Mapping snags and understory shrubs for a LiDAR-based assessment of wildlife habitat suitability

Remote Sensing of Environment

Volumn 113, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 2533-2546

  Martinuzzi, Sebastián ^a   Vierling, Lee A ^a   Gould, William A ^b   Falkowski, Michael J ^c   Evans, Jeffrey S ^d   Hudak, Andrew T ^e   Vierling, Kerri T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

^b USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

^c MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d THE NATURE CONSERVANCY   (United States)

^e ROCKY MOUNTAIN RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Forest structure; Keystone structures; LiDAR metrics; Species distribution modeling; Wildlife habitat; Woodpeckers

Indexed keywords

FOREST STRUCTURE; KEYSTONE STRUCTURES; LIDAR METRICS; SPECIES DISTRIBUTION MODELING; WILDLIFE HABITAT; WOODPECKERS;

ANIMALS; ARCHES; FORESTRY; MAPPING; METRIC SYSTEM; OCEAN HABITATS; OPTICAL RADAR; REMOTE SENSING; VEGETATION;

ECOLOGY;

ALGORITHM; BIRD; ECOSYSTEM MODELING; FOREST CANOPY; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; HABITAT STRUCTURE; LIDAR; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; SHRUB; SNAG; SPECIES DIVERSITY; WILD POPULATION; WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT;

ANIMALS; ECOLOGY; FORESTRY; MAPPING; PLANTS; RADAR; REMOTE SENSING; SPECIES IDENTIFICATION;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

AVES; CONIFEROPHYTA; PICIDAE;

EID: 70350033997     PISSN: 00344257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2009.07.002     Document Type: Article

References (99)

1. Alluoche O., Tsoar A., and Kadmon R. Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: Prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS). Journal of Applied Ecology 43 (2006) 1223-1232
2. Bartemucci P., Messier C., and Canham C.D. Overstory influences on light attenuation patterns and understory plant community diversity and composition in southern boreal forests of Quebec. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36 (2006) 2065-2079
3. Bate L.S., Garton E.O., and Wisdom M.J. Sampling methods for snags and large trees important for wildlife. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-GTR-181 (2002)
4. Bater, C. W. (2008). Assessing indicators of forest sustainability using LiDAR remote sensing (Thesis). University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (97 pp.).
5. Bater C.W., Coops N.C., Gergel S.E., and Goodwin N.R. Towards the estimation of tree structural class in northwest coastal forest using LiDAR remote sensing. Proceedings of the ISPR Workshop "Laser Scanning 2007 and SilviLaser 2007", Espoo, September 12-14, 2007, Finland Vol. XXXVI (2007) 38-43 ISSN:1682-1777, P3/W52
6. Breiman L. Random Forests. Machine Learning 45 (2001) 5-32
7. Brokaw N.V., and Lent R.A. Vertical structure. In: Hunter M. (Ed). Maintaining biodiversity in forest ecosystems (1999), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 373-399
8. Broughton R.K., Hinsley S.A., Bellampy P.E., Hill R., and Rothery P. Marsh Tit Poecile palustris territories in a British broad-leaved wood. Ibis 148 (2006) 744-752
9. Bütler R., and Schlaepfer R. Spruce snag quantification by coupling colour infrared aerial photos and a GIS. Forest Ecology and Management 195 (2004) 325-339
10. Chen C., Liaw A., and Breiman L. Using random forest to learn imbalanced data. Technical report Vol. 666 (2004), Statistics Department, University of California at Berkeley
11. Clark D.B., Castro C.S., Alvarado L.D.A., and Read J.M. Quantifying mortality of tropical rain forest trees using high-spatial-resolution satellite data. Ecology Letters 7 (2004) 52-59
12. Clawges R., Vierling L.A., Calhoon M., and Toomey M.P. Use of a ground-based scanning lidar for estimation of biophysical properties of western larch (Larix occidentalis). International Journal of Remote Sensing 28 (2007) 4331-4344
13. Clawges R., Vierling K., Vierling L., and Rowell E. The use of airborne lidar to assess avian species diversity, density, and occurrence in a pine/aspen forest. Remote Sensing of Environment 112 (2008) 2064-2073
14. Cline S.P., Berg A.B., and Wight H.M. Snag characteristics and dynamics in Douglas-fir forests, western Oregon. Journal of Wildlife Management 44 (1980) 773-786
15. Congalton R., and Green K. Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: Principles and practices (1999), CRC/Lewis Press., Boca Raton, FL 137 pp.
16. Cooper S.V., Neiman K.E., and Roberts D.W. Forest habitat types of Northern Idaho: A second approximation. USDA Forest Service IRS, GTR-INT-236. (1991) 143 pp.
17. Crookston N.L., and Finley A.O. yaImpute: An R package for KNN imputation. Journal of Statistical Software 23 10 (2008) 16 pp.
18. Cutler R.D., Edwards Jr. T.C., Beard K.H., Cutler A., Hess K.T., Gibson J., et al. Random Forests for classification in ecology. Ecology 88 (2007) 2783-2792
19. Davis J.W. Snags are for wildlife. In: Davis J.W., Goodwin G.A., and Ockenfels R.A. (Eds). Proceedings of the Symposium on Snag Habitat Management. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-99 (1983), Flagstaff, AZ 4-9
20. Díaz-Uriarte. The varSelRF package (2008). http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/varSelRF/varSelRF.pdf 23 pp. Available at: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/varSelRF/varSelRF.pdf
21. Díaz-Uriarte R., and Alvarez S. Gene selection and classification of microarray data using random forest. BMC Bioinformatics 7 (2006) 3
22. Drake J., Dubayah R.O., Clark D.A., Knox R.G., Blair B., Hofton M., et al. Estimation of forest structural characteristics using large-footprint lidar. Remote Sensing of Environment 79 (2002) 305-319
23. Edenius L., and Mikusiński G. Utility of habitat suitability models as biodiversity assessment tools in forest management. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 21 (2006) 62-72
24. Evans J.S., and Hudak A.T. A multiscale curvature algorithm for classifying discrete return LiDAR in forested environments. IEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 45 (2007) 1029-1038
25. Falkowski M.J., Evans J.S., Martinuzzi S., Gessler P.E., and Hudak A.T. Characterizing forest succession with Lidar data: An evaluation for the inland Northwest USA. Remote Sensing of Environment 113 (2009) 946-956
26. Falkowski M.J., Gessler P.E., Morgan P., Hudak A.T., and Smith A.M.S. Evaluating ASTER satellite imagery and gradient modeling for mapping and characterizing wildland fire fuels. Forest Ecology and Management 217 (2005) 129-146
27. Flanagan P.T., Morgan P., and Everett R.L. Snag recruitment in subalpine forest of the North Cascades, Washington State. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-DTR-181 (2002)
28. Frescino T.S., Edwards T.C., and Moisen G.G. Spatially explicit forest structural attributes using generalized additive models. Journal of Vegetation Science 12 (2001) 15-26
29. Fu W.J., Raymond J.C., and Wand S. Estimating misclassification error with small samples via bootstrap cross-validation. Bioinformatics 21 (2005) 1979-1986
30. Ganey J.L. Snag density and composition of snag populations in two National Forests in northern Arizona. Forest Ecology and Management 117 (1999) 169-178
31. Goetz S., Steinberg D., Dubayah R., and Blair B. Laser remote sensing of canopy habitat heterogeneity as a predictor of bird species richness in an eastern temperate forest, USA. Remote Sensing of Environment 108 (2007) 254-263
32. Goodwin, N. R. (2006). Assessing understorey structural characteristics in eucalyptus forests: An investigation of LiDAR techniques (Thesis). University of New South Wales, Sydney NSW Australia (206 pp.).
33. Goodwin N.R., Coops N.C., Bater C., and Gergel S.E. Assessment of sub-canopy structure in a complex coniferous forest. Proceedings of the ISPR Workshop "Laser Scanning 2007 and SilviLaser 2007", Espoo, September 12-14, 2007, Finland Vol. XXXVI (2007) 169-172 ISSN:1682-1777, P3/W52
34. Gracia M., Montané F., Piqué J., and Retana J. Overstory structure and topographic gradients determining diversity and abundance of understory shrub species in temperate forests in central Pyrenees (Spain). Forest Ecology and Management 242 (2007) 391-397
35. Graf R.F., Mathys L., and Bollmann K. Habitat assessment for forest dwelling species using LiDAR remote sensing: Capercaillie in the Alps. Forest Ecology and Management 257 (2009) 160-167
36. Guisan A., and Zimmerman N.E. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modelling 135 (2000) 147-186
37. Hagar J.C. Wildlife species associated with non-coniferous vegetation in Pacific Northwest forests: A review. Forest Ecology and Management 246 (2007) 108-122
38. Harding D.J., Lefksy M.A., Parker G.G., and Blair J.B. Laser altimeter canopy height profiles: Methods and validations for closed-canopy, broadleaf forests. Remote Sensing of Environment 76 (2001) 283-297
39. Hill R.A., and Broughton R.K. Mapping understorey from leaf-on and leaf-off airborne LiDAR data of deciduous woodland. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 64 (2009) 223-233
40. Hinsley S.A., Hill R.A., Bellampy P.E., Harrison N.M., Speakman J.R., Wilson A.K., et al. Effects of structural and functional habitat gaps on breeding woodland birds: Working harder for less. Landscape Ecology 23 (2008) 615-626
41. Hinsley S.A., Hill R.A., Gaveau D.L.A., and Bellampy P.E. Quantifying woodland structure and habitat quality for birds using airborne laser scanning. Functional Ecology 16 (2002) 851-857
42. Hofton M.A., Rocchio L.E., Blair J.B., and Dubayah R. Validation of vegetation canopy lidar sub-canopy topography measurements for a dense tropical forest. Journal of Geodynamics 34 (2002) 491-502
43. Huang C., Homer C., and Yang L. Regional forest land cover characterization using Landsat type data. In: Wulder M., and Franklin M. (Eds). Methods and applications for remote sensing of forests: Concepts and case studies (2003), Kluwer, Academic Publishers 389-410
44. Hudak A.T., Crookston N.L., Evans J.S., Falkowski M.J., Smith A.M.S., Gessler P.E., et al. Regression modeling and mapping of coniferous forest basal area and tree density from discrete-return lidar and multispectral satellite data. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 32 (2006) 126-138
45. Hudak A.T., Crookston N.L., Evans J.S., Hall D.E., and Falkowski M.J. Nearest neighbor imputation modeling of species-level, plot-scale structural attributes from LiDAR data. Remote Sensing of Environment 112 (2008) 2232-2245
46. Hudak A.T., Evans J.S., Crookston N.L., Falkowski M.J., Steigers B., Tylor R., et al. Aggregating pixel-level basal area predictions derived from LiDAR data to industrial forest stands in Idaho. In: Havis R.N., and Crookston N.L. (Eds). Third Forest Vegetation Simulator Conference 2007. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station; Proceedings RMRS-P-54 (2008) 133-146 (refereed)
47. Hyde P., Dubayah R., Peterson B., Blair J.B., Hofton M., Hunsaker C., et al. Mapping forest structure for wildlife habitat analysis using waveform lidar: Validation of montane ecosystems. Remote Sensing of Environment 96 (2005) 427-437
48. Hyde P., Dubayah R., Walker W., Blair J.B., Hofton M., and Hunsaker C. Mapping forest structure for wildlife habitat analysis using multi-sensor (LiDAR, SAR/InSar, ETM+, Quickbird) synergy. Remote Sensing of Environment 102 (2006) 63-73
49. Kennedy R.S.H., Spies T.A., and Gregory M.J. Relationships of dead wood patterns with biophysical characteristics and ownership according to scale in Coastal Oregon, USA. Landscape Ecology 23 (2008) 55-68
50. Kerns B.K., and Ohmann J.L. Evaluation and prediction of shrub cover in coastal Oregon forests (USA). Ecological Indicators 4 (2004) 83-98
51. Kerr J.T., and Ostrovsky M. From space to species: Ecological applications for remote sensing. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18 (2003) 299-305
52. Kilina A.K., Chen H.Y.H., Wang Q., and Montigny L. Forest canopies and their influence of understory vegetation in early seral stands on west Vancouver island. Northwest Science 70 (1996) 193-200
53. Korol J.J., Hemstrom M.A., Hann W.J., and Gravenmier R.A. Snags and down wood in the interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-GTR-181 (2002)
54. Korpela I.S. Mapping of understory lichens with airborne discrete-return LiDAR data. Remote Sensing of Environment 112 (2008) 3891-3897
55. Kroll A.J., and Haufle J.B. Development and evaluation of habitat suitability models at multiple spatial scale: A case study with the dusky flycatcher. Forest Ecology and Management 229 (2006) 161-169
56. Lawrence R.L., Wood S.D., and Sheley R.L. Mapping invasive plants using hyperspectral imagery and Breiman Cutler classifications (RandomForest). Remote Sensing of Environment 100 (2006) 356-362
57. Lefsky M.A., Cohen W.B., Harding D.J., and Parker G.G. Lidar remote sensing for forest ecosystem studies. BioScience 52 (2002) 19-30
58. Liaw A., and Wiener M. Classification and regression by Random-Forest. R News 2 (2002) 18-22
59. Linderman M., Beaer S., An L., Tan Y.C., Ouyang Z.Y., and Liu H.G. The effects of understory bamboo or broad-scale estimated of giant panda habitat. Biological Conservation 121 (2005) 383-390
60. MacArthur R.H., and MacArthur J.W. On bird species diversity. Ecology 42 (1961) 594-598
61. Maltamo M., Packalén P., Yu X., Eerikäinen K., Hyyppä J., and Pitkänen J. Identifying and quantifying structural characteristics of heterogeneous boreal forests using laser scanner data. Forest Ecology and Management 216 (2005) 41-50
62. Martinuzzi S., Vierling L., Gould W., and Vierling K. Improving the characterization and mapping of wildlife habitats with LiDAR data: Measurement priorities for the Inland Northwest, USA. In: Maxwell J., et al. (Ed). Gap analysis bulletin No. 16. USGS/BRD/Gap Analysis Program, Moscow, ID, USA (2009)
63. McDermid G.J., Franklin S.E., and LeDrew E.F. Remote sensing for large-area habitat mapping. Progress in Physical Geography 29 (2005) 449-474
64. McKenzie D., and Halpern C.B. Modeling the distributions of shrub species in Pacific Northwest forests. Forest Ecology and Management 114 (1999) 293-307
65. Morrison M.L., and Raphael M.G. Modeling the dynamics of snags. Ecological Applications 3 (1993) 322-330
66. Murphy, M. A., Evans, J. S., & Storfer. (in press). Quantifying Bufo bores connectivity in Yellowstone National Park with landscape genetics. Ecology.
67. Nelson R., Keller C., and Ratnaswamy M. Locating and estimating the extent of delmarva fox squirrel habitat using an airborne LiDAR profiler. Remote Sensing of Environment 96 (2005) 292-301
68. Nelson R.F., Krabill W.B., and Tonelli J. Estimating forest biomass and volume using airborne laser data. Remote Sensing of Environment 24 (1988) 247-267
69. Noss R.F. Assessing and monitoring forest biodiversity: A suggested framework and indicators. Forest Ecology and Management 115 (1999) 135-146
70. Ohmann J.L., McComb W.C., and Zunrawi A. Snag abundance for primary cavity-nesting birds on nonfederal forest lands in Oregon and Washington. Wildlife Society Bulletin 22 (1994) 607-620
71. Pesonen A., Maltamo M., Eerikäinen, and Packalen P. Airborne laser scanning-based prediction of coarse woody debris volumes in a conservation area. Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 3288-3296
72. Prasad A.M., Iverson L.R., and Liaw A. Newer classification and regression tree techniques: Bagging and random forests for ecological prediction. Ecosystems 9 (2006) 181-199
73. Prosser D.J., and Brooks R.P. A verified habitat suitability index for the Louisiana Waterthrush. Journal of Field Ecology 69 (1998) 288-298
74. R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (2005). http://www.R-project.org ISBN:3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org
75. Riaño D., Meier E., Allgöwer B., Chuvieco E., and Ustin S.L. Modelling airborne laser scanning data for the spatial generation of critical forest parameters in fire behaviour modelling. Remote Sensing of Environment 86 (2003) 177-186
76. Roloff G.F. Habitat suitability model for dusky flycatcher (Empidonax oberholseri) in the intermountain West. Timberland Resources, Boise Cascade Corporation, Boise, ID (2001) 6 pp.
77. Ruiz-Gazen A., and Villa. Storms prediction: Logistic regression vs. random forest for unbalanced data. Case studies in business, industry and government statistics Vol. 1 (2007) 91-101
78. Russell R.E., Saab V.A., and Dudley J. Habitat suitability models for cavity-nesting birds in a postfire landscape. The Journal of Wildlife Management 71 (2007) 2600-2611
79. Sampson R.N., and Adams D.L. Assessing forest ecosystem health in the inland west (1994), Food Products Press, New York 461 pp.
80. Schroeder R.L. Habitat suitability index models: Downy woodpecker. US Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service (1982) FWS/OBS/82/10.38. 10 pp
81. Scott J.M., Peterson C.R., Karl J.W., Strand E., Svancara L.V., and Wright N.M. A GAP Analysis of Idaho: Final report. Idaho Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit. Moscow, ID, USA (2002)
82. Skowronski N., Clark K., Nelson R., Hom J., and Patterson M. Remotely sensed measurements of forest structure and fuel loads in the Pinelands of New Jersey. Remote Sensing of Environment 108 (2007) 123-129
83. Souza P.J. Habitat suitability index models: Lewis' woodpecker. US Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service (1982) FWS/OBS/82/10.32. 14 pp.
84. Souza P.J. Habitat suitability index models: Hairy woodpecker. US Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. Biol. Rep. Vol. 82 (10.146) (1987) 19 pp.
85. Spiering D.J., and Knight R.L. Snag density and use by cavity-nesting birds in managed stands of the Black Hills National Forest. Forest Ecology and Management 214 (2005) 40-52
86. Stage A.R. An expression of the effects of aspect, slope, and habitat type on tree growth. Forest Science 22 (1976) 457-460
87. Stoker J., Harding D., and Parrish J. The need for a national lidar dataset. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 74 (2008) 1066-1068
88. Strobl C., Boulesteix A., Zeileis A., and Hothorn T. Bias in random forest variable importance measures: Illustrations, sources and a solution. BMC Bioinformatics 8 (2007) 25
89. Su J., and Bork E.W. Characterization of diverse plant communities in Aspen Parkland rangeland using LiDAR data. Applied Vegetation Science 10 (2007) 407-416
90. Sun Y., Kamel M.S., Wong A.K.C., and Wang Y. Cost-sensitive boosting for classification of imbalanced data. Pattern Recognition 40 (2007) 3358-3378
91. Swatantran A., Dubayah R., Hofton M., Blair J.B., and Handley L. Mapping potential Ivory billed woodpecker habitat using LiDAR and hyperspectral data fusion. Eos, Transactions AGU 89 53 (2008) 2008 Fall Meeting Suppl., Abstract B32A-04
92. Thomas J.W., Anderson R.G., Maser C., and Bull E.L. Snags. In: Thomas J.W. (Ed). Wildlife habitats in managed forests: The Blue Mountains of Oregon Washington. US Forest Service Agriculture Handbook Vol. 553 (1979), Wildlife management Institute, Washington, D.C., USA 60-77
93. Turner W., Spector S., Gardiner N., Fladeland M., Sterling E., and Steininger M. Remote sensing for biodiversity and conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18 (2003) 306-314
94. Turner M.G., Gardner R.H., and O'Neill. Landscape ecology in theory and practice (2001), Springer, New York
95. Van Pelt R., and Franklin J.F. Influence of canopy structure on the understory environment in tall, old-growth, coniferous forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 30 (2000) 1231-1245
96. Venier L.A., and Pearce J.L. Boreal forest landbirds in relation to forest composition, structure, and landscape: Implications for forest management. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 37 (2007) 1214-1226
97. Vierling K.T., Vierling L.A., Martinuzzi S., Gould W., and Clawges R. Lidar: Shedding new light on habitat modeling. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 6 (2008) 90-98
98. Virkkala R. Why study woodpeckers? The significance of woodpeckers in forest ecosystems. Annales Zoologici Fennici 43 (2006) 82-85
99. Wulder M., and Franklin S. Remote sensing of forest environments: Concepts and case studies (2003), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht / Boston / London 519 pp.