica Ital., Padova, p. Paper B26; 2013.
30. [30] Galli, P., Camassi, R., Azzaro, R., Bernardini, F., Castenetto, S., Molin, D., et al. Il Terremoto Aquilano del 6 Aprile 2009: Rilievo Macrosismico, Effetti di Superficie ed Implicazioni Sismotettoniche. Quat Ital J Quat Sci 22 (2009), 235–246.
31. [31] Çelebi, M., Bazzurro, P., Chiaraluce, L., Clemente, P., Decanini, L., Desortis, A., et al. Recorded motions of the 6 April 2009 Mw 6.3 L'Aquila, Italy, earthquake and implications for building structural damage: overview. Earthq Spectra 26 (2010), 651–684, 10.1193/1.3450317.
32. [32] Gizzi, F.T., Masini, N., Sileo, M., Zotta, C., Scavone, M., Potenza, M.R., et al. Building features and safeguard of church towers in Basilicata (Southern Italy). 2nd Int Congr Sci Technol Conserv Cult Herit, 2014, 369–374.
33. [33] Sorrentino, L., Alshawa, O., Liberatore, D., Observations of out-of-plane rocking in the oratory of San Giuseppe dei Minimi during the 2009 L'Aquila earthquake. Appl Mech Mater 621 (2014), 101–106, 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.621.101.
34. [34] Marotta, A., Goded, T., Giovinazzi, S., Lagomarsino, S., Liberatore, D., Sorrentino, L., et al. An inventory of unreinforced masonry churches in New Zealand. Bull New Zeal Soc Earthq Eng 48 (2015), 171–190.
35. [35] Marotta, A., Sorrentino, L., Liberatore, D., Ingham, J.M., Vulnerability assessment of unreinforced masonry churches following the 2010–2011 Canterbury (New Zealand) earthquake sequence. J Earthq Eng, 2016, 10.1080/13632469.2016.1206761.
36. [36] DPCM. Decreto del Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri 5 maggio 2011. Approvazione del modello per il rilevamento dei danni, pronto intervento e agibilità per edifici ordinari nell'emergenza post-sismica e del relativo manuale di compilazione. Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana n. 113 del 17 maggio 2011 (Supplemento ordinario n. 123); 2011.
37. [37] Walsh, K.Q., Cummuskey, P.A., Jafarzadeh, R., Ingham, J.M., Rapid Identification and Taxonomical Classification of Structural Seismic Attributes in a Regionwide Commercial Building Stock. J Perform Constr Facil, 31, 2017, 4016067, 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000927.
38. [38] Zindato, D., 15° Censimento Generale della Popolazione e delle Abitazioni 2011. [Manuale della rilevazione], 2011, Istituto Nazionale di Statistica, Roma.
39. [39] Jolliffe, I.T., Principal component analysis, 2nd ed., 2002, Springer, New York, 10.1007/b98835.
40. [40] Giuffrè, A., A mechanical model for statics and dynamics of historical masonry buildings. Petrini, V., Save, M., (eds.) Prot. archit. herit. against earthquakes, 1996, Springer, Wien, 71–153.
41. [41] Gutiérrez, E., Zaldivar, J.M., The application of Karhunen-Loeve, or principal component analysis method, to study the non-linear seismic response of structures. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 29 (2000), 1261–1286, 10.1002/1096-9845(200009)29:9<1261::AID-EQE964>3.0.CO;2-N.
42. [42] Ni YQ, Zhou XT, Ko JM. Experimental investigation of seismic damage identification using PCA-compressed frequency response functions and neural networks. Vol. 290; 2006, p. 242–63. 〈 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2005.03.016〉.
43. [43] Pei Q, Wang L, Quan H. Study on characteristics of time-varying parameters of reinforced concrete frame structure. Vol. 33; 2013, p. 40–6.
44. [44] Loh CH, Chan CK, Chen SF, Huang SK. Vibration-based damage assessment of steel structure using global and local response measurements. Vol. 45; 2016, p. 699–718. 〈 http://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2680〉.
45. [45] Aschheim, M.A., Black, E.F., Cuesta, I., Theory of principal components analysis and applications to multistory frame buildings responding to seismic excitation. Eng Struct 24 (2002), 1091–1103, 10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00036-6.
46. [46] Li H, Li S, Ou J, Li H. Modal identification of bridges under varying environmental conditions: temperature and wind effects. Vol. 17; 2010, p. 495–512. 〈 http://doi.org/10.1002/stc.319〉.
47. [47] Massumi A, Gholami F. The influence of seismic intensity parameters on structural damage of RC buildings using principal components analysis. Vol. 40; 2016, p. 2161–76. 〈 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2015.09.043〉.
48. [48] Hotelling, H., Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. J Educ Psychol 24 (1933), 417–441, 10.1037/h0071325.
49. [49] Sorrentino, L., D'Ayala, D., de Felice, G., Griffith, M.C., Lagomarsino, S., Magenes, G., Review of out-of-plane seismic assessment techniques applied to existing masonry buildings. Int J Arch Herit 11 (2017), 2–21, 10.1080/15583058.2016.1237586.
50. [50] Abrams, D.P., AlShawa, O., Lourenço, P.B., Sorrentino, L., Of unreinforced masonry walls: conceptual discussion, research needs, and modeling issues. Int J Arch Herit 11 (2017), 22–30, 10.1080/15583058.2016.1238977.
51. [51] Anderson, T.W., An introduction to multivariate statistical analysis, 3rd ed, 2003, Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey.
52. [52] Guidoboni E, Ferrari G, Mariotti D, Comastri A, Tarabusi G, Valensise G. CFTI4Med, Catalogue of strong earthquakes in Italy (461 B.C.-1997) and mediterranean area (760 B.C.-1500) 2007. 〈 http://storing.ingv.it/cfti4med/〉.
53. [53] Locati M, Camassi R, Stucchi M. DBMI11, la versione 2011 del DataBase Macrosismico Italiano. Ist Di Geofis E Vulcanol Milano, Bol 2011. 〈 http://emidius.mi.ingv.it/DBMI11〉.
54. [54] Decanini LD, Mollaioli F. Sull'attenuazione dell'intensità macrosismica in alcune zone sismogenetiche italiane. 8 Convegno Naz. L'ingegneria sismica Ital., Taormina; 1997, p. 895–902.
55. [55] Sorrentino, L., Liberatore, L., Decanini, L.D., Liberatore, D., The performance of churches in the 2012 Emilia earthquakes. Bull Earthq Eng 12 (2014), 2299–2331, 10.1007/s10518-013-9519-3.
56. [56] Murphy, J.R., O’ Brien, L.J., The correlation of peak ground acceleration amplitude with seismic intensity and other physical parameters. Bull Seismol Soc Am 67 (1977), 877–915.
57. [57] Guagenti E, Petrini V. Il caso delle vecchie costruzioni: verso una legge danni intensità. 4 convegno Naz. l'ingegneria sismica Ital.; 1989, p. 145–53.
58. [58] Margottini, C., Molin, D., Serva, L., Intensity versus ground motion: a new approach using Italian data. Eng Geol 33 (1992), 45–58, 10.1016/0013-7952(92)90034-V.
59. [59] Decanini LD, Gavarini C, Mollaioli F Proposta di definizione delle relazioni fra intensità macrosimica e parametri del moto del suolo. 7 Convegno Naz. L'ingegneria sismica Ital., Siena; 1995, p. 63–72.
60. [60] Wald, D.J., Quitoriano, V., Heaton, T.H., Kanamori, H., Relationships between peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and modified Mercalli intensity in California. Earthq Spectra 15 (1999), 557–564.
61. [61] DMI. Decreto del Ministro delle Infrastrutture 14 gennaio 2008. Approvazione delle nuove norme tecniche per le costruzioni. Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana, n. 29 del 4 febbraio 2008, Supplemento Ordinario n. 30; 2008.
62. [62] Sorrentino, L., The early entrance of dynamics in earthquake engineering: Arturo Danusso's contribution. ISET J Earthq Technol 44 (2007), 1–24.
63. [63] Sorrentino L, Tocci C. The structural strengthening of early and mid 20th century reinforced concrete diaphragms. In: Proceedings of the sixth international conference struct. anal. hist. constr. 2–4 July, Bath; 2008, p. 1431–1439.
64. [64] Caravaggi L, Carpenzano O, Fioritto A, Imbroglini C, Sorrentino L. Ricostruzione e governo del rischio. Piani di ricostruzione post sisma dei Comuni di Lucoli, Ovindoli, Rocca di Cambio e Rocca di Mezzo (L'Aquila). Macerata: Quodlibet; 2013.
65. [65] Sorrentino L, Bruccoleri D, Antonini M. Structural interpretation of post-earthquake (19th century) retrofitting on the Santa Maria degli Angeli Basilica, Assisi, Italy. Proceedings of the sixth international conference struct. anal. hist. constr. 2–4 July, Bath; 2008, p. 217–25.