Manual vs. adaptive cruise control - Can driver's expectation be matched?

Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies

Volumn 13, Issue 5-6, 2005, Pages 421-431

  Zheng, Pengjun ^a   McDonald, Mike ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adaptive cruise control; Driver behaviour; Driver expectation; Evaluation; Simulation

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS; COLLISION AVOIDANCE; COMPUTER CONTROL SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLABILITY; MANUAL CONTROL;

ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL; DRIVER BEHAVIOUR; DRIVER EXPECTATION; MANUAL CRUISE CONTROL; TIME-TO-COLLISION LEVELS;

INTELLIGENT VEHICLE HIGHWAY SYSTEMS;

CONTROL SYSTEM; SIMULATION; TRANSPORT VEHICLE;

EID: 33646803478     PISSN: 0968090X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2005.05.001     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2001. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets.
2. Burgett, A., Chande, A., Miller, R., 1998. Operational test results of an adaptive cruise control system and implications for level of deceleration-authority. In: Proceedings of 5th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, Seoul, Korea. Paper No. 1073.
3. Darbha S., and Rajagopal K.R. Intelligent cruise control systems and traffic flow stability. Transportation Research 7C 6 (1999) 329-352
4. Donikian, S., Espie S., Parent M., Rousseau, G., 1998. Simulation studies on the impact of ACC. In: Proceedings of the Fifth World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, Seoul, Korea. Paper No. 2108.
5. Fancher P., and Bareket Z. Evaluating headway control using range versus range-rate relationships. Vehicle System Dynamics 23 8 (1994) 575-596
6. Godbole, D., Kourjanskaia N., Sengupta R., Zandonadi, M., 1999. Breaking the highway capacity barrier: adaptive cruise control-based concept. Transportation Research Record, No. 1679, pp. 148-157.
7. Hoffmann E.R., and Mortimer R. Drivers' estimates of time to collision. Accident Analysis and Prevention 26 4 (1994) 511-520
8. ITE. 1976. Transportation and Traffic Engineering Handbook, Washington DC.
9. Marsden, G., Brackstone, M., McDonald, M., 2001. Assessment of the stop-and-go function using real driving behaviour. In: 2001 Proceedings of the ADAS Conference, Birmingham, UK, pp. 76-80.
10. McDonald, M., Wu, J., Brackstone, M., 1997. Development of a fuzzy logic based microscopic motorway simulation model. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transport Systems, Boston, USA.
11. McLaughlin, S., Serafin, C., 1999. Measurement of driver intervention responses during transition from ACC deceleration to manual control. In: Proceedings of the ITS, America Conference, Washington DC, USA.
12. Murdocco, V., Albero, D., Carrea, P., 2000. Control of longitudinal vehicle motion for adaptive cruise control and stop & go applications. In: Proceedings of the Seventh World Congress on ITS, Turin, 2000.
13. Rajamani R., and Shladover S.E. An experimental comparative study of autonomous and co-operative vehicle-follower control systems. Transportation Research 9C 1 (2001) 15-31
14. Sidaway B., Fairweather M., Sekiya H., and Mcnitt-Gray J. Time-to-collision estimation in a simulated driving task. Human Factors 38 1 (1996) 101-113
15. Venhovens, P., Naab, K., Adiprasito, B., 2000. Stop and go cruise control. In: Proceedings of the 2000 FISITA World Automotive Congress, Seoul, Korea.
16. Zheng, P., 2002. A microscopic simulation model of merging operation at motorway on-ramps. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Southampton.