Distinguishing reconfiguration and compound-cue retrieval in task switching

Psychologica Belgica

Volumn 50, Issue 3-4, 2010, Pages 413-433

  Logan, Gordon D ^a   Schneider, Darryl W ^b  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957836214     PISSN: 00332879     EISSN: 2054670X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5334/pb-50-3-4-413     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Allport, A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, X. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umiltá & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance. Vol. 15. (pp. 421-452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Arrington, C. M., & Logan, G. D. (2004). The cost of a voluntary task switch. Psychological Science, 15, 610-615.
3. Arrington, C. M., & Logan, G. D. (2005). Voluntary task switching: Chasing the elusive homunculus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 31, 683-702.
4. Arrington, C. M., Logan, G. D., & Schneider, D. W. (2007). Separating cue encoding from target processing in the explicit task-cuing procedure: Are there "true" task switch effects? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 33, 484-502.
5. Bundesen, C. (1990). A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 97, 523-547.
6. Busemeyer, J. R. (1982). Choice behavior in a sequential decision-making task. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 29, 175-207.
7. Choplin, J. M., & Logan, G. D. (2005). A memory-based account of automatic numerosity processing. Memory & Cognition, 33, 17-28.
8. Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371-396.
9. Hines, T. M. (1990). An odd effect: Lengthened reaction times for judgments about odd digits. Memory & Cognition, 18, 40-46.
10. Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492-527.
11. Logan, G. D. (2002). An instance theory of attention and memory. Psychological Review, 109, 376-400.
12. Logan, G. D. (2004). Working memory, task switching, and executive control in the task span procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 218-236.
13. Logan, G. D. (2005). The time it takes to switch attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 647-653.
14. Logan, G. D., & Bundesen, C. (2003). Clever homunculus: Is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task-cuing procedure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 575-599.
15. Logan, G. D., & Gordon, R. D. (2001). Executive control of visual attention in dualtask situations. Psychological Review, 108, 393-434.
16. Logan, G. D., & Schneider, D. W. (2006a). Interpreting instructional cues in task switching procedures: The role of mediator retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 32, 347-363.
17. Logan, G. D., & Schneider, D. W. (2006b). Priming or executive control? Associative priming of cue encoding increases "switch costs" in the explicit task-cuing procedure. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1250-1259.
18. Logan, G. D., Schneider, D. W., & Bundesen, C. (2007). Still clever after all these years: Searching for the homunculus in explicitly-cued task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 978-994.
19. Mayr, U. (in press). The surface structure and the deep structure of sequential control: What can we learn from task-span switch costs? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
20. Mayr, U., & Kliegl, R. (2003). Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task-set selection costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 362-372.
21. Medin, D. L., & Shaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification. Psychological Review, 85, 207-238.
22. Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22, 1423-1442.
23. Miller, K., & Gelman, R. (1983). The child's representation of number: A multidimensional scaling analysis. Child Development, 54, 1470-1479.
24. Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 134-140.
25. Monsell, S., & Mizon, G. A. (2006). Can the task-cuing paradigm measure an endogenous task-set reconfiguration process? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 493-516.
26. Nosofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39-57.
27. Nosofsky, R. M., & Palmeri, T. J. (1997). An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification. Psychological Review, 104, 266-300.
28. Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
29. Schneider, D. W. (2007). Task-set inhibition in chunked task sequences. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 970-976.
30. Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. (2005). Modeling task switching without switching tasks: A short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 343-367.
31. Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. (2006a). Hierarchical control of cognitive processes: Switching tasks in sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 623-640.
32. Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. (2006b). Priming cue encoding by manipulating transition frequency in explicitly cued task switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 145-151.
33. Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. (2007a). Defining task-set reconfiguration: The case of reference point switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 118-125.
34. Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. (2007b). Retrieving information from a hierarchical plan. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 33, 1076-1091.
35. Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. (2007c). Task switching versus cue switching: Using transition cuing to disentangle sequential effects in task-switching performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 33, 370-378.
36. Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. (2009). Selecting a response in task switching: Testing a model of compound cue retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 35, 122-136.
37. Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. (2010). The target of task switching. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 129-133.
38. Shepard, R. N., Kilpatric, D. W., & Cunningham, J. P. (1975). The internal representation of numbers. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 82-138.
39. Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. In W. G. Koster (Ed.), Attention and performance II, Acta Psychologica, 30, 276-315.
40. Tulving, E., & Thompson, D. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352-373.
41. Vandierendonck, A., Liefooghe, B., & Verbruggen, F. (2010). Task switching: Interplay of reconfiguration and interference control. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 601-626.