Going beyond the problem given: How human tutors use post- solution discussions to support transfer

International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 79-116

  Katz, Sandra ^a   Allbritton, David ^b   Connelly, John ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b DEPAUL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85013614523     PISSN: 15604292     EISSN: 15604306     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Akhras, F. N., & Self, J. A. (2000). System intelligence in constructivist learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11, 344-376.
2. Allison, P. D. (1990). Change scores as dependent variables in regression analysis. Sociological Methodology, 20, 93-114.
3. Bielaczyc, K., Pirolli, P. L., & Brown, A. L. (1995). Training in self-explanation and self-regulation strategies: Investigating the effects of knowledge acquisition activities on problem solving. Cognition and Instruction, 13(2), 221-252.
4. Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13(6), 4-16.
5. Bransford, J. D., Sherwood, R. S., Hasselbring, T. S., Kinzer, C. K., & Williams, S. M. (1990). Anchored instruction: Why we need it and how technology can help. In D. Nix & R. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education, and multimedia: Exploring ideas in high technology (pp. 115-141). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Brown, J. S. (1985). Process versus product: A perspective on tools for communal and informal electronic learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1, 179-201.
7. Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145-182.
8. Chi, M. T. H., Siler, S., Jeong, H., Yamauchi, T., & Hausmann, R. G. (2001). Learning from human tutoring. Cognitive Science, 25, 471-533.
9. Chi, M. T. H., & VanLehn, K. (1991). The content of physics self-explanations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1, 69-105.
10. Collins, A., & Stevens, A. L. (1982). Goals and strategies of inquiry teachers. In Glaser, R. (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology, vol. 2 (pp. 65-119). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand-McNally.
12. Cronbach, L. J., & Furby, L. (1970). How should we measure change - Or should we? Psychological Bulletin, 74, 32-49.
13. Derry, S., & Lesgold, A. (1996). Toward a situated social practice model for instructional design. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 787-807). New York: Macmillan.
14. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston: Heath.
15. Evens, M. W., Spitkowsky, J., Boyle, P., Michael, J. A., & Rovick, A. A. (1993). Synthesizing tutorial dialogues. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 137-142), Boulder, CO. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Gadd, C. S. (1995, July). A theory of the multiple roles of diagnosis in collaborative problem solving discourse. In J. D. Moore & J. F. Lehman (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 352-357), Pittsburgh, PA.
17. Gertner, A., & VanLehn, K. (2000). Andes: A coached problem solving environment for physics. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference, ITS 2000, Montreal, Canada.
18. Goodman, B., Soller, A., Linton, F., & Gaimari, R. (1998). Encouraging student reflection and articulation using a learning companion. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 9, 237-255.
19. Graesser, A. C., Person, N. K., & Magliano, J. P. (1995). Collaborative dialog patterns in naturalistic oneon-one tutoring. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 359-387.
20. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 3 (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
21. Hume, G. D., Michael, J., Rovick, A., & Evens, M. (1996). Hinting as a tactic in one-on-one tutoring. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5(1), 23-47.
22. Katz, S., & Allbritton, D. (2002). Improving learning from practice problems through reflection. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
23. Katz, S., & O’Donnell, G. (1999). The cognitive skill of coaching collaboration. In C. Hoadley & J. Roschelle (Eds.), Proceedings of Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 1999 (pp. 291-299), Stanford, CA.
24. Katz, S., O’Donnell, G., & Kay, H. (2000). An approach to analyzing the role and structure of reflective dialogue. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Education, 11, 320-343.
25. Katz, S., Lesgold, A., Hughes, E., Peters, D., Eggan, G., Gordin, M., & Greenberg., L. (1998). Sherlock 2: An intelligent tutoring system built upon the LRDC Tutor Framework. In C. P. Bloom & R. B. Loftin (Eds.), Facilitating the development and use of interactive learning environments (pp. 227-258). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Lee, A. Y., & Hutchison, L. (1998). Improving learning from examples through reflection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 4(3), 187-210.
27. Leinhardt, G., & Greeno, J. (1986). The cognitive skill of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(2), 75-95.
28. Lesgold, A., Katz, S., Greenberg, L., Hughes, E., & Eggan, G. (1992). Extensions of intelligent tutoring paradigms to support collaborative learning. In S. Dijkstra, H. Krammer, J. van Merrienboer (Eds.), Instructional models in computer-based learning environments (pp. 291-311). Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 291-311.
29. Mann, W., & Thompson, S. (1988). Rhetorical structure theory: Towards a functional theory of text organization. TEXT, 8(3), 243-281.
30. Maris, E. (1998). Covariance adjustment versus gain scores-revisited. Psychological Methods, 3(3), 309-327.
31. McArthur, D., Stasz, C., & Zmuidzinas, M. (1990). Tutoring techniques in algebra. Cognition and Instruction, 7, 197-244.
32. Moore, J. D. (1996). Making computer tutors more like humans. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 7(2), 181-214.
33. Moore, J. D., Lemaire, B., & Rosenblum, J. A. (1996). Discourse generation for instructional applications: Identifying and exploiting relevant prior explanations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5(1), 49-94.
34. Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84(3), 231-259.
35. Person, N. K., Graesser, A. C., Kreuz, R. J., Pomeroy, V., & the Tutoring Research Group. (2001). Simulating human tutor dialog moves in AutoTutor. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 23-39.
36. Piaget, J. (1976). The grasp of consciousness: Action and concept in the young child. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37. Pilkington, R.M., & Mallen, C. (1996). Dialogue games to support reasoning and reflection in diagnostic tasks. Proceedings of the European Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education (pp. 220-225), Lisbon, Portugal.
38. Pioch, N. J., Roberts, B., & Zeltzer, D. (1997). A virtual environment for learning to pilot remotely operated vehicles. Proceedings of Virtual Systems and Multimedia 1997, Geneva, Switzerland.
39. Putnam, R. T. (1987). Structuring and adjusting content for students: A study of live and simulated tutoring of addition. American Educational Research Journal, 24, 13-48.
40. Ravenscroft, A., & Pilkington, R. M. (2000). Investigation by design: Developing dialogue models to support reasoning and conceptual change. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11, 273-298.
41. Rosé, C. P. (1997). The role of natural language interaction in electronics troubleshooting. Proceedings of the Eighth Annual International Energy Week Conference and Exhibition.
42. Smith-Jentsch, K. A., Zeisig, R. L., Acton, B., & McPherson, J. A. (1998). Team dimensional training: A strategy for guided team self-correction. In J. A. Cannon-Bowers & E. Salas (Eds.), Making decisions under stress: Implications for individual and team training (pp. 271-297). Washington, DC: APA.
43. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning: Cognitive Science, 12, 257-285.
44. VanLehn, K., Jones, R. M., & Chi, M. T. H. (1992). A model of the self-explanation effect. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 1-59.
45. VanLehn, K., Siler, S., Murray, C, Yamauchi, T. & Baggett, W. B. (in press). Human tutoring: Why do only some events cause learning? Cognition and Instruction.
46. Wenger, E. (1987). Artificial intelligence and tutoring systems: Computational and cognitive approaches to the communication of knowledge. Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
47. Werts, C. E., & Linn, R. L. (1970). A general linear model for studying growth. Psychological Bulletin, 73, 17-22.
48. White, B., & Frederiksen, J. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3-117.
49. White, B., Shimoda, T.A., & Frederiksen, J. (1999). Enabling students to construct theories of collaborative inquiry and reflective learning: Computer support for metacognitive development. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, 151-182.