Rapid Identification and Taxonomical Classification of Structural Seismic Attributes in a Regionwide Commercial Building Stock

Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Walsh, Kevin Q ^a   Cummuskey, Patrick A ^b   Jafarzadeh, Reza ^c   Ingham, Jason M ^d  

^a Frost Engineering and Consulting   (United States)

^b AUCKLAND COUNCIL   (New Zealand)

^c SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^d UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Buildings; Earthquakes; Hazard model; Initial evaluation procedure; Nonductile; Rapid assessment; Reinforced concrete (RC); Structural footprint; Taxonomy; Unreinforced masonry (URM)

Indexed keywords

CONSTRUCTION; EARTHQUAKES; GEOPHYSICS; OFFICE BUILDINGS; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMOLOGY; TAXONOMIES;

HAZARD MODELING; INITIAL EVALUATION PROCEDURE; NONDUCTILE; RAPID ASSESSMENT; STRUCTURAL FOOTPRINT; UNREINFORCED MASONRY;

BUILDINGS;

EID: 85010375975     PISSN: 08873828     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000927     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Anagnos, T., et al. (2012). " Developing regional building inventories: Lessons from the field." Earthquake Spectra, 28 (4), 1305-1329. 10.1193/1.4000087. EASPEF 8755-2930
2. ArcGIS [Computer software]. ESRI, Redlands, CA.
3. ASCE. (2014). " Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings." ASCE 41-13, Reston, VA.
4. ATC (Applied Technology Council). (1985). " Earthquake damage evaluation data for California." ATC-13, Redwood City, CA.
5. ATC (Applied Technology Council). (1989). " Procedures for post-earthquake safety evaluation of buildings." ATC-20, Redwood City, CA.
6. ATC (Applied Technology Council). (2000). " Database on the performance of structures near strong-motion recordings: 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake." ATC-38, Redwood City, CA.
7. Auckland Council. (2011). " Earthquake-prone, dangerous & insanitary buildings policy (2011-2016)." Auckland, New Zealand.
8. Auckland Council. (2012). " The Auckland plan, March." Auckland, New Zealand.
9. Brown, J., Walsh, K., and, Cummuskey, P. (2014). " The four R's- reduce risk, raise resilience: Local authority priorities and the Auckland perspective on engineering requirements for heritage buildings." 4th Australasian Engineering Heritage Conf., IPENZ, Wellington, New Zealand.
10. Burak, B., and, Comlekoglu, H. (2013). " Effect of shear wall area to floor area ratio on the seismic behavior of reinforced concrete buildings." J. Struct. Eng., 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000785, 1928-1937.
11. Charleson, A. (2011). " Review of existing structural taxonomies: Global earthquake model." (http://www.nexus.globalquakemodel.org/gem-building-taxonomy/posts/review-of-existing-structural-taxonomies) (Jan. 12, 2014).
12. City of Los Angeles. (1949). " Los Angeles city building code and other ordinances." Dept. of Building and Safety, Los Angeles.
13. City of Los Angeles. (1985). " Division 88: Earthquake hazard reduction in unreinforced masonry buildings." Los Angeles.
14. City of Portland. (2004). Chapter 24.85: Seismic design requirements for existing buildings, City Code and Charter, City of Portland, Oregon.
15. City of San Francisco. (1993). " Earthquake safety programs: Community safety element of the San Francisco master plan." (https://archive.org/stream/earthquakesafety93sanf/earthquakesafety93sanf-djvu.txt) (Mar. 28, 2015).
16. City of Seattle. (2009). Chapter 34-Existing buildings and structures, Washington, DC.
17. City of Vancouver. (2012). Vancouver building bylaw 9419, British Columbia, Canada.
18. Cooper, M., Carter, R., and, Fenwick, R. (2012). " Canterbury earthquakes royal commission." Royal Commission of Inquiry, Christchurch, New Zealand.
19. Cousins, J. (2005). " Estimated damage and casualties from earthquakes affecting Auckland City: A report prepared for the Auckland City Council." Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences (GNS), Lower Hutt, New Zealand.
20. CSA (Canadian Standards Association). (2014). " Seismic risk reduction of operational and functional components (OFCs) of buildings." S832-14, Mississauga, ON, Canada.
21. Elwood, K., and, Moehle, J. (2006). " Idealized backbone model for existing reinforced concrete columns and comparisons with FEMA 356 criteria." Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 15 (5), 553-569. 10.1002/tal.382.
22. FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). (2002). " Rapid visual screening of buildings for potential seismic hazards." FEMA 154, Washington, DC.
23. FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). (2009). " Unreinforced masonry buildings and earthquakes: Developing successful risk reduction programs." FEMA P-774, Washington, DC.
24. Fenwick, R., and, MacRae, G. (2009). " Comparison of New Zealand standards used for seismic design of concrete buildings." Bull. New Zealand Soc. Earthquake Eng., 42 (3), 187-203. NZEBA3
25. GEM (Global Earthquake Model). (2013). " GEM building taxonomy v2.0: An overview." (http://www.nexus.globalquakemodel.org/gem-building-taxonomy/overview) (Dec. 25, 2013).
26. Glogau, O. (1980). " Low-rise reinforced concrete buildings of limited ductility." Bull. New Zealand National Soc. Earthquake Eng., 13 (2), 182-193. BNZED6 0110-0718
27. GNS (Geological and Nuclear Sciences). (2010). " RiskScape user manual, ver. 0.2.30." Lower Hutt, New Zealand.
28. Hassan, A. F., and, Sozen, M. A. (1997). " Seismic vulnerability assessment of low-rise buildings in regions with infrequent earthquakes." ACI Struct. J., 94 (1), 31-39. ASTJEG 0889-3241
29. Kam, W., Pampanin, S., and, Elwood, K. (2011). " Seismic performance of reinforced concrete buildings in the 22 February Christchurch (Lyttelton) earthquake." Bull. New Zealand Soc. Earthquake Eng., 44 (4), 239-278.
30. King, A., and, Bell, R. (2006). " RiskScape New Zealand: A multihazard loss modelling tool." Proc., New Zealand Society for Earthquake Eng. Conf., NZSEE, Wellington, New Zealand.
31. Lindeburg, M., and, McMullin, K. (2011). Seismic design of building structures, 10th Ed., Professional Publications, Inc. (PPI), Belmont, CA.
32. MacRae, G., Clifton, C., and, Megget, L. (2011). " Review of NZ building codes of practice." Royal Commission of Inquiry, Christchurch, New Zealand.
33. Monitor Auckland. (2012). " Gross domestic product (GDP) and average annual change." (http://monitorauckland.arc.govt.nz/MonitorAuckland/index.cfm?242A576B-1279-D5EC-EDD1-A4B81624B46D) (Dec. 12, 2012).
34. Newman, P. (1976). " San Francisco's parapet ordinance." Foundation for San Francisco's architectural heritage, American Institute of Architects Northern California Chapter, San Francisco.
35. New Zealand Parliament. (2004). " Building Act 2004." Dept. of Building and Housing, Ministry of Economic Development, New Zealand Government, Wellington, New Zealand.
36. New Zealand Parliament. (2005). " Building (specified systems, change the use, and earthquake-prone buildings) regulations." Dept. of Building and Housing, Ministry of Economic Development, New Zealand Government, Wellington, New Zealand.
37. NZSEE (New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering). (2006). " Assessment and improvement of the structural performance of buildings in earthquakes, recommendations of a NZSEE study group on earthquake risk of buildings, Incorporated Corrigenda No. 1 & 2." New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, Wellington, New Zealand.
38. NZSEE (New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering). (2014). " Assessment and improvement of the structural performance of buildings in earthquakes, recommendations of a NZSEE project technical group, Incorporated Corrigenda No. 3, Section 3, Initial seismic assessment." New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, Wellington, New Zealand.
39. NZS (Standards New Zealand). (1982). " Code of practice for the design of concrete structures." NZS 3101 Part 1:1982, Wellington, New Zealand.
40. NZS (Standards New Zealand). (2002). " Structural design actions. Part 0: General principles." NZS 1170.0:2002, Joint Technical Committee BD-006, Australian Standards (AS) and Standards New Zealand (NZS), Wellington, New Zealand.
41. NZS (Standards New Zealand). (2006). " Concrete structures standard. Part 1: The design of concrete structures." NZS 3101:2006, Standards New Zealand Concrete Design Committee P 3101, Wellington, New Zealand.
42. Paxton, B., Turner, F., Elwood, K., and, Ingham, J. (2015). " URM bearing wall building seismic risk mitigation on the west coast of the United States: A review of policies and practices." Bull. New Zealand Soc. Earthquake Eng., 48 (1), 31-40. NZEBA3
43. Ploeger, S., Sawada, M., Elsabbagh, A., Saatcioglu, M., Nastev, M., and, Rosetti, E. (2015). " Urban RAT: New tool for virtual and site-specific mobile rapid data collection for seismic risk assessment." J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000472, 04015006. JCCEE5 0887-3801
44. Priestley, M. J. N. (1996). " Displacement-based seismic assessment of existing reinforced concrete buildings." Bull. New Zealand National Soc. Earthquake Eng., 29 (4), 256-272. BNZED6 0110-0718
45. Russell, A., and, Ingham, J. (2010). " Prevalence of New Zealand's unreinforced masonry buildings." Bull. New Zealand Soc. Earthquake Eng., 43 (3), 182-201. NZEBA3
46. Sezen, H., and, Moehle, J. (2004). " Shear strength model for lightly reinforced concrete columns." J. Struct. Eng., 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:11(1692), 1692-1703.
47. Statistics New Zealand. (2013). " Infoshare; Group: Population estimates-DPE; Table: Estimated resident population for territorial authority areas, at 30 June (1996+) (Annual-Jun)." (http://www.stats.govt.nz/infoshare) (Aug. 7, 2013).
48. Tokyo Metropolitan Government. (2011). " Ordinance to promote the earthquake resistance of emergency transportation roadside buildings in Tokyo." Tokyo Ordinance No. 36, Tokyo.
49. Uma, S., Bothara, J., Jury, R., and, King, A. (2008). " Performance assessment of existing buildings in New Zealand." Proc., New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering Conf., NZSEE, Wellington, New Zealand.
50. Wallace, J. W. (1994). " A new methodology for seismic design of reinforced concrete shear walls." J. Struct. Eng., 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:3(863), 863-884.
51. Walsh, K., et al. (2014). " Geometric characterisation and out-of-plane seismic stability of low-rise unreinforced brick masonry buildings in Auckland, New Zealand." Bull. New Zealand Soc. Earthquake Eng., 47 (2), 139-156. NZEBA3
52. Walsh, K., Elwood, K., and, Ingham, J. (2015). " Seismic considerations for the Art Deco interwar reinforced-concrete buildings of Napier, New Zealand." Nat. Hazard. Rev., 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000169, 04014035. NHREFO 1527-6988