The influence of seismic intensity parameters on structural damage of RC buildings using principal components analysis

Applied Mathematical Modelling

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 2161-2176

  Massumi, Ali ^a   Gholami, Fatemeh ^a  

^a KHARAZMI UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Damage criteria; Principal component analysis; Seismic intensity parameters

Indexed keywords

DAMAGE DETECTION; EARTHQUAKES; GEOPHYSICS; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMOLOGY; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

DAMAGE CRITERIA; EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTIONS; FREQUENCY DEPENDENT PARAMETERS; GROUND MOTION PARAMETERS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS ANALYSIS; REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAMES; SEISMIC INTENSITY; TIME DEPENDENT PARAMETER;

PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

EID: 84955197624     PISSN: 0307904X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2015.09.043     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Elenas A. Correlation between seismic acceleration parameters and overall structural damage indices of buildings. Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 2000, 20(1-4):93-100.
2. Elenas A., Meskouris K. Correlation study between seismic acceleration parameters and damage indices of structure. Eng. Struct. 2001, 23(6):698-704.
3. Lio W., Loh C., Wan S. Earthquake response of RC moment frames subjected to near-fault ground motions. Struct. Des. Tall Builld. 2001, 10(3):219-229.
4. Akkar S., Özen O. Effect of peak ground velocity on deformation demand for SDOF systems. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 2005, 34(13):1551-1571.
5. Yakut A., Yilmaz H. Correlation of deformation demands with ground motion intensity. J. Struct. Eng. 2008, 134(12):1818-1828.
6. Kadas K., Yakut A., Kazaz I. Spectral ground motion intensity based on capacity and period longation. J. Struct. Eng. 2011, 137(3):401-409.
7. Lin L., Noumoski N., Saatcioglu M., Foo S. Effect of strong-motion duration on the response of reinforced concrete frame buildings. Proceedings of 9th US National and 10th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering 2010.
8. Kumar M., Stafford P.J., Elghazouli A.Y. Influence of ground motion characteristics on drift demands in steel moment frames designed to Eurocode 8. Eng. Struct. 2013, 52:502-517.
9. Nuttli O.W. The relation of sustained maximum ground motion acceleration and velocity to earthquake intensity and magnitude 1979, U.S. Army Corp of Engineers Waterway Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MO, Miscellaneous paper S-73-1, Report 16.
10. Arias A. A measure of earthquake intensity. Seismic Design for Nuclear Power Plants 1970, 438-469. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. R. Hansen (Ed.).
11. Park Y.J., Ang A.H.-S., Wen Y.K. Damage-limiting seismic design of buildings. Earthquake Spectra 1987, 3(1):1-26.
12. Fajfar P., Vidic T., Fischinger M. A measure of earthquake motion capacity to damage medium-period structures. Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 1990, 9(5):236-242.
13. Riddell R., Garcia E.J. Hysteretic energy spectrum and damage control. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 2001, 30(12):1791-1816.
14. Rathje E.M., Faraj F., Russell S., Bray J.D. Empirical relationships for frequency content parameters of earthquake ground motions. Earthquake Spectra 2004, 20(1):119-144.
15. Araya R., Saragoni G.R. Capacity of seismic motion to produce structural damage 1980, División Ingeniería Estructural, Departamento de Ingeniería Civil, Universidad de Chile, Publicación SES I 7/80 (156) (in Spanish).
16. ATC 3-06 Tentative Provisions for the Development of Seismic Regulations for Buildings 1978, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA.
17. Housner G.W. Spectrum intensities of strong-motion earthquakes. Proceedings of the Symposium on Earthquake and Blast Effects on Structures 1952, EERI, Berkeley, CA.
18. Von Thun J.L., Roehm L.H., Scott G.A., Wilson J.A. Earthquake ground motions for design and analysis of dams. Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics II-Recent Advances in Ground Motion Evaluation 1988, 463-481. ASCE, New York, NY, Geotechnical Special Publication No. 20.
19. Lee J. Engineering Characterization of Earthquake Ground Motion 2009, University of Michigan, USA, Ph.D. thesis.
20. Rathje E.M., Abrahamson N., Bray J.D. Simplified frequency content estimates of earthquake ground motions. J. Geotech. Eng. 1998, 124(2):150-159.
21. Park Y.J., Ang A.H.-S. Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete. J. Struct. Eng. 1985, 111(4):722-739.
22. Park Y.J., Ang A.H., Wen Y.K. Damage-limiting aseismic design of buildings. Earthquake Spectra 1987, 3(1):1-26.
23. Kunnath S.K., Reinhorn A.M., Lobo R.F. IDARC version 3: a program for the inelastic damage analysis of RC structures 1992, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, Technical report NCEER-92-0022.
24. Lott W.F. The optimal set of principal component restrictions on a least squares regression. Commun. Stat. Theory Meth. 1973, 2:449-464.
25. Rowlings J.O., Pantula S.G., Dickey D.A. Applied Regression Analysis: A Research Tool 1998, Springer, NY. second ed.