A new approach to forest biodiversity monitoring in Canada

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 258, Issue SUPPL., 2009, Pages

  Boutin, Stan ^a   Haughland, Diane L ^a   Schieck, Jim ^a,b   Herbers, Jim ^a,b   Bayne, Erin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b ALBERTA RESEARCH COUNCIL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Forest management; Monitoring

Indexed keywords

FOREST BIODIVERSITY; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FOREST MANAGERS; HARVEST RATES; HUMAN IMPACT; KEY CHARACTERISTICS; KEY INDICATOR; LONG TERM; MONITORING APPROACH; NEW APPROACHES; SAMPLING DESIGN; SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY; THREATENED SPECIES; TREE GROWTH; WOOD SUPPLY;

CONSERVATION; ECOLOGY; FORESTRY; MANAGERS;

BIODIVERSITY;

ANTHROPOGENIC EFFECT; BIODIVERSITY; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY POLICY; SAMPLING; TIMBER HARVESTING;

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; ECOLOGY; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY; MONITORING;

CANADA; NORTH AMERICA;

EID: 71949124963     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.08.024     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute, Available at http://www.abmi.ca/abmi/home/home.jsp.
2. Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Program, 2006. Information Application and System Efficiencies Project, Available at http://www.abmi.ca/abmi/reports/reports.jsp?categoryId=1&subcategory Id=68.
3. Alberta Sustainable Resource Development, 2007. Forest Health Aerial and Ground Survey Data (Arc/INFO) Format, Available at http://srd.alberta.ca/forests/health/surveydata/downloads.aspx.
4. Anderson D.R. The need to get the basics right in wildlife field studies. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 29 (2001) 1294-1297
5. Angelstam P., and Pettersson B. Principles of present Swedish Forestry biodiversity management. Ecol. Bull. 46 (1997) 191-203
6. Balmford A., Crane P., Dobson A., Green R.E., and Mace G.M. The 2010 challenge: data availability, information needs and extraterrestrial insights. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 360 (2005) 221-228
7. Bergeron Y., Harvey B., Leduc A., and Gauthier S. Forest management guidelines based on natural disturbance dynamics: stand- and forest-level considerations. For. Chron. 75 (1999) 49-54
8. Bird Studies Canada, 2009. National Nocturnal Owl Surveys, Available at http://www.bsc-eoc.org/volunteer/natowls.
9. Butchart S.H.M., Stattersfield A.J., Baillie J., Bennun L.A., Stuart S.N., Akcakaya H.R., Hilton-Taylor C., and Mace G.M. Using Red List Indices to measure progress towards the 2010 target and beyond. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 360 (2005) 255-268
10. Canadian Council of Forest Ministers. Criteria and Indicators of Sustainable Forest Management in Canada: National Status 2005 (2006), Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service. Available at http://www.ccfm.org/pdf/C&I_e.pdf
11. Canadian Endangered Species Conservation Council. Wild Species 2000: The General Status of Species in Canada (2001), Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada, Ottawa. http://www.wildspecies.ca/wildspecies2000/en/Report.pdf Available at
12. Canadian Endangered Species Conservation Council. Wild Species 2005: The General Status of Species in Canada (2006), Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada, Ottawa. http://www.wildspecies.ca/wildspecies2005/GS2005_site_e.pdf Available at
13. Canadian Standards Association, 2008. Sustainable forest management. Report Z809-08, Available at http://www.csa.ca/cm/standards?packedargs=category%3D1238188977020.
14. Carey A.B., and Curtis R.O. Conservation of biodiversity: a useful paradigm for forest ecosystem management. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 24 (1996) 610-620
15. Carlson M., and Schmiegelow F. Cost-effective sampling design applied to large-scale monitoring of boreal birds. Conserv. Ecol. (2002) 6, 11. http://www.consecol.org/vol6/iss2/art11 Available at
16. Caughlan L., and Oakley K.L. Cost considerations for long-term ecological monitoring. Ecol. Indic. 1 (2001) 123-134
17. Clark J.A., and May R.M. Taxonomic bias in conservation research. Science 297 (2002) 191-192
18. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada, Available at http://www.cosewic.gc.ca/eng/sct5/index_e.cfm.
19. Convention on Biological Diversity, Available at http://www.cbd.int/.
20. Dale V.H., and Beyeler S.C. Challenges in the development and use of ecological indicators. Ecol. Indic. 1 (2001) 3-10
21. Dobson A. Monitoring global rates of biodiversity change: challenges that arise in meeting the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) 2010 goals. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 360 (2005) 229-241
22. Dobson J., Gardner M., Miller B., Jessep M., and Toft R. An approach to the assessment of the quality of environmental monitoring data. J. Environ. Monit. 1 (1999) 91-95
23. Edwards D. Issues and themes for natural resources trend and change detection. Ecol. Appl. 8 (1998) 323-325
24. Field S.A., Tyre A.J., Jonzen N., Rhodes J.R., and Possingham H.P. Minimizing the cost of environmental management decisions by optimizing statistical thresholds. Ecol. Lett. 7 (2004) 669-675
25. Foster J.R. Statistical power in forest monitoring. For. Ecol. Manag. 151 (2001) 211-222
26. Gaston K.J., and Fuller R.A. Commonness, population depletion and conservation biology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23 (2007) 14-19
27. Gillis M.D., Omule A.Y., and Brierley T. Monitoring Canada's forests: the National Forest Inventory. For. Chron. 81 (2005) 214-221
28. Gilmore D.W. Ecosystem management-a needs driven, resource-use philosophy. For. Chron. 73 (1997) 560-564
29. Government of Canada, 2009. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada: wildlife species status search results (endangered or threatened), Available at http://www.cosewic.gc.ca.
30. Government of Canada, 2002. Species at Risk Act: an act respecting the protection of wildlife species at risk in Canada, Bill C-5, 1st Session 37th Parliament, 49-50-51 Elizabeth II, Available at http://www.sararegistry.gc.ca/sarredirect/.
31. Green R.E., Balmford A., Crane P.R., Mace G.M., Reynolds J.D., and Turner R.K. A framework for improved monitoring of biodiversity: responses to the World Summit on Sustainable Development. Conserv. Biol. 19 (2005) 56-65
32. Hagan J.M., and Whitman A.A. Biodiversity indicators for sustainable forestry: simplifying complexity. J. For. 104 (2006) 203-210
33. Hannon, S. J., McCallum, C., 2003. Using the focal species approach for conserving biodiversity in landscape managed for forestry. Synthesis Paper. Sustainable Forest Management Network, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton.
34. Hobson K.A., and Schieck J. Changes in bird communities in boreal mixedwood forest: harvest and wildfire effects over 30 years. Ecol. Appl. 9 (1999) 849-863
35. Hunter M.L. Wildlife, Forests, and Forestry: Principles of Managing Forests for Biological Diversity (1990), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
36. International Union for Conservation of Nature, Available at http://www.iucn.org/.
37. In: Jonsson B.G., and Kruys N. (Eds). Ecology of woody debris in boreal forests. Ecol. Bull. (2001) 49
38. Karr J.R. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fisheries 6 (1981) 21-27
39. In: Kohm K.A., and Franklin J.F. (Eds). Creating a Forestry for the 21st Century: the Science of Ecosystem Management (1997), Island Press, Washington, DC
40. Krebs C.J. Ecological Methodology (1989), Harper and Row, New York, NY, USA
41. Lambeck R.J. Focal species: a multi-species umbrella for nature conservation. Conserv. Biol. 11 (1997) 849-856
42. Larsen D.P., Kincaid T.M., Jacobs S.E., and Urquhart N.S. Designs for evaluating local and regional scale trends. Bioscience 51 (2001) 1069-1078
43. Leckie D.G., and Gillis M.D. Forest inventory in Canada with emphasis on map production. For. Chron. 71 (1995) 74-88
44. Lengyel S., Kobler A., Kutnar L., Framstad E., Henry P.Y., Babij V., Gruber B., Schmeller D., and Henle K. A review and a framework for the integration of biodiversity monitoring at the habitat level. Biodivers. Conserv. 17 (2008) 3341-3356
45. Lindenmayer D.B. Future directions for biodiversity conservation in managed forests: indicator species, impact studies and monitoring programs. For. Ecol. Manag. 115 (1999) 277-287
46. Loh J., Green R.E., Ricketts T., Lamoreux J., Jenkins M., Kapos V., and Randers J. The Living Planet Index: using species population time series to track trends in biodiversity. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 360 (2005) 289-295
47. Lowenstein L. Financial transparency and corporate governance: you manage what you measure. Columbia Law Rev. 96 (1996) 1335-1362
48. Mace G.M., and Baillie J.E.M. The 2010 biodiversity indicators: challenges for science and policy. Conserv. Biol. 21 (2007) 1406-1413
49. Maclaurin J., and Sterelny K. What is Biodiversity? (2008), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
50. Maes D., and Van Dyck H. Habitat quality and biodiversity indicator performances of a threatened butterfly versus a multispecies group for wet heathlands in Belgium. Biol. Conserv. 123 (2005) 177-187
51. Magurran A.E. Measuring Biological Diversity (2004), Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford
52. Manley P.N., Zielinski W.J., Schlesinger M.D., and Mori S.R. Evaluation of a multiple-species approach to monitoring species at the ecoregional scale. Ecol. Appl. 14 (2004) 296-310
53. Manley P.N., Zielinski W.J., Stuart C.M., Keane J.J., Lind A.J., Brown C., Plymale B.L., and Napper C.O. Monitoring ecosystems in the Sierra Nevada: the conceptual model foundation. Environ. Monit. Assess. 64 (2000) 139-152
54. Maxwell D., and Jennings S. Power of monitoring programmes to detect decline and recovery of rare and vulnerable fish. J. Appl. Ecol. 42 (2005) 25-37
55. Millard S.P., and Lettenmaier D.P. Optimal design of biological sampling programs using the analysis of variance. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 22 (1986) 637-656
56. Montréal Process. Criteria and Indicators for the Conservation and Sustainable Management of Temperate and Boreal Forests (2007). http://www.rinya.maff.go.jp/mpci/meetings/an-6.pdf Available at
57. Mulder B.S., Noon B.R., Spies T.A., Raphael M.G., Palmer C.J., Olsen A.R., Reeves G.H., and Welsh H.H. The Strategy and Design of the Effectiveness Monitoring Program for the Northwest Forest Plan (1999), USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station
58. Natural Resources Canada, 2007. Canada's National Forest Inventory: Business Report Fiscal Year 2006-07. Government of Canada, Available at https://nfi.nfis.org/reporting/business/NFI_Business_Report_2006-07.pdf.
59. Nature Watch. Worm Watch (2009). http://www.naturewatch.ca/english/wormwatch/ Available at
60. Nichols J.D., and Williams B.K. Monitoring for conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21 (2006) 668-673
61. Nielsen, S., Haughland, D.L., Bayne, E., Schieck, J., 2009. Capacity of large-scale, long-term biodiversity monitoring programmes to detect trends in species prevalence. Biodivers. Conserv.
62. Noon B.R. Conceptual issues in monitoring ecological resources. In: Busch D.E., and Trexler J.C. (Eds). Monitoring Ecosystems: Interdisciplinary Approaches for Evaluating Ecoregional Initiatives (2003), Island Press, Washington 27-72 (Chapter 2)
63. Noon, B.R., Spies, T.A., Raphael, M.G., 1999. Conceptual basis for designing an effectiveness monitoring program. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-437. USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station.
64. North American Butterfly Association. NABA Butterfly Counts (2009). http://www.naba.org/counts.html Available at
65. North American Waterfowl Management Plan, Available at http://www.nawmp.ca/ (accessed August 3, 2009).
66. Norton B.G. Improving ecological communication: the role of ecologists in environmental policy formation. Ecol. Appl. 8 (1998) 350-364
67. Noss R.F. Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach. Conserv. Biol. 4 (1990) 355-364
68. Parrish J.D., Braun D.P., and Unnasch R.S. Are we conserving what we say we are? Measuring ecological integrity within protected areas. Bioscience 53 (2003) 851-860
69. Pereira H.M., and Cooper H.D. Towards the global monitoring of biodiversity change. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21 (2006) 123-129
70. Quayle J.F., Ramsay L.R., and Fraser D.F. Trend in the status of breeding bird fauna in British Columbia, Canada, based on the IUCN red list index method. Conserv. Biol. 21 (2007) 1241-1247
71. Ralph, C.J., Droege, S., Sauer, J.R., 1995. Managing and monitoring birds using point counts: standards and applications. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-149.
72. Rodrigues A.S.L., Pilgrim J.D., Lamoreux J.F., Hoffmann M., and Brooks T.M. The value of the IUCN Red List for conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21 (2006) 71-76
73. Roth T., and Weber D. Top predators as indicators for species richness? Prey species are just as useful. J. Appl. Ecol. 45 (2008) 987-991
74. Roy D.B., Rothery P., and Brereton T. Reduced-effort schemes for monitoring butterfly populations. J. Appl. Ecol. 44 (2007) 993-1000
75. Sáenz-Arroyo A., Roberts C.M., Torre J., Cariño-Olvera M., and Enríquez-Andrade R.R. Rapidly shifting environmental baselines among fishers of the Gulf of California. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. 272 (2005) 1957-1962
76. Sauer J.R., Hines J.E., and Fallon J. The North American Breeding Bird Survey Results and Analysis 1966-2007 (2008), USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, MD. http://www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/bbs/ Available at
77. Seavy N.E., and Reynolds M.H. Is statistical power to detect trends a good assessment of population monitoring?. Biol. Conserv. 140 (2007) 187-191
78. Sergio F., Newton I., Marchesi L., and Pedrini P. Ecologically justified charisma: preservation of top predators delivers biodiversity conservation. J. Appl. Ecol. 43 (2006) 1049-1055
79. Shank C.C. The committee on the status of endangered wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC): a 21-year retrospective. Can. Field: Nat. 113 (1999) 318-341
80. Sharma M., Parton J., Woods M., Newton P., Penner M., Wang J., Stinson A., and Bell F.W. Ontario's forest growth and yield modelling program: advances resulting from the Forestry Research Partnership. For. Chron. 84 (2008) 694-703
81. Thompson W.L. Sampling rare or elusive species. Concepts, Designs, and Techniques for Estimating Population Parameters (2004), Island Press, Washington, DC
82. Thornton K.W., Saul G.E., and Hyatt D.E. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program Assessment Framework (1994), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, EMAP Center, Research Triangle Park, NC
83. Trexler J.C., and Busch D.E. Monitoring, assessment and ecological initiatives: a synthesis. In: Busch D.E., and Trexler J.C. (Eds). Monitoring Ecosystems: Interdisciplinary Approaches for Evaluating Ecoregional Initiatives (2003), Island Press, Washington 405-424
84. United Nations Environment Programme. Convention on Biological Diversity Indicators (2009). http://www.cbd.int/2010-target/framework/indicators.shtml Available at
85. United States Department of Agriculture, 2009. Forest inventory and analysis: fiscal year 2008 business report. Report FS-929, Forest Service, Available at http://www.fia.fs.fed.us/library/bus-org-documents/docs/FIA_Annual_Repor t_2008_draft.pdf.
86. University of Alberta. A National Boreal Bird-Habitat Modelling Project for Canada (2009). http://www.borealbirds.ca/ Available at
87. Urquhart N.S., and Kincaid T.M. Designs for detecting trend from repeated surveys of ecological resources. J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat. 4 (1999) 404-414
88. Urquhart N.S., Paulsen S.G., and Larsen D.P. Monitoring for policy-relevant regional trends over time. Ecol. Appl. 8 (1998) 246-257
89. Walters C.J. Adaptive management of renewable resources (1986), Macmillan, New York
90. Watson I., and Novelly P. Making the biodiversity monitoring system sustainable: design issues for large-scale monitoring systems. Austr. Ecol. 29 (2004) 16-30
91. World Wildlife Fund 2008. Living Planet Report 2008, Available at http://assets.panda.org/downloads/living_planet_report_2008.pdf.
92. Wulder M.A., Bater C.W., Coops N.C., Hilker T., and White J.C. The role of LiDAR in sustainable forest management. For. Chron. 84 (2008) 807-826
93. Wulder M.A., White J.C., Cranny M., Hall R.J., Luther J.E., Beaudoin A., Goodenough D.G., and Dechka J.A. Monitoring Canada's forests. Part 1: completion of the EOSD land cover project. Can. J. Remote Sens. 34 (2008) 549-562