Covariation in levels of nucleotide diversity in homologous regions of the avian genome long after completion of lineage sorting

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 284, Issue 1849, 2017, Pages

  Dutoit, Ludovic ^a   Vijay, Nagarjun ^a,c   Mugal, Carina F ^a   Bossu, Christen M ^a,d   Burri, Reto ^a,e   Wolf, Jochen ^a,b   Ellegren, Hans ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^d STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^e FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

Author keywords

Birds; Linked selection; Nucleotide diversity; Recombination rate

Indexed keywords

AVIFAUNA; CHROMOSOME; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENOME; HOMOLOGY; PASSERINE; RECOMBINATION;

AVES;

NUCLEOTIDE;

ANIMAL; CORVUS; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETICS; GENOME; KARYOTYPE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; SONGBIRD; SYNTENY;

ANIMALS; CROWS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENOME; KARYOTYPE; NUCLEOTIDES; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SONGBIRDS; SYNTENY;

EID: 85012991893     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2016.2756     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Ellegren H, Galtier N. 2016 Determinants of genetic diversity. Nat. Rev. Genet. 17, 422-433. (doi: 10.1038/nrg.2016.58)
2. Haasl RJ, Payseur BA. 2016 Fifteen years of genomewide scans for selection: trends, lessons and unaddressed genetic sources of complication. Mol. Ecol. 25, 5-23. (doi: 10.1111/mec.13339)
3. Cruickshank TE, Hahn MW. 2014 Reanalysis suggests that genomic islands of speciation are due to reduced diversity, not reduced gene flow. Mol. Ecol. 23, 3133-3157. (doi: 10.1111/mec.12796)
4. Frankham R. 2015 Genetic rescue of small inbred populations: meta-analysis reveals large and consistent benefits of gene flow. Mol. Ecol. 24, 2610-2618. (doi: 10.1111/mec.13139)
5. Charlesworth B. 2009 Effective population size and patterns of molecular evolution and variation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10, 195-205. (doi: 10.1038/nrg2526)
6. Gossmann TI, Woolfit M, Eyre-Walker A. 2011 Quantifying the variation in the effective population size within a genome. Genetics 189, 1389-1402. (doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.132654)
7. Begun DJ, Aquadro CF. 1992 Levels of naturally occurring DNA polymorphism correlate with recombination rates in D. melanogaster. Nature 356, 519-520. (doi: 10.1038/356519a0)
8. Consortium TGP. 2015 A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature 526, 68-74. (doi: 10.1038/nature15393)
9. Fijarczyk A, Babik W. 2015 Detecting balancing selection in genomes: limits and prospects. Mol. Ecol. 24, 3529-3545. (doi: 10.1111/mec.13226)
10. Hodgkinson A, Eyre-Walker A. 2011 Variation in the mutation rate across mammalian genomes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 12, 756-766. (doi: 10.1038/nrg3098)
11. Makova KD, Hardison RC. 2015 The effects of chromatin organization on variation in mutation rates in the genome. Nat. Rev. Genet. 16, 213-223. (doi: 10.1038/nrg3890)
12. Cutter AD, Payseur BA. 2013 Genomic signatures of selection at linked sites: unifying the disparity among species. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14, 262-274. (doi: 10.1038/nrg3425)
13. Charlesworth B, Morgan MT, Charlesworth D. 1993 The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. Genetics 134, 1289-1303.
14. Gillespie JH. 2000 Genetic drift in an infinite population: the pseudohitchhiking model. Genetics 155, 909-919.
15. Smith JM, Haigh J. 1974 The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet. Res. 23, 23-35. (doi: 10.1017/S0016672300014634)
16. Ellegren H. 2010 Evolutionary stasis: the stable chromosomes of birds. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25, 283-291. (doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.12.004)
17. Gregory T. 2016 Animal genome size database. See http://www.genomesize.com/.
18. Shields G. 1982 Comparative avian cytogenetics: a review. Condor 84, 45-58. (doi: 10.2307/1367820)
19. Roslik G, Kryukov A. 2001 Karyological study of some corvine birds (Corvidae, Aves). Russ. J. Genet. 37, 796-806. (doi: 10.1023/A:1016703127516)
20. Bian X, Li Q, Ning S. 1991 Studies on the karyotypes of birds III. 10 species of warblers and 4 species of flycatchers (Aves). Zool. Res. 12, 215-220.
21. Ellegren H et al. 2012 The genomic landscape of species divergence in Ficedula flycatchers. Nature 491, 756-760. (doi: 10.1038/nature11584)
22. Kawakami T, Smeds L, Backström N, Husby A, Qvarnström A, Mugal CF, Olason P, Ellegren H. 2014 A high-density linkage map enables a secondgeneration collared flycatcher genome assembly and reveals the patterns of avian recombination rate variation and chromosomal evolution. Mol. Ecol. 23, 4035-4058. (doi: 10.1111/mec.12810)
23. Poelstra JW et al. 2014 The genomic landscape underlying phenotypic integrity in the face of gene flow in crows. Science 344, 1410-1414. (doi: 10.1126/science.1253226)
24. Poelstra JW, Vijay N, Hoeppner MP, Wolf JBW. 2015 Transcriptomics of colour patterning and coloration shifts in crows. Mol. Ecol. 24, 4617-4628. (doi: 10.1111/mec.13353)
25. Jarvis ED et al. 2014 Whole-genome analyses resolve early branches in the tree of life of modern birds. Science 346, 1320-1331. (doi: 10.1126/science.1253451)
26. Prum RO, Berv JS, Dornburg A, Field DJ, Townsend JP, Lemmon EM, Lemmon AR. 2015 A comprehensive phylogeny of birds (Aves) using targeted next-generation DNA sequencing. Nature 526, 569-573. (doi: 10.1038/nature15697)
27. Jønsson KA, Fabre P-H, Kennedy JD, Holt BG, Borregaard MK, Rahbek C, Fjeldså J. 2016 A supermatrix phylogeny of corvoid passerine birds (Aves: Corvides). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 94A, 87-94. (doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2015.08.020)
28. Vijay N, Bossu CM, Poelstra JW, Weissensteiner MH, Suh A, Kryukov AP, Wolf JBW. 2016 Evolution of heterogeneous genome differentiation across multiple contact zones in a crow species complex. Nat. Commun. 7, 13195. (doi: 10.1038/ncomms13195)
29. Brommer JE, Gustafsson L, Pietiäinen H, Merilä J. 2004 Single-generation estimates of individual fitness as proxies for long-term genetic contribution. Am. Nat. 163, 505-517. (doi: 10.1086/382547)
30. Nadachowska-Brzyska K, Burri R, Olason PI, Kawakami T, Smeds L, Ellegren H. 2013 Demographic divergence history of pied flycatcher and collared flycatcher inferred from whole-genome re-sequencing data. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003942. (doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003942)
31. Nadachowska-Brzyska K, Burri R, Smeds L, Ellegren H. 2016 PSMC analysis of effective population sizes in molecular ecology and its application to blackand- white Ficedula flycatchers. Mol. Ecol. 25, 1058-1072. (doi: 10.1111/mec.13540)
32. Wolf JBW, Bayer T, Haubold B, Schilhabel M, Rosenstiel P, Tautz D. 2010 Nucleotide divergence vs. gene expression differentiation: comparative transcriptome sequencing in natural isolates from the carrion crow and its hybrid zone with the hooded crow. Mol. Ecol. 19, 162-175. (doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04471.x)
33. Hudson RR, Coyne JA. 2002 Mathematical consequences of the genealogical species concept. Evolution 56, 1557-1565. (doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01467.x)
34. Harris RS. 2007 Improved pairwise alignment of genomic DNA. PhD thesis, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA.
35. Kent WJ, Sugnet CW, Furey TS, Roskin KM, Pringle TH, Zahler AM, Haussler D. 2002 The human genome browser at UCSC. Genome Res. 12, 996-1006. (doi: 10.1101/gr.229102. Article published online before print in May 2002)
36. Tang H, Krishnakuar V, Li J. 2015 jcvi: JCVI utility libraries. Zenodo. (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.31631)
37. Burri R et al. 2015 Linked selection and recombination rate variation drive the evolution of the genomic landscape of differentiation across the speciation continuum of Ficedula flycatchers. Genome Res. 25, 1656-1665. (doi: 10.1101/gr.196485.115)
38. Li H, Durbin R. 2009 Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754-1760. (doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324)
39. DePristo MA et al. 2011 A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat. Genet. 43, 491-498. (doi: 10.1038/ng.806)
40. McKenna A et al. 2010 The genome analysis toolkit: a mapreduce framework for analyzing nextgeneration DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20, 1297-1303. (doi: 10.1101/gr.107524.110)
41. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R, Genome Project Data Processing S. 2009 The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078-2079. (doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352)
42. Garrison E, Marth G. 2012 Haplotype-based variants detection from short-read sequencing. ArXiv 1207. 3907.
43. Cock PJ et al. 2009 Biopython: freely available Python tools for computational molecular biology and bioinformatics. Bioinformatics 25, 1422-1423. (doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp163)
44. Bolívar P, Mugal CF, Nater A, Ellegren H. 2016 Recombination rate variation modulates gene sequence evolution mainly via GC-biased gene conversion, not Hill-Robertson interference, in an avian system. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33, 216-227. (doi: 10.1093/molbev/msv214)
45. Kaufman L, Rousseeuw PJ. 1990 Finding groups in data: an introduction to cluster analysis. New York, NY: Wiley.
46. Mugal CF, Nabholz B, Ellegren H. 2013 Genomewide analysis in chicken reveals that local levels of genetic diversity are mainly governed by the rate of recombination. BMC Genomics 14, 86. (doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-86)
47. Manthey JD, Klicka J, Spellman GM. 2015 Chromosomal patterns of diversity and differentiation in creepers: a next-gen phylogeographic investigation of Certhia americana. Heredity 115, 165-172. (doi: 10.1038/hdy.2015.27)
48. Callicrate T, Dikow R, Thomas JW, Mullikin JC, Jarvis ED, Fleischer RC. 2014 Genomic resources for the endangered Hawaiian honeycreepers. BMC Genomics 15, 1098. (doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-1098)
49. ICGSC. 2004 Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution. Nature 432, 695-716. (doi: 10.1038/nature03154)
50. Corbett-Detig RB, Hartl DL, Sackton TB. 2015 Natural selection constrains neutral diversity across a wide range of species. PLoS Biol. 13, e1002112. (doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002112)
51. Slotte T. 2014 The impact of linked selection on plant genomic variation. Brief. Funct. Genomics 13, 268-275. (doi: 10.1093/bfgp/elu009)
52. Volker M, Backstrom N, Skinner BM, Langley EJ, Bunzey SK, Ellegren H, Griffin DK. 2010 Copy number variation, chromosome rearrangement, and their association with recombination during avian evolution. Genome Res. 20, 503-511. (doi: 10.1101/gr.103663.109)
53. Mugal CF, Arndt PF, Ellegren H. 2013 Twisted signatures of GC-biased gene conversion embedded in an evolutionary stable karyotype. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 1700-1712. (doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst067)
54. Backström N et al. 2010 The recombination landscape of the zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata genome. Genome Res. 20, 485-495. (doi: 10.1101/gr.101410.109)
55. Singhal S et al. 2015 Stable recombination hotspots in birds. Science 350, 928-932. (doi: 10.1126/science.aad0843)
56. Nabholz B, Kunstner A, Wang R, Jarvis ED, Ellegren H. 2011 Dynamic evolution of base composition: causes and consequences in avian phylogenomics. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 2197-2210. (doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr047)
57. Langley CH et al. 2012 Genomic variation in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 192, 533. (doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.142018)