Communally constrained decisions in workplace contexts

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Volumn 55, Issue , 2014, Pages 175-187

  McCarty, Megan K ^a   Monteith, Margo J ^a   Kaiser, Cheryl R ^b  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Communion; Gender; Goals; Work environment

Indexed keywords

EID: 84904873539     PISSN: 00221031     EISSN: 10960465     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2014.07.007     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Abele A.E., Wojciszke B. Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2007, 93:751-763.
2. Atler A.L., Oppenheimer D.M., Zemla J.C. Missing the trees for the forest: A construal level account of the illusion of explanatory depth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2010, 99:436-451.
3. Bakan D. The duality of human existence 1966, Addison-Wesley, Reading, PA.
4. Bales R.F. Task roles and social roles in problem-solving groups. Readings in social psychology 1958, 437-447. Hold, Rinehart & Winston, New York. E.E. Maccoby, T.M. Newcomb, E.L. Hartley (Eds.).
5. Bass B.M. Does the transactional-transformational leadership paradigm transcend organizational and national boundaries?. American Psychologist 1997, 52:130-139.
6. Bem S.L. The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1974, 42:155-162.
7. Bosak J., Sczesny S. Am I the right candidate? Self-ascribed fit of women and men to a leadership position. Sex Roles 2008, 58:682-688.
8. Bryant, A. (2013). Four executives on succeeding in business as a woman. The New York Times. Retrieved October 16, 2013, from http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2013/10/13/business/women-corner-office.html.
9. Buhrmester M., Kwang T., Gosling S.D. Amazon's mechanical turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2011, 6:3-5.
10. Catalyst Catalyst 2012 census for Fortune 500: No change for women in top leadership 2013, (Retrieved September 8, 2013, from http://www.catalyst.org/media/catalyst-2012-census-fortune-500-no-change-women-top-leadership).
11. Cuddy A.J.C., Glick P., Beninger A. The dynamics of warmth and competence judgments, and their outcomes in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior 2011, 31:73-98.
12. Cuddy A.J.C., Kohut M., Neffinger J. Connect, then lead. Harvard Business Review 2013, 91:55-61.
13. Degroot T., Kiker D.S., Cross T.C. A meta-analysis to review organizational outcomes related to charismatic leadership. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences 2000, 17:356-371.
14. Diekman A.B., Brown E.R., Johnston A.M., Clark E.K. Seeking congruity between goals and roles: A new look at why women opt out of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers. Psychological Science 2010, 21:1051-1057.
15. Diekman A.B., Clark E.K., Johnston A.M., Brown E.R., Steinberg M. Malleability in communal goals and beliefs influences attraction to STEM careers: Evidence for a goal congruity perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2011, 101:902-918.
16. Diekman A.B., Eagly A.H. Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2000, 26:1171-1188.
17. Digman J.M. Higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1997, 73:1246-1256.
18. Eagly A.H. Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation 1987, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
19. Eagly A., Carli L. Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders 2007, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
20. Eagly A.H., Steffen V.J. Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1984, 46:735-754.
21. Eagly A.H., Wood W., Diekman A.B. Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. The development of social psychology of gender 2000, 123-174. T. Eckes, H.M. Trautner (Eds.).
22. Evans C.D., Diekman A.B. On motivated role selection: Gender beliefs, distant goals, and career interest. Psychology of Women Quarterly 2009, 33:235-249.
23. Fiske S.T., Cuddy A.J.C., Glick P. Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2006, 11:77-83.
24. Fiske S.T., Cuddy A.J.C., Glick P., Xu J. A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2002, 82:878-902.
25. Giner-Sorolla R. Science or art? How aesthetic standards grease the way through the publication bottleneck but undermine science. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2012, 7:562-571.
26. Graziano W.G., Tobin R.M. Agreeableness: Dimension of personality or social desirability artifact?. Journal of Personality 2002, 70:695-728.
27. Hayes A.F. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach 2013, The Guilford Press, New York, NY.
28. Hayes A.F., Matthes J. Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations. Behavioral Research Methods 2009, 41:924-936.
29. Heilman M.E. Sex bias in work settings: The lack of fit model. Research in Organizational Behavior 1983, 5:269-298.
30. Hofstede G. Culture's consequences 1980, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
31. Kawahara D.M., Esnil E.M., Hsu J. Asian American women leaders: The intersection of race, gender, and leadership. Women and leadership: Transforming visions and diverse voices 2007, 297-313. Blackwell, Malden, MA. J.L. Chin, B. Lott, J.K. Rice, J. Sanchez-Hucles (Eds.).
32. Korabik K. Perspectives on women in management. Journal of Business Ethics 1990, 9:283-292.
33. Kristof-Brown A.L., Zimmerman R.D., Johnson E.C. Consequences of individuals' fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology 2005, 58:281-342.
34. Lewin K., Lippitt R., White R. Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created "social climates.". Journal of Social Psychology 1939, 10:271-299.
35. Martell R.F., Parker C., Emrich C.G., Crawford M.S. Sex stereotyping in the executive suite: "Much ado about something.". Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 1998, 13:127-138.
36. Oppenheimer D.M., Meyvis T., Davidenko N. Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2009, 45:867-872.
37. Paolacci G., Chandler J., Ipeirotis P.G. Running experiments on amazon mechanical turk. Judgment and Decision Making 2010, 5:411-419.
38. Pohlmann K. Agency- and communion-orientation in life goals: Impacts on goal pursuit strategies and psychological well-being. Life goals and well-being: Towards a positive psychology of human striving 2001, 68-84. Hagrefe & Huber, Seattle, WA. P. Schmuck, K.M. Sheldon (Eds.).
39. Pratto R., Stallworth L.M., Sidanius J., Siers B. The gender gap in occupational role attainment: A social dominance approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1997, 72:37-53.
40. Roberts B.W. Personality development and organizational behavior. Research on Organizational Behavior 2006, 1-41. Elsevier Science/JAI Press, New York, NY. B.M. Staw (Ed.).
41. Rudman L.A. Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotyipcal impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1998, 74:629-645.
42. Rudman L.A., Glick P. Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1999, 77:1004-1010.
43. Rudman L.A., Moss-Racusin C.A., Phelan J.E., Nauts S. Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2012, 48:165-179.
44. Sandberg S. Lean in: Women, work, and the will to lead 2013, Knopf Doublday Publishing Group, New York.
45. Sinha J.B.P. A model of effective leadership styles in India. International Studies of Management and Organization 1984, 14:86-98.
46. Slaughter A. Why women still can't have it all. The Atlantic 2012, (Retrieved October 16, 2013 from http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2012/07/why-women-still-cant-have-it-all/309020/).
47. Snyder M., Ickes W. Personality and social behavior. Handbook of social psychology 1985, Vol. 2:883-947. Random House, New York, NY. 3rd ed.
48. Spence J.T., Helmreich R., Stapp J. Ratings of self and peers on sex role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1975, 32:29-39.
49. Twenge J.M. Changes in masculine and feminine traits over time: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles 1997, 36:305-325.
50. Twenge J.M. Changes in women's assertiveness in response to status and roles: A cross-temporal meta-analysis, 1931-1993. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2001, 81:133-145.
51. Wiggins J.S. Agency and communion as conceptual coordinates for the understanding and measurement of interpersonal behaviour. Thinking clearly about psychology: Essays in honour of Paul Everett Meehl 1991, 89-113. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MI. W. Grove, D. Ciccetti (Eds.).