Regional mapping of vegetation structure for biodiversity monitoring using airborne lidar data

Ecological Informatics

Volumn 38, Issue , 2017, Pages 50-61

  Guo, Xuan ^a   Coops, Nicholas C ^a   Tompalski, Piotr ^a   Nielsen, Scott E ^b   Bater, Christopher W ^c   John Stadt, J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^c ALBERTA AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT   (Canada)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Cluster analysis; Lidar; Vegetation structure; Wildlife habitat

Indexed keywords

AIRBORNE SENSING; BIODIVERSITY; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; FOREST INVENTORY; FOREST MANAGEMENT; HABITAT STRUCTURE; LIDAR; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; TIMBER HARVESTING; VEGETATION STRUCTURE;

ALBERTA; CANADA;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 85011582044     PISSN: 15749541     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2017.01.005     Document Type: Article

References (103)

1. Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development, General Specifications for Acquisition of LiDAR Data. 2013, Government of Alberta. Pub.
2. Alberta Environmental Protection, Alberta Vegetation Inventory Standard Manual, Version 2.1. 1991, Alberta Environmental Protection, Resource Data Division, Data Acquisition Branch.
3. Apps, C.D., McLellan, B.N., Kinley, T.A., Flaa, J.P., Scale-dependent habitat selection by Mountain Caribou, Columbia Mountains, British Columbia. The J. Wildl. Manage. 65 (2001), 65–77.
4. August, P.V., The role of habitat complexity and heterogeneity in structuring tropical mammal communities. Ecology, 1983, 1495–1507.
5. Bater, C.W., Coops, N.C., Gergel, S.E., Lemay, V., Collins, D., Estimation of standing dead tree class distributions in northwest coastal forests using lidar remote sensing. Can. J. For. Res. 39 (2009), 1080–1091.
6. Bergen, K.M., Goetz, S.J., Dubayah, R.O., Henebry, G.M., Hunsaker, C.T., Imhoff, M.L., Radeloff, V.C., Remote sensing of vegetation 3-D structure for biodiversity and habitat: Review and implications for lidar and radar spaceborne missions. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci., 114(G2), 2009.
7. Blakely, T.J., Didham, R.K., Disentangling the mechanistic drivers of ecosystem-size effects on species diversity. J. Anim. Ecol. 79 (2010), 1204–1214.
8. Boutin, S., Haughland, D.L., Schieck, J., Herbers, J., Bayne, E., A new approach to forest biodiversity monitoring in Canada. For. Ecol. Manag. 258 (2009), S168–S175.
9. Brandt, J.P., The extent of the north American boreal zone. Environ. Rev. 17 (2009), 101–161.
10. Breslow, N., A generalized Kruskal–Wallis test for comparing K samples subject to unequal patterns of censorship. Biometrika 57 (1970), 579–594.
11. Castilla, G., Hird, J., Maynes, B., Crane, D., Cosco, J., Schieck, J., McDermid, G., Broadening modern resource inventories: a new protocol for mapping natural and anthropogenic features. The For. Chron. 89 (2013), 681–689.
12. Chirici, G., Winter, S., McRoberts, R.E., (eds.) National Forest Inventories: Contributions to Forest Biodiversity Assessments: Contributions to Forest Biodiversity Assessments (Vol. 20), 2011, Springer Science & Business Media.
13. Chiu, T., Fang, D., Chen, J., Wang, Y., Jeris, C., A robust and scalable clustering algorithm for mixed type attributes in large database environment. In Proceedings of the Seventh ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2001, ACM, 263–268.
14. Clawges, R., Vierling, K., Vierling, L., Rowell, E., The use of airborne lidar to assess avian species diversity, density, and occurrence in a pine/aspen forest. Remote Sens. Environ. 112 (2008), 2064–2073.
15. Cohen, W., Goward, S., Landsat's role in ecological applications of remote sensing. Bioscience 54 (2004), 535–545.
16. Conner, R.N., Adkisson, C.S., Principal component analysis of woodpecker nesting habitat. Wilson Bull. 89 (1977), 122–129.
17. Coops, N.C., Wulder, M.A., Duro, D.C., Han, T., Berry, S., The development of a Canadian dynamic habitat index using multi-temporal satellite estimates of canopy light absorbance. Ecol. Indic. 8 (2008), 754–766.
18. Coops, N.C., Wulder, M.A., Iwanicka, D., An environmental domain classification of Canada using earth observation data for biodiversity assessment. Ecol. Inform 4 (2009), 8–22.
19. Coops, N.C., Duffe, J., Koot, C., Assessing the utility of lidar remote sensing technology to identify mule deer winter habitat. Can. J. Remote. Sens. 36 (2010), 81–88.
20. Coops, N.C., Tompaski, P., Nijland, W., Rickbeil, G.J., Nielsen, S.E., Bater, C.W., Stadt, J.J., A forest structure habitat index based on airborne laser scanning data. Ecol. Indic. 67 (2016), 346–357.
21. Culbert, P.D., Radeloff, V.C., Flather, C.H., Kellndorfer, J.M., Rittenhouse, C.D., Pidgeon, A.M., The influence of vertical and horizontal habitat structure on nationwide patterns of avian biodiversity. Auk 130 (2013), 656–665.
22. Davies, A.B., Tambling, C.J., Kerley, G.I.H., Asner, G.P., Effects of vegetation structure on the location of lion kill sites in African thicket. PLoS One, 11, 2016, e0149098.
23. Desrochers, A., Tardif, J., Mazerolle, M.J., Use of large clear-cuts by Wilson's warbler in an eastern Canadian Boreal Forest. Avian Conserv Ecol., 7, 2012, 1.
24. Devictor, V., Julliard, R., Jiguet, F., Distribution of specialist and generalist species along spatial gradients of habitat disturbance and fragmentation. Oikos 117 (2008), 507–514.
25. Duncan, J.R., Great gray owls (Strix nebulosa nebulosa) and forest. J. Raptor Res 31:2 (1997), 160–166.
26. Duro, D.C., Coops, N.C., Wulder, M.A., Han, T., Development of a large area biodiversity monitoring system driven by remote sensing. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 31 (2007), 235–260.
27. Erdelen, M., Bird communities and vegetation structure: I. Correlations and comparisons of simple and diversity indices. Oecologia 61 (1984), 277–284.
28. Ewijk, K.Y.V., Randin, C., Treitz, P., Scott, N., Predicting fine-scale species abundance patterns using biotic variables derived from LiDAR and high spatial resolution imagery. Remote Sens. Environ. 150 (2014), 120–131.
29. Falkowski, M.J., Evans, J.S., Martinuzzi, S., Gessler, P.E., Hudak, A.T., Characterizing forest succession with lidar data: an evaluation for the inland northwest, USA. Remote Sens. Environ. 113 (2009), 946–956.
30. Fensham, R.J., Fairfax, R.J., Holman, J.E., Whitehead, P.J., Quantitative assessment of vegetation structural attributes from aerial photography. Int. J. Remote Sens. 23 (2002), 2293–2317.
31. Fitterer, J.L., Nelson, T.A., Coops, N.C., Wulder, M.A., Modelling the ecosystem indicators of British Columbia using earth observation data and terrain indices. Ecol. Indic. 20 (2012), 151–162.
32. Franklin, J.F., Denison, W., McKee, A., Maser, C., Sedell, J., Swanson, F., Juday, G., Ecological Characteristics of Old-Growth Douglas-Fir Forests. 1981.
33. Franklin, S.E., Stenhouse, G.B., Hansen, M.J., Popplewell, C.C., Dechka, J.A., Peddle, D.R., An integrated decision tree approach (IDTA) to mapping landcover using satellite remote sensing in support of grizzly bear habitat analysis in the Alberta Yellowhead Ecosystem. Can. J. Remote. Sens. 27 (2001), 579–592.
34. Gao, T., Hedblom, M., Emilsson, T., Nielsen, A.B., The role of forest stand structure as biodiversity indicator. For. Ecol. Manag. 330 (2014), 82–93.
35. Gaston, K.J., What is biodiversity?. Gaston, K.J., (eds.) Biodiversity. A Biology of Numbers and Difference, 1996, Blackwell Sciences, London, 1–9.
36. Gil-Tena, A., Saura, S., Brotons, L., Effects of forest composition and structure on bird species richness in a Mediterranean context: implications for forest ecosystem management. For. Ecol. Manag. 242 (2007), 470–476.
37. Goetz, S., Steinberg, D., Dubayah, R., Blair, B., Laser remote sensing of canopy habitat heterogeneity as a predictor of bird species richness in an eastern temperate forest. USA. Remote Sens. Environ. 108 (2007), 254–263.
38. Goetz, S.J., Steinberg, D., Betts, M.G., Holmes, R.T., Doran, P.J., Dubayah, R., Hofton, M., Lidar remote sensing variables predict breeding habitat of a neotropical migrant bird. Ecology 91 (2010), 1569–1576.
39. Graf, R.F., Mathys, L., Bollmann, K., Habitat assessment for forest dwelling species using LiDAR remote sensing: capercaillie in the Alps. For. Ecol. Manag. 257 (2009), 160–167.
40. Green, R.E., Balmford, A., Crane, P.R., Mace, G.M., Reynolds, J.D., Turner, R.K., A framework for improved monitoring of biodiversity: responses to the world summit on sustainable development. Conserv. Biol. 19 (2005), 56–65.
41. Hamer, D., Herrero, S., Grizzly bear food and habitat in the front ranges of Banff National Park, Alberta. Zager, P., (eds.) Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Bear Research and Management. International Association of Bear Research and Management, Williamsburg, Va, U.S.A. and Plityice Lakes, Yugoslavia, February and March 1986, 1987, 199–213.
42. Hansen, A.J., Phillips, L.B., Dubayah, R., Goetz, S., Hofton, M., Regional-scale application of lidar: variation in forest canopy structure across the southeastern US. For. Ecol. Manag. 329 (2014), 214–226.
43. Hill, R., Hinsley, S., Airborne lidar for woodland habitat quality monitoring: exploring the significance of lidar data characteristics when modelling organism-habitat relationships. Remote Sens. 7 (2015), 3446–3466.
44. Hobson, K.A., Bayne, E., Breeding bird communities in boreal forest of western Canada: consequences of “unmixing” the mixedwoods. Condor 102 (2000), 759–769.
45. Hovick, T.J., Elmore, R.D., Fuhlendorf, S.D., Structural heterogeneity increases diversity of non-breeding grassland birds. Ecosphere 5 (2014), 1–13.
46. Hunter, M.L. Jr., Natural fire regimes as spatial models for managing boreal forests. Biol. Conserv. 65 (1993), 115–120.
47. Hunter, M.L., Maintaining Biodiversity in Forest Ecosystems. 1999, Cambridge University Press.
48. Hyde, P., Dubayah, R., Walker, W., Blair, J.B., Hofton, M., Hunsaker, C., Mapping forest structure for wildlife habitat analysis using multi-sensor (LiDAR, SAR/InSAR, ETM +, Quickbird) synergy. Remote Sens. Environ. 102 (2006), 63–73.
49. Isenburg, M., LAStools—Efficient tools for LiDAR processing. Available at: http://www.cs.unc.edu/~isenburg/lastools/, 2016 accessed 16.05.09.
50. Johnson, C.J., Parker, K.L., Heard, D.C., Gillingham, M.P., A multiscale behavioral approach to understanding the movements of woodland caribou. Ecol. Appl. 12 (2002), 1840–1860.
51. Jung, K., Kaiser, S., Böhm, S., Nieschulze, J., Kalko, E.K., Moving in three dimensions: effects of structural complexity on occurrence and activity of insectivorous bats in managed forest stands. J. Appl. Ecol. 49 (2012), 523–531.
52. Kane, M.J., Emerson, J.W., Bigmemory: manage massive matrices with shared memory and memory-mapped files. R package version, 4(2), 2010, 3 available at: http://cran.r-project.org/package=bigmemory accessed 16.05.09.
53. Kaufman, L., Rousseeuw, P.J., Finding groups in data: an introduction to cluster analysis (vol. 344). 2009, John Wiley & Sons.
54. Kershaw, K.A., Studies on lichen-dominated systems. XX. An examination of some aspects of the northern boreal lichen woodlands in Canada. Can. J. Bot. 55 (1977), 393–410.
55. Kim, S., Hinckley, T., Briggs, D., Classifying individual tree genera using stepwise cluster analysis based on height and intensity metrics derived from airborne laser scanner data. Remote Sens. Environ. 115 (2011), 3329–3342.
56. Lim, K., Treitz, P., Wulder, M., St-Onge, B., Flood, M., LiDAR remote sensing of forest structure. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 27 (2003), 88–106.
57. Lindenmayer, D.B., Franklin, J.F., Fischer, J., General management principles and a checklist of strategies to guide forest biodiversity conservation. Biol. Conserv. 131 (2006), 433–445.
58. Linke, J., Franklin, S.E., Huettmann, F., Stenhouse, G., Seismic cutlines, changing landscape metrics and grizzly bear landscape use in Alberta. Landsc. Ecol. 20 (2005), 811–826.
59. Little, T.I., Pluth, D.J., Corns, I.G., Gilmore, D.W., Post-fire forest floor development along toposequences of white spruce-trembling aspen mixedwood communities in west-central Alberta. Can. J. For. Res. 32 (2002), 892–902.
60. Lucas, K.L., Raber, G.T., Carter, G.A., Estimating vascular plant species richness on Horn Island. Mississippi using small-footprint airborne LIDAR. J. Appl. Remote Sens., 4, 2010, 043545.
61. MacArthur, R.H., Population ecology of some warblers of northeastern coniferous forests. Ecology 39 (1958), 599–619.
62. MacArthur, R.H., Geographical Ecology: Patterns in the Distribution of Species. 1972, Princeton University Press.
63. MacArthur, R.H., MacArthur, J.W., On bird species diversity. Ecology 42 (1961), 594–598.
64. Maltamo, M., Packalén, P., Yu, X., Eerikäinen, K., Hyyppä, J., Pitkänen, J., Identifying and quantifying structural characteristics of heterogeneous boreal forests using laser scanner data. For. Ecol. Manag. 216 (2005), 41–50.
65. Marchese, C., Biodiversity hotspots: a shortcut for a more complicated concept. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 3 (2015), 297–309.
66. Marcot, B.G., Wisdom, M.J., Li, H.W., Castillo, G.C., Managing for Featured, Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive Species and Unique Habitats for Ecosystem Sustainability. 1994.
67. Martinuzzi, S., Vierling, L.A., Gould, W.A., Falkowski, M.J., Evans, J.S., Hudak, A.T., Vierling, K.T., Mapping snags and understory shrubs for a LiDAR-based assessment of wildlife habitat suitability. Remote Sens. Environ. 113 (2009), 2533–2546.
68. McCleary, K., Mowat, G., Using forest structural diversity to inventory habitat diversity of forest- dwelling wildlife in the West Kootenay region of British Columbia. BC j. ecosyst. manag., 2, 2002.
69. McDermid, G.J., Franklin, S.E., LeDrew, E.F., Remote sensing for large-area habitat mapping. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 29 (2005), 449–474.
70. McDermid, G.J., Hall, R.J., Sanchez-Azofeifa, G.A., Franklin, S.E., Stenhouse, G.B., Kobliuk, T., LeDrew, E.F., Remote sensing and forest inventory for wildlife habitat assessment. For. Ecol. Manag. 257 (2009), 2262–2269.
71. McGaughey, R.J., FUSION/LDV: Software for LIDAR Data Analysis and Visualization. 2015, Seattle, WA, USA, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station Available at http://forsys.cfr.washington.edu/fusion/FUSION_manual.pdf accessed 16.05.09.
72. Moritz, C., Biodiversity hotspots and beyond: the need for preserving environmental transitions. Trends Ecol. Evol., 2001, 16.
73. Morsdorf, F., Mårell, A., Koetz, B., Cassagne, N., Pimont, F., Rigolot, E., Allgöwer, B., Discrimination of vegetation strata in a multi-layered Mediterranean forest ecosystem using height and intensity information derived from airborne laser scanning. Remote Sens. Environ. 114 (2010), 1403–1415.
74. Mueller, J., Moning, C., Baessler, C., Heurich, M., Brandl, R., Using airborne laser scanning to model potential abundance and assemblages of forest passerines. Basic Appl. Ecol. 10 (2009), 671–681.
75. Næsset, E., Gobakken, T., Estimation of above-and below-ground biomass across regions of the boreal forest zone using airborne laser. Remote Sens. Environ. 112 (2008), 3079–3090.
76. Natural Regions Committee, Downing, D.J., Pettapiece, W.W., (eds.) Natural Regions and Subregions of Alberta, 2006, Government of Alberta. Pub Compiled by.
77. Nelson, R., Keller, C., Ratnaswamy, M., Locating and estimating the extent of Delmarva fox squirrel habitat using an airborne LiDAR profiler. Remote Sens. Environ. 96 (2005), 292–301.
78. Nielsen, S.E., Munro, R.H.M., Bainbridge, E.L., Stenhouse, G.B., Boyce, M.S., Grizzly bears and forestry: II. Distribution of grizzly bear foods in clearcuts of west-central Alberta. Canada. For. Ecol. Manag. 199 (2004), 67–82.
79. Nijland, W., Nielsen, S.E., Coops, N.C., Wulder, M.A., Stenhouse, G.B., Fine-spatial scale predictions of understory species using climate-and LiDAR-derived terrain and canopy metrics. J. Appl. Remote. Sens., 8, 2014, 083572.
80. Nijland, W., Coops, N.C., Nielsen, S.E., Stenhouse, G., Integrating optical satellite data and airborne laser scanning in habitat classification for wildlife management. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 38 (2015), 242–250.
81. Nijland, W., Coops, N.C., Macdonald, S.E., Nielsen, S.E., Bater, C.W., Stadt, J.J., Comparing patterns in forest stand structure following variable harvests using airborne laser scanning data. For. Ecol. Manag. 354 (2015), 272–280.
82. Nilsen, E.B., Herfindal, I., Linnell, J.D., Can intra-specific variation in carnivore home-range size be explained using remote-sensing estimates of environmental productivity?. Ecoscience 12 (2005), 68–75.
83. Noss, R.F., Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach. Conserv. Biol. 4 (1990), 355–364.
84. Opedal, Ø.H., Armbruster, W.S., Graae, B.J., Linking small-scale topography with microclimate, plant species diversity and intra-specific trait variation in an alpine landscape. Plant Ecol. Divers. 8 (2015), 305–315.
85. Ozanne, C.M.P., Anhuf, D., Boulter, S.L., Keller, M., Kitching, R.L., Körner, C., Yoshimura, M., Biodiversity meets the atmosphere: a global view of forest canopies. Science 301 (2003), 183–186.
86. Pasher, J., Seed, E., Duffe, J., Development of boreal ecosystem anthropogenic disturbance layers for Canada based on 2008 to 2010 Landsat imagery. Can. J. Remote. Sens. 39 (2013), 42–58.
87. Reque, J.A., Bravo, F., Identifying forest structure types using National Forest Inventory Data: the case of sessile oak forest in the Cantabrian range. Forest Syst. 17 (2008), 105–113.
88. Riggio, J., Jacobson, A., Dollar, L., Bauer, H., Becker, M., Dickman, A., Lichtenfeld, L., The size of savannah Africa: a lion's (Panthera leo) view. Biodivers. Conserv. 22 (2013), 17–35.
89. Schuster, C., Schmidt, T., Conrad, C., Kleinschmit, B., Förster, M., Grassland habitat mapping by intra-annual time series analysis—comparison of RapidEye and TerraSAR-X satellite data. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 34 (2015), 25–34.
90. Sen, P.K., Puri, M.L., Nonparametric Methods in Multivariate Analysis. 1971, Wiley, New York.
91. Servheen, G., Lyon, L.J., Habitat use by woodland caribou in the Selkirk Mountains. J. Wildl. Manag., 1989, 230–237.
92. Simonson, W.D., Allen, H.D., Coomes, D.A., Use of an airborne lidar system to model plant species composition and diversity of Mediterranean oak forests. Conserv. Biol. 26 (2012), 840–850.
93. Smart, L.S., Swenson, J.J., Christensen, N.L., Sexton, J.O., Three-dimensional characterization of pine forest type and red-cockaded woodpecker habitat by small-footprint, discrete-return lidar. For. Ecol. Manag. 281 (2012), 100–110.
94. Tews, J., Brose, U., Grimm, V., Tielbörger, K., Wichmann, M.C., Schwager, M., Jeltsch, F., Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. J. Biogeogr. 31 (2004), 79–92.
95. Thompson, S.D., Nelson, T.A., Giesbrecht, I., Frazer, G., Saunders, S.C., Data-driven regionalization of forested and non-forested ecosystems in coastal British Columbia with LiDAR and RapidEye imagery. Appl. Geogr. 69 (2016), 35–50.
96. Vierling, K.T., Vierling, L.A., Gould, W.A., Martinuzzi, S., Clawges, R.M., Lidar: shedding new light on habitat characterization and modeling. Front. Ecol. Environ. 6 (2008), 90–98.
97. Vogeler, J.C., Hudak, A.T., Vierling, L.A., Evans, J., Green, P., Vierling, K.T., Terrain and vegetation structural influences on local avian species richness in two mixed-conifer forests. Remote Sens. Environ. 147 (2014), 13–22.
98. Wessels, K.J., Reyers, B., Van Jaarsveld, A.S., Incorporating land cover information into regional biodiversity assessments in South Africa. Anim. Conserv. 3 (2000), 67–79.
99. Wulder, M., Optical remote sensing techniques for the assessment of forest inventory and biophysical parameters. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 22 (1998), 449–476.
100. Wulder, M.A., Bater, C.W., Coops, N.C., Hilker, T., White, J.C., The role of LiDAR in sustainable forest management. The For. Chron. 84 (2008), 807–826.
101. Zald, H.S., Ohmann, J.L., Roberts, H.M., Gregory, M.J., Henderson, E.B., McGaughey, R.J., Braaten, J., Influence of lidar, Landsat imagery, disturbance history, plot location accuracy, and plot size on accuracy of imputation maps of forest composition and structure. Remote Sens. Environ. 143 (2014), 26–38.
102. Zellweger, F., Braunisch, V., Baltensweiler, A., Bollmann, K., Remotely sensed forest structural complexity predicts multi species occurrence at the landscape scale. For. Ecol. Manag. 307 (2013), 303–312.
103. Zhang, S., Zhang, X., Huffman, T., Liu, X., Yang, J., Influence of topography and land management on soil nutrients variability in Northeast China. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 89 (2011), 427–438.