Early clinical experience with digital breast tomosynthesis for screening mammography

Radiology

Volumn 274, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 85-92

  Durand, Melissa A ^a   Haas, Brian M ^a   Yao, Xiaopan ^a   Geisel, Jaime L ^a   Raghu, Madhavi ^a   Hooley, Regina J ^a   Horvath, Laura J ^a   Philpotts, Liane E ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST DENSITY; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGING AND DISPLAY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TWO DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; BREAST TUMOR; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; PROCEDURES; RADIATION DOSE; RADIOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84919776981     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14131319     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Poplack SP, Tosteson TD, Kogel CA, Nagy HM. Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 189(3): 616-623.
2. Gur D, Abrams GS, Chough DM, et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193(2): 586-591.
3. Skaane P, Bandos AI, Gullien R, et al. Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program. Radiology 2013; 267(1): 47-56.
4. Ciatto S, Houssami N, Bernardi D, et al. Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study. Lancet Oncol 2013; 14(7): 583-589.
5. Rose SL, Tidwell AL, Bujnoch LJ, Kushwaha AC, Nordmann AS, Sexton R Jr. Implementation of breast tomosynthesis in a routine screening practice: an observational study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013; 200(6): 1401-1408.
6. Haas BM, Kalra V, Geisel J, Raghu M, Durand M, Philpotts LE. Comparison of tomo-synthesis plus digital mammography and digital mammography alone for breast cancer screening. Radiology 2013; 269(3): 694-700.
7. Good WF, Abrams GS, Catullo VJ, et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis: a pilot observer study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 190(4): 865-869.
8. Hakim CM, Chough DM, Ganott MA, Sumkin JH, Zuley ML, Gur D. Digital breast tomosynthesis in the diagnostic environment: A subjective side-by-side review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 195(2): W172-W176.
9. Spangler ML, Zuley ML, Sumkin JH, et al. Detection and classification of calcifications on digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography: a comparison. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196(2): 320-324.
10. Smith A. Fundamentals of breast tomosyn-thesis: improving the performance of mam-mography. Hologic Breast Imaging White Papers. Bedford, Mass: Hologic, 2008.
11. Rafferty EA, Park JM, Philpotts LE, et al. Assessing radiologist performance using combined digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography alone: results of a multicenter, multireader trial. Radiology 2013; 266(1): 104-113.
12. Andersson I, Ikeda DM, Zackrisson S, et al. Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammog-raphy: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings. Eur Radiol 2008; 18(12): 2817-2825.
13. Gur D, Bandos AI, Rockette HE, et al. Localized detection and classification of abnormalities on FFDM and tomosynthesis examinations rated under an FROC paradigm. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196(3): 737-741.
14. Noroozian M, Hadjiiski L, Rahnama-Moghadam S, et al. Digital breast tomosynthe-sis is comparable to mammographic spot views for mass characterization. Radiology 2012; 262(1): 61-68.
15. Teertstra HJ, Loo CE, van den Bosch MA, et al. Breast tomosynthesis in clinical practice: initial results. Eur Radiol 2010; 20(1): 16-24.
16. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151: 716-726.
17. Wallis MG, Moa E, Zanca F, Leifland K, Danielsson M. Two-view and single-view tomo-synthesis versus full-field digital mammogra-phy: high-resolution X-ray imaging observer study. Radiology 2012; 262(3): 788-796.
18. Smith AP, Rafferty EA, Niklason L. Clinical performance of breast tomosynthesis as a function of radiologist experience level. Digit Mammography 2008; 5116: 61-66.