Regional-scale application of lidar: Variation in forest canopy structure across the southeastern US

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 329, Issue , 2014, Pages 214-226

  Hansen, Andrew J ^a   Phillips, Linda B ^a   Dubayah, Ralph ^b   Goetz, Scott ^c   Hofton, Michelle ^b  

^a MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^c WOODS HOLE RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Canopy cover; Canopy richness; Disturbed forest; Lidar; LVIS; Southeast United States

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; BUDGET CONTROL; ECOSYSTEMS; MAPPING; NASA; NUTRIENTS; OPTICAL RADAR; VEGETATION;

CANOPY COVER; CANOPY RICHNESS; DISTURBED FORESTS; LVIS; SOUTHEAST UNITED STATES;

FORESTRY;

AIRBORNE SENSING; CANOPY ARCHITECTURE; CLIMATE CONDITIONS; ECOSYSTEM MODELING; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; LIDAR; SATELLITE DATA; STAND STRUCTURE; TOPOGRAPHIC EFFECT; VEGETATION MAPPING;

BIODIVERSITY; COST CONTROL; ECOSYSTEMS; FOREST CANOPY; MAPPING; NUTRIENTS; PLANTS; RADAR; SOUTHEASTERN USA;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 84904472021     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.06.009     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Asner G.P., Powell G.V.N., Mascaro J., et al. High-resolution carbon stocks and emissions in the Amazon. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:16738-16742.
2. Asner G.P., Hughes R.F., Mascaro J., Uowolo A.L., Knapp D.E., Jacobson J., Kennedy-Bowdoin T., Clark J.K. High-resolution carbon mapping on the million-hectare Island of Hawaii. Front Ecol. Environ. 2011, 9(8):434-439.
3. Habitat Structure: The Physical Arrangement of Objects in Space 1991, Chapman and Hall, London, UK. S.S. Bell, E.D. McCoy, H.R. Mushinsky (Eds.).
4. Begon M., Townsend C.R., Harper J.L. Ecology: From Individuals to Ecosystems 2006, Blackwell, Oxford, UK.
5. Bergen K.M., Goetz S.J., Dubayah R.O., Henebry G.M., Hunsaker C.T., et al. Remote sensing of vegetation 3-D structure for biodiversity and habitat: review and implications for lidar and radar spaceborne missions. J. Geophys. Res. 2009, 114:1-13.
6. Birdsey R.A., Lewis G.M., Birdsey R.A. Carbon in US Forests and Wood Products, 1987-1997: State-by-State Estimates 2000, DIANE Publishing.
7. Blair J.B., Rabine D.L., Hofton M.A. The laser vegetation imaging sensor: a medium-altitude, digitisation-only, airborne laser altimeter for mapping vegetation and topography. ISPRS J. Photogramm. 1999, 54:115-122.
8. Bolton D.K., Coops N.C., Wulder M.A. Measuring forest structure along productivity gradients in the Canadian boreal with small-footprint Lidar. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2013, 185:6617-6634.
9. Boucher D., Gauthier L., De Grandpré.S. Structural changes in coniferous stands along a chronosequence and a productivity gradient in the northeastern boreal forest of Québec. Ecoscience 2006, 13:172-180. 10.2980/i1195-6860-13-2-172.
10. Brodersen C., Pohl S., Lindenlaub M., Leibungut C., Wilpert K.V. Influence of vegetation structure on isotope content of throughfall and soil water. Hydrol. Process. 2000, 14:1439-1448.
11. Brown J.H., Ernest S.K., Parody J.M., Haskell J.P. Regulation of diversity: maintenance of species richness in changing environments. Oecologia 2001, 126:321-332.
12. Burnham K.P., Anderson D.R. Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach 1998, Springer-Verlag, NY.
13. Burnham K.P., Anderson D.R. Model selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach 2002, Springer, New York. second ed.
14. Carey A.B. Ecological foundations of biodiversity: lessons from natural and managed forests of the Pacific Northwest. Northwest Sci. 1998, 72:127-133.
15. Chapin F.Stuart, Matson P.A., Vitousek P.M. Principles of Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology 2011, Springer.
16. Chen X.L., Zhao H.M., Li P.X., Yin Z.Y. Remote sensing image-based analysis of the relationship between urban heat island and land use/cover changes. Remote Sens. Environ. 2006, 104(2):133-146.
17. Conservation Biology Institute, 2006. Protected areas database. Version 4. Conservation Biology Institute, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
18. Currie D.J. Energy and large-scale patterns of animal- and plant-species richness. Am. Nat. 1991, 137(1):27-49.
19. Daly C., Halbleib M., Smith J.I., Gibson W.P., Doggett M.K., Taylor G.H., Pasteris P.P. Physiographically sensitive mapping of climatological temperature and precipitation across the conterminous United States. Int. J. Climatol. 2008, 28:2031-2064.
20. Didham R.K., Lawton J.H. Edge Structure determines the magnitude of changes in microclimate and vegetation structure in tropical forest fragments. Biotropica 1999, 31:17-30. 10.1111/j.1744-7429.1999.tb00113.x.
21. Dingman S.L. Physical Hydrology 2001, Prentice-Hall. second ed.
22. Drake J.B., Dubayah R.O., Clark D., Knox R., Blair J.B., Hofton M., Chazdon R.L., Weishampel J.F., Prince S. Estimation of tropical forest structural characteristics using large-footprint LIDAR. Remote Sens. Environ. 2002, 79:305-319.
23. Drummond M.A., Loveland T.R. Land-use pressure and a transition to forest-cover Loss in the eastern United States. BioScience 2010, 60(4):286-298.
24. Dubayah R.O., Drake J.B. Lidar remote sensing for forestry applications. J. Forest. 2000, 98:44-46.
25. Dubayah R.O., Sheldon S.L., Clark D.B., Hofton M.A., Blair J.B., Hurtt G.C., Chazdon R.L. Estimation of tropical forest height and biomass dynamics using lidar remote sensing at La Selva, Costa Rica. J. Geophys. Res. 2010, 115:1-17.
26. Fang J., Shen Z., Tang Z., Wang X., Wang Z., Feng J., Zheng C. Forest community survey and the structural characteristics of forests in China. Ecography 2012, 35(12):1059-1071.
27. Franklin J.F., Van Pelt R. Spatial aspects of structural complexity in old-growth forests. J. Forest. 2004, 102:3.
28. Frolking S., Palace M.W., Clark D.B., Chambers J.Q., Shugart H.H., Hurtt G.C. Forest disturbance and recovery: a general review in the context of spaceborne remote sensing of impacts on aboveground biomass and canopy structure. J. Geophys. Res.: Biogeosci. 2009, 114(G2):2005-2012.
29. Fry J., Xian G., Jin S., Dewitz J., Homer C., Yang L., Barnes C., Herold N., Wickham J. Completion of the 2006 national land cover database for the conterminous United States. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2011, 77(9):858-864.
30. Geesch D., Oimoen M., Greenlee S., Nelson C., Steuck M., et al. The national elevation dataset. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2002, 68(1):5-11.
31. Goetz S.J., Dubayah R.O. Advances in remote sensing technology and implications for measuring and monitoring forest carbon stocks and change. Carbon Manage. 2011, 2:231-244. doi: 210.4155/cmt.4111.4118.
32. Goetz S., Steinberg D., Dubayah R., Blair B. Laser remote sensing of canopy habitat heterogeneity as a predictor of bird species richness in an eastern temperate forest, USA. Remote Sens. Environ. 2007, 108:254-263.
33. Goetz S.J., Daniel S., Matthew B.G., Holmes R.T., Doran P.J., et al. Lidar remote sensing variables predict breeding habitat of a neotropical migrant bird. Ecology 2010, 91:1569-1576.
34. Goetz S.J., Bond-Lamberty B., Law B.E., Hicke J.A., Huang C., Houghton R.A., McNulty S., O'Halloran T., Harmon M., Meddens A.J.H., Pfeifer E.M., Mildrexler D., Kasischke E.S. Observations and assessment of forest carbon dynamics following disturbance in North America. J. Geophys. Res.: Biogeosci. 2012, 117:G02022. doi: 02010.01029/02011JG001733.
35. Goward S.N., Masek J.G., Cohen W., Moisen G., Collatz G.J., Healey S., Houghton R.A., Huang C., Kennedy R., Law B., Powell S., Turner D., Wulder M.A. Forest disturbance and North American carbon flux. EOS 2008, 89(11):105-106.
36. Hicke J.A., Asner G.P., Randerson J.T., Tucker C.J., Los S.O., Birdsey R.A., Jenkins J.C., Field C.B. Trends in North American net primary productivity derived from satellite observations, 1982-1998. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 2002, 16(2):1018. 10.1029/2001GB001550.
37. Hobbie S.E. Effects of plant species on nutrient cycling. Tree 1992, 7(10):337-339.
38. Hofton M.A., Rocchio L.E., Blair J.B., Dubayah R. Validation of vegetation canopy lidar sub-canopy topography measurements for a dense tropical forest. J. Geodyn. 2002, 34:491-502.
39. Homeier J., Breckle S.W., Gunter S., Rollenbeck R.T., Lueschner C. Tree diversity, forest structure and productivity anong altitudinal and topographical gradients in a species-rich Ecuadorian montane rain forest. Biotropica 2010, 42(2):140-148.
40. Homer C., Huang C., Yang L., Coan B. Development of a 2001 national landcover database for the United States. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2004, 70:829-840.
41. Huang C., Goward S.N., Masek J.G., Gao F., Vermote E.F., Thomas N., Townshend J.R. Development of time series stacks of Landsat images for reconstructing forest disturbance history. Int. J. Digital Earth 2009, 2(3):195-218.
42. Huang C., Goward S.N., Masek J.G., Thomas N., Zhu Z., Vogelmann J.E. An automated approach for reconstructing recent forest disturbance history using dense Landsat time series stacks. Remote Sens. Environ. 2010, 114:183-198.
43. Hunter M.L. Maintaining Biodiversity in Forest Ecosystems 1999, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
44. Hyde P., Dubayah R., Walker W., Blair J.B., Hofton M. Mapping forest structure for wildlife habitat analysis using multi-sensor (LiDAR, SAR/InSAR, ETM+, Quickbird) synergy. Remote Sens. Environ. 2006, 102:63-73.
45. Hyde P., Dubayah R., Peterson B., Blair J.B., Hofton M. Mapping forest structure for wildlife habitat analysis using waveform lidar: validation of montane ecosystems. Remote Sens. Environ. 2005, 96:427-437.
46. Li A., Huang C., Sun G., Shi H., Toney C., Zhu Z., Rollins M.G., Goward S.N., Masek J.G. Modeling the height of young forests regenerating from recent disturbances in Mississippi using Landsat and ICESat data. Remote Sens. Environ. 2011, 115:1837-1849.
47. Jenness, J. 2006. Topographic Position Index (tpi_jen.avx) extension for ArcView 3.x, v. 1.3a. Jenness Enterprises. <>. http://www.jennessent.com/arcview/tpi.htm.
48. Kennedy R.E., Yang Z.G., Cohen W.B. Detecting trends in forest disturbance and recovery using yearly Landsat time series: 1. LandTrendr - temporal segmentation algorithms. Remote Sens. Environ. 2010, 114:2897-2910.
49. Larson A.J., Lutz J.A., Gersonde R.F., Franklin J.F., Hietpas F.F. Potential site productivity influences the rate of forest structural development. Ecol. Appl. 2008, 18:899-910.
50. Lefsky M.A., Cohen W.B., Parker G.G., Harding D.J. Lidar remote sensing for ecosystem studies. BioScience 2002, 52:19-30.
51. Lefsky M., Harding D., Keller M., Cohen W., Carabajal C., Espirito-Santo F., Hunter M., de Oliveira R. Estimates of forest canopy height and aboveground biomass using ICESat. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2005, 32:L22S02. 10.1029/2005GL023971.
52. Lefsky M.A. A global forest canopy height map from the moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer and the geoscience laser altimeter system. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2010, 37:L15401. 10.1029/2010GL043622.
53. Li M., Huang C., Zhu Z., Shi H., Lu H., Peng S. Assessing rates of forest change and fragmentation in Alabama, USA, using the vegetation change tracker model. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2009, 257:1480-1488.
54. Li M., Huang C., Zhu Z., Shi H., Lu H., Peng S. Use of remote sensing coupled with a vegetation change tracker model to assess rates of forest change and fragmentation in Mississippi, USA. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2009, 30(2009):6559-6574.
55. Li A., Huang C., Sun G., Shi H., Toney C., Zhu Z., Rollins M., Goward S., Masek J. Modeling the height of young forests regenerating from recent disturbances in Mississippi using Landsat and ICESat data. Remote Sens. Environ. 2011, 115:1837-1849.
56. MacArthur R.H., MacArthur J.W. On bird species diversity. Ecology 1961, 42:594-598.
57. Means J.E., Acker S.A., Harding D.J., Blair J.B., Lefsky M.A., Cohen W.B., Harmon M.E., McKee W.A. Use of large-footprint scanning airborne LIDAR to estimate forest stand characteristics in the western Cascades of Oregon. Remote Sens. Environ. 1999, 67:298-308.
58. Miller D.A., White R.A. A conterminous United States multi-layer soil characteristics data set for regional climate and hydrology modeling. Earth Interact. 1998, 2:1-26.
59. Moles A.T., Warton D.I., Warman L., Swenson N.G., Laffan S.W., Xanne A.E., Pitman A., Hemmings F.A., Leishman M.R. Global patterns in plant height. J. Ecol. 2009, 97:923-932.
60. Ni-Meister W., Jupp D.L.B., Dubayah R. Modeling lidar waveforms in heterogeneous and discrete canopies. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2001, 39:1943-1958. 10.1109/36.951085.
61. Olson D.M. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on earth. BioScience 2001, 51(11):933-938.
62. Pacala S.W., Hurtt G.C., Baker D., Peylin P., Houghton R.A., Birdsey R.A., Heath L., Sundquist E.T., Stallard R.F., Ciais P., Moorcroft P., Caspersen J.P., Shevliakova E., Moore B., Kohlmaier G., Holland E., Gloor M., Harmon M.E., Fan S.M., Sarmiento J.L., Goodale C.L., Schimel D., Field C.B. Consistent land- and atmosphere-based U.S. carbon sink estimates. Science 2001, 292:2316-2320.
63. Pan Y., Birdsey R.A., Fang J., Houghton R., Kauppi P.E., Kurz W.A., Phillips O.L., Shvidenko A., Lewis S.L., Canadell J.G., Ciais P., Jackson R.B., Pacala S.W., et al. A large and persistent carbon sink in the world's forests. Science 2011, 333(6045):988-993.
64. Pan Y., Chen J.M., Birdsey R., McCullough K., He L., Deng F. Age structure and disturbance legacy of North American forests. Biogeosciences 2011, 8:715-732.
65. Parker G.G. Structure and microclimate of forest canopies. Forest Canopies: A Review of Research on a Biological Frontier 1995, Academic Press, San Diego, CA. M. Lowman, N. Nadkarni (Eds.).
66. Phillips L.B., Hansen A.J., Flather C.H., Robison-Cox J. Applying species-energy theory to conservation: a case study for North American birds. Ecol. Appl. 2010, 20(7):2007-2023.
67. Pickett S.T.A., White P.S. The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics 1985, Academic Press, New York.
68. Powell S.L., Cohen W.B., Kennedy R.E., Healey S.P., Huang C. Observation of trends in biomass loss due to disturbance in the 6 conterminous U.S.: 1986-2004. Ecosystems 2014, 17:142-157.
69. Rangel T.F.V.L.B., Diniz-Filho J.A.F., Bini L.M. Towards an integrated computational tool for spatial analysis in macroecology and biogeography. Global Ecol. Biog. 2006, 15:321-327.
70. Robbins C.S. Effect of forest fragmentation on breeding bird populations in the Piedmont of the mid-Atlantic region. Atlantic Nat. 1980, 33.
71. Ruefenacht B., Finco M.V., Nelson M.D., Czaplewski R., Helmer E.H., Blackard J.A., Holden G.R., Lister A.J., Salajanu D., Weyermann D., Winterberger K. Conterminous U.S. and Alaska forest type mapping using Forest Inventory and Analysis data. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2008, 74(11):1379-1388.
72. Running, S.W., Nemani, R.R., Heinsch, F.A., Zhao, Z., Reeves, M., Hashimoto, H., 2004. A continuous satellite derived measure of global terrestrial primary production. BioScience 54, pp. 547-560. Sauer, J.R., Hines, J.E., Gough, G., Thomas, I., Peterjohn, B.G., 2011. The North American Breeding Bird Survey Results and Analysis. Version 96.4. Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, Maryland, United States Geological Survey.
73. Sauer, J.R., Hines, J.E., Gough, G., Thomas, I., Peterjohn, B.G., 2011. The North American Breeding Bird Survey Results and Analysis. Version 96.4. Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, Maryland, United States Geological Survey.
74. Simard M., Pinto N., Fisher J.B., Baccini A. Mapping forest canopy height globally with spaceborne lidar. J. Geophys. Res. 2011, 116:G04021.
75. Skovsgaard J.P., Vanclay J.K. Forest site productivity: a review of the evolution of dendrometric concepts for even-aged stands. Forestry 2008, 81(1):13-31. 10.1093/forestry/cpm041.
76. Soil Survey Staff, 2012. Spatial and tabular data of the Soil. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. <> Fort Worth, TX. http://soildatamartnrcs.usda.gov/.
77. Sork V.L., Davis F.W., Westfall R., Flint A., Ikegami M., Wang H., Grivet D. Gene movement and genetic association with regional climate gradients in California valley oak (Quercus lobata Nee) in the face of climate change. Mol. Ecol. 2010, 19:3806-3823.
78. Spies T.A., Turner M.G. Dynamic forest mosaics. Maintaining Biodiversity in Forest Ecosystems 1999, 95-160. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. M.L. Hunter (Ed.).
79. Swatantran A., Dubayah R., Goetz S., Hofton M., Betts M.G., Sun M., Simard M., Holmes R. Mapping migratory bird prevalence using remote sensing data fusion. PLoS ONE 2012, 7(1):e28922.
80. Theobald D.M. Landscape patterns of exurban growth in the USA from 1980 to 2020. Ecol. Soc. 2005, 10:32.
81. Tilman D. Causes, consequences, and ethics of biodiversity. Nature 2000, 405:208-211.
82. USEPA US Environmental Protection Agency, 1999. Level III ecoregions of the continental United States, Revised March 1999, map. USEPA.
83. Verschuyl J.P., Hansen A.J., McWethy D.B., Sallabanks R., Hutto R.L. Is the effect of forest structure on bird diversity modified by forest productivity?. Ecol. Appl. 2008, 18(5):1155-1170.
84. Vierling K., Vierling L., Gould W., Martinuzzi S., Clawges R. Lidar: shedding new light on habitat characterization and modeling. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2008, 6:90-98.
85. Weiskittel A.R., Crookston N.L., Radtke P.J. Linking climate, gross primary productivity, and site index across forests of the western United States. Can. J. For. Res. 2011, 41:1710-1721.
86. Whitehurst A.S., Swatantran A., Blair J.B., Hofton M.A., Dubayah R. Characterization of canopy layering in forested ecosystems using full waveform lidar. Remote Sens. 2013, 5:2014-2036.
87. Whittaker R.H. Vegetation of the great smoky mountains. Ecol. Monogr. 1956, 26(1):1-80.