Encouraging environmental sustainability through gender: A micro-foundational approach using linguistic gender marking

Journal of Organizational Behavior

Volumn 38, Issue 9, 2017, Pages 1356-1379

  Shoham, Amir ^a   Almor, Tamar ^b   Lee, Sang Mook ^c   Ahammad, Mohammad F ^d  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b The College of Management ^*  (Israel)

^c PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

environmental sustainability; gender; linguistic gender marking; micro foundations

Indexed keywords

EID: 85013640431     PISSN: 08943796     EISSN: 10991379     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/job.2188     Document Type: Article

References (113)

1. Angrist, J. D., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Does compulsory school attendance affect schooling and earnings? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), 979–1014.
2. Aras, G., & Crowther, D. (2008). Governance and sustainability. Management Decision, 46(3), 433–448.
3. Bansal, P., & Clelland, I. (2004). Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 93–103.
4. Barney, J., & Felin, T. (2013). What are microfoundations? Academy of Management Perspectives, 27, 138–155.
5. Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 207–221.
6. Bernardi, R., Bosco, S., & Vassill, K. (2006). Does female representation on boards of directors associate with Fortune's 100 “Best companies to work for” list? Business & Society, 45(2), 235–248.
7. Blomgren, A. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility influence profit margins? A case study of executive perceptions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 18, 263–274.
8. Bordia, S., & Bordia, P. (2014). Employees' willingness to adopt a foreign functional language in multilingual organizations: The role of linguistic identity. Journal of International Business Studies, 46, 415–428.
9. Boroditsky, L., & Gaby, A. (2010). Remembrances of times east: Absolute spatial representations of time in an Australian aboriginal community. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1635–1639.
10. Boroditsky, L., Schmidt, L., & Phillips, W. (2003). Sex, syntax, and semantics. In D. Gentner, & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and cognition (pp. 61–80). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Boulouta, I. (2013). Hidden connections: the link between board gender diversity and corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(2), 185–197.
12. Burke, L., & Logsdon, J. M. (1996). How corporate social responsibility pays off. Long Range Planning, 29(4), 495–502.
13. Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 367–383.
14. Callan, S. J., & Thomas, J. M. (2009). Corporate financial performance and corporate social performance: An update and reinvestigation. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16, 61–78.
15. Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial Review, 38(1), 33–53.
16. Chen, M. K. (2013). The effect of language on economic behavior: Evidence from savings rates, health behaviors, and retirement assets. American Economic Review, 103(2), 690–731.
17. Ciocirlan, C., & Pettersson, C. (2012). Does workforce diversity matter in the fight against climate change? An analysis of Fortune 500 companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 19, 47–62.
18. Corbett, G. G. (2011a). Number of genders. In M. S. Dryer and M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures online (chapter 30). Munich, Germany: Max Planck Digital Library. Website: http://wals.info.
19. Corbett, G. G. (2011b). Sex-based and non-sex-based gender systems, in M. S. Dryer, and M. Haspelmath (eds.). The world atlas of language structures online (chapter 31). Munich, Germany: Max Planck Digital Library. Website: http://wals.info.
20. Corbett, G. G. (2011c). Systems of gender assignment. In M. S. Dryer, & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures online (chapter 32). Munich, Germany: Max Planck Digital Library Website: http://wals.info.
21. Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 448–474.
22. Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species. London: John Murray.
23. Datta, D. K., Rajagopalan, N., & Zhang, Y. (2003). New CEO openness to change and strategic persistence: The moderating role of industry characteristics. British Journal of Management, 14(2), 101–114.
24. Delmas, M. A., & Pekovic, S. (2013). Environmental standards and labor productivity: Understanding the mechanisms that sustain sustainability. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 230–252.
25. Delmas, M., & Montiel, I. (2009). Green the supply chain: When is customer pressure effective? Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 18(1), 171–201.
26. Dhont, K., Hodson, G., Costello, K., & MacInnis, C. C. (2014). Social dominance orientation connects prejudicial human-human and human-animal relations. Personality and Individual Differences, 61-62, 105–108.
27. Diamantopoulos, A., Schlegelmilch, B. B., Sinkovics, R. R., & Bohlen, G. M. (2003). Can socio-demographics still play a role in profiling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation. Journal of Business Research, 56, 465–480.
28. Dietz, T., Kalof, L., & Stern, P. C. (2002). Gender, values, and environmentalism. Social Science Quarterly, 83, 353–364.
29. Dixon-Fowler, H. R., Slater, D. J., Johnson, J. L., Ellstrand, A. E., & Romi, A. M. (2012). Beyond does it pay to be green?: A meta-analysis of moderators of the CEP-CFP relationship. Journal of Business Ethics, 112, 353–366.
30. Dollar, D., & Gatti, R. (1999). Gender inequality, income, and growth: are good times good for women? (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: Development Research Group, The World Bank.
31. Ducassy, I. (2013). Does corporate social responsibility pay off in times of crisis? An alternate perspective on the relationship between financial and corporate social performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20, 157–167.
32. Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1991). Explaining sex differences in social behavior: A meta-analytic perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 306–315.
33. Erhardt, N. L., Werbel, J. D., & Shrader, C. B. (2003). Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(2), 102–111.
34. Falck, O., Heblich, S., Lameli, A., & Suedekum, J. 2010. Dialects, cultural identity, and economic exchange, IZA Discussion Papers No. 4743.
35. Felin, T., Foss, N. J., & Ployhart, R. E. (2015). The microfoundations movement in strategy and organization theory. The Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 575–632.
36. Felin, T., Foss, N., Heimeriks, K., & Madsen, T. (2012). Microfoundations of routines and capabilities: Individuals, processes, and structure. Journal of Management Studies, 49, 1351–1374.
37. Fernandez-Feijoo, B., Romero, S., & Ruiz-Blanco, S. (2014). Women on boards: Do they affect sustainability reporting? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 21(6), 351–364.
38. Frias-Aceituno, J. V., Rodriguez-Ariza, L., & Garcia-Sanchez, I. M. (2013). The role of the board in the dissemination of integrated corporate social reporting. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(4), 219–233.
39. Galbreath, J. (2011). Are there gender-related influences on corporate sustainability? A study of women on boards of directors. Journal of Management and Organization, 17, 17–38.
40. Gay, V., Hicks, D. L. Santacreu-Vasut, E., & Shoham, A. Decomposing culture: Can gendered language influence women's economic engagement? (January 1, 2015). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract = 2544396 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2544396
41. Gay, V., Santacreu-Vasut, E., & Shoham, A. (2013). The grammatical origins of gender roles. Berkeley Economic History Economic Laboratory working paper series WP2013-03.
42. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43. Givati, Y., & Troiano, U. (2012). Law, economics, and culture: Theory of mandated benefits and evidence from maternity leave policies. Journal of Law and Economics, 52(2), 339–364.
44. Guiora, A. Z., Beit-Hallahmi, B., Fried, R., & Yoder, C. (1982). Language environment and gender identity attainment. Language Learning, 32(2), 289–304.
45. Haniffa, R. M., & Cooke, T. E. (2005). The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(5), 391–430.
46. Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20, 986–1014.
47. Hart, S. L. (2005). Capitalism at the crossroads: The unlimited business opportunities in solving the world's most difficult problems. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing.
48. Hayek, F. A. (1960). The constitution of liberty. Chicago: The University of Chicago.
49. Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2015). Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 36(6), 831–850.
50. Hicks, D. L., Santacreu-Vasut, E., & Shoham, A. (2015). Does mother tongue make for women's work? Linguistics, household labor, and gender identity. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 110, 19–44.
51. Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A. Jr., & Harris, I. C. (2002). Women and racial minorities in the boardroom: How do directors differ? Journal of Management, 28, 747–763.
52. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53. Hoijer, H. (Ed) (1954). Language in culture: Conference on the interrelations of language and other aspects of culture: The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis (pp. 92–105). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
54. Jackson, S. E., Ones, D. S., & Dilchert, S. (Eds) (2012). Managing human resources for environmental sustainability. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
55. Jamali, D., Safieddine, A., & Daouk, M. (2007). Corporate governance and women: an empirical study of top and middle women managers in the Lebanese banking sector. Corporate Governance, 7(5), 574–585.
56. Johansson, S. (2005). Origins of language: Constraints on hypotheses. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
57. Johnson, R. A., & Greening, D. W. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 564–576.
58. Jylhä, K. M., & Akrami, N. (2015). Social dominance orientation and climate change denial: The role of dominance and system justification. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 108–111.
59. Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C. (1986). Technology adoption in the presence of network externalities. Journal of Political Economy, 94(4), 822–841.
60. Klein, R. M., D'Mello, S., & Wiernik, B. M. (2012). Demographic characteristics and employee sustainability. In S. E. Jackson, D. S. Ones, & S. Dilchert (Eds.), Managing human resources for environmental sustainability (pp. 117–154). Sanfranciso, CA: Jossey-Bass.
61. Konrad, A., & Kramer, V. W. (2006). How many women do boards need? Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 22–24.
62. Kopelman, S., Weber, J. M., & Messick, D. M. (2002). Commons dilemma management: recent experimental results. In E. Ostrom, T. Dietz, N. Dolsak, P. C. Stern, S. Stonich, & E. Weber (Eds.), The drama of the commons. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
63. Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
64. Ladd, D. R., Roberts, S. G., & Dediu, D. (2015). Correlational studies in typological and historical linguistics. Annual Review of Linguistics, 1(1).
65. Larrieta-Rubín de Celis, I., Velasco-Balmaseda, E., Fernández de Bobadilla, S., Alonso-Almeida, M. D. M., & Intxaurburu-Clemente, G. (2015). Does having women managers lead to increased gender equality practices in corporate social responsibility? Business Ethics: A European Review, 24(1), 91–110.
66. Lee, S. M., & Shoham, A. (2014). The Causal Impact of Grammatical Gender Marking on Gender and Social Inequality? Business and Society, forthcoming.
67. Levinson, S. C. (2003). Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
68. Licht, A. N., Goldschmidt, C., & Schwartz, S. H. (2005). Culture, law, and corporate governance. International Review of Law and Economics, 25(2), 229–255.
69. Lucy, J. A., & Gaskins, S. (2001). Grammatical categories and the development of classification preferences: A comparative approach in language acquisition and conceptual development. In M. Bowerman, & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 257–283). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
70. Margolis, J., & Walsh, J. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305.
71. Marquis, C., & Lee, M. (2012). Who is governing whom? Senior managers, governance and the structure of generosity in large U.S. firms. Strategic Management Journal, 34(4), 483–497.
72. McElhaney, K., & Mobasseri, S. (2012). Women create a sustainable future. Center for Responsible Business, Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley.
73. Mercadillo, R. E., Diaz, J. L., Pasaye, E. H., & Barrios, F. A. (2011). Perception of suffering and compassion experience: Brain gender disparities. Brain and Cognition, 76(1), 5–14.
74. Merchant, C. (1992). Radical ecology: The search for a liveable world. New York: Routledge.
75. Michelon, G., Boesso, G., & Kumar, K. (2013). Examining the link between strategic corporate social responsibility and company performance: An analysis of the best corporate citizens. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20, 81–94.
76. Milfont, T. L., Richter, I., Sibley, C. G., Wilson, M. S., & Fischer, R. (2013). Environmental consequences of the desire to dominate and be superior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1127–1138.
77. Milfont, T. L., & Sibley, C. G. (2014). The hierarchy enforcement hypothesis of environmental exploitation: A social dominance perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 188–193.
78. Milfont, T. L., & Sibley, C. G. (2016). Empathic and social dominance orientations help explain gender differences in environmentalism: A one-year Bayesian mediation analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 85–88.
79. Moldan, B., Janousková, S., & Hák, T. (2012). How to understand and measure environmental sustainability: Indicators and targets. Ecological Indicators, 17, 4–13.
80. Molina-Azorin, J. F. (2014). Microfoundations of strategic management: Towards micro–macro research in the resource-based theory. Business Research Quarterly, 17(2), 102–114.
81. North, D. C. (1993). Prize Lecture. Nobelprize.org, accessed 21 February 2011. http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economics/laureates/1993/north-lecture.html.
82. Orlitsky, M., Schmidt, F., & Rynes, F. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24, 403–441.
83. Peltokorpi, V., & Vaara, E. (2014). Knowledge transfer in multinational corporations: Productive and counterproductive effects of language-sensitive recruitment. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(5), 600–622.
84. Plessis, J. J., Saenger, I., & Foster, R. (2012). Board diversity or gender diversity? Deakin Law Review, 17(2), 207–249.
85. Porter, M. E., & Van Der Linde, C. (1995). Towards a new conception of the environment — competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118.
86. Post, C., Rahman, N., & Rubow, E. (2011). Green governance: boards of directors' composition and environmental corporate social responsibility. Business and Society, 50, 189–223.
87. Quigley T., & Hambrick D. (2011). Macrosocietal changes and executive effects on firm performance: A new explanation for the great rise in attribVutions of CEO significance, 1950-2009. Working paper, University of Georgia.
88. Ricart, J. E., Rodriguez, M. A., & Sanchez, P. (2005). Sustainability in the boardroom: An empirical examination of Dow Jones sustainability world index leaders. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 5, 24–41.
89. Roberts, S., & Winters, J. (2013). Linguistic diversity and traffic accidents: Lessons from statistical studies of cultural traits. PloS One, 8(8), e70902.
90. Robertson, J. L., & Barling, J. (2013). Greening organizations through leaders' influence on employees' pro-environmental behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(2), 176–194.
91. Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 534–559.
92. Santacreu-Vasut, E., Shenkar, O., & Shoham, A. (2014). Linguistic gender marking and its international business ramifications. Journal of International Business Studies, 45, 1170–1178.
93. Santacreu-Vasut, E., Shoham, A., & Gay, V. (2013). Do female/male distinctions in language matter? Evidence from gender political quotas. Applied Economics Letters, 20(5), 495–498.
94. Setó-Pamies, D. (2015). The relationship between women directors and corporate social responsibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(6), 334–345.
95. Siewierska, A. (2011). Gender distinctions in independent personal pronouns. In M. S. Dryer, and M. Haspelmath (Eds.). The world atlas of language structures online (chapter 44). Munich, Germany: Max Planck Digital Library. Website: http://wals.info.
96. Śliwa, M., & Johansson, M. (2014). How non-native English speaking staff are evaluated in linguistically diverse organizations: A sociolinguistic perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(9), 1133–1151.
97. Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1994). The value basis of environmental concern. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 65–84.
98. Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Kalof, L. (1993). Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 25(3), 322–348.
99. Tabellini, G. (2008). The scope of cooperation: Values and incentives. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(3), 905–950.
100. Tang, L., & Koveos, P. E. (2008). A framework to update hofstede's cultural value indices: economic dynamics and institutional stability. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(6), 1045–1063.
101. Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.
102. Van der Velde, L., Tyrowicz, J., & Siwinska, J. (2015). Language and (the estimates of) the gender wage gap. Economics Letters, 136, 165–170.
103. Walls, J. L., Berrone, P., & Phan, P. H. (2012). Corporate governance and environmental performance: is there really a link? Strategic Management Journal, 33, 885–913.
104. Wang, J., & Coffey, B. (1992). Board composition and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(10), 771–778.
105. WCED (1987). Our common future: The Brundtland Report, World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
106. Welch, D., Welch, L., & Piekkari, R. (2005). Speaking in tongues: The importance of language in international management processes. International Studies of Management and Organization, 35(1), 10–27.
107. Wichmann, S., & Holman, E. W. (2009). Assessing temporal stability for linguistic typological features. Munich: LINCOM Europa.
108. Williams, R. J. (2003). Women on corporate boards of directors and their influence on corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 42(1), 1–10.
109. Winawer, J., Witthoft, N., Frank, M. C., Wu, L., Wade, A. R., & Boroditsky, L. (2007). Russian blues reveal effects of language on color discrimination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(19), 7780–7785.
110. Xiao, C., & McCright, A. M. (2015). Gender differences in environmental concern: Revisiting the institutional trust hypothesis in the USA. Environment and Behavior, 47, 17–37.
111. Zelezny, L. C., Chua, P.-P., & Aldrich, C. (2000). Elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 443–457.
112. Zhang, J. Q., Zhu, H., & Ding, H. (2013). Board composition and corporate social responsibility: an empirical investigation in the post Sarbanes-Oxley era. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(3), 381–392.
113. Zhang, Y., & Rajagopalan, N. (2010). Once an outsider, always an outsider? CEO origin, strategic change, and 41 firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3), 334–346.