Identification of quiescent and spatially restricted mammary stem cells that are hormone responsive

Nature Cell Biology

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 164-176

  Fu, Nai Yang ^a,b,e   Rios, Anne C ^a,b   Pal, Bhupinder ^a,b   Law, Charity W ^a,b   Jamieson, Paul ^a   Liu, Ruijie ^a   Vaillant, François ^a,b   Jackling, Felicity ^a   Liu, Kevin He ^a   Smyth, Gordon K ^a,c   Lindeman, Geoffrey J ^a,b,d   Ritchie, Matthew E ^a,c   Visvader, Jane E ^a,b  

^a WALTER AND ELIZA HALL INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL RESEARCH   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^d ROYAL MELBOURNE HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^e DUKE NUS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL SURFACE MARKER; CLAUDIN; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; PROTEIN LGR5; TETRASPANIN 8; TRANSCRIPTOME; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; HORMONE;

ADULT; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CELL LABELING; CELL POPULATION; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EPIGENETICS; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; HISTONE METHYLATION; HORMONE RESPONSE; MAMMARY STEM CELL; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; STEM CELL; ANIMAL; CELL CYCLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL MOTION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CYTOLOGY; DRUG EFFECTS; HUMAN; METABOLISM; UDDER;

ANIMALS; CELL CYCLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL MOVEMENT; CELL PROLIFERATION; FEMALE; HORMONES; HUMANS; MAMMARY GLANDS, ANIMAL; MICE; STEM CELLS;

EID: 85012263772     PISSN: 14657392     EISSN: 14764679     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncb3471     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Visvader, J. E. & Clevers, H. Tissue-specific designs of stem cell hierarchies. Nat. Cell Biol. 18, 349-355 (2016).
2. Stingl, J. et al. Purification and unique properties of mammary epithelial stem cells. Nature 439, 993-997 (2006).
3. Barker, N., Tan, S. & Clevers, H. Lgr proteins in epithelial stem cell biology. Development 140, 2484-2494 (2013).
4. Plaks, V. et al. Lgr5-expressing cells are sufficient and necessary for postnatal mammary gland organogenesis. Cell Rep. 3, 70-78 (2013).
5. Wang, D. et al. Identification of multipotent mammary stem cells by protein C receptor expression. Nature 517, 81-84 (2015).
6. De Visser, K. E. et al. Developmental stage-specific contribution of LGR5 (C) cells to basal and luminal epithelial lineages in the postnatal mammary gland. J. Pathol. 228, 300-309 (2012).
7. Rios, A. C., Fu, N. Y., Lindeman, G. J. & Visvader, J. E. In situ identification of bipotent stem cells in the mammary gland. Nature 506, 322-327 (2014).
8. Van Keymeulen, A. et al. Distinct stem cells contribute to mammary gland development and maintenance. Nature 479, 189-193 (2011).
9. Cicalese, A. et al. The tumor suppressor p53 regulates polarity of self-renewing divisions in mammary stem cells. Cell 138, 1083-1095 (2009).
10. Dos Santos, C. O. et al. Molecular hierarchy of mammary differentiation yields refined markers of mammary stem cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 7123-7130 (2013).
11. Smith, G. H. Label-retaining epithelial cells in mouse mammary gland divide asymmetrically and retain their template DNA strands. Development 132, 681-687 (2005).
12. Boras-Granic, K., Dann, P. & Wysolmerski, J. J. Embryonic cells contribute directly to the quiescent stem cell population in the adult mouse mammary gland. Breast Cancer Res. 16, 487 (2014).
13. Barker, N. et al. Identification of stem cells in small intestine and colon by marker gene Lgr5. Nature 449, 1003-1007 (2007).
14. Zhang, L. et al. Establishing estrogen-responsive mouse mammary organoids from single Lgr5C cells. Cell. Signal. 29, 41-51 (2016).
15. Greco, C. et al. E-cadherin/p120-catenin and tetraspanin Co-029 cooperate for cell motility control in human colon carcinoma. Cancer Res. 70, 7674-7683 (2010).
16. Hemler, M. E. Tetraspanin functions and associated microdomains. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6, 801-811 (2005).
17. Zoller, M. Tetraspanins: push and pull in suppressing and promoting metastasis. Nat. Rev. Cancer 9, 40-55 (2009).
18. Giraddi, R. R. et al. Stem and progenitor cell division kinetics during postnatal mouse mammary gland development. Nat. Commun. 6, 8487 (2015).
19. Arai, F. & Suda, T. StemBook (Cambridge, 2008).
20. Cheung, T. H. & Rando, T. A. Molecular regulation of stem cell quiescence. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 14, 329-340 (2013).
21. Zeng, Y. A. & Nusse, R. Wnt proteins are self-renewal factors for mammary stem cells and promote their long-term expansion in culture. Cell Stem Cell 6, 568-577 (2010).
22. Fukada, S. et al. Molecular signature of quiescent satellite cells in adult skeletal muscle. Stem Cells 25, 2448-2459 (2007).
23. Liu, L. et al. Chromatin modifications as determinants of muscle stem cell quiescence and chronological aging. Cell Rep. 4, 189-204 (2013).
24. Chambers, S. M. et al. Hematopoietic fingerprints: an expression database of stem cells and their progeny. Cell Stem Cell 1, 578-591 (2007).
25. Lien, W. H. et al. Genome-wide maps of histone modifications unwind in vivo chromatin states of the hair follicle lineage. Cell Stem Cell 9, 219-232 (2011).
26. Genander, M. et al. BMP signaling and its pSMAD1/5 target genes differentially regulate hair follicle stem cell lineages. Cell Stem Cell 15, 619-633 (2014).
27. He, X. C. et al. BMP signaling inhibits intestinal stem cell self-renewal through suppression of Wnt-β-catenin signaling. Nat. Genet. 36, 1117-1121 (2004).
28. Prat, A. et al. Phenotypic and molecular characterization of the claudin-low intrinsic subtype of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 12, R68 (2010).
29. Lim, E. et al. Aberrant luminal progenitors as the candidate target population for basal tumor development in BRCA1 mutation carriers. Nat. Med. 15, 907-913 (2009).
30. Pal, B. et al. Global changes in the mammary epigenome are induced by hormonal cues and coordinated by Ezh2. Cell Rep. 3, 411-426 (2013).
31. Wu, D. et al. ROAST: rotation gene set tests for complex microarray experiments. Bioinformatics 26, 2176-2182 (2010).
32. Westphalen, C. B. et al. Dclk1 defines quiescent pancreatic progenitors that promote injury-induced regeneration and tumorigenesis. Cell Stem Cell 18, 441-455 (2016).
33. Makarem, M. et al. Developmental changes in the in vitro activated regenerative activity of primitive mammary epithelial cells. PLoS Biol. 11, e1001630 (2013).
34. Spike, B. T. et al. A mammary stem cell population identified and characterized in late embryogenesis reveals similarities to human breast cancer. Cell Stem Cell 10, 183-197 (2012).
35. Asselin-Labat, M. L. et al. Control of mammary stem cell function by steroid hormone signalling. Nature 465, 798-802 (2010).
36. Orford, K. W. & Scadden, D. T. Deconstructing stem cell self-renewal: genetic insights into cell-cycle regulation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 9, 115-128 (2008).
37. Wilson, A. et al. Hematopoietic stem cells reversibly switch from dormancy to selfrenewal during homeostasis and repair. Cell 135, 1118-1129 (2008).
38. Rodgers, J. T. et al. mTORC1 controls the adaptive transition of quiescent stem cells from G0 to G (Alert). Nature 510, 393-396 (2014).
39. Barker, N. et al. Lgr5 (Cve) stem cells drive self-renewal in the stomach and build long-lived gastric units in vitro. Cell Stem Cell 6, 25-36 (2010).
40. Jaks, V. et al. Lgr5 marks cycling, yet long-lived, hair follicle stem cells. Nat. Genet. 40, 1291-1299 (2008).
41. Buczacki, S. J. et al. Intestinal label-retaining cells are secretory precursors expressing Lgr5. Nature 495, 65-69 (2013).
42. Fuentealba, L. C. et al. Embryonic origin of postnatal neural stem cells. Cell 161, 1644-1655 (2015).
43. Furutachi, S. et al. Slowly dividing neural progenitors are an embryonic origin of adult neural stem cells. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 657-665 (2015).
44. Bowie, M. B. et al. Identification of a new intrinsically timed developmental checkpoint that reprograms key hematopoietic stem cell properties. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 5878-5882 (2007).
45. Shackleton, M. et al. Generation of a functional mammary gland from a single stem cell. Nature 439, 84-88 (2006).
46. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2012); http://www.R-project.org
47. Ritchie, M. E. et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNAsequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, e47 (2015).
48. Shi, W., Oshlack, A. & Smyth, G. K. Optimizing the noise versus bias trade-off for Illumina whole genome expression BeadChips. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, e204 (2010).
49. Barbosa-Morais, N. L. et al. A re-annotation pipeline for Illumina BeadArrays: improving the interpretation of gene expression data. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, e17 (2010).
50. Smyth, G. K. Linear models and empirical Bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1027 (2004).
51. Ritchie, M. E. et al. Empirical array quality weights in the analysis of microarray data. BMC Bioinf. 7, 261 (2006).
52. Smyth, G. K., Michaud, J. & Scott, H. S. Use of within-array replicate spots for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Bioinformatics 21, 2067-2075 (2005).
53. Liao, Y., Smyth, G. K. & Shi, W. The Subread aligner: fast, accurate and scalable read mapping by seed-and-vote. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, e108 (2013).
54. Liao, Y., Smyth, G. K. & Shi, W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 30, 923-930 (2014).
55. Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139-140 (2010).
56. Robinson, M. D. & Oshlack, A. A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data. Genome Biol. 11, R25 (2010).
57. Law, C. W., Chen, Y., Shi, W. & Smyth, G. K. voom: precision weights unlock linear model analysis tools for RNA-seq read counts. Genome Biol. 15, R29 (2014).
58. Young, M. D., Wakefield, M. J., Smyth, G. K. & Oshlack, A. Gene ontology analysis for RNA-seq: accounting for selection bias. Genome Biol. 11, R14 (2010).
59. Zhang, Y. et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol. 9, R137 (2008).
60. Yu, G., Wang, L. G. & He, Q. Y. ChIPseeker: an R/Bioconductor package for ChIP peak annotation, comparison and visualization. Bioinformatics 31, 2382-2383 (2015).