Location, location, location: Positioning biotechnology education for the 21st century

Studies in Science Education

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 88-122

  France, Bev ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85012429570     PISSN: 03057267     EISSN: 19408412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03057260708560228     Document Type: Note

References (99)

1. AAAS (1989). Science for all Americans. Project 2061. Washington, DC: AAAS Publication.
2. ALSOP, S. & WATTS, M. (2003). Science education and affect. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1043-1047.
3. AUSUBEL, D. (1968). Educational psychology: a cognitive view. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
4. BIOTECHNOLOGY AUSTRALIA. (2001). Biotechnology online. Canberra: Biotechnology Australia. www.biotechnology.gov.au.
5. BIOTECHNOLOGY TASKFORCE (2003). Growing the biotechnology sector in New Zealand. A framework for action. Wellington: Biotechnology Taskforce, RO. Box 2878, Wellington, New Zealand.
6. BROWN, D., KEMP, M. & HALL, J. (1998). On teaching biotechnology in Kentucky. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education 35(4), 1-13.
7. BRYCE, T. & GRAY, D. (2004). Tough acts to follow: the challenges to science teachers presented by biotechnological progress. International Journal of Science Education, 26(6), 717-733.
8. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION. (2003). Science framework for California public schools. Kindergarten through grade twelve. Sacramento CA: California Department of Education.
9. CHOWNING, J. (2002). The student biotechnology expo. A new model for a science fair. The American Biology Teacher, 64(5), 33-39.
10. CLARK, B. (2003). Entering the debate on Genetic Modification by developing a critical thinking response. Produced by the Royal Society of New Zealand. Wellington: Manor House Press Ltd. www.rsnz.org/education/learning resources/crithink.php
11. CONNER, L. (1999/2000). Teaching social and ethical issues in senior high school science. An investigation. Christchurch College of Education. Journal of Educational Research, 5, 23-44.
12. CONNER, L. (2003). The importance of developing critical thinking in issues education. New Zealand Biotechnology Association Journal, 56, 58-71.
13. CONNER, L. & GUNSTONE, R. (2004). Conscious knowledge of learning: accessing learning strategies in a final year high school biology class. International Journal of Science Education, 26(12), 1427-1444.
14. CONWAY, R. (2000). Ethical judgements in genetic engineering: the implications for technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10, 239-254.
15. COYLE, F., MASLIN, C., FAIRWEATHER, J. & HUNT, L. (2003). Public understandings of biotechnology in New Zealand: nature, clean green image and spirituality. Research Report No. 265 October 2003. Christchurch: Agribusiness and Economics Research Unit (AERU), Lincoln University, New Zealand. www.lincoln.ac.nz/AERU/
16. CRONIN, K. & JACKSON, L. (2004). Hands across the water. A project for the Ministry of Research, Science and Technology (MoRST) 'dialogue' programme. Wellington: Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.
17. DAMASIO, A. (1994). Descartes' error: emotion, reason, and the human brain. (New York: Avon Books).
18. DAWSON, V. (1996). A constructivist approach to teaching transplantation technology in science. Australian Science Teachers' Journal, 42(4), 15-20.
19. DAWSON, V. (2000). Factors influencing the successful teaching of bioethics in secondary school science. Paper presented at the 31st annual conference of Australasian Science Education Research Association (ASERA) Fremantle, Western Australia, June 28-30, 2000.
20. DAWSON, V. & SCHIBECI, R. (2003a). Western Australian school students' understanding of biotechnology. International Journal of Science Education, 25(1), 57-69.
21. DAWSON, V. & SCHIBECI, R. (2003b). Western Australian high school students' attitudes towards biotechnology processes. Journal of Biological Education, 38(1), 7-11.
22. DeHART HURD, P. (1998). Scientific literacy: what could it mean? Science Education, 82(3), 402-416.
23. DREYFUS, A. (1995). Biological knowledge as a prerequisite for the development of values and attitudes. Journal of Biological Education, 29(3), 215-219.
24. DRUCKER, P. (1961). The technological revolution: notes on the relationship of technology, science and culture. Technology and Culture, 2(4), 342-351.
25. EICHELBAUM, T., ALLAN, J., FLEMING, J. & RANDERSON, R. (2001). Report of the Royal Commission on genetic modification. Report and recommendations. (Vol. 1). Wellington, N.Z.: Royal Commission on Genetic Modification.
26. FLEMING, J. (2003). Playing God or being human? In Proceedings of Conference: Being human: science, culture and fear. The Royal Society of New Zealand. Miscellaneous Series 63, 35-41.
27. FRANCE, B. (2001). Comment. Report on the Royal Commission on Genetic Modification. New Zealand Biotechnology Association Newsletter, 49, 13-15.
28. FRANCE, B. & BOLSTAD, R. (2004). Enhancing biotechnology education in New Zealand schools. A literature review of approaches to raise awareness and enhance biotechnology education in schools. Wellington, N.Z.: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
29. FRANCE, B., GILBERT, J. & MADDOX, I. (2001). Public concerns about biotechnology: some questions that must be addressed. New Zealand Biotechnology Association Journal, 49, 35-42.
30. FRANCE, B., GILBERT, J. & MADDOX, I. (2002). Public concerns about biotechnology: do biotechnologists share them? New Zealand Biotechnology Association Journal, 53, 14-7.
31. FRANCE, B. & GILBERT J.K. (2006). A model for communication about biotechnology. Biotechnology Learning Series, Volume 1. Rotterdam/Taipei: Sense Publishers in co operation with The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
32. FRANCE-FARMER, B. (1997). Biotechnology: applied science or technology? In B. Bell &R. Baker (Eds.). Developing the science curriculum in Aotearoa New Zealand (pp.242-255). Auckland: Addison Wesley Longman.
33. GARDNER, P. (1994). Representations of the relationship between science and technology in the curriculum. Studies in Science Education, 24, 1-28.
34. GARDNER, P. (1995). The relationship between technology and science: Some historical and philosophical reflections. Part II International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 5(1), 1-33.
35. GILBERT, J.K. (1992). The interface between science education and technology education. International Journal of Science Education, 14(5), 563-578.
36. HENNESSEY, S. (1993). Situated cognition and cognitive apprenticeship; implications for classroom learning. Studies in Science Education, 22, 1-41.
37. HUNT, L., FAIRWEATHER, J. & COYLE, F. (2003). Public understandings of biotechnology in New Zealand: factors affecting acceptability rankings of five selected biotechnologies. Research report No. 266, December 2003. Christchurch: Agribusiness and Economics Research Unit (AERU), Lincoln University. www.lincoln.ac.nz/AERU/
38. JARVIS, S. & HICKFORD, J. (1995). Link Resources. Gene technology 1. Christchurch, N.Z.: Crop and Food Research, Lincoln University.
39. JARVIS, S., HICKFORD, J. & CONNER, L. (1998). Link resources. Bio-decisions. Christchurch, N.Z.: Crop and Food Research, Lincoln University.
40. JARVIS, S., HICKFORD, J. & TURNER, J. (1998). Link resources. Gene technology 2. Christchurch, N.Z.: Crop and Food Research, Lincoln University.
41. JENKIN OF RODING, LORD C. (2002). The role of science teachers in the drive for scientific literacy. School Science Review, 83(304), 21-25.
42. JENKINS, E.W. (1990). Scientific literacy and school science education. School Science Review, 71(256), 43-51.
43. JENKINS, E.W. (1992). School science education: towards a reconstruction. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 24(3), 229-246.
44. JONES, A. (Ed.). (2004). Biotechnology in the New Zealand Curriculum. Report to the Ministry of Research, Science and Technology. Hamilton: Centre for Science and Technology Educational Research, Wilf Malcolm Institute of Educational Research, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
45. JOLIFFE, A. (2003). DNA for real: learning about PCR in science centre workshops. School Science Review, 84(308), 49-54.
46. JORGENSEN, L.M. & RYAN, S.A. (2004). Relativism, values and morals in the New Zealand Curriculum Framework. Science & Education, 13, 223-233.
47. KENNEDY, M. & DAVIES, R. (1994). The impact of biotechnology on New Zealand Industry 1984-1994, a decade of rapid change. Wellington, N.Z.: New Zealand Biotechnology Association, SIR Publishing.
48. LAUGKSCH, R.C. (2000). Scientific literacy: a conceptual overview. Science Education, 84, 71-94.
49. LAVE, J. (1993). Situating learning in communities of practice. In L.B. Resnick, J.M Levine & S.D. Teasley (Eds.) Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp.17-36). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
50. LAVE, J & WENGER, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51. LAWSON, A. E. (2003). The nature and development of hypothetico-predictive argumentation with implications for science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 25(11), 1387-1408.
52. LAYTON, D. (1973). Science for the people. London: Allen & Unwin.
53. LAYTON, D., DAVEY, A. & JENKINS, E. (1986). Science for specific social purposes (SSSP): perspectives on adult scientific literacy. Studies in Science Education, 13, 27-52.
54. LEVINSON, R. & REISS, M. (Eds.) (2003). Key issues in bioethics. A guide for teachers. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
55. LEVINSON, R. & TURNER, S. (2001). Valuable lessons. Engaging with the social context of science in schools. Recommendations and summary of research findings. London: Wellcome Trust, www.Wellcome.ac.uk
56. LEWIS, T. & GAGEL, C. (1992). Technological literacy: a critical analysis. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 24(2), 117-138.
57. MACER, D. (Ed.). (2004). Bioethics for informed citizens across cultures. Christchurch, N.Z.: Eubios Ethics Institute, www.biol.tsukuba.ac.jp/~macer/betbk.htm for online version.
58. MICHAEL, M., GRINYER, A. & TURNER, J. (1997). Teaching biotechnology: identity in the context of ignorance and knowledgeability. Public Understanding of Science, 6, 1-17.
59. MILLAR, R. & OSBORNE, J. (Eds.). (1998). Beyond 2000: science education for the future. London: King's College London.
60. MINISTRY OF EDUCATION. (1993). Science in the New Zealand Curriculum. Wellington, N.Z.: Learning Media.
61. MINISTRY OF EDUCATION. (1994). Biology in the New Zealand Curriculum. Wellington, N.Z.: Learning Media.
62. MINISTRY OF EDUCATION. (1995). Technology in the New Zealand Curriculum Wellington, N.Z.: Learning Media.
63. MINISTRY OF EDUCATION. (1999). Guidelines for Environmental Education in New Zealand Schools. Wellington, N.Z.: Learning Media.
64. MINISTRY OF EDUCATION. (2002). New Zealand Ministry of Education research project curriculum stocktake-National School Sampling Study. Teachers' experiences in curriculum implementation. General curriculum, mathematics science and technology. Available at: http://www.minu.govt.nz/web/document
65. MINISTRY OF RESEARCH SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY. (2003). New Zealand biotechnology strategy. A foundation for development with care. Wellington, N.Z.: Ministry of Research, Science and Technology
66. MINISTRY OF RESEARCH SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (MoRST). (2005). Futurewatch. Biotechnologies to 2025. Wellington, N.Z.: Ministry of Research, Science and Technology (MoRST).
67. NATIONAL CENTRE FOR BIOTECHNOLOGY EDUCATION (NCBE). (1993). Practical biotechnology. A guide for schools and colleges. Reading, England: Department of Microbiology, University of Reading.
68. NEIDHARDT, F. (1993). The public as a communication system. Public Understanding of Science, 2, 339-350.
69. NEW ZEALAND BIOTECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION. (1995). The NZBA definition of biotechnology. New Zealand Biotechnology Association Newsletter, 28: 4.
70. NEWTON, P, DRIVER, R. & OSBORNE, J. (1999). The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 553-576.
71. ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT (OECD) (1999). Measuring student knowledge and skills (pp.59-75). Paris: OECD. In J.K. Gilbert (Ed.) (2004). The RoutledgeFalmer Reader in Science Education (pp.39-52). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
72. OLEJNIK, I. & FARMER, B. (1989). Biology and industry. Practical biotechnology for A-level. Glasgow: Blackie.
73. OSBORNE, J., ERDURAN, S., SIMON, S. & MONK, M. (2001). Enhancing the quality of argument in school science. School Science Review, 82 (301), 63-70.
74. OULTON, C. (2004). Reconceptualizing the teaching of controversial issues. International Journal of Science Education, 26(4), 411-423.
75. PHOENIX, D.A. (2000). The science of the millennium. Journal of Biological Education, 34(3), 115-116.
76. RATTRAY TAYLOR, G. (1968). The biological time bomb. Panther Books: London.
77. RAVETZ, J. R. (1990). The merger of knowledge with power. Essays in critical science. London: Mansell
78. RESNICK, L. B. (1987). Learning in school and out. Educational Researcher, 16, 13-20.
79. RIGGS, A., FARMER, B. & OLEJNIK, I. (1993). Current trends in biology. Cheltenham: Stanley Thornes.
80. SADLER, T.D., CHAMBERS, F.W & ZEIDLER, D.L. (2004). Student conceptualisations of the nature of science in response to a socioscientific issue. International Journal of Science Education 26(4), 387-423.
81. SCHAILLES, M. & LEMBENS, A. (2002). Student learning by research. Journal of Biological Education, 37(1), 13-17.
82. SCHALLIES, M. & SOLTERER, A. (1992). Working Group 2.4. Evaluation of dissemination and implementation of EIBE material-How are the students in the region between the Rhine and the Neckar coping with the new study resources in biotechnology? A study in the framework of the European Initiative for Biotechnology Education'. Personal communication.
83. SIMMONNEAUX, L. (2000). A study of pupils' conceptions and reasoning in connection with 'microbes' as a contribution to research in biotechnology education. International Journal in Science Education, 22(6), 619-644.
84. SIMMONNEAUX, L. (2001). Role-play or debate to promote students' argumentation and justification on an issue in animal transgenesis. International Journal of Science Education, 23(9), 903-927.
85. SIMMONNEAUX, L. (2002). Analysis of classroom debating strategies in the field of biotechnology. Journal of Biological Education, 37(1), 9-12.
86. SIMPSON, R, KOBALLA, T., OLIVER, J. & CRAWLEY, F. (1995). Research on the affective dimensions of science learning. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp.211-250). (New York: Macmillan).
87. SMITH, L. (2003). Who can speak? Is this a conversation, a debate? Who is listening? Abstract. In Proceedings of Conference. Being human: science, culture and fear. The Royal Society of New Zealand, Miscellaneous Series, 63, 29.
88. SMITH, P. (Ed.). (1997). Enzymes in action. Lincoln University: Educational Solutions.
89. SOLOMON, J. (1983). Science in a social context (SISCON) in schools. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
90. SOLOMON, J. (2001). Teaching for scientific literacy: what could it mean? School Science Review, 82(300), 93-96.
91. SOLOMON, J. & THOMAS, J. (1999). Science education for the public understanding of science. Studies in Science Education, 33, 61-90.
92. SOUTER, N. (2003). DNA in the school curriculum-a poorly exploited asset? School Science Review, 84(308), 57-63.
93. SYMINGTON, D & TYTLER, R. (2004). Community leaders' views of the purposes of science in the compulsory years of schooling. International Journal of Science Education, 26(11), 1403-1418.
94. TEIXEIRA DOS SANTOS. F.M. & MORTIMER, E.F. (2003). How emotions shape the relationship between a chemistry teacher and her high school students. International Journal of Science Education, 25, (9), 1095-1110.
95. THOMAS, M., HUGHES, S., HART, P., SCHOLLAR, J., KEIRLE, K. & GRIFFITH, G. (2001). Group project work in biotechnology and its impact on key skills. Journal of Biological Education, 35(3), 133-140.
96. THOMAS, M., KIERLE, K. & GRIFFITH HUGHES, S., HART, P. & SCHOLLAR, J. (2002). The biotechnology summer school: a novel teaching initiative. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39(2), 124-136.
97. WATSON, L. (2003). Science and mataurangi Maori in the Wai 262 claim. In Proceedings of Conference. Being human: science, culture and fear. The Royal Society of New Zealand Miscellaneous Series, 63, 17-22.
98. WRAY, F., FOX, M., HUETHER, C. & SCHURDAK, E. (2001). Biotechnology for non-biology majors. An activity using a commercial biotechnology laboratory. The American Biology Teacher, 63(5) 363-367.
99. WYNNE, B. (1992). Public understanding of science research: new horizons or hall of mirrors? Public Understanding of Science, 1, 37-43.