Distribution of specialist and generalist species along spatial gradients of habitat disturbance and fragmentation

Oikos

Volumn 117, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 507-514

  Devictor, Vincent ^a   Julliard, Romain ^a   Jiguet, Frédéric ^a  

^a MUSÉUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; ANTHROPOGENIC EFFECT; BIRD; DATABASE; ENVIRONMENTAL DISTURBANCE; GENERALIST; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; SPATIAL VARIATION; SPECIALIST; SPECIALIZATION;

AVES;

EID: 41149101284     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2008.16215.x     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Agreste,. 2003. Indicateurs paysagers élaborés a partir de l'enquête sur l'utilisation du territoire (TERUTI). Tech. Rep. 151. SCEES, Paris.
2. Ashraf, M. et al. 1997. Application of geostatistics to evaluate partial weather station Agric. For. Meteorol. 84 : 255 271.
3. Attum, O. et al. 2006. Response of a desert lizard community to habitat degradation: do ideas about habitat specialists/generalists hold? Biol. Conserv. 133 : 52 62.
4. Austin, M. P. et al. 1990. Measurement of the realized qualitative niche: environmental niches of five Eucalyptus species Ecol. Monogr. 60 : 161 177.
5. Blumstein, D. T. et al. 2005. Inter-specific variation in avian responses to human disturbance J. Appl. Ecol. 42 : 943 953.
6. Bossard, M. et al. 2000. CORINE land cover technical guide-Addendum 2000 Eur. Environ. Agency. Tech. Rep. 40, www.eea.eu.int.
7. Boulinier, T. et al. 1998. Estimating species richness: the importance of heterogeneity in species detectability Ecology 79 : 1018 1028.
8. Brouat, C. et al. 2004. Specialization and habitat: spatial and environmental effects on abundance and genetic diversity of forest generalist and specialist Carabus species Mol. Ecol. 13 : 1815 1826.
9. Brown, J. H. et al. 1995. Spatial variation in abundance Ecology 76 : 2028 2043.
10. Buckland, S. T. et al. 2006. Advanced distance sampling: estimating abundance of biological populations Biometrics 62 : 940 941.
11. Carroll, S. S. Pearson, D. L. 2000. Detecting and modeling spatial and temporal dependence in conservation biology Conserv. Biol. 14 : 1893 1897.
12. Carroll, R. J. Ruppert, D. 1988. Transformation and weighting in regression. Chapman and Hall.
13. Cressie, N. 1993. Statistics for spatial data (rev. ed.). John Wiley and Sons.
14. Crick, H. Q. P. 1992. A bird-habitat coding system for use in Britain and Ireland incorporating aspects of land-management and human activity Bird Study 39 : 1 12.
15. Devictor, V. et al. 2007a. Functional homogenization effect of urbanization on bird communities Conserv. Biol. 21 : 741 751.
16. Devictor, V. et al. 2007b. Functional biotic homogenization of bird communities in disturbed landscapes 10 Global Ecol. Biogeogr. doi:1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00364.x.
17. Diaz, S. et al. 2006. Biodiversity loss threatens human well-being PLoS Biol. 4 : 1300 1305.
18. ESRI. 2000. ArcView 3.2. Redlands, California.
19. Fahrig, L. 2003. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 34 : 487 515.
20. Fischer, M. Stöcklin, J. 1997. Local extinctions of plants in remnants of extensively used calcareous grasslands 1950-1985 Conserv. Biol. 11 : 727 737.
21. Fisher, D. O. et al. 2003. Extrinsic versus intrinsic factors in the decline and extinction of Australian marsupials Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B. 270 : 1801 1808.
22. Fortin, M. Dale, M. 2005. Spatial analysis. A guide for ecologists. Cambridge Univ. Press.
23. Futuyma, D. J. Moreno, G. 1988. The evolution of ecological specialization Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 19 : 207 233.
24. Goulson, D. et al. 2005. Causes of rarity in bumblebees Biol. Conserv. 122 : 1 8.
25. Guisan, A. et al. 2002. Generalized linear and generalized additive models in studies of species distribution: setting the scene Ecol. Modell. 157 : 89 100.
26. Heikkinen, R. K. Birks, H. J. B. 1996. Spatial and environmental components of variation in the distribution patterns of subarctic plant species at Kevo, N Finland-a case study at the meso-scale level Ecography 19 : 341 351.
27. Jonsen, I. D. Fahrig, L. 1997. Response of generalist and specialist insect herbivores to landscape spatial structure Landscape Ecol. 12 : 185 197.
28. Julliard, R. Jiguet, F. 2002. Un suivi intégré des populations d'oiseaux communs en France Alauda 70 : 137 147.
29. Julliard, R. et al. 2004. Common birds facing global changes: what makes a species at risk? Global Change Biol. 10 : 148 154.
30. Julliard, R. et al. 2006. Spatial segregation of specialists and generalists in bird communities Ecol. Lett. 9 : 1237 1244.
31. Kassen, R. 2002. The experimental evolution of specialists, generalists, and the maintenance of diversity J. Evol. Biol. 15 : 173 190.
32. Kithahara, M et al. 2000. Patterns in the structure of grassland butterfly communities along a gradient of human disturbance analysis based on the generalist/specialist concept Popul. Ecol. 42 : 135 144.
33. Koening, W. D. 1999. Spatial autocorrelation of ecological phenomena Trends Ecol. Evol. 14 : 22 26.
34. Kotze, D. J. O'Hara, R. B. 2003. Species decline-but why? Explanations of carabid beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) declines in Europe Oecologia 135 : 138 148.
35. Krauss, J. et al. 2003. Local species immigration, extinction, and turnover of butterflies in relation to habitat area and habitat isolation Oecologia 442 : 591 602.
36. Lausch, A. Herzog, F. 2002. Applicability of landscape metrics for the monitoring of landscape change: issues of scale, resolution and interpretability Ecol. Indic. 2 : 3 15.
37. Levins, R. 1968. Evolution in changing environments. Princeton Univ. Press.
38. Lindenmayer, D. B. Fischer, J. 2006. Tackling the habitat fragmentation panchreston Trends Ecol. Evol. 22 : 127 132.
39. Lockwood, J. L. et al. 2002. A metric for analyzing taxonomic patterns of extinction risk Conserv. Biol. 16 : 1137 1142.
40. Marvier, M. et al. 2004. Habitat destruction, fragmentation, and disturbance promote invasion by habitat generalists in a multispecies metapopulation Risk Anal. 24 : 869 878.
41. McGill, B. J. et al. 2006. Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits Trends Ecol. Evol. 21 : 178 185.
42. McKinney, M. L. 1997. Exctinction vulnerability and selectivity: combining ecological and paleontological views Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28 : 495 516.
43. McKinney, M. L. Lockwood, J. L. 1999. Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction Trends Ecol. Evol. 14 : 450 453.
44. Munday, P. L. 2004. Habitat loss, resource specialization, and extinction on coral reefs Global Change Biol. 10 : 1642 1647.
45. Olden, J. D. 2006a. Biotic homogenization: a new research agenda for conservation biogeography J. Biogeogr. 33 : 2027 2039.
46. Olden, J. D. 2006b. On defining and quantifying biotic homogenization Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 15 : 113 120.
47. Östergård, H. Ehrlén, J. 2005. Among population variation in specialist and generalist seed predation-the importance of host plant distribution, alternative hosts and environmental variation Oikos 111 : 39 46.
48. Owens, I. P. F. Bennett, P. M. 2000. Ecological basis of extinction risk in birds: habitat loss versus human persecution and introduced predators Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 97 : 12144 12148.
49. Rooney, T. P. et al. 2004. Biotic impoverishment and homogenization in unfragmented forest understory communities Conserv. Biol. 18 : 787 798.
50. Rooney, T. P. et al. 2007. Biotic homogenization and conservation prioritization Biol. Conserv. 134 : 447 450.
51. Royle, J. A. et al. 2005. Modelling occurence and abundance of species when detection is imperfect Oikos 110 : 353 359.
52. Ryan, T. P. 1997. Modern regression methods. Wiley.
53. Siriwardena, G. M. et al. 1998. Trends in the abundance of farmland birds: a quantitative comparison of smoothed common birds census indices J. Appl. Ecol. 35 : 24 43.
54. Smart, S. M. et al. 2006. Biotic homogenization and changes in species diversity across human-modified ecosystems Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 273 : 2659 2665.
55. Starzomski, B. M. Srivastava, D. S. 2007. Landscape geometry determines community response to disturbance Oikos 116 : 690 699.
56. Steffan-Dewenter, I. Tscharntke, T. 2000. Butterfly community structure in fragmented habitats Ecol. Lett. 3 : 449 456.
57. Thompson, W. L. 2002. Towards reliable bird surveys: accounting for individuals present but not detected Auk 119 : 18 25.
58. Violle, C. et al. 2007. Let the concept of trait be functional! Oikos 116 : 882 892.
59. Warren, M. S. et al. 2001. Rapid responses of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change Nature 414 : 65 69.