Corrigendum to: Not By Success Alone: Role Models Provide Pathways to Communal Opportunities in STEM (Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, (2017), 43, 2, (163-176), 10.1177/0146167216678857);Not By Success Alone: Role Models Provide Pathways to Communal Opportunities in STEM

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 163-176

  Fuesting, Melissa A ^a   Diekman, Amanda B ^a  

^a MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

communion; goals; role models; STEM

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MATHEMATICS; MODEL; PREDICTION; STUDENT; WORKPLACE; ADULT; EDUCATION; ENGINEERING; FEMALE; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; MOTIVATION; SCIENCE; TECHNOLOGY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ENGINEERING; FEMALE; GOALS; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MATHEMATICS; SCIENCE; STUDENTS; TECHNOLOGY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85011579199     PISSN: 01461672     EISSN: 15527433     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0146167217698161     Document Type: Erratum

References (38)

1. Allen T. D., Eby L. T., Poteet M. L., Lentz E., Lima L., (2004). Career benefits associated with mentoring for protégés: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 127-136.
2. Bamberger Y. M., (2014). Encouraging girls into science and technology with feminine role model: Does this work? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23, 549-561.
3. Betz D. E., Sekaquaptewa D., (2012). My fair physicist? Feminine math and science role models demotivate young girls. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 3, 738-746.
4. Blake-Beard S., Bayne M. L., Crosby F. J., Muller C. B., (2011). Matching by race and gender in mentoring relationships: Keeping our eyes on the prize. Journal of Social Issues, 67, 622-643.
5. Brown E. R., Smith J. L., Thoman D. B., Allen J. M., Muragishi G., (2015). From bench to bedside: A communal utility value intervention to enhance students’ biomedical science motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 1116-1135.
6. Brown E. R., Thoman D. B., Smith J. L., Diekman A. B., (2015). Closing the communal gap: The importance of communal affordances in science career motivation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45, 662-673.
7. Buck G. A., Clark V. L. P., Leslie-Pelecky D., Lu Y., Cerda-Lizarraga P., (2008). Examining the cognitive processes used by adolescent girls and women scientists in identifying science role models: A feminist approach. Science Education, 92, 688-707.
8. Chen X., Weko T., (2009). Students who study science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) in postsecondary education. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
9. Cheryan S., Drury B. J., Vichayapai M., (2013). Enduring influence of stereotypical computer science role models on women’s academic aspirations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37, 72-79.
10. Cheryan S., Siy J. O., Vichayapai M., Drury B. J., Kim S., (2011). Do female and male role models who embody STEM stereotypes hinder women’s anticipated success in STEM? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 656-664.
11. Clark E. K., Fuesting M. A., Diekman A. B., (2016). Enhancing interest in science: Exemplars as cues to communal affordances of science. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 46,641-654.
12. Cotten S. R., Wilson B., (2006). Student–faculty interactions: Dynamics and determinants. Higher Education, 51, 487-519.
13. Cross S. E., Bacon P. L., Morris M. L., (2000). The relational-interdependent self-construal and relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 791-808.
14. Daniel T., Kostic B., (2015). RStats Effect Size Calculator. Retrieved from http://www.missouristate.edu/rstats/Tables-and-Calculators.htm
15. Diekman A. B., Brown E. R., Johnston A. M., Clark E. K., (2010). Seeking congruity between goals and roles: A new look at why women opt out of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers. Psychological Science, 21, 1051-1057.
16. Diekman A. B., Clark E. K., Johnston A. M., Brown E. R., Steinberg M., (2011). Malleability in communal goals and beliefs influences attraction to stem careers: Evidence for a goal congruity perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 902-918.
17. Diekman A. B., Steinberg M., Brown E. R., Belanger A. L., Clark E. K., (2016). A goal congruity model of role entry, engagement, and exit: Understanding communal goal processes in STEM gender gaps. Personality and Social Psychology Review. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1088868316642141
18. Diekman A. B., Weisgram E. S., Belanger A. L., (2015). New routes to recruiting and retaining women in STEM: Policy implications of a communal goal congruity perspective. Social Issues and Policy Review, 9, 52-88.
19. Downing R. A., Crosby F. J., Blake-Beard S., (2005). The perceived importance of developmental relationships on women undergraduates’ pursuit of science. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 419-426.
20. Eagly A. H., Karau S. J., (1991). Gender and the emergence of leaders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 685-710.
21. Eagly A. H., Mladinic A., (1989). Gender stereotypes and attitudes toward women and men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 543-558.
22. Faul F., Erdfelder E., Lang A. G., Buchner A., (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191.
23. Gabriel S., Gardner W. L., (1999). Are there “his” and “hers” types of interdependence? The implications of gender differences in collective versus relational interdependence for affect, behavior, and cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 642-655.
24. Good C., Rattan A., Dweck C. S., (2012). Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women’s representation in mathematics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 700-717.
25. Harackiewicz J. M., Smith J. L., Priniski S. J., (2016). Interest matters: The importance of promoting interest in education. Policy Insights From the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 220-227. doi:10.1177/2372732216655542
26. Hayes A. R., Bigler R. S., (2013). Gender-related values, perceptions of discrimination, and mentoring in STEM graduate training. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 5, 254-280.
27. Hayes A. R., Bigler R. S., (2015). Postbaccalaureate STEM students’ perceptions of their training: Exploring the intersection of gender and nativity. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 7, 180-204.
28. Lent R. W., Brown S. D., Hackett G., (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79-122.
29. McCarty M. K., Monteith M. J., Kaiser C. R., (2014). Communally constrained decisions in workplace contexts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 175-187.
30. National Science Board. (2016). Science and Engineering Indicators 2016 (NSB-2016-1). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
31. Packard B. W.-L., (2009). Definition of mentoring [Article]. Retrieved from http://ehrweb.aaas.org/sciMentoring/Mentor_Definitions_Packard.pdf
32. Packard B. W.-L., Gagnon J. L., LaBelle O., Jeffers K., Lynn E., (2011). Women’s experiences in the STEM community college transfer pathway. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 17, 129-147. doi:10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2011002470
33. Schaub M., Tokar D. M., (2005). The role of personality and learning experiences in social cognitive career theory. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 304-325.
34. Schneider M. C., Holman M. R., Diekman A. B., McAndrew T., (2016). Power, conflict, and community: How gendered views of political power influence women’s political ambition. Political Psychology, 37, 515-531.
35. Stout J. G., Dasgupta N., Hunsinger M., McManus M. A., (2011). STEMing the tide: Using ingroup experts to inoculate women’s self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 255-270.
36. Thoman D. B., Brown E. R., Mason A. Z., Harmsen A. G., Smith J. L., (2015). The role of altruistic values in motivating underrepresented minority students for biomedicine. BioScience, 65, 183-188.
37. Vogt C. M., (2008). Faculty as a critical juncture in student retention and performance in engineering programs. Journal of Engineering Education, 97, 27-36.
38. Williams C. M., Subich L. M., (2006). The gendered nature of career related learning experiences: A social cognitive career theory perspective. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69, 262-275.