Correction: Examining sources of error in PCR by single-molecule sequencing (PLoS ONE (2017) 12:1 (e0169774) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169774);Examining sources of error in PCR by single-molecule sequencing

PLoS ONE

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Potapov, Vladimir ^a   Ong, Jennifer L ^a  

^a NEW ENGLAND BIOLABS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BETA GALACTOSIDASE; DNA; TAQ POLYMERASE;

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DAMAGE; GENE AMPLIFICATION; GENE REPLICATION; MUTATION; NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCING ASSAY;

EID: 85009887629     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181128     Document Type: Erratum

References (37)

1. Martincorena I, Campbell PJ. Somatic mutation in cancer and normal cells. Science. 2015; 349 (6255):1483-9. doi: 10.1126/science.aab4082 PMID: 26404825
2. Kebschull JM, Zador AM. Sources of PCR-induced distortions in high-throughput sequencing data sets. Nucleic Acids Research. 2015; 43(21):e143. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv717 PMID: 26187991
3. Schmitt MW, Kennedy SR, Salk JJ, Fox EJ, Hiatt JB, Loeb LA. Detection of ultra-rare mutations by next-generation sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012; 109(36):14508-13. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1208715109 PMID: 22853953
4. Hoang ML, Kinde I, Tomasetti C, McMahon KW, Rosenquist TA, Grollman AP, et al. Genome-wide quantification of rare somatic mutations in normal human tissues using massively parallel sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016; 113(35):9846-51. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1607794113 PMID: 27528664
5. Kinde I, Wu J, Papadopoulos N, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Detection and quantification of rare mutations with massively parallel sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011; 108(23):9530-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1105422108 PMID: 21586637
6. Preston JL, Royall AE, Randel MA, Sikkink KL, Phillips PC, Johnson EA. High-specificity detection of rare alleles with Paired-End Low Error Sequencing (PELE-Seq). BMC Genomics. 2016; 17(1):1543-21.
7. Barnes WM. The fidelity of Taq polymerase catalyzing PCR is improved by an N-terminal deletion. Gene. 1992; 112(1):29-35. PMID: 1551596
8. Eckert KA, Kunkel TA. High fidelity DNA synthesis by the Thermus aquaticus DNA polymerase. Nucleic Acids Research. 1990; 18(13):3739-44. PMID: 2374708
9. Cline J, Braman JC, Hogrefe HH. PCR fidelity of Pfu DNA polymerase and other thermostable DNA polymerases. Nucleic Acids Research. 1996; 24(18):3546-51. PMID: 8836181
10. Eckert KA, Kunkel TA. DNA polymerase fidelity and the polymerase chain reaction. Genome Research. 1991; 1(1):17-24.
11. Bebenek K, Joyce CM, Fitzgerald MP, Kunkel TA. The fidelity of DNA synthesis catalyzed by derivatives of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I. J Biol Chem. 1990; 265(23):13878-87. PMID: 2199444
12. Cariello NF, Swenberg JA, Skopek TR. Fidelity of Thermococcus litoralis DNA polymerase (VentTM) in PCR determined by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Nucleic Acids Research. 1991; 19 (15):4193-8. PMID: 1870973
13. Ling LL, Keohavong P, Dias C, Thilly WG. Optimization of the polymerase chain reaction with regard to fidelity: modified T7, Taq, and vent DNA polymerases. PCR Methods Appl. 1991; 1(1):63-9. PMID: 1842924
14. McInerney P, Adams P, Hadi MZ. Error Rate Comparison during Polymerase Chain Reaction by DNA Polymerase. Molecular Biology International. 2014; 2014(8):1-8.
15. Hestand MS, Van Houdt J, Cristofoli F, Vermeesch JR. Polymerase specific error rates and profiles identified by single molecule sequencing. Mutat Res. 2016; 784-785:39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2016.01.003 PMID: 26829216
16. Lee DF, Lu J, Chang S, Loparo JJ, Xie XS. Mapping DNA polymerase errors by single-molecule sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016; 44(13):e118. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw436 PMID: 27185891
17. Kou R, Lam H, Duan H, Ye L, Jongkam N, Chen W, et al. Benefits and Challenges with Applying Unique Molecular Identifiers in Next Generation Sequencing to Detect Low Frequency Mutations. PLoS ONE. 2016; 11(1):e0146638. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146638 PMID: 26752634
18. Schloss PD, Gevers D, Westcott SL. Reducing the effects of PCR amplification and sequencing artifacts on 16S rRNA-based studies. PLoS ONE. 2011; 6(12):e27310. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027310 PMID: 22194782
19. Holcomb CL, Rastrou M, Williams TC, Goodridge D, Lazaro AM, Tilanus M, et al. Next-generation sequencing can reveal in vitro-generated PCR crossover products: some artifactual sequences correspond to HLA alleles in the IMGT/HLA database. Tissue Antigens. 2014; 83(1):32-40. doi: 10.1111/tan.12269 PMID: 24355006
20. Lahr DJG, Katz LA. Reducing the impact of PCR-mediated recombination in molecular evolution and environmental studies using a new-generation high-fidelity DNA polymerase. BioTechniques. 2009; 47 (4):857-66. doi: 10.2144/000113219 PMID: 19852769
21. Meyerhans A, Vartanian J-P, Wain-Hobson S. DNA recombination during PCR. Nucleic Acids Research. 1990; 18(7):1687-91. PMID: 2186361
22. Odelberg SJ, Weiss RB, Hata A, White R. Template-switching during DNA synthesis by Thermus aquaticus DNA polymerase I. Nucleic Acids Research. 1995; 23(11):2049-57. PMID: 7596836
23. Shafikhani S. Factors affecting PCR-mediated recombination. Environ Microbiol. 2002; 4(8):482-6. PMID: 12153589
24. Smyth RP, Schlub TE, Grimm A, Venturi V, Chopra A, Mallal S, et al. Reducing chimera formation during PCR amplification to ensure accurate genotyping. Gene. 2010; 469(1-2):45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2010.08.009 PMID: 20833233
25. Wang GC, Wang Y. Frequency of formation of chimeric molecules as a consequence of PCR coamplification of 16S rRNA genes from mixed bacterial genomes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1997; 63(12):4645-50. PMID: 9406382
26. Drake JW. A constant rate of spontaneous mutation in DNA-based microbes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991; 88(16):7160-4. PMID: 1831267
27. Lee H, Popodi E, Tang H. Rate and molecular spectrum of spontaneous mutations in the bacterium Escherichia coli as determined by whole-genome sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012; 109 (41):E2774-E83. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1210309109 PMID: 22991466
28. Diegoli TM, Farr M, Cromartie C, Coble MD, Bille TW. An optimized protocol for forensic application of the PreCR™ Repair Mix to multiplex STR amplification of UV-damaged DNA. Forensic Science International: Genetics. 2012; 6(4):498-503.
29. Cheng KC, Cahill DS, Kasai H, Nishimura S, Loeb LA. 8-Hydroxyguanine, an abundant form of oxidative DNA damage, causes G-T and A-C substitutions. J Biol Chem. 1992; 267(1):166-72. PMID: 1730583
30. Wong ML, Medrano JF. Real-time PCR for mRNA quantitation. BioTechniques. 2005; 39(1):75-85. PMID: 16060372
31. Mytelka DS, Chamberlin MJ. Analysis and suppression of DNA polymerase pauses associated with a trinucleotide consensus. Nucleic Acids Research. 1996; 24(14):2774-81. PMID: 8759010
32. Ellefson JW, Gollihar J, Shroff R, Shivram H, Iyer VR, Ellington AD. Synthetic evolutionary origin of a proofreading reverse transcriptase. Science. 2016; 352(6293):1590-3. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf5409 PMID: 27339990
33. Laird PW. Principles and challenges of genomewide DNA methylation analysis. Nat Rev Genet. 2010; 11(3):191-203. doi: 10.1038/nrg2732 PMID: 20125086
34. Shuttleworth G, Fogg MJ, Kurpiewski MR, Jen-Jacobson L, Connolly BA. Recognition of the pro-mutagenic base uracil by family B DNA polymerases from archaea. J Mol Biol. 2004; 337(3):621-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.01.021 PMID: 15019782
35. Fogg MJ, Pearl LH, Connolly BA. Structural basis for uracil recognition by archaeal family B DNA polymerases. Nat Struct Biol. 2002; 9(12):922-7. doi: 10.1038/nsb867 PMID: 12415291
36. BindingCalculator [updated January 17, 2015]. Available from: https://github.com/PacificBiosciences/BindingCalculator.
37. pbccs - Generate Accurate Consensus Sequences from a Single SMRTbell [updated July 13, 2016]. Available from: https://github.com/PacificBiosciences/unanimity/blob/master/doc/PBCCS.md.