Incremental effect from integrating 3D-mammography (tomosynthesis) with 2D-mammography: Increased breast cancer detection evident for screening centres in a population-based trial

Breast

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 76-80

  Caumo, Francesca ^a   Bernardi, Daniela ^b   Ciatto, Stefano ^a,b   Macaskill, Petra ^c   Pellegrini, Marco ^b   Brunelli, Silvia ^a   Tuttobene, Paola ^b   Bricolo, Paola ^a   Fantò, Carmine ^b   Valentini, Marvi ^b   Montemezzi, Stefania ^a   Houssami, Nehmat ^c  

^a Centro di Prevenzione Senologica   (Italy)

^b UO di Senologia Clinica e Screening Mammografico   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Digital breast tomosynthesis; Mammography; Population cancer screening

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOGRAPHY DEVICE; THREE DIMENSIONAL MAMMOGRAPHY; TWO DIMENSIONAL MAMMOGRAPHY; VERY ELDERLY;

DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS; MAMMOGRAPHY; POPULATION CANCER SCREENING;

AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84890878392     PISSN: 09609776     EISSN: 15323080     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2013.11.006     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Baker J.A., Lo J.Y. Breast tomosynthesis: state-of-the-art and review of the literature. Acad Radiol 2011, 18:1298-1310.
2. Houssami N., Skaane P. Overview of the evidence on digital breast tomosynthesis in breast cancer detection. Breast 2013, 22:101-108.
3. Wallis M.G., Moa E., Zanca F., Leifland K., Danielsson M. Two-view and single-view tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: high-resolution X-ray imaging observer study. Radiology 2012, 262:788-796.
4. Houssami N. STORM, a new dimension for mammography screening. Med J Aust 2013, 199:308-309.
5. Ciatto S., Houssami N., Bernardi D., Caumo F., Pellegrini M., Brunelli S., et al. Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study. Lancet Oncol 2013, 583-589.
6. Skaane P., Bandos A.I., Gullien R., Eben E.B., Ekseth U., Haakenaasen U., et al. Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program. Radiology 2013, 267:47-56.
7. Pellegrini M., Bernardi D., Di Michele S., Tuttobene P., Fanto C., Valentini M., et al. Analysis of proportional incidence and review of interval cancer cases observed within the mammography screening programme in Trento province, Italy. Radiol Med 2011, 116:1217-1225.
8. Caumo F., Vecchiato F., Pellegrini M., Vettorazzi M., Ciatto S., Montemezzi S. Analysis of interval cancers observed in an Italian mammography screening programme (2000-2006). Radiol Med 2009, 114:907-914.
9. SAS Institute Inc SAS/STAT 9.2 user's guide 2009, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC. 2nd ed.
10. Independent UK Panel on Breast Cancer Screening The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review. Lancet 2012, 380:1778-1786.
11. Glasziou P., Houssami N. The evidence base for breast cancer screening. Prev Med 2011, 53:100-102.
12. Houssami N., Zackrisson S. Digital breast tomosynthesis: the future of mammography screening or much ado about nothing?. Expert Rev Med Devices 2013, 10:583-585.