Erratum: Effectiveness of digital breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography: Outcomes analysis from 3 years of breast cancer screening (JAMA Oncology (2016) DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.5536);Effectiveness of digital breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography: Outcomes analysis from 3 years of breast cancer screening

JAMA Oncology

Volumn 2, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 737-743

  McDonald, Elizabeth S ^a   Oustimov, Andrew ^b   Weinstein, Susan P ^a   Synnestvedt, Marie B ^c   Schnall, Mitchell ^a   Conant, Emily F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; BREAST DENSITY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EARLY CANCER DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; RISK FACTOR; TUMOR INVASION; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST DENSITY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 85010634303     PISSN: 23742437     EISSN: 23742445     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.0571     Document Type: Erratum

References (29)

1. Ciatto S, Houssami N, Bernardi D, et al. Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(7):583-589.
2. Friedewald SM, Rafferty EA, Rose SL, et al. Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography. JAMA. 2014;311(24):2499-2507.
3. McCarthy AM, Kontos D, Synnestvedt M, et al. Screening outcomes following implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis in a general-population screening program. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(11):106.
4. Rose SL, Tidwell AL, Bujnoch LJ, Kushwaha AC, Nordmann AS, Sexton R Jr. Implementation of breast tomosynthesis in a routine screening practice: an observational study. AJR AmJ Roentgenol. 2013;200(6):1401-1408.
5. Skaane P, Bandos AI, Gullien R, et al. Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program. Radiology. 2013;267(1):47-56.
6. Durand MA, Haas BM, Yao X, et al. Early clinical experience with digital breast tomosynthesis for screening mammography. Radiology. 2015;274(1): 85-92.
7. Haas BM, Kalra V, Geisel J, Raghu M, Durand M, Philpotts LE. Comparison of tomosynthesis plus digital mammography and digital mammography alone for breast cancer screening. Radiology. 2013; 269(3):694-700.
8. Lourenco AP, Barry-Brooks M, Baird G, et al. Changes in recall type and patient treatment following implementation of screening digital breast tomosynthesis. Radiology. 2015;274(2):337-342.
9. Andersson I, Ikeda DM, Zackrisson S, et al. Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BI-RADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings. Eur Radiol. 2008;18(12):2817-2825.
10. Bernardi D, Ciatto S, PellegriniM, et al. Prospective study of breast tomosynthesis as a triage to assessment in screening. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;133(1):267-271.
11. Gur D, Abrams GS, Chough DM, et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study. AJR AmJ Roentgenol. 2009;193(2):586-591.
12. Rafferty EA, Park JM, Philpotts LE, et al. Assessing radiologist performance using combined digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography alone: results of a multicenter, multireader trial. Radiology. 2013; 266(1):104-113.
13. Teertstra HJ, Loo CE, van den Bosch MA, et al. Breast tomosynthesis in clinical practice: initial results. Eur Radiol. 2010;20(1):16-24.
14. Wallis MG, Moa E, Zanca F, Leifland K, Danielsson M. Two-view and single-view tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: high-resolution X-ray imaging observer study. Radiology. 2012;262(3):788-796.
15. Friedewald SM, Rafferty EA, Conant EF. Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis and digital mammography-reply. JAMA. 2014;312(16):1695-1696.
16. Caumo F, Bernardi D, Ciatto S, et al. Incremental effect from integrating 3D-mammography (tomosynthesis) with 2D-mammography: Increased breast cancer detection evident for screening centres in a population-based trial. Breast. 2014;23 (1):76-80.
17. Gilbert FJ, Tucker L, Gillan MG, et al. The TOMMY trial: a Comparison of TomosynthesisWith Digital Mammography in the UK NHS Breast Screening Programme: a multicentre retrospective reading study comparing the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography with digital mammography alone. Health Technol Assess. 2015;19(4):i-xxv, 1-136.
18. McDonald ES, McCarthy AM, Akhtar AL, Synnestvedt MB, SchnallM, Conant EF. Baseline screening mammography: performance of full-field digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesis. AJR AmJ Roentgenol. 2015;205(5): 1143-1148.
19. Gur D, Nishikawa RM, Sumkin JH. New screening technologies and practices: a different approach to estimation of performance improvement by using data from the transition period. Radiology. 2015;275(1):9-12.
20. Sickles EA, D'Orsi CJ, Bassett LW, et al. ACR BI-RADS Mammography. In: D'Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB, et al. ACR BI-RADS Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2013.
21. Rohatgi VK, Ehsanes Saleh AKM. An Introduction to Probability and Statistics. Vol 910. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2001:500-509.
22. Zeger SL, Liang KY, Albert PS. Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach. Biometrics. 1988;44(4):1049-1060.
23. US Preventive Services Task Force. Breast cancer: screening: recommendation summary. http: //www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page /Topic/recommendation-summary/breast-cancer-screening. Published November 2009; updated July 2015. Accessed December 18, 2015.
24. Houssami N. Digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) screening: data and implications for population screening. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2015;12(4):377-379.
25. Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Benchmarks for abnormal screening mammography interpretations from 2004-2008-based on BCSC data through 2009 (HHSN261201100031C). http://breastscreening .cancer.gov/statistics/benchmarks/screening/2009 /table5.html. Accessed June 20, 2015.
26. Sharpe RE Jr, Venkataraman S, Phillips J, et al. Increased cancer detection rate and variations in the recall rate resulting from implementation of 3D digital breast tomosynthesis into a population-based screening program [published online October 9, 2015]. Radiology.
27. Houssami N. STORM, a new dimension for mammography screening. Med J Aust. 2013;199(5): 308-309.
28. Irwig L, Houssami N, Armstrong B, Glasziou P. Evaluating new screening tests for breast cancer. BMJ. 2006;332(7543):678-679.
29. Lee CI, Cevik M, Alagoz O, et al. Comparative effectiveness of combined digital mammography and tomosynthesis screening for women with dense breasts. Radiology. 2015;274(3):772-780.